Lisa writes:
Loprinzi- Arusi: Put Your Head in A Noose
Arusi Loprinzini, Attorney, District Attorneys
http://notagoodqueer.blogspot.com/2008/07/put-your-head-in-noose.html
I laughed with a friend today as we talked about putting ones head in a noose. The District Attorneys office in Multnomah County has certainly done that. We both laughed as I told her of the video the DA edited to the jury.
What, Lisa, are you really so ignorant that you are unaware that tapes are usually edited to remove extraneous bits?
As he told the jury that we were talking about drugs and cut out the video of what was really being said. What I was saying to Maria Leal, a drug addict and hater, that this is your source of drugs, as I pointed to Meyers as she approached me over and over again when the stairs to her exit was a breathe away. She would walk towards me intentionally even though I had a stalking order on her. The only thing I could do was to video tape that she was not afraid of me, and she sent her dogs after my wittiness in room 207. Who left me a note on video not to come to her room, to call her instead due to fear of the mob.
Oh dear, oh dear. There you go again, Lisa. What is it with you that you simply can NOT stick to the facts?
You seem to forget that you yourself posted the original “video-tape”, as you call it – actually, images from your cell – on your blog. The originals, like the edited version presented to the court, give the lie to your foregoing statements, as do the observations of a number of witnesses to your antics.
The facts:
Meyers did not approach you “over and over again”. Meyers, who took out the original temporary protective stalking order against you (remember when you were served 19th October, and you rampaged up and own the corridors of The Rose, hysterically laughing, singing, dancing, shrieking?) was trying to exit the building. You blocked her egress. Meyers turned around and attempted to exit the building via another corridor. You raced ahead of her to bar her path; in compliance with the the retaliatory temporary stalking order you took out against her half a month after the one she took out against you, she had to turn around again. You continued your childish game for some time, forcing Meyers to take refuge in a neighbour's apartment. When other tenants came to her rescue, you scuttled off.
Neither Meyers nor Leal left you “a note on video”. Prior to the first hearing on your many violations of the stalking order against you, YOU shoved a note under Leal's door threatening her if she appeared in court. Leal brought that note to the 2nd November hearing. You must have feared what Leal had to say, for, when she attempted to address the court, you immediately set up a ruckus so that she was not heard.
Note that, back in November, Leal was, according to you, part of that “hate mob” which serves you as a convenient excuse for your erratic behaviour. Correct us if we are wrong, but it seems to us that you were still touting your “hate mob” as a bible-thumping, drug-dealing gang of African American grandmothers who, with Portland Impact, were engaged in a vast and complex drug-related welfare fraud conspiracy.
According to you, the previous source of Leal's prescription meds was Kimberly, your former employer. Thereafter, it was “convicted felon Marttha”. Now it seems to be Meyers. Actually, the source of Leal's prescription meds was the pharmacy.
No one sent dogs or anything other animal against your “wittiness”. As you have proven, wittiness is one of several qualities you lack.
The hate mob led by Jackle Barton and Martha Feggan was in full force.
“Jackle” Barton? Martha “Feggan”? Looks like your “hate mob” acquired some new leaders, whoever Jackle and Feggan may be. Maybe you're confusing them with Fagin, and Heckle & Jeckle?
They knocked on my wittiness door late at night, she said she felt like she was dragged out her room. They brought her into a room across the hallway from my room in 204. They told her she did not have to lie as my witness but she could say it like this or that. She told them she would not lie as they continued to harass her by banging on her door as they walked by and cut off her resources for the help she needed.
Who might this “wittiness” of yours be, Lisa? Could she be the shy, reclusive, and emotionally fragile person into whose apartment you barged, uninvited, and whom you frightened with your belligerent and aggressive behaviour? If so, the only person who harassed her by banging on her door was YOU.
It never ceases to amaze us how all of the “wittinesses” you claim to have lined up have been, according to your various redactions of your stories, so intimidated by the variously-led “hate mob” that ALL failed to appear for you. Rather like that “rally” you held for yourself, where nobody came.
But the intimidation of your “wittinesses” indicates an astonishing degree of prescience on the part of your “hate mob”. None of them have ever known who, exactly, your “wittinesses” are – and yet they manage to intimidate your “wittinesses” all the same. Don't you find that utterly amazing?
When I was arrested, Terry Sharpe was on trial for stalking me, she is a real stalker...........
What trial was that, Lisa?
The facts:
On 31st October, you took out a bogus temporary protective stalking order against Terry Sharp at the same time you took out your retaliatory temporary stalking order against Meyers. This was less than a month after you harassed Ms Sharp with your picture-taking antics, and she told you: “Please leave me alone and don't harass me.” When you failed to cease harassing her, the building manager intervened and ordered you to leave her alone, and just leave. These are only two of the five incidents of your harassment of Ms Sharp which occurred that day. On 1st November 2007, you told Ms Sharp that you would cut her legs off if she appeared in court. Perhaps you had learned that Ms Sharp was one of several tenants who filed complaints against you for your racist hate speech against African Americans
At all times subsequent thereto, your behaviour toward Ms Sharp was aggressive, hostile, and belligerent. You alleged that Ms Sharp “intimidated” several of your “wittinesses” in your money-grubbing “gender”grievance with the Bureau of Labor and Industries. This last is a patent impossibility, as no one, including Ms Sharp, has ever known the identity of your alleged “wittinesses”. In court, you alleged that Ms Sharp “peeped” through your window and watched you while you masturbated. It's difficult to see how one could watch you masturbate through your window, as your window was on the second floor -- -- or why anyone would want to do so. You made it more confusing by repeatedly insisting to the court that your window was UNDER the table in the courtyard.
The hate mob harassed my witness by phone calls and other tenants demanding that she keep quiet. My witness went into the hospital for mental health.
When did this alleged hospitalization occur, Lisa? As previously, it's difficult to see how anyone could have harassed your alleged witness, since no one has ever known who they are -- or, indeed, if they exist.
The DA's office new that I had accused Meyers for drug dealing which is what Reach CDC and the DA office is been trying to hide. The great crime, of hiding and protecting drug dealers who are leaders in a hate mob.
The grotesque absurdity of the first sentence speaks for itself. The second is merely more of your self-serving exculpatory flatulence.
You still owe certain members of your alleged “hate mob” a great deal of gratitude, in that they never reported you for giving drugs and alcohol to a minor in exchange for sex with her.
SHAME ON THE DA'S office. I will get a new trial. Your a hater? , ETHICS District Attorney Loprinzi- Arusi put your head in a NOOSE? Come and get me or protect me and do your FUCKING JOB. Remember, Straight but NOT NARROW. I coming for you Loprinzi- Arusi, I coming with a gang of mine called JUSTICE!
It's curious, Lisa dear, how you spend so much time whinging about the so-called “threats” you and your “wittinesses” have received from your beloved hate mob. And yet, the only threats anyone has ever heard have come from YOU.
The GANG, Martin Luther KING, Malcom X, Rosa Parks, Sojourner Truth, Harvey MILK,. Steven BICO, Cesar Chavez, Harriet Tubman, Chief Sitting BULL, etc.. They are my GANG!
These are your “wittinesses”? Oh, please. Note that five of your “GANG” are what you call “niggers”. As Rosa Parks, Sojourner Truth, and Harriet Tubman were African American women, that makes them, according to you, “nigger bitches”. The chances of African Americans such as these, let alone any African Americans, joining a “GANG” led by a racist hate monger are not likely.
Am I being disrespecting,inflammatory?
You're rarely anything but, except when you're being stupid, or trying to get something for nothing.
Or am I making fucking correct assessment on the responsibility of the DA's office which is not to hold evidence.
Actually, Lisa dear, you're being your usual delusional, attention-seeking drama queen self. And wherever did you ever get the notion that the DA's responsibility is NOT to hold evidence?
The police and the Loprinzi- Arusi are to be neutral. If their is a piece missing, like my side of the police report, then, correct it, do not hide it, do not create more fear, give drug dealers and haters power?
Lisa dear, it is impossible for what you imagine “my side of the police report” to exist. A police report is a report written by the police. That is why it is called a police report. It doesn't have sides. If you have a side to report, it should be called something like My Side of My Arrest, or Lisa Iacuzzi's Mein Kampf, but it is not called a police report.
For your further edification, Lisa, when one is being prosecuted for a crime one committed, the prosecuting attorney represents the people of the State of Oregon. In your recent trial for your repeated violations of one of the stalking orders against you – in which you got off lightly -- the prosecuting attorney for the State of Oregon was DA Arusi Loprinzi. As such, it was certainly NOT his place “to be neutral”.
You may thank your lucky stars that you got off as lightly as you did – that, and the fact that the jails are too crowded, and the dockets too full, to waste more time and taxpayers' money on your petty penny-ante antics.
Are you kidding me! Documented death threats on my life in the BOLI file that you completely ignored.
What you call “documented death threats”, Lisa, are those you yourself invented. That makes them allegations, not “documented death threats”. Considering you are the sole source, that also makes your allegations highly dubious -- at best.
What about the people who still live in a hate mob building, who are not haters, who want nothing to do this but to live in peace without a mob threatening and running a building. They behave like they own the building verses the fact that it is a place to transition.
Terry Sharp is one of those people who isn't a hater, and who wants to live in peace. You attacked her nevertheless, as you attacked others who wish only to live in peace. In fact, the only “hate mob” engaged in “threatening and running a building” was YOU.
Most of my haters lived in the building four years or more and ran the building like a jail. Kim Matic from Transitions Project who was fired, called the mob on their behavior. The hate mob attacked her included in her attack, was her "Queer Friendly" position on sexual minorities.
Why are you so obsessed with Kimberly Matic? What were you two, lovers? Matic was fired for her inability to perform her job -- at The Rose as well as elsewhere.
Let us now dispense with this particular lie of yours.
The facts:
Kimberly Matic was fired for, among other things:
1) Chronic tardiness to her ONE day per week round of appointments at The Rose
2) Habitual early departure
3) Regular and habitual personal grooming during client conferences
4) Routine violation of The Rose's computer room rules restricting the same exclusively to Rose tenants
5) An insensitive and cavalier attitude, best displayed in her cold response to a TPI client hospitalized for depression, which resulted in a downturn of that client's condition to the point where she was placed on suicide watch. By her inappropriate response, Matic laid TPI wide open to the possibility of some very costly litigation.
The first two are sufficient cause for termination of any employment; the remainder only underscore Matic's general incompetency -- as you, with your stochastic employment history, should well know. TPI was quite pleased to receive documentation of Matic's poor job performance, so that they could expedite her termination for cause.
Why do you natter on about this, yet completely ignore the complaint filed with the NAACP on your racist hate speech and behaviour towards your African American neighbours? Haven't you been able to think up a good enough lie to excuse your repeated use of the phrase “nigger bitches”?
DA Loprinzi- Arusi put a drug dealer on a pedestal as you came into her apartment building knowing the STATE of OREGON proved her to be DISCRIMINATORY and their had been Gender Discrimination over a 8 month period that is still ongoing. You ignored a state investigation Loprinzi- Arusi?
Silly Lisa, your self-serving BOLI grievance complaints have absolutely nothing to do with your violations of the stalking order against you. Can't one or two of that five-lawyer team you claimed you have explain it to you?
YOU ARE FUCKED. I wonder how much insurance you have Loprinzi- Arusi or is a true desire for you to do dishes for a living! I making myself clear!
You not making youself clear, Lisa. You substandard English rarely is making youself clear. That aside, does the foregoing constitute a threat against DA Arusi Loprinzi? Gee, maybe the guy will have to take out a stalking order against you, in view of your admission during your trial of having stalked him. Tell us, Lisa, do you plan on filing another of your bogus and money-grubbing BOLI “gender discrimination” grievances against the Portland DA's office? What an elevation in targets that will be for you, Lisa!
I love my readership which has now expended to every judicial and social service agency in this city of Portland that is liberal and conservative.
You flatter yourself, Lisa. But, of course, you might as well flatter yourself. You don't inspire anybody else to do it for you.
The hate mob writes me quite often but I do not post their hate. They have their own hate blog dedicated to 100 percent of their writing about me. I have over 320 posts and maybe 10 percent is addressing my freedom and the hate I have endured and still enduring.
Lisa, Lisa, you know and we know that if your imaginary “hate mob” had written you 320 posts, you would have slapped every one of them onto your blog. But maybe you are referring to the comments about you in the Portland Mercury blog? But there were only 14 or so comments there -- and half of them were from YOU.
We are wounded that you think our NOT A GOOD QUEER – OR ANYTHING ELSE blog is a hate blog. We take comfort in the fact that NAGQ-OAE is about posting facts in opposition to your multifarious lies; ergo, “hate blog” is your pet term for facts about you and your antics -- just as “hate mob” is your pet term for those who refuse to goose step when you bark “Sieg heil!”, and “mentorship student” for an underage minor with whom you exchange alcohol and drugs for sex.
I am not afraid of dying, what I am afraid of is LIVIN with your hate in my life.
Then stop inviting it. But the fact of the matter is – you LOVE it. You love and crave attention like a druggie craves a fix.
I REBUKE YOU! FUCK YOU! I though I was well behaved during the trial as you were covering up for the drug addict. I smiled for my MOB SHOT! Thanks for hanging yourself. I am sure you will not be at the new trial.
Not a lot showed up for the old trial, either, old git. Remember the “rally” you held for yourself last year, to winkle money for yourself from the unwary. Nobody showed up at that, either. Nobody cares enough.
We still rise, we will not apologize for anything!
Not a Good Queer on Blog Spot!
Posted by Not a Good Queer at 2:29 PM
One of the authors of the Hate Blog called Not a good Queer or anything else authors is Deborah Johnson. She is Jewish and likes to use hate language.
So, you've added a new author to your “hate blog”, have you, Lisa? And one of three Jews at The Rose, too – how about that? Keep running through the roster of Rose tenants for your guesses as to NAGQ-OAE's identities, Lisa, and you might hit the other Jews, too. But your scattershot will still keep MISSING THE TARGET.
I was a drum circle where her son told me she was threatened to be evicted if she did not stop writing in this blog. She and the other haters have not stopped.
So far as we at NAQG-OAE are aware, no Rose tenant has ever been threatened with eviction for her contributions to our magnificent blog. And no tenant is likely to be evicted, either. That's just more of your scattershot, Lisa. After all, you yourself weren't evicted for your racist hate speech, your vandalising building property, your verbal threats and physical assaults on your neighbours, so why do you imagine that providing NAGC-OAE with facts in opposition to your gobbledygook would result in anyone's eviction?
Deborah son told me that she is an obsessed woman who has a cruel streak. He said that he did not want to be like her. He apologized for her behavior and we gave each other a hug.
Did you give the boy alcohol, pot, and drugs, too, as you did your 17-year-old girlfriend Nicole, last April, in exchange for sex with her? We at NAGQ-OAE fervently hope you didn't. As to your version of your interchange with Deborah's son, the African-American ladies at The Rose who know and love him disbelieve your account – largely because the boy told them, after learning of your racist hate actions against them, that he plans to apply his foot to a certainly broad portion of your anatomy should he ever see you again.
The hate mob uses hate language, I do not. As a matter of fact, I wrote educational materials on anti-Semetism, racism, and heterosexism and showed how they parralled. I am number one on Goggle for Understanding Equality. So I am a racist?
Of course you are, Lisa – unless you have another word for one who, like yourself, bangs on African Americans' doors, screams “nigger!”, then runs away; vandalises African American property, then brags about it; and tells African Americans, in front of nine-year old African American children, “All you nigger bitches do drugs.” Or don't you consider that “hate language”?
And please don't insult NAGQ-OAE's collective intelligence with your claims to have written “educational materials” on “anti-Semetism” and racism. As one of the NAGQ-OAE bloggers advised you, you yourself have repeatedly proven that
a) you are not educated, and
b) you can't write.
Given your inability to write coherently, it is extremely difficult to see how you could have written anything that could be remotely considered “educational”, except by followers of David Duke or the KKK, who are of sufficiently low mentality to view your scrawlings as “educational.”
In future, if you have any urges to babble about antisemitism, do try to spell the word correctly.
Your time is coming, Reach CDC has a lot of money and power. They are supported by the City of Portland and the State.
“A lot of money and power”. That's all it's ever been for you -- right, Lisa? How goes that $1,000,000 settlement you claim you're going to get out of REACH? And the $300,000 – “and MORE!” -- from a domestic violence shelter?
So come on, make a threat, tell me to leave town, make sure you put my name on your cells visitors list.
Lee
Not a Good Queer on Google
July 21, 2008 5:27 PM
Why leave town, Lisa? You'd just go to another and bother people there with your hateful antics, then whine and sob when they react. You're the woman who murdered her mother and father, then threw herself on the mercy of the court because she was an orphan.
Why not try to change your behaviour? That would be your best bet. You might even get a life out of it.
NAGQ-OAE
We still rise! (despite our inclinations to sleep in)
28 July 2008
HUGS & KISSES
Lisa writes:
Hate Mobs Blog
http://notagoodqueer.blogspot.com/2008/07/hate-mobs-blog.html
This is the owners signature of the hate blog called Not a Good QUeer or Anything Else.
terai toujours plus haut que mon cul! ought to be Lisa's sig tag
This means something about ones head up their ass but I am not sure.
Wrong, as usual, Lisa dear. What, exactly, was the foreign language you took as part of your alleged MA/Education? English? Whatever it was, you failed it.
....terai toujours plus haut que mon cul makes no sense, like your writings when your buddy Paul doesn't vet them -- or you paste them from other sources and fail to give credit to the real author.-- In the above instance, you fail at pasting. Don't worry, though, we can glean what you're attempting to say.
The hate mob will be emailing me and telling me the correct interpetation.
Your “hate mob” is unlikely to be emailing you anything -- unless you receive email in the interstices between your ears, which is largely where your “hate mob” resides. Come to think of it, though, it's likely you do – and voice mail, too.
The funny thing is that these haters were warned not to publish anymore but recently they have increase their hate activity.
Really, Lisa? When were your imaginary “haters” “warned not to publish anymore”? Publish what, and who warned them? What “hate activity” has increased? Is “hate activity” your pet term for presenting facts in opposition to your rubbish?
I have copied everything on line. As I know their are many writers of this hate blog, I know one Rose tenant that speaks French and German, etc. She is a one of the biggest haters named Deborah Johnson. Hey Deb, keep writing because the more you write the more my damages are, so keep writing, you are making me famous.......
Once again, you prove you know very little, Lisa, and have a curious fondness for displaying it. Our preference here at NAGQ-OAE being for checking facts, as opposed to your penchant for spewing without regard to them, we discovered that Deborah does NOT speak French or German. But don't let facts get in your way.
Alas for your claim to fame, it's mostly negative. Comments on you from the blogosphere include: “One of the biggest nuts on the streets" “A bully that is trying to work the system” “A self-serving manipulator” “Clinically insane" “Obviously nuts” ”Seemingly chemically unbalanced” “Paranoid, violent, and crazy” “Mentally ill and needs treatment” “A crazy, violent, stalking, tire slashing psycho who may turn on anyone at anytime, and she likes to make up bullshit lawsuits” “One of the most abrasive, sick people I have come across” “An extremely abusive person” “A very angry person with no positive outlet” “A serial bully and pathological liar looking for attention” “Not a model citizen of Portland by any reasonable person's definition”
Not exactly the sort of “fame” you'd care to write home about, is it, Lisa?
By the way, Lisa, do the folks back home know what you're up to?
Also, If your so proud of your blog, why are you mispelling my name as the author of your hate! The first thing haters do, is steal your identity than start calling authorities and filling false stalking orders.
How amusing -- a spelling rebuke from one who has trouble spelling “their”, and can't distinguish it from “there”, and misspells “mispelling”, to boot. We refrain from a more thorough consideration of the phrase “my name as the author of your hate”, except to note in passing that this seems quite a Freudian slip.
NAGQ-OAE have almost as great a respect for the English language as we have for fact – two qualities rarely, if ever, seen in you, Lisa. Is your legal name not Lisa Mary Iacuzzi? Is that not how it appears in the pleading headers of State of Oregon v. Lisa Mary Iacuzzi on citation no. Z1621963, as well as on that citation itself? Are you not the Lisa Mary Iacuzzi issued ODL# 7887155 with DOB 7/03/1963, and do the records of your November/December 2007 incarceration in the Multnomah County jail not reflect the spelling of your legal name Lisa Mary Iacuzzi? If so, then we at NAGQ-OAE have certainly never misspelled your legal name.
FYI, the State of Oregon has neither time nor money to waste on one's “filling false stalking orders”. Your games with stalking orders, your trial and incarceration for your violations of the same, your money-grubbing BOLI grievances over imaginary slights, are none of them based on falsehoods, except in your mind. All are the result of your own self-destructive antics, and it's disheartening that you have no intention of putting an end to it.
I am not afraid of dying, but what I am afraid of is having you constantly in my life
Didn't you just write this? Ah, no. You wrote: “I am not afraid of dying, what I am afraid of is LIVIN with your hate in my life. I REBUKE YOU! FUCK YOU!”
Our error.
which is why the MOB will be taken down, and arrested for their hate crimes. It will be just a matter of time....
Do tell us exactly what “hate crimes” your imaginary “hate mob” have committed against you, Lisa. So far as we at NAGQ-OAE have been able to determine, the only “hate crimes” your cherished hate mob has committed is failing and refusing to goosestep whenever you bark “sieg heil!”
Perhaps you considered it a “hate crime” when your African American neighbours filed a complaint with the NAACP over your repeated racist slurs and attacks? Is calling a nine-year old African American girl and her grandmother “nigger bitches” NOT hate speech when the speech is yours, Lisa?
Do tell us about these “hate crimes,” Lisa. Inquiring minds would like to know.
We still rise, we will not apologize for anything!
Not a Good Queer on Blog Spot!
Not apologizing for your hateful antics – as well as your refusal to acknowledge them – is part and parcel of one of your major mental problems, Lisa.
I have 15 responses on my moderation page from the hate mob.
Shtuyot. Those “15 responses” are on the Portland Mercury's blog, not yours, all of them responses to Matt Davis's silly puff piece on you. And half of them are yours. Most of the remainder are from your former fellow employees. How surprising that their opinion of you is even lower that those we have seen from your former neighbors.
Does that tell you anything, Lisa? Alas, it probably won't even register.
NAGQ-OAE
We still rise! (despite our inclinations to sleep in)
Hate Mobs Blog
http://notagoodqueer.blogspot.com/2008/07/hate-mobs-blog.html
This is the owners signature of the hate blog called Not a Good QUeer or Anything Else.
terai toujours plus haut que mon cul! ought to be Lisa's sig tag
This means something about ones head up their ass but I am not sure.
Wrong, as usual, Lisa dear. What, exactly, was the foreign language you took as part of your alleged MA/Education? English? Whatever it was, you failed it.
....terai toujours plus haut que mon cul makes no sense, like your writings when your buddy Paul doesn't vet them -- or you paste them from other sources and fail to give credit to the real author.-- In the above instance, you fail at pasting. Don't worry, though, we can glean what you're attempting to say.
The hate mob will be emailing me and telling me the correct interpetation.
Your “hate mob” is unlikely to be emailing you anything -- unless you receive email in the interstices between your ears, which is largely where your “hate mob” resides. Come to think of it, though, it's likely you do – and voice mail, too.
The funny thing is that these haters were warned not to publish anymore but recently they have increase their hate activity.
Really, Lisa? When were your imaginary “haters” “warned not to publish anymore”? Publish what, and who warned them? What “hate activity” has increased? Is “hate activity” your pet term for presenting facts in opposition to your rubbish?
I have copied everything on line. As I know their are many writers of this hate blog, I know one Rose tenant that speaks French and German, etc. She is a one of the biggest haters named Deborah Johnson. Hey Deb, keep writing because the more you write the more my damages are, so keep writing, you are making me famous.......
Once again, you prove you know very little, Lisa, and have a curious fondness for displaying it. Our preference here at NAGQ-OAE being for checking facts, as opposed to your penchant for spewing without regard to them, we discovered that Deborah does NOT speak French or German. But don't let facts get in your way.
Alas for your claim to fame, it's mostly negative. Comments on you from the blogosphere include: “One of the biggest nuts on the streets" “A bully that is trying to work the system” “A self-serving manipulator” “Clinically insane" “Obviously nuts” ”Seemingly chemically unbalanced” “Paranoid, violent, and crazy” “Mentally ill and needs treatment” “A crazy, violent, stalking, tire slashing psycho who may turn on anyone at anytime, and she likes to make up bullshit lawsuits” “One of the most abrasive, sick people I have come across” “An extremely abusive person” “A very angry person with no positive outlet” “A serial bully and pathological liar looking for attention” “Not a model citizen of Portland by any reasonable person's definition”
Not exactly the sort of “fame” you'd care to write home about, is it, Lisa?
By the way, Lisa, do the folks back home know what you're up to?
Also, If your so proud of your blog, why are you mispelling my name as the author of your hate! The first thing haters do, is steal your identity than start calling authorities and filling false stalking orders.
How amusing -- a spelling rebuke from one who has trouble spelling “their”, and can't distinguish it from “there”, and misspells “mispelling”, to boot. We refrain from a more thorough consideration of the phrase “my name as the author of your hate”, except to note in passing that this seems quite a Freudian slip.
NAGQ-OAE have almost as great a respect for the English language as we have for fact – two qualities rarely, if ever, seen in you, Lisa. Is your legal name not Lisa Mary Iacuzzi? Is that not how it appears in the pleading headers of State of Oregon v. Lisa Mary Iacuzzi on citation no. Z1621963, as well as on that citation itself? Are you not the Lisa Mary Iacuzzi issued ODL# 7887155 with DOB 7/03/1963, and do the records of your November/December 2007 incarceration in the Multnomah County jail not reflect the spelling of your legal name Lisa Mary Iacuzzi? If so, then we at NAGQ-OAE have certainly never misspelled your legal name.
FYI, the State of Oregon has neither time nor money to waste on one's “filling false stalking orders”. Your games with stalking orders, your trial and incarceration for your violations of the same, your money-grubbing BOLI grievances over imaginary slights, are none of them based on falsehoods, except in your mind. All are the result of your own self-destructive antics, and it's disheartening that you have no intention of putting an end to it.
I am not afraid of dying, but what I am afraid of is having you constantly in my life
Didn't you just write this? Ah, no. You wrote: “I am not afraid of dying, what I am afraid of is LIVIN with your hate in my life. I REBUKE YOU! FUCK YOU!”
Our error.
which is why the MOB will be taken down, and arrested for their hate crimes. It will be just a matter of time....
Do tell us exactly what “hate crimes” your imaginary “hate mob” have committed against you, Lisa. So far as we at NAGQ-OAE have been able to determine, the only “hate crimes” your cherished hate mob has committed is failing and refusing to goosestep whenever you bark “sieg heil!”
Perhaps you considered it a “hate crime” when your African American neighbours filed a complaint with the NAACP over your repeated racist slurs and attacks? Is calling a nine-year old African American girl and her grandmother “nigger bitches” NOT hate speech when the speech is yours, Lisa?
Do tell us about these “hate crimes,” Lisa. Inquiring minds would like to know.
We still rise, we will not apologize for anything!
Not a Good Queer on Blog Spot!
Not apologizing for your hateful antics – as well as your refusal to acknowledge them – is part and parcel of one of your major mental problems, Lisa.
I have 15 responses on my moderation page from the hate mob.
Shtuyot. Those “15 responses” are on the Portland Mercury's blog, not yours, all of them responses to Matt Davis's silly puff piece on you. And half of them are yours. Most of the remainder are from your former fellow employees. How surprising that their opinion of you is even lower that those we have seen from your former neighbors.
Does that tell you anything, Lisa? Alas, it probably won't even register.
NAGQ-OAE
We still rise! (despite our inclinations to sleep in)
ASKING FOR EVIDENCE? LISA ON HER ARREST
Dear, oh dear Lisa, after the excellent beginning you made when you admitted “I am guitly” and “I am an asshole” -- admission of personal error being a step on the road to wisdom -- you had to go and spoil it.
Asking for Evidence
http://notagoodqueer.blogspot.com/2008/07/asking-for-eidence.html
Are you really asking for evidence, Lisa? Let's see.....
portland police arrested me on Nov 11, 2007.
You were arrested Monday morning, 12th November 2007, after the most recent of your repeated violations of one of the temporary protective stalking orders issued by the court against you.
My statement was missing form the police report. Why?
Lisa dear, as you should know, police reports don't usually include lengthy statements from arrestees. This is due, partly, to space limitations on the report form; partly to the volume of reports which police are required to write in the course of a day's work, particularly on minor matters such as your peccadilloes; and partly because no one likes reading lengthy reports, and the police don't like writing them. Moreover, space on the report was taken up by your hitting, kicking, and screeching obscenities at the arresting officers, so that they had to shackle you, and then spitting on them, so that they had to muzzle you.
If the foregoing doesn't satisfy, you can ask one of that “team of five lawyers” you claim to have, or maybe write a letter to your sister Chris, the award-winning paralegal with the huge New Jersey law firm, who has “solved” so many cases.
A false accusation from one the the hate mobs led police to come to a 911 call. This women was hysterical on the phone staing that she was trapped in a corner by her stalker. The truth is that I have a stalking order on this women and she could just walk out the door which could be touched by the phone cord. Thier was a security guard in the lobby, and a night manager and a maintenace guy. But she said that she was bieng trapped.
My goodness, Lisa, it's amazing how you manage to compact so much rubbish into a few sentences. You're a walking (waddling?) verbal trash compactor. If you're asking for evidence, the evidence shows that: Your victim made no false accusation. You were observed racing from floor to floor, and corridor to corridor, in a clear attempt to blockade your victim's egress from the building. You were also heard verbally taunting her. It's immaterial whether any “door could be touched by the phone cord” or not, as was your retaliatory temporary protective stalking order.
There was indeed a security guard on duty that morning, who witnessed most of your childish antics. The “maintenace guy” was not around. There was no night manager, nor has there ever been one.
The evidence shows that your victim was indeed “bieng trapped” by you, in one of your characteristic childish games of provocation, and your motive was nothing more than to harass your emotionally fragile victim.
The series of threats of physical harm you had recently issued to a number of residents should be noted.
In short, Lisa, you violated the order against you.
The police came and they came for one thing, they came to finally arrest me. They had enough calls that made their presence a daily event.
Of course they came to arrest you, Lisa, but their appearance was hardly the “daily event” you claim. Do try not to exaggerate.
The Portland Police were will aware since they were given a document by residents who malaigned me to the point of abuse beyond that any one human being can endure. This document was sent to the portland Police and to two particular officers Andrew Koefed and Offcer Fulitano.
Clearly, you are still in the dark as to the nature of that “document” you keep nattering about; your scattershot references show it, as does your uncertainty as to whether it was eight pages or fourteen pages. We here at NAGQ-OAE have seen it, and it was neither. Suffice to say that you were not “malaigned” in it; your comment that it contained “abuse beyond that any one human being can endure” is nothing more than your usual childish and grotesque hyperbole.
For your future reference, Lisa, the subject of that “document” was your disturbing and destructive behaviour at The Rose since the inception of your residency. It set forth your repeated violations of your lease provisions; your violent and threatening antics; your deliberate, willful, and malicious harassment of tenants, chief among whom were gay women and the African American women whom you made the targets of your abuse and racist hate speech; and your general conduct of yourself in a such manner that disturbed tenants' peaceful enjoyment of the premises. It further set forth details of your erratic and destructive antics, and included dates, times, and places. It was composed by legal professionals, and was attested to by the signatures of approximately two-thirds of the tenants who either witnessed or were the targets of the same.
Those are the facts, Lisa. But, as per your usual, we assume you won't let facts get in your way. You never do.
Officer Fulitano warned me that some judge may beleieve that drug addict and your going to get in trouble. This building is for women only and trans need a place they can be that is safe. I agree with Fulitano, I was not safe,
We pass over your allegations as to Officer Fulitano's comments, as, once again, the sole source is highly dubious. The building is indeed a residence for women only – excluding male personnel – as are some rather exclusive and expensive residences in New York, Los Angeles, San Francisco, and elsewhere.
Immediately prior to your residency, a tenant who was in the process of transgendering opted to move elsewhere. The reason s/he gave was that the process had reached the point where s/he no longer felt s/he could reside in a building for women, as he felt himself more of a man than a woman. That was his option. Contrary to your alleged experiences, at no time did he express any feeling that he felt unsafe, nor did any tenant express concerns for her safety around him. To this day, he remains on close and friendly terms with a number of tenants – including those tenants whom you variously place in your “hate mob.”
Does that tell you something, Lisa?
I carried my camera around and tried my hardest to stay safe.
“Tried your hardest,” did you? You didn't try too hard. You carried around your cell phone and, later, your little camera, for the sole purpose of videoing the defensive reactions from tenants -- which you yourself provoked by jumping out and shoving waving your camera at them, while taunting them with your usual brand of childish insults and malicious harassing antics.
Evidently you've forgotten your antics of 14th October 2007, when you physically assaulted a crippled homeless man, then taunted those who came to his rescue, and videoed their reaction.
The Da told the jury that my stalking order was that I could only come in and out of the building when In fact it was modified to, no intentional contact.
If you're going to reference what the order says, Lisa, it would be best to quote directly from the order. That way it will be intelligible, as well as believable. In any case, your contact with your victim was at all times intentional.
More to come, the cover up of Drugs at the Rose by the DA's office and Portland Police and even the city of Portland?
Do tell, Lisa. We at NAGQ-OAE will be fascinated by your saga of the attempted cover-up of Drugs At The Rose on the part of the District Attorney's office, the Portland Police, and the City of Portland. Please get your buddy Paul Hamilton to vet the saga for you, though. We'd like to be able to read it without the usual inconveniences of your substandard and often-incoherent language.
We still rise, we will not apologize for anything!
Not a Good Queer on Blog Spot!
A more appropriate sig for you, Lisa, would be what you admitted on 5th July, to wit:
I am an asshole.
Posted by Not a Good Queer at 12:14 PM
http://notagoodqueer.blogspot.com/2008/07/asshole.html
Now that's more like it, Lisa, you dear old git.
We notice you've omitted that “MA@PSU” from your sig. Have you finally given over the fiction of your master's degree? If so, kudos to you.
Not A Good Queer – or Anything Else
We still rise! (despite our inclinations to sleep in)
Asking for Evidence
http://notagoodqueer.blogspot.com/2008/07/asking-for-eidence.html
Are you really asking for evidence, Lisa? Let's see.....
portland police arrested me on Nov 11, 2007.
You were arrested Monday morning, 12th November 2007, after the most recent of your repeated violations of one of the temporary protective stalking orders issued by the court against you.
My statement was missing form the police report. Why?
Lisa dear, as you should know, police reports don't usually include lengthy statements from arrestees. This is due, partly, to space limitations on the report form; partly to the volume of reports which police are required to write in the course of a day's work, particularly on minor matters such as your peccadilloes; and partly because no one likes reading lengthy reports, and the police don't like writing them. Moreover, space on the report was taken up by your hitting, kicking, and screeching obscenities at the arresting officers, so that they had to shackle you, and then spitting on them, so that they had to muzzle you.
If the foregoing doesn't satisfy, you can ask one of that “team of five lawyers” you claim to have, or maybe write a letter to your sister Chris, the award-winning paralegal with the huge New Jersey law firm, who has “solved” so many cases.
A false accusation from one the the hate mobs led police to come to a 911 call. This women was hysterical on the phone staing that she was trapped in a corner by her stalker. The truth is that I have a stalking order on this women and she could just walk out the door which could be touched by the phone cord. Thier was a security guard in the lobby, and a night manager and a maintenace guy. But she said that she was bieng trapped.
My goodness, Lisa, it's amazing how you manage to compact so much rubbish into a few sentences. You're a walking (waddling?) verbal trash compactor. If you're asking for evidence, the evidence shows that: Your victim made no false accusation. You were observed racing from floor to floor, and corridor to corridor, in a clear attempt to blockade your victim's egress from the building. You were also heard verbally taunting her. It's immaterial whether any “door could be touched by the phone cord” or not, as was your retaliatory temporary protective stalking order.
There was indeed a security guard on duty that morning, who witnessed most of your childish antics. The “maintenace guy” was not around. There was no night manager, nor has there ever been one.
The evidence shows that your victim was indeed “bieng trapped” by you, in one of your characteristic childish games of provocation, and your motive was nothing more than to harass your emotionally fragile victim.
The series of threats of physical harm you had recently issued to a number of residents should be noted.
In short, Lisa, you violated the order against you.
The police came and they came for one thing, they came to finally arrest me. They had enough calls that made their presence a daily event.
Of course they came to arrest you, Lisa, but their appearance was hardly the “daily event” you claim. Do try not to exaggerate.
The Portland Police were will aware since they were given a document by residents who malaigned me to the point of abuse beyond that any one human being can endure. This document was sent to the portland Police and to two particular officers Andrew Koefed and Offcer Fulitano.
Clearly, you are still in the dark as to the nature of that “document” you keep nattering about; your scattershot references show it, as does your uncertainty as to whether it was eight pages or fourteen pages. We here at NAGQ-OAE have seen it, and it was neither. Suffice to say that you were not “malaigned” in it; your comment that it contained “abuse beyond that any one human being can endure” is nothing more than your usual childish and grotesque hyperbole.
For your future reference, Lisa, the subject of that “document” was your disturbing and destructive behaviour at The Rose since the inception of your residency. It set forth your repeated violations of your lease provisions; your violent and threatening antics; your deliberate, willful, and malicious harassment of tenants, chief among whom were gay women and the African American women whom you made the targets of your abuse and racist hate speech; and your general conduct of yourself in a such manner that disturbed tenants' peaceful enjoyment of the premises. It further set forth details of your erratic and destructive antics, and included dates, times, and places. It was composed by legal professionals, and was attested to by the signatures of approximately two-thirds of the tenants who either witnessed or were the targets of the same.
Those are the facts, Lisa. But, as per your usual, we assume you won't let facts get in your way. You never do.
Officer Fulitano warned me that some judge may beleieve that drug addict and your going to get in trouble. This building is for women only and trans need a place they can be that is safe. I agree with Fulitano, I was not safe,
We pass over your allegations as to Officer Fulitano's comments, as, once again, the sole source is highly dubious. The building is indeed a residence for women only – excluding male personnel – as are some rather exclusive and expensive residences in New York, Los Angeles, San Francisco, and elsewhere.
Immediately prior to your residency, a tenant who was in the process of transgendering opted to move elsewhere. The reason s/he gave was that the process had reached the point where s/he no longer felt s/he could reside in a building for women, as he felt himself more of a man than a woman. That was his option. Contrary to your alleged experiences, at no time did he express any feeling that he felt unsafe, nor did any tenant express concerns for her safety around him. To this day, he remains on close and friendly terms with a number of tenants – including those tenants whom you variously place in your “hate mob.”
Does that tell you something, Lisa?
I carried my camera around and tried my hardest to stay safe.
“Tried your hardest,” did you? You didn't try too hard. You carried around your cell phone and, later, your little camera, for the sole purpose of videoing the defensive reactions from tenants -- which you yourself provoked by jumping out and shoving waving your camera at them, while taunting them with your usual brand of childish insults and malicious harassing antics.
Evidently you've forgotten your antics of 14th October 2007, when you physically assaulted a crippled homeless man, then taunted those who came to his rescue, and videoed their reaction.
The Da told the jury that my stalking order was that I could only come in and out of the building when In fact it was modified to, no intentional contact.
If you're going to reference what the order says, Lisa, it would be best to quote directly from the order. That way it will be intelligible, as well as believable. In any case, your contact with your victim was at all times intentional.
More to come, the cover up of Drugs at the Rose by the DA's office and Portland Police and even the city of Portland?
Do tell, Lisa. We at NAGQ-OAE will be fascinated by your saga of the attempted cover-up of Drugs At The Rose on the part of the District Attorney's office, the Portland Police, and the City of Portland. Please get your buddy Paul Hamilton to vet the saga for you, though. We'd like to be able to read it without the usual inconveniences of your substandard and often-incoherent language.
We still rise, we will not apologize for anything!
Not a Good Queer on Blog Spot!
A more appropriate sig for you, Lisa, would be what you admitted on 5th July, to wit:
I am an asshole.
Posted by Not a Good Queer at 12:14 PM
http://notagoodqueer.blogspot.com/2008/07/asshole.html
Now that's more like it, Lisa, you dear old git.
We notice you've omitted that “MA@PSU” from your sig. Have you finally given over the fiction of your master's degree? If so, kudos to you.
Not A Good Queer – or Anything Else
We still rise! (despite our inclinations to sleep in)
COMMENTS ON LISA FROM THE BLOGOSPHERE (AND A FEW KIND WORDS FOR NAGQ-OAE)
On 12th June 2008, the Portland Mercury ran a puff piece on Lisa and her “suit” against the Bradley-Angle domestic violence shelter. Along with basic fact-checking, investigative journalism seems to have been somewhat lacking, as the Mercury's sole source of information was Lisa herself, which makes the fluff about as valid as A History of the Jewish People written by Adolf Hitler.
What follows is a number of comments on the Mercury's fluff. Lisa, naturally, responded to every one of the comments. Most of Lisa's comments have been elided, due to space considerations, and because we've heard her apologiae pro sua vita before.
We note, with some surprise, that Lisa's former fellow employees have a far lower opinion of her, if possible, than any we have heard from her former neighbours.
With our customary modesty, we at NAGQ-OAE point to the favorable comments on our magnificent blog.
Here are the comments. Enjoy.
Not A Good Queer-Or Anything Else
Still we rise! (despite our inclinations to sleep late)
===================
Suing a women's shelter: Class.
Posted by C-Ho | June 12, 2008 9:51 AM
I thought Bradley Angle House had a specific program for an all genders queer support group (among MANY other support groups). I'm wondering if when they gave her/him info for the male shelter, they were just trying to offer her/him as many options as possible. Every experience with women's shelters/crisis lines in the Portland area I've had have been extremely queer/transgender friendly.
Posted by Hmmm | June 12, 2008 12:31 PM
Also, if the case has merit, then I'm glad Iacuzzi is pursuing it to the extent that discriminatory policies could be fixed. However, to try to get money from a shelter seems really wrong. You'll just be taking it away from other people in need. People donate to that shelter hoping to help families in need, not to pay for lawsuits.
Posted by Hmmm | June 12, 2008 12:37 PM
Yowza! I can see that Lisa/Lee is angry.
"I think this behavior is consistent with the womens community who throw rocks and then cry victim!" - False generalization?
"How about Bradley Angle House changing their programs to be EQUAL for trans folk and stop their discriminatory policies." - I agree that they should stop discriminatory policies if those exist... but they are a 'women's' shelter who support women and children who are trying to escape from domestic abuse. Was their transgender/queer support group not in place when you were at their shelter?
"How about the 15 times I called the police for death threats and Bradley Angle house who works with the police never came to interfere or stop the abuse." It is awful that you have had to live through this, but is it the Bradley Angle's house's responsibility to come to your house? I think most advocates would leave that up to the police (even if just for liability reasons alone).
"They also case managed residents who I lived with who they did not stop but encouraged them for a "women" only environment." - I'm not entirely sure what this means, but I imagine that a lot of women who are escaping abusive situations feel safer in a shelter that consists of women. The fact that Lee/Lisa sometimes identifies as a man may have triggered fear in some of the women.
I was just voicing concerns over some issues I see rising out of Lee/Lisa's lawsuit. I was always willing to give Lee/Lisa the benefit of the doubt...but maybe not anymore.
Posted by Hmmm | June 12, 2008 10:29 PM
It is unfortunate to see that the Mercury is giving any time whatsoever to the Lee/Lisa story. While there is no question that discrimination of any type is a serious problem of society, what this article fails to realize, is that this person is certainly not a model citizen of Portland by any reasonable person's definition. While one wants to empathize with someone who feels they are being discrimated against, one should also consider the source. Lee/Lisa is well-knowned throughout this city as several of Portland's Finest put it "one of the biggest nuts on the streets." he/he has a long record of mental illness, arrests, restraining orders, and frivilous lawsuits. Just read the NOT A GOOD QUEER BLOG, to get a sense of how convuoleted his/her sense of reality really is. While there is not question that he/she may have to deal with a great amount of ignorance and most likely prejudice from the greater populace regarding his/her gender identification, it is asinine for him/her to sue places like the Bradley House, bc it takes $ from the very services that were there to help him/her in the first place.
If you get beyond his/her sanctimonious reheoric, you'll find that Lee/Lisa is nothing more than an bully that is trying to work the system under the guise of someone who is being oppressed.
Posted by j | June 13, 2008 12:38 AM
The Mercury and specifically Matt Davis totally fucked this story up. "Crazy Lisa" (to those who know her well) is "clinically insane" (seriously no joke or exaggeration) and has even been on Judge Judy for punching a pacifist in the face. I worked with her directly and know for a fact that she has unprovoked attacked people (even challenged me to a fight) and has slashed many tires. To leave out the facts that- Lee/Lisa is well-known throughout this city as several of Portland's Finest put it "one of the biggest nuts on the streets." he/he has a long record of mental illness, arrests, restraining orders, and frivolous lawsuits is unconscionable journalism. All of these court cases are part of public record and journalists have tools beyond Google like LexisNexis to research stories like this, so if the Mercury wants any credibility at all it their reports should at least attempt to get their facts straight and present the full story.
This (the violence and unstability) is all part of public record so Matt Davis who wrote this article is either sloppy and does not know how to do basic journalistic research or deliberately misrepresented the facts for a better story, which amounts to either being stoopid or an asshole hack.
Now lets move on to "Crazy Lee/Lisa". Once again I worked with her directly and yes she was nuts. We actually had a goodbye, friendly party for her when she at one time decided to move away from Portland and moved to Boston, and many people where relieved that she was leaving because she was obviously nuts. But then she returned and renewed old acquaintances, and then for some reason declared war on everyone and started attacking people- physically and slashing tires. We wondered what set her off and to be truthful many believe that it's the whole bigendered thing. Now when I say "the whole bigendered thing" it's not the fact that Lee/Lisa has gender issues- it's more along the lines that she was seemingly chemically unbalanced to begin with and all of the hormones and testosterone that goes into a sex change set her over the edge. The next thing we knew she could be found daily with a bull horn shouting poorly contrived rants at passerbies walking on Hawthorne past the Baghdad Theater. Soon afterwards she went on her violent rampage of fist fighting and slashing tires. She is paranoid, violent, and crazy- need I say more?
Anyhow I would identify myself except I know that she will damn well be reading this and I do not want to be on her revenge list because she is dangerous and could potentially hurt people.
Posted by John Smoak | June 13, 2008 2:40 AM
My advice is if you ever come across this person avoid eye contact, and for God's sakes do not let *her know where you live or what car you drive! And whether *she goes to jail for *her last escapade is not the issue- *she is mentally ill and needs treatment, or at least kept away form the public for being a threat to *herself and others.
*Sorry about referring to Lee/Lisa as she or herself instead of some convoluted she/he/it preface. But to reiterate Lee/Lisa should is a very poor choice for the abused transgender poster child- the only worst choice I could think of would be Buffalo Bill, the fictional transgender serial killer from Silence of the Lambs- the one who abducted women and skinned them.
So to end on a positive note I can say this about Lee/Lisa- she is very, very good at training dogs. Really amazing!
Also maybe we could help heal the transgender issue by thinking of some better role models. So maybe let us know who is your favorite transgender personality and why?
Posted by John Smoak | June 13, 2008 3:14 AM
My apologies for some of my poorly worded entries above, but it's late night and my proof reading is off. Anyhow the fuse has been lit, so let’s watch the fireworks fly!
Posted by John Smoak | June 13, 2008 3:30 AM
FROM LISA:
Just for shits and giggles. John Smoak is Talbot Wallace. He is the manager at the Portland International Hostel. Talbot was just a hosteller when I met him and when he was homeless, I let him stay longer at the hostel. He eventually got on the board and bad mouthed me because I would not invite him to an event that many board members attended. I thought he was and still is a child. He obssessed about me like some many closet gays who get obssessed about people that they can not control. He was given the assistant managers job eventhough this was a clear violation of board ethics.
He then had hostellers cleaning his own private residence and then stay free at the hostel. Then having women from the hostel hot tub with him at his home. Poor Talbot has quite a labido problem and he just does not have any boundaries to his job. It is unfortunate that the Portland Hostel has allowed his behavior against me without holding him accountable. I did make a sexual harrassment complaint about him but Talbot kept trying to tell them that I was crazy to avoid the truth of his behavior.
But I still have a relationship with a board member who understands Queer oppression who will take care of poor Talbot Wallace's sorry ass.
Thanks for publically calling me crazy. When I was transitioning, Talbot took it upon himself to call me crazy. I was going to sue the organization but I figured Talbot would bury himself.
Thanks for the easy pay back!
Not a Good Queer on Google
Posted by Lee Iacuzzi | June 13, 2008 2:39 PM
Compassion automatically brings happiness and calmness. Then, even if you receive disturbing news, it will be easier to take, as your mind is still. But if you are agitated, even a minor happening will upset you greatly.
Posted by Veronica Lake | June 13, 2008 3:59 PM
First off I am not Talbot, but I am friends with Talbot. Talbot is one of the people who has a restraining order against Lisa because she has slashed his tires multiply times, and threatened him. If you happen to be around Lisa she will accuse you of anything under the sun especially sexual harassment. Talbot and other people have told Lisa on many occasions basically:
1) I do not want any trouble.
2) Please just leave us alone.
3) What did we ever do to you?
4) If you persist in stalking and threatening me and my friends or slash my tires again we will be forced to call the police.
Once again this is not Talbot- Talbot is happily married with a wife and they are raising a little girl and they just want to be left alone. They would really prefer to be at the bottom of the list of "Lisa's enemies".
As far as who I am- let's just say that I am an immature jerk who enjoys pissing off bullies, and can not resist throwing rocks at a wasp's nest to watch them go into a buzzing frenzy.
On a serious note though- the Mercury really dropped the ball taking by taking Lisa's side, and some simple research would show that she has been committed to a loony bin and is prescribed serious medication for mental issues, has been arrested for acts of violence and stalking, has restraining orders against her, has sued many people for frivolous lawsuits and sexual harassment.
As far as Talbot goes nobody- especially Talbot has any understanding as to why Lisa suddenly started going after him. Lisa was once a hostel manager and moved away to Boston. Then after another manager stepped down Talbot became the manager. When Lisa moved back to town at first they where on good terms then she went on her rampage of attacking people and slashing tires. And doing a lot of ranting with a bull horn in front of the Baghdad Theater. She actually used the bull horn a lot and would stand out side court houses after she lost her lawsuits shouting nonsense.
As far as the trans or bi gender issue goes- nobody cares what sex Lisa is. Only Lisa wants to make her identity into an issue- people just want to go along peaceably and not be psychically threatened by a nutso menace.
People are concerned because she is a crazy, violent, stalking, tire slashing psycho who may turn on anyone at anytime, and she likes to make up bullshit lawsuits.
Finally I will not reveal myself because I do not want to have Lisa come and try kill me in my sleep.
Favorite line from Hitchhiker's Guide Series: "Zaphod did not want to tangle with them and, deciding that just as discretion was the better part of valor, so was cowardice the better part of discretion, he valiantly hid himself in a closet."
Lisa can come out of whatever closet she wants to but I am hiding in mine from she/he/it.
Posted by John Smoak | June 13, 2008 4:46 PM
The real reason for posting on this blog is the next time Lee/Lisa goes after someone they will know who they are dealing with.
Here's a quote from her entry above #14:
"Also, get use to me getting press, because it is just the beginning."
This is actually the end. No more press for Lee/Lisa- this Mercury article is the most fame she will ever get or have, and it is already forgotten. She can have her MySpace page and her crazy ass blog, but that is about it. Her 15 minutes ia over- nobody is oppressing her, nobody is picking on her, and nobody is going after her. Mostly nobody cares. Her desperate need for attention will not get press again- that is unless she goes overboard and hurts someone.
Did anyone think it strange that a women's shelter would go out of their way to pick on a woman?
The fact of the matter is that the world is not out to get Lisa. Lisa may think that, since she has paranoid schizophrenic tendencies, but in reality the world would rather just go about its own business.
My work is now done here because the next time someone has to Google Lisa Iacuzzi because she is threatening them- this blog will pop up and they will know what they are dealing with.
PS Also when she goes to court on Monday her long record of arrests for violence, destruction, and stalking will weigh in on the court's decision, so at least for a while the world will be safe from Lee/Lisa. God help her cell mate!
Posted by John Smoak | June 13, 2008 5:32 PM
Lisa, you are once again off your meds and totally insane. It's nice to see that you've taken libel to whole new level. Can't wait to see you in prison---again!
Posted by DD | June 13, 2008 6:05 PM
FROM LISA:
This has all been great fun.
I think the story in Just Out talks about Bradley Angle and the trans community as a whole. Again, Bradley Angle has not been sued, my lawyers have shown an outrageous amount of work and dedication to trans rights. Matt Ellis is looking for a solution to end this problem so people like me will get safety. Letigation will take years which is not what the trans community needs.
Reach CDC is a huge organization with 988 units in the city and their womens' housing is only a small representation of their organization. Reach CDC has at least a three history with other gays in the building where they demonstrated severe negligence.
Lying in Court, and having someone deliberately arrested and harassed is over the top. Anytime that someone faces discrimination, their is a cost. Sometimes one does not live through it, it was close for me. Reach was hellish malicious expereince.
Lee
Not a Good Queer on google
Posted by Not a Good Queer | June 13, 2008 6:22 PM
Great fun? Really like the time your where in court and they played the tapes of the messages you left threatening a friend of mine repeatedly. (That was brilliant! and showed intelligence! Of course you denied ever threatening anyone but thankfully my friend had the foresight to save all your phone messages). Great fun? like when Judge Judy questioned you about your mental health and all the heavy meds you where on, and decided that you unprotected attacked another friend of mine? SURE! I would get SANCTIMONIOUS right about now. I also remember when you came over to a friend of mine's house and demanded that he give you a bag of weed or you would kick his ass. Of course he gave you the weed, so that you would leave, but you still returned the next day and punched him in the face. (We still joke about how he got beat up by a girl, but Lee/Lisa really does pack a wallop!!!(and to be fair he really is a pacifist))
By the way if you are following this flame war the above statements are true with the identities of Lisa's victims left out.
So I agree this is great fun! Hope you enjoy all the great fun in jail after Monday. Maybe one day you will follow your restraining orders, but to be fair you have so many of them it will be hard to be anywhere in Portland where you won't be bumping into someone you are courted order to stay 30 yards away from at all times.
Posted by John Smoak | June 13, 2008 8:07 PM
Well I guess congratulations are in order! By the way have you been standing on any street corners lately shouting at people with your bull horn? Did the courts finally take it away from you? For a while you were a landmark- the crazy shouting lady in front of the Baghdad Theater.
Your one person movement is really amazing! Normally a movement is more than one person off there meds running around attacking people, but sure we will all go along with this one. It would be nice if your "movement" had other people in it, but then again you would most likely attack them sooner or later. Still you must be proud to bask in the glory of suing women's shelters and community non-profit groups- essentially anyone forced to deal with you.
The fact is your past is catching up to you. The court system is going to get tired of dealing with you- and if you want to be made a hero for your last escapade of breaking your restraining order go ahead!
I should not being jabbing at you right now- I should as others are doing encourage you to get back on your meds. The fact is sooner or later everyone will know your reputation and no one will want to have anything to do with Lee/Lisa Iacuzzi.
By the way it is really unclear just what these shelters are doing to you. Really just how are they discriminating against you- just seemed like they were trying to find a nice way to get rid of you without resorting to calling in the cops. You of course took their kindness and sued them for trying to be decent and give you a break. They obviously did not know who they were dealing with.
Posted by John Smoak | June 13, 2008 11:13 PM
At the very top of the page Matt Davis asserts that Not A Good Queer Or Anything Else,is a hate blog run by Rose tenants,and he provides a link. If you take a look at the site you will see that is dedicated to how to deal with the menace that is Lee/Lisa Iacuzzi who was terrorising the inhabitants of the Rose. (All anyone has to do to get on Lisa's revenge list is to be perceived as friends of someone she has it in for.)
After taking a look at the site I now wonder why Matt Davis is getting involved and why he is misrepresenting Iacuzzi as a victim. Before I was wondering if Matt Davis did not have the facts because he did not do his research before he submitted this story, but it seems that he did in fact have an inkling of Lisa's past and deliberately left out obviously important facts like all of her previous court cases, arrests, and mental illness issues.
This is a clear case of trying to make a story out of nothing. Also using Lisa to represent the plight of transgendered people is really insulting. What minority wants to be linked associated with someone who has a history of violence and mental illness? Lisa does not want to work for change. She is just looking for a way to entrap an organization and sue for a quick buck.
If anyone is still reading this you can be the judge (Just seems everyone is just tired of living in terror of Lisa) Either go to http://notagoodqueer-oae.blogspot.com/ or you can read the following copied directly from Not A Good Queer Or Anything Else:
DO NOT approach Lisa Iacuzzi.
AVOID Lisa Iacuzzi. 29 days in the jail psycho ward should give you a clue why.
DO NOT show fear. Serial bullies like Lisa feed on fear; when you show it, it only encourages them to escalate their abuse. Don't feed the monkey; ignore Lisa as if she isn't there.
One tenant reports a face-to-face encounter in which Lisa castigated the tenant for signing a “document” (or “petition” -- Lisa is still vague as to what, exactly, a majority of Rose tenants signed. Lisa's claim that it was full of lies can be dismissed as the gibberish it is). To be sure, Lisa's threats were only of the vague “I'll get you!” variety, as opposed to the concrete “When I get out, I'm gonna kill you!” threat Lisa uttered during her arrest in November.
The tenant's calm response in this encounter caused the usual response in Lisa: she scuttled off. Of course, this calm response or no-response tactic falls flat, in the face of another person who encountered Lisa. When Lisa attempted to photograph her with her ubiquitous cell, that person grabbed the cell, told Lisa that if she took her picture again, she'd shove it up...... er, where the sun doesn't shine. Lisa's reaction was the same: she scuttled off. It's the usual response of a coward, which is what a bully is, and Lisa is nothing if not a bully. But that's not a response most of us would prefer to engage in.
If an encounter with Lisa is unavoidable, remain calm and DO NOT run. If Lisa taunts you and tries to provoke you, DO NOT react. Or, if you feel you must respond, either laugh her off, or tell her, kindly, “I'll be praying for you, Lisa.” But make sure you mean it.
Bear in mind that, despite her vicious antics, Lisa Iacuzzi is a human being, and a deeply disturbed one. It's possible she's menopausal, which would make it worse. Whatever hatred she has shown to others must be nowhere near as great as her hatred of herself. Considering the viciousness Lisa has shown to others, especially to African Americans and gay women, her self-hatred must be a terrible burden for her to bear. Lisa Iacuzzi is more to be pitied than anything else.
The best thing to do, if you encounter Lisa, can't avoid her, feel you can't ignore her harassment, feel you will burst if you don't respond, simply tell her as kindly as you can, “I'll be praying for you, Lisa.”
AGAIN SPECIAL THANKS TO MATT DAVIS
Thanks again Matt for inferring that this is a "hate" blog, and that the tenants that live at the Rose are a bunch of intolerant haters and gay bashers. Really- your best work yet!
So how are you going to top this? Are you going to start defending the person who puts poison meat in parks to kill dogs- you might as well if you are press and defending giving to Iacuzzi. Journalistic integrity must seem like an idealistic joke to you.
Posted by John Smoak | June 14, 2008 1:12 AM
Talbot Wallace is a responsible, intelligent, caring, and civil person who would never have anything to do with anything this nasty and stupid. TO BE VERY CLEAR HE HAS NOTHING TO DO WITH THIS BLOG!
Furthermore Talbot Wallace is a great guy who is involved in many community projects and Portland is lucky to have him.
He and his family understandably want to be left out of this mess. They have really solid good priorities and causing trouble is not one of them.
So I really screwed up in inadvertently getting his name mentioned in this blog. Also it never occurred to me that I would be mistaken for him. He is an upstanding professional and would never stoop to anything this crass. I owe him his family and friends an apology.
So please leave him out of this discussion.
I feel that I have both very legitimate and illegitimate reasons for posting on this blog, but I would have forgoed it, if I thought that my friends or others would have been mentioned in the slightest.
Finally Lee I will address you directly (albeit anonymously) just this once- T.W. contacted me directly and asked me to make sure you knew that he knew nothing about this blog until after the fact and does not want to stir up any trouble.
I ACTED ALONE! MY BAD!!!
Posted by John Smoak | June 15, 2008 1:06 AM
lee is an extremely negative individual who does nothing for the community. I am very disappointed that the Mercury gave lee a half of a page article. As someone who has been involved in the community for years, I have come in contact with Lee numerous times. He/She is one of the most abrasive, sick people I have come across. He/She is verbally abusive to numerous folks. I am really embarrassed for the Mercury. Is no one on your staff at all involved in the community? Lee is notorious for being an abusive, dangerous person. And i think you all should address that in your next issue. I, like numerous other folks who are active in the community, was disturbed by the press he/she recieved. It's wrong.
Posted by m.skinner | June 15, 2008 2:41 AM
The reason Bradley Angle house never came to "stop the abuse" is because Lee/Lisa is an extremely abusive person him/herself. I have worked in the social services field for 8 years in Portland, and I know of numerous agencies who have had difficulties with this person. Lee/Lisa's problems are not just a result of their bigendered identification. It is a result of their abusive, manipulative behavior.
Posted by ashley | June 15, 2008 2:49 AM
I just read some of Lee's comments. Lee says " He obssessed about me like some many closet gays who get obssessed about people that they can not control"
What are you talking about? You not only don't make any sense, but you are also are voicing some really negative stereotypes about "closet gays". You show a complete lack of sensitivity. You aren't doing this to help people. And you're not an ally at all. You say negative things about "closet gays" but expect people to side with you?
You aren't an ally. You're a very angry person with no positive outlet. You feed off of fear and negativity, and that's extremely sad.
Posted by m.skinner | June 15, 2008 2:58 AM
TIS BUT THY NAME THAT IS MY ENEMY
"Tis but thy name that is my enemy. What's in a name? That which we will call a rose. By any other word would smell as sweet."
Alas! Alas! if only Sir Shakespeare but knew of the tragedy of the star and gender crossed Lee/Lisa...
I would like to bury the hatchet on this one by addressing issues that LEEE has presented in this blog.
Evidentially by calling this person still legally named "Lisa Iacuzzi", Lisa I am being insensitive to a segment of society.
TO QUOTE LEEE: Nobody calls me Lisa. I say calling me Lisa and not by my gender name is transphobia. When people say Lisa, I correct them quickly. Lee can be both he and she. I do sign my name Lisa to my work for psychological purposes. I lived 39 years as Lisa.
Firstly LEEE infers that Lisa can only be she a she name and not a he name- I feel that this is untrue and a slap in the face to anyone who identifies as a male and wants to be "Lisa" for whatever reason. For example what of Johnny Cash's "A Boy Named Sue" But she is right names are important.
Perhaps dialogue from the movie Airplane expresses it best:
TED STRIKER:
Surely you can't be serious.
RUMCAK(Leslie Nielsen):
I am serious... and don't call me Shirley.
The reason why I referred to her as Lisa is because in her own words "I lived 39 years as Lisa." I only knew her as "Lisa" and then a few restraining orders later more commonly "Crazy Lisa".
To the best of our knowledge the moment she decided to publicly announce that her preferred name was "Lee" was on the Judge Judy show, which came as news to us all! However, we thought at first it was just a publicity stunt and had no idea the name was supposed to stick for good. Also LEEE states that no pronoun can describe her, which does cause difficulties in referring to her in 2nd person. Matt Davis attempted the he/she vehicle; however it is not fully appropriate. The only known similar delihima was when Prince decided that he no longer had a name at all, so a perplexed media started to calling him "The Artist Formerly Known as Prince". With Lisa something in a similar vein may work like "the person who may no longer be referred to as he or she for being insentive for reasons that are to complicated to get into just now", which for convince sake may be shortened to the acronym: tpwmnlbrtahosfbifrtatctgijn which just sort of rolls of the tongue. This would avoid complications like when Judge Judy addressed LEEE "Ma'am, I mean Sir- whatever" if Judge Jude had instead just used the soon to be widespread word “tpwmnlbrtahosfbifrtatctgijn”.
By the way I am trade registering the word "tpwmnlbrtahosfbifrtatctgijn", so hands off Mercury!!!
A better word for referring to LEEE in 2nd person might be just to remove the / in he/she and just have a new pronoun "heshe" pronounced "Hee'-sheey" which can refer to someone who wants to claim either both genders or neither. And the posseive form could be "heher" pronounced "Hee'-hur" not to be confused with the similar sounding "Hee'-haw".
I am also patenting the word "heshe" and "heher", so hands off Matt Davis!!!
Also now that I know that Lisa's idea to call hesheself (it's mine!)Lee, and it was not just a stunt or a new fad she was trying out I will refer to her as Lee. The whole Lee/Lisa thing could be avoided if she would just legally change her name to what she wants to be called- I do not think it is fair to be accused of being obsessed by referring to someone by their legal name. By the way LEE sarcastic thanks for earlier referring to me as Joan instead of John- at first it hut but it has started to stir up the most curious feelings and I kinda like... ur, um, wait where am I going with this?
To mack a long story short what I just meant to say is Sure no problem!- Instead of referring to heher as "Crazy Lisa" heher estranged friends will just start calling heher "Crazy Lee" instead.
Posted by John Smoak | June 15, 2008 3:58 PM
To John Smoak:
Until, Mr. Smoake (sic) and Mirrors, you have your own objective study supporting your claims, we can safely ignore your comments - and move on to a productive discussion based on those issues that have been objectively verified.
Matt Davis's article is based on an objective investigation of Reach CDC by Kerry Johnson from the Bureau of Labor and Industry - who found that Lee's claim of discrimination was true.
How is it possible that an institution like The Bradley Angle House that is supposed to be protecting the most vulnerable people in our society - is given non-profit status by our government and is allowed free reign to discriminate against transgendered people?
Paul Hamilton
Posted by Paul Hamilton | June 15, 2008 6:35 PM
I agree!
Hopefully Lee wins and get the $350,000 that is rightfully hers, and then can go on to sue that other place.
YOU GO GIRL!!!
Posted by Shirley | June 15, 2008 6:56 PM
There is no such thing as bi-gendered. There is such a thing as a hermaphrodite wherein someone possesses both types of sexual organs fully or vestigially. "Gender" is a psychological term, a social term and the "gender" wars are about power not a plea for understanding.
No one is born with the "wrong gender" or with both "genders". It is not physically possible. The term "gender" is a social construct not a physical state of being. Sexual organs are a physical state of being. They have a limited use and do not make you buy shoes or like football.
People are socialized to believe things about "gender" and make decisions to accept or deny social behaviors based on false concepts about how "gender" relates to behavior.
There is power in stereotypes and "gender" is laden with them. The individuals who seek alternate gender recognition are doing so because they perceive a level of power available in the gender they do not possess. The desire for this social acceptance based on the general affirmation of a stereotype causes intellectual conflict within and without.
The use of emotional and social manipulation to "prove" they have the "wrong gender" is driven by the need to gain the power that the stereotype they wish to embody will give them. Hiding behind "gender misidentification" allows them to demand that society help them to ignore their deeper psychological issues (all of which were created by social concepts which certain aspects of society benefit from by keeping in place)
The "gender" wars are not helping anyone. They are not helping society. They are selfish and petty and further damage any ability for people to be human instead of characters.
Posted by an Observer | June 19, 2008 5:48 PM
http://blogtown.portlandmercury.com/2008/06/manwoman_sues_womens_shelters.php
Kiala Says:
June 14th, 2008 at 2:03 am
I have to ask why you are failed to mention Lee/Lisa Iacuzzi’s history of assaulting, and threatening people with violence? There are plenty of court cases, restraining orders, and police reports that verify this. She was even on Judge Judy for attacking someone.
Matt Davis Says:
June 14th, 2008 at 6:56 am
And who are you, John?
John Smoak Says:
June 14th, 2008 at 10:37 am
I am a guy who used to work with Lisa. 3 of my friends have been to court over her either stalking or assaulting them. Some of these guys have restraining orders against her and she has slashed tires on a few occasions before. One of the court cases was open and shut because my friend saved all the messages that Lisa had sent to him accusing him of crazy things and making threats.
With one friend she showed up his house demanded weed, which he gave to her so she would go away. The friend was a pacifist that Lisa believed could he easily bullied. She showed up the next day and when he demanded that she leave she punched him in the face (this is the case that ended up on Judge Judy).
My issue with Lisa's that as one person put it she is a serial bully- she does not just pick fights with people- she picks fights with really nice and civiled people that she can push around. As you can probably tell at heart I am irrsopnsible and don’t really fall into that catagory. However I do know that Lisa’s beshavior will continue and that other peole will be picked on and terroized by her and that giving her favorable press will just add fuel to the fire.
I should apoloigise for my rants against you on the blog- they where unfair cheap shots, but I reallydo beleive the biggest error was insinuating that poeple have been picking on Lisa. If there is someone who has a history of violence, vandalism, stalking, and mental illness there really are not that many peole lining up to get in her line of fire voluntairly.
Evidentally she is good at playing the victim and getting the press on her side. My question still bacically why did you and the others who cover stories on her not mention her criminal history? And I do not mean bring up her jaywalking tickets. Since her court cases are public record I assume getting information on her criminal history should be easy. I assume that it just takes a search on a legal database (maybe I am wrong and this information is harder to get to than I thought).
John Smoak Says:
June 14th, 2008 at 10:39 am
PS Sorry there was a glitch and my response got sent while I was proofing it, so I apologise for the bad grammar and misspellings.
Laura M Says:
June 25th, 2008 at 11:14 pm
Matt, I think John makes an excellent point. Why didn’t you reference the rather extensive paper trail available via police records, county court records, and neighborhood association complaints? It’s certainly relevant and you ignored it entirely. Was it laziness on your part or did you feel that your readers should only be informed by Lee/Lisa and his/her lawyer? In either scenario, it’s just terrible journalism and doesn’t speak well of your professional ethics or integrity.
Please answer the question, why did you ignore or fail to reference reams of public records when writing this story?
FROM LISA:
Not a Good Hate Says:
June 29th, 2008 at 6:37 pm
I would like to thank Matt personally of trying to start another hate blog against Not a Good Queer. I want to let the readers know about the hate blog already written by the tenants of the Rose. It is here where the state found substanial evidence of gender discrimination.
Did it ever make you think that people who try to get stalking orders on people are being used as a payback. Did you ever think that a city with such totting of public anger, behaves quietly behind close doors to smear people. People like me who are right, hold you accountable, and make you feel uncomfortable. People like me make you feel uncomfortable because the world you live in, is blind to hate and motivators of retaliation to those who speak out.
This behavior is Portland, writing messages without signing ones name demonstrates the cities childhood obsessed behavior.
Also, I have be given enough experience and go to the legislature and complain that stalking orders and restraining orders are being misused as retaliatory behavior versus really being a victim. I think the court should pentalize those who try to get a restraining order, stalking order, they can’t get it, because it is seen as the judges as bullshit, that it should be reomoved from ones record.
I could go down to the court house on Monday and put on a stalking order against Joh Smoak, this would be on his record. Imagine, pissing off your friends, then they hate you as much as they loved you and they are freaked out about their own sexuality forget the understanding of ones gender which is so far removed from most brains.
I am Mr. Potatoe head. Potatoe head best explains gender. You can dress it up, but it is still a potatoe. I can wear a dress, and maybe put on a bra, but I am still different. As a matter of fact, this was said to me once in college by a professor in a full classrom. He said that lesbians can wear skirts but every one knows thier lesbians because they are so uncomfortable in their skirts.
I have to be nice to haters. Read Not a Good Queer on Google. Their is already a hate blog, but I guess know their is two hate blogs. I am flattered.
See ya
Lee
Laura M Says:
June 29th, 2008 at 10:59 pm
Hi Matt, still waiting for an answer. I’m really interested in knowing why you chose to ignore the ample evidence provided to you through public records.
Lee, so in your imagination the stalking and restraining orders against you are purely retalitory measures from transphobic people? You’ve never threatened anyone? Harassed them at their place of work? Yelled slurs like “faggot” and “dyke” at people who oppose you (by the way, so classy coming from someone who claims to champion queer rights)? Slashed tires? “Borrowed” cars from differently abled people without returning them, save by force? Bullied and intimidated? Physically attacked others? And that’s just a short list of the allegations. All of these are lies? I don’t think so.
Lee, you’re sick. You need help. Medicine. Therapy. Support. It’s got nothing to do with your gender, it’s got everything to do with untreated bi-polar disorder. Please stop using your transgender/bi-gendered status as a foil to carry out your petty revenge on people who disagree with you. It demeans the movement and discredits those who legitimately face discrimination because of their gender identification. Stop.
Matt Davis Says:
June 30th, 2008 at 10:01 am
I’m not answering any of these comments, and if you people persist in posting boring, weird, threatening stuff on here I’m just going to take the post down.
Laura M Says:
June 30th, 2008 at 10:52 am
Matt, you screwed up. Own it.
http://mattdavisopenshismouth.com/2008/06/manwoman-sues-womens-shelters-for-discrimination/
06/14/2008 08:55 AM
There are some very irresponsible journalists reporting on Lee/Lisa Iacuzzi referring to her as an activist or someone who is being picked on everyone from women's shelters, to community based non-profits, to tenants.
The truth is for anyone who knows Lisa Iacuzzi is that she is often off her meds, and that she frequently pyshically assaulted and threatens people. She has many arrests, convictions, and restraining orders against her, which are all part of public record, so any time the media reports on Iacuzzi's claims, and omits out this vital information out it is a travesty.
Lisa Iacuzzi is going to court on Monday and will most likely be doing end up doing time in jail for breaking one of her many restraining orders. She also has a history of stalking people and slashing tires. Be sure though that after she physically attacks someone or in the middle of the night vandalizes their property that she will cry that she is a victim. She wraps herself in the whole transgender, gay abuse issues to gain sympathy and justification for her actions. She is actually just a serial bully and pathological liar looking for attention.
Matt Davis, the journalist for the Mercury, omitted all of this- there is evidence that he knew of her history of violence, being a menace, and her severe mental illness, but decided deliberately to leave this out of his story. Also there is no excuse for him to claim that he did not know about Lisa Iacuzzi's terror sprees- it is all part of public record and she has even been on Judge Judy and lost for punching someone without cause. What is even worse is that Matt Davis infers that a woman's shelter and tenants in an apartment have been intolerant haters and gay bashing because they had trouble with Lisa.
The only thing that people need to know about Lisa Iacuzzi is who is currently on her revenge list, so they can sleep with one eye open, and jump at anything that goes bump in the night because it may well be Lisa lurking around in the dark
http://www.yourstreet.com/2008/6/12/21/3514622/man-woman-sues-women-s-shelters-for-discrimination
What follows is a number of comments on the Mercury's fluff. Lisa, naturally, responded to every one of the comments. Most of Lisa's comments have been elided, due to space considerations, and because we've heard her apologiae pro sua vita before.
We note, with some surprise, that Lisa's former fellow employees have a far lower opinion of her, if possible, than any we have heard from her former neighbours.
With our customary modesty, we at NAGQ-OAE point to the favorable comments on our magnificent blog.
Here are the comments. Enjoy.
Not A Good Queer-Or Anything Else
Still we rise! (despite our inclinations to sleep late)
===================
Suing a women's shelter: Class.
Posted by C-Ho | June 12, 2008 9:51 AM
I thought Bradley Angle House had a specific program for an all genders queer support group (among MANY other support groups). I'm wondering if when they gave her/him info for the male shelter, they were just trying to offer her/him as many options as possible. Every experience with women's shelters/crisis lines in the Portland area I've had have been extremely queer/transgender friendly.
Posted by Hmmm | June 12, 2008 12:31 PM
Also, if the case has merit, then I'm glad Iacuzzi is pursuing it to the extent that discriminatory policies could be fixed. However, to try to get money from a shelter seems really wrong. You'll just be taking it away from other people in need. People donate to that shelter hoping to help families in need, not to pay for lawsuits.
Posted by Hmmm | June 12, 2008 12:37 PM
Yowza! I can see that Lisa/Lee is angry.
"I think this behavior is consistent with the womens community who throw rocks and then cry victim!" - False generalization?
"How about Bradley Angle House changing their programs to be EQUAL for trans folk and stop their discriminatory policies." - I agree that they should stop discriminatory policies if those exist... but they are a 'women's' shelter who support women and children who are trying to escape from domestic abuse. Was their transgender/queer support group not in place when you were at their shelter?
"How about the 15 times I called the police for death threats and Bradley Angle house who works with the police never came to interfere or stop the abuse." It is awful that you have had to live through this, but is it the Bradley Angle's house's responsibility to come to your house? I think most advocates would leave that up to the police (even if just for liability reasons alone).
"They also case managed residents who I lived with who they did not stop but encouraged them for a "women" only environment." - I'm not entirely sure what this means, but I imagine that a lot of women who are escaping abusive situations feel safer in a shelter that consists of women. The fact that Lee/Lisa sometimes identifies as a man may have triggered fear in some of the women.
I was just voicing concerns over some issues I see rising out of Lee/Lisa's lawsuit. I was always willing to give Lee/Lisa the benefit of the doubt...but maybe not anymore.
Posted by Hmmm | June 12, 2008 10:29 PM
It is unfortunate to see that the Mercury is giving any time whatsoever to the Lee/Lisa story. While there is no question that discrimination of any type is a serious problem of society, what this article fails to realize, is that this person is certainly not a model citizen of Portland by any reasonable person's definition. While one wants to empathize with someone who feels they are being discrimated against, one should also consider the source. Lee/Lisa is well-knowned throughout this city as several of Portland's Finest put it "one of the biggest nuts on the streets." he/he has a long record of mental illness, arrests, restraining orders, and frivilous lawsuits. Just read the NOT A GOOD QUEER BLOG, to get a sense of how convuoleted his/her sense of reality really is. While there is not question that he/she may have to deal with a great amount of ignorance and most likely prejudice from the greater populace regarding his/her gender identification, it is asinine for him/her to sue places like the Bradley House, bc it takes $ from the very services that were there to help him/her in the first place.
If you get beyond his/her sanctimonious reheoric, you'll find that Lee/Lisa is nothing more than an bully that is trying to work the system under the guise of someone who is being oppressed.
Posted by j | June 13, 2008 12:38 AM
The Mercury and specifically Matt Davis totally fucked this story up. "Crazy Lisa" (to those who know her well) is "clinically insane" (seriously no joke or exaggeration) and has even been on Judge Judy for punching a pacifist in the face. I worked with her directly and know for a fact that she has unprovoked attacked people (even challenged me to a fight) and has slashed many tires. To leave out the facts that- Lee/Lisa is well-known throughout this city as several of Portland's Finest put it "one of the biggest nuts on the streets." he/he has a long record of mental illness, arrests, restraining orders, and frivolous lawsuits is unconscionable journalism. All of these court cases are part of public record and journalists have tools beyond Google like LexisNexis to research stories like this, so if the Mercury wants any credibility at all it their reports should at least attempt to get their facts straight and present the full story.
This (the violence and unstability) is all part of public record so Matt Davis who wrote this article is either sloppy and does not know how to do basic journalistic research or deliberately misrepresented the facts for a better story, which amounts to either being stoopid or an asshole hack.
Now lets move on to "Crazy Lee/Lisa". Once again I worked with her directly and yes she was nuts. We actually had a goodbye, friendly party for her when she at one time decided to move away from Portland and moved to Boston, and many people where relieved that she was leaving because she was obviously nuts. But then she returned and renewed old acquaintances, and then for some reason declared war on everyone and started attacking people- physically and slashing tires. We wondered what set her off and to be truthful many believe that it's the whole bigendered thing. Now when I say "the whole bigendered thing" it's not the fact that Lee/Lisa has gender issues- it's more along the lines that she was seemingly chemically unbalanced to begin with and all of the hormones and testosterone that goes into a sex change set her over the edge. The next thing we knew she could be found daily with a bull horn shouting poorly contrived rants at passerbies walking on Hawthorne past the Baghdad Theater. Soon afterwards she went on her violent rampage of fist fighting and slashing tires. She is paranoid, violent, and crazy- need I say more?
Anyhow I would identify myself except I know that she will damn well be reading this and I do not want to be on her revenge list because she is dangerous and could potentially hurt people.
Posted by John Smoak | June 13, 2008 2:40 AM
My advice is if you ever come across this person avoid eye contact, and for God's sakes do not let *her know where you live or what car you drive! And whether *she goes to jail for *her last escapade is not the issue- *she is mentally ill and needs treatment, or at least kept away form the public for being a threat to *herself and others.
*Sorry about referring to Lee/Lisa as she or herself instead of some convoluted she/he/it preface. But to reiterate Lee/Lisa should is a very poor choice for the abused transgender poster child- the only worst choice I could think of would be Buffalo Bill, the fictional transgender serial killer from Silence of the Lambs- the one who abducted women and skinned them.
So to end on a positive note I can say this about Lee/Lisa- she is very, very good at training dogs. Really amazing!
Also maybe we could help heal the transgender issue by thinking of some better role models. So maybe let us know who is your favorite transgender personality and why?
Posted by John Smoak | June 13, 2008 3:14 AM
My apologies for some of my poorly worded entries above, but it's late night and my proof reading is off. Anyhow the fuse has been lit, so let’s watch the fireworks fly!
Posted by John Smoak | June 13, 2008 3:30 AM
FROM LISA:
Just for shits and giggles. John Smoak is Talbot Wallace. He is the manager at the Portland International Hostel. Talbot was just a hosteller when I met him and when he was homeless, I let him stay longer at the hostel. He eventually got on the board and bad mouthed me because I would not invite him to an event that many board members attended. I thought he was and still is a child. He obssessed about me like some many closet gays who get obssessed about people that they can not control. He was given the assistant managers job eventhough this was a clear violation of board ethics.
He then had hostellers cleaning his own private residence and then stay free at the hostel. Then having women from the hostel hot tub with him at his home. Poor Talbot has quite a labido problem and he just does not have any boundaries to his job. It is unfortunate that the Portland Hostel has allowed his behavior against me without holding him accountable. I did make a sexual harrassment complaint about him but Talbot kept trying to tell them that I was crazy to avoid the truth of his behavior.
But I still have a relationship with a board member who understands Queer oppression who will take care of poor Talbot Wallace's sorry ass.
Thanks for publically calling me crazy. When I was transitioning, Talbot took it upon himself to call me crazy. I was going to sue the organization but I figured Talbot would bury himself.
Thanks for the easy pay back!
Not a Good Queer on Google
Posted by Lee Iacuzzi | June 13, 2008 2:39 PM
Compassion automatically brings happiness and calmness. Then, even if you receive disturbing news, it will be easier to take, as your mind is still. But if you are agitated, even a minor happening will upset you greatly.
Posted by Veronica Lake | June 13, 2008 3:59 PM
First off I am not Talbot, but I am friends with Talbot. Talbot is one of the people who has a restraining order against Lisa because she has slashed his tires multiply times, and threatened him. If you happen to be around Lisa she will accuse you of anything under the sun especially sexual harassment. Talbot and other people have told Lisa on many occasions basically:
1) I do not want any trouble.
2) Please just leave us alone.
3) What did we ever do to you?
4) If you persist in stalking and threatening me and my friends or slash my tires again we will be forced to call the police.
Once again this is not Talbot- Talbot is happily married with a wife and they are raising a little girl and they just want to be left alone. They would really prefer to be at the bottom of the list of "Lisa's enemies".
As far as who I am- let's just say that I am an immature jerk who enjoys pissing off bullies, and can not resist throwing rocks at a wasp's nest to watch them go into a buzzing frenzy.
On a serious note though- the Mercury really dropped the ball taking by taking Lisa's side, and some simple research would show that she has been committed to a loony bin and is prescribed serious medication for mental issues, has been arrested for acts of violence and stalking, has restraining orders against her, has sued many people for frivolous lawsuits and sexual harassment.
As far as Talbot goes nobody- especially Talbot has any understanding as to why Lisa suddenly started going after him. Lisa was once a hostel manager and moved away to Boston. Then after another manager stepped down Talbot became the manager. When Lisa moved back to town at first they where on good terms then she went on her rampage of attacking people and slashing tires. And doing a lot of ranting with a bull horn in front of the Baghdad Theater. She actually used the bull horn a lot and would stand out side court houses after she lost her lawsuits shouting nonsense.
As far as the trans or bi gender issue goes- nobody cares what sex Lisa is. Only Lisa wants to make her identity into an issue- people just want to go along peaceably and not be psychically threatened by a nutso menace.
People are concerned because she is a crazy, violent, stalking, tire slashing psycho who may turn on anyone at anytime, and she likes to make up bullshit lawsuits.
Finally I will not reveal myself because I do not want to have Lisa come and try kill me in my sleep.
Favorite line from Hitchhiker's Guide Series: "Zaphod did not want to tangle with them and, deciding that just as discretion was the better part of valor, so was cowardice the better part of discretion, he valiantly hid himself in a closet."
Lisa can come out of whatever closet she wants to but I am hiding in mine from she/he/it.
Posted by John Smoak | June 13, 2008 4:46 PM
The real reason for posting on this blog is the next time Lee/Lisa goes after someone they will know who they are dealing with.
Here's a quote from her entry above #14:
"Also, get use to me getting press, because it is just the beginning."
This is actually the end. No more press for Lee/Lisa- this Mercury article is the most fame she will ever get or have, and it is already forgotten. She can have her MySpace page and her crazy ass blog, but that is about it. Her 15 minutes ia over- nobody is oppressing her, nobody is picking on her, and nobody is going after her. Mostly nobody cares. Her desperate need for attention will not get press again- that is unless she goes overboard and hurts someone.
Did anyone think it strange that a women's shelter would go out of their way to pick on a woman?
The fact of the matter is that the world is not out to get Lisa. Lisa may think that, since she has paranoid schizophrenic tendencies, but in reality the world would rather just go about its own business.
My work is now done here because the next time someone has to Google Lisa Iacuzzi because she is threatening them- this blog will pop up and they will know what they are dealing with.
PS Also when she goes to court on Monday her long record of arrests for violence, destruction, and stalking will weigh in on the court's decision, so at least for a while the world will be safe from Lee/Lisa. God help her cell mate!
Posted by John Smoak | June 13, 2008 5:32 PM
Lisa, you are once again off your meds and totally insane. It's nice to see that you've taken libel to whole new level. Can't wait to see you in prison---again!
Posted by DD | June 13, 2008 6:05 PM
FROM LISA:
This has all been great fun.
I think the story in Just Out talks about Bradley Angle and the trans community as a whole. Again, Bradley Angle has not been sued, my lawyers have shown an outrageous amount of work and dedication to trans rights. Matt Ellis is looking for a solution to end this problem so people like me will get safety. Letigation will take years which is not what the trans community needs.
Reach CDC is a huge organization with 988 units in the city and their womens' housing is only a small representation of their organization. Reach CDC has at least a three history with other gays in the building where they demonstrated severe negligence.
Lying in Court, and having someone deliberately arrested and harassed is over the top. Anytime that someone faces discrimination, their is a cost. Sometimes one does not live through it, it was close for me. Reach was hellish malicious expereince.
Lee
Not a Good Queer on google
Posted by Not a Good Queer | June 13, 2008 6:22 PM
Great fun? Really like the time your where in court and they played the tapes of the messages you left threatening a friend of mine repeatedly. (That was brilliant! and showed intelligence! Of course you denied ever threatening anyone but thankfully my friend had the foresight to save all your phone messages). Great fun? like when Judge Judy questioned you about your mental health and all the heavy meds you where on, and decided that you unprotected attacked another friend of mine? SURE! I would get SANCTIMONIOUS right about now. I also remember when you came over to a friend of mine's house and demanded that he give you a bag of weed or you would kick his ass. Of course he gave you the weed, so that you would leave, but you still returned the next day and punched him in the face. (We still joke about how he got beat up by a girl, but Lee/Lisa really does pack a wallop!!!(and to be fair he really is a pacifist))
By the way if you are following this flame war the above statements are true with the identities of Lisa's victims left out.
So I agree this is great fun! Hope you enjoy all the great fun in jail after Monday. Maybe one day you will follow your restraining orders, but to be fair you have so many of them it will be hard to be anywhere in Portland where you won't be bumping into someone you are courted order to stay 30 yards away from at all times.
Posted by John Smoak | June 13, 2008 8:07 PM
Well I guess congratulations are in order! By the way have you been standing on any street corners lately shouting at people with your bull horn? Did the courts finally take it away from you? For a while you were a landmark- the crazy shouting lady in front of the Baghdad Theater.
Your one person movement is really amazing! Normally a movement is more than one person off there meds running around attacking people, but sure we will all go along with this one. It would be nice if your "movement" had other people in it, but then again you would most likely attack them sooner or later. Still you must be proud to bask in the glory of suing women's shelters and community non-profit groups- essentially anyone forced to deal with you.
The fact is your past is catching up to you. The court system is going to get tired of dealing with you- and if you want to be made a hero for your last escapade of breaking your restraining order go ahead!
I should not being jabbing at you right now- I should as others are doing encourage you to get back on your meds. The fact is sooner or later everyone will know your reputation and no one will want to have anything to do with Lee/Lisa Iacuzzi.
By the way it is really unclear just what these shelters are doing to you. Really just how are they discriminating against you- just seemed like they were trying to find a nice way to get rid of you without resorting to calling in the cops. You of course took their kindness and sued them for trying to be decent and give you a break. They obviously did not know who they were dealing with.
Posted by John Smoak | June 13, 2008 11:13 PM
At the very top of the page Matt Davis asserts that Not A Good Queer Or Anything Else,is a hate blog run by Rose tenants,and he provides a link. If you take a look at the site you will see that is dedicated to how to deal with the menace that is Lee/Lisa Iacuzzi who was terrorising the inhabitants of the Rose. (All anyone has to do to get on Lisa's revenge list is to be perceived as friends of someone she has it in for.)
After taking a look at the site I now wonder why Matt Davis is getting involved and why he is misrepresenting Iacuzzi as a victim. Before I was wondering if Matt Davis did not have the facts because he did not do his research before he submitted this story, but it seems that he did in fact have an inkling of Lisa's past and deliberately left out obviously important facts like all of her previous court cases, arrests, and mental illness issues.
This is a clear case of trying to make a story out of nothing. Also using Lisa to represent the plight of transgendered people is really insulting. What minority wants to be linked associated with someone who has a history of violence and mental illness? Lisa does not want to work for change. She is just looking for a way to entrap an organization and sue for a quick buck.
If anyone is still reading this you can be the judge (Just seems everyone is just tired of living in terror of Lisa) Either go to http://notagoodqueer-oae.blogspot.com/ or you can read the following copied directly from Not A Good Queer Or Anything Else:
DO NOT approach Lisa Iacuzzi.
AVOID Lisa Iacuzzi. 29 days in the jail psycho ward should give you a clue why.
DO NOT show fear. Serial bullies like Lisa feed on fear; when you show it, it only encourages them to escalate their abuse. Don't feed the monkey; ignore Lisa as if she isn't there.
One tenant reports a face-to-face encounter in which Lisa castigated the tenant for signing a “document” (or “petition” -- Lisa is still vague as to what, exactly, a majority of Rose tenants signed. Lisa's claim that it was full of lies can be dismissed as the gibberish it is). To be sure, Lisa's threats were only of the vague “I'll get you!” variety, as opposed to the concrete “When I get out, I'm gonna kill you!” threat Lisa uttered during her arrest in November.
The tenant's calm response in this encounter caused the usual response in Lisa: she scuttled off. Of course, this calm response or no-response tactic falls flat, in the face of another person who encountered Lisa. When Lisa attempted to photograph her with her ubiquitous cell, that person grabbed the cell, told Lisa that if she took her picture again, she'd shove it up...... er, where the sun doesn't shine. Lisa's reaction was the same: she scuttled off. It's the usual response of a coward, which is what a bully is, and Lisa is nothing if not a bully. But that's not a response most of us would prefer to engage in.
If an encounter with Lisa is unavoidable, remain calm and DO NOT run. If Lisa taunts you and tries to provoke you, DO NOT react. Or, if you feel you must respond, either laugh her off, or tell her, kindly, “I'll be praying for you, Lisa.” But make sure you mean it.
Bear in mind that, despite her vicious antics, Lisa Iacuzzi is a human being, and a deeply disturbed one. It's possible she's menopausal, which would make it worse. Whatever hatred she has shown to others must be nowhere near as great as her hatred of herself. Considering the viciousness Lisa has shown to others, especially to African Americans and gay women, her self-hatred must be a terrible burden for her to bear. Lisa Iacuzzi is more to be pitied than anything else.
The best thing to do, if you encounter Lisa, can't avoid her, feel you can't ignore her harassment, feel you will burst if you don't respond, simply tell her as kindly as you can, “I'll be praying for you, Lisa.”
AGAIN SPECIAL THANKS TO MATT DAVIS
Thanks again Matt for inferring that this is a "hate" blog, and that the tenants that live at the Rose are a bunch of intolerant haters and gay bashers. Really- your best work yet!
So how are you going to top this? Are you going to start defending the person who puts poison meat in parks to kill dogs- you might as well if you are press and defending giving to Iacuzzi. Journalistic integrity must seem like an idealistic joke to you.
Posted by John Smoak | June 14, 2008 1:12 AM
Talbot Wallace is a responsible, intelligent, caring, and civil person who would never have anything to do with anything this nasty and stupid. TO BE VERY CLEAR HE HAS NOTHING TO DO WITH THIS BLOG!
Furthermore Talbot Wallace is a great guy who is involved in many community projects and Portland is lucky to have him.
He and his family understandably want to be left out of this mess. They have really solid good priorities and causing trouble is not one of them.
So I really screwed up in inadvertently getting his name mentioned in this blog. Also it never occurred to me that I would be mistaken for him. He is an upstanding professional and would never stoop to anything this crass. I owe him his family and friends an apology.
So please leave him out of this discussion.
I feel that I have both very legitimate and illegitimate reasons for posting on this blog, but I would have forgoed it, if I thought that my friends or others would have been mentioned in the slightest.
Finally Lee I will address you directly (albeit anonymously) just this once- T.W. contacted me directly and asked me to make sure you knew that he knew nothing about this blog until after the fact and does not want to stir up any trouble.
I ACTED ALONE! MY BAD!!!
Posted by John Smoak | June 15, 2008 1:06 AM
lee is an extremely negative individual who does nothing for the community. I am very disappointed that the Mercury gave lee a half of a page article. As someone who has been involved in the community for years, I have come in contact with Lee numerous times. He/She is one of the most abrasive, sick people I have come across. He/She is verbally abusive to numerous folks. I am really embarrassed for the Mercury. Is no one on your staff at all involved in the community? Lee is notorious for being an abusive, dangerous person. And i think you all should address that in your next issue. I, like numerous other folks who are active in the community, was disturbed by the press he/she recieved. It's wrong.
Posted by m.skinner | June 15, 2008 2:41 AM
The reason Bradley Angle house never came to "stop the abuse" is because Lee/Lisa is an extremely abusive person him/herself. I have worked in the social services field for 8 years in Portland, and I know of numerous agencies who have had difficulties with this person. Lee/Lisa's problems are not just a result of their bigendered identification. It is a result of their abusive, manipulative behavior.
Posted by ashley | June 15, 2008 2:49 AM
I just read some of Lee's comments. Lee says " He obssessed about me like some many closet gays who get obssessed about people that they can not control"
What are you talking about? You not only don't make any sense, but you are also are voicing some really negative stereotypes about "closet gays". You show a complete lack of sensitivity. You aren't doing this to help people. And you're not an ally at all. You say negative things about "closet gays" but expect people to side with you?
You aren't an ally. You're a very angry person with no positive outlet. You feed off of fear and negativity, and that's extremely sad.
Posted by m.skinner | June 15, 2008 2:58 AM
TIS BUT THY NAME THAT IS MY ENEMY
"Tis but thy name that is my enemy. What's in a name? That which we will call a rose. By any other word would smell as sweet."
Alas! Alas! if only Sir Shakespeare but knew of the tragedy of the star and gender crossed Lee/Lisa...
I would like to bury the hatchet on this one by addressing issues that LEEE has presented in this blog.
Evidentially by calling this person still legally named "Lisa Iacuzzi", Lisa I am being insensitive to a segment of society.
TO QUOTE LEEE: Nobody calls me Lisa. I say calling me Lisa and not by my gender name is transphobia. When people say Lisa, I correct them quickly. Lee can be both he and she. I do sign my name Lisa to my work for psychological purposes. I lived 39 years as Lisa.
Firstly LEEE infers that Lisa can only be she a she name and not a he name- I feel that this is untrue and a slap in the face to anyone who identifies as a male and wants to be "Lisa" for whatever reason. For example what of Johnny Cash's "A Boy Named Sue" But she is right names are important.
Perhaps dialogue from the movie Airplane expresses it best:
TED STRIKER:
Surely you can't be serious.
RUMCAK(Leslie Nielsen):
I am serious... and don't call me Shirley.
The reason why I referred to her as Lisa is because in her own words "I lived 39 years as Lisa." I only knew her as "Lisa" and then a few restraining orders later more commonly "Crazy Lisa".
To the best of our knowledge the moment she decided to publicly announce that her preferred name was "Lee" was on the Judge Judy show, which came as news to us all! However, we thought at first it was just a publicity stunt and had no idea the name was supposed to stick for good. Also LEEE states that no pronoun can describe her, which does cause difficulties in referring to her in 2nd person. Matt Davis attempted the he/she vehicle; however it is not fully appropriate. The only known similar delihima was when Prince decided that he no longer had a name at all, so a perplexed media started to calling him "The Artist Formerly Known as Prince". With Lisa something in a similar vein may work like "the person who may no longer be referred to as he or she for being insentive for reasons that are to complicated to get into just now", which for convince sake may be shortened to the acronym: tpwmnlbrtahosfbifrtatctgijn which just sort of rolls of the tongue. This would avoid complications like when Judge Judy addressed LEEE "Ma'am, I mean Sir- whatever" if Judge Jude had instead just used the soon to be widespread word “tpwmnlbrtahosfbifrtatctgijn”.
By the way I am trade registering the word "tpwmnlbrtahosfbifrtatctgijn", so hands off Mercury!!!
A better word for referring to LEEE in 2nd person might be just to remove the / in he/she and just have a new pronoun "heshe" pronounced "Hee'-sheey" which can refer to someone who wants to claim either both genders or neither. And the posseive form could be "heher" pronounced "Hee'-hur" not to be confused with the similar sounding "Hee'-haw".
I am also patenting the word "heshe" and "heher", so hands off Matt Davis!!!
Also now that I know that Lisa's idea to call hesheself (it's mine!)Lee, and it was not just a stunt or a new fad she was trying out I will refer to her as Lee. The whole Lee/Lisa thing could be avoided if she would just legally change her name to what she wants to be called- I do not think it is fair to be accused of being obsessed by referring to someone by their legal name. By the way LEE sarcastic thanks for earlier referring to me as Joan instead of John- at first it hut but it has started to stir up the most curious feelings and I kinda like... ur, um, wait where am I going with this?
To mack a long story short what I just meant to say is Sure no problem!- Instead of referring to heher as "Crazy Lisa" heher estranged friends will just start calling heher "Crazy Lee" instead.
Posted by John Smoak | June 15, 2008 3:58 PM
To John Smoak:
Until, Mr. Smoake (sic) and Mirrors, you have your own objective study supporting your claims, we can safely ignore your comments - and move on to a productive discussion based on those issues that have been objectively verified.
Matt Davis's article is based on an objective investigation of Reach CDC by Kerry Johnson from the Bureau of Labor and Industry - who found that Lee's claim of discrimination was true.
How is it possible that an institution like The Bradley Angle House that is supposed to be protecting the most vulnerable people in our society - is given non-profit status by our government and is allowed free reign to discriminate against transgendered people?
Paul Hamilton
Posted by Paul Hamilton | June 15, 2008 6:35 PM
I agree!
Hopefully Lee wins and get the $350,000 that is rightfully hers, and then can go on to sue that other place.
YOU GO GIRL!!!
Posted by Shirley | June 15, 2008 6:56 PM
There is no such thing as bi-gendered. There is such a thing as a hermaphrodite wherein someone possesses both types of sexual organs fully or vestigially. "Gender" is a psychological term, a social term and the "gender" wars are about power not a plea for understanding.
No one is born with the "wrong gender" or with both "genders". It is not physically possible. The term "gender" is a social construct not a physical state of being. Sexual organs are a physical state of being. They have a limited use and do not make you buy shoes or like football.
People are socialized to believe things about "gender" and make decisions to accept or deny social behaviors based on false concepts about how "gender" relates to behavior.
There is power in stereotypes and "gender" is laden with them. The individuals who seek alternate gender recognition are doing so because they perceive a level of power available in the gender they do not possess. The desire for this social acceptance based on the general affirmation of a stereotype causes intellectual conflict within and without.
The use of emotional and social manipulation to "prove" they have the "wrong gender" is driven by the need to gain the power that the stereotype they wish to embody will give them. Hiding behind "gender misidentification" allows them to demand that society help them to ignore their deeper psychological issues (all of which were created by social concepts which certain aspects of society benefit from by keeping in place)
The "gender" wars are not helping anyone. They are not helping society. They are selfish and petty and further damage any ability for people to be human instead of characters.
Posted by an Observer | June 19, 2008 5:48 PM
http://blogtown.portlandmercury.com/2008/06/manwoman_sues_womens_shelters.php
Kiala Says:
June 14th, 2008 at 2:03 am
I have to ask why you are failed to mention Lee/Lisa Iacuzzi’s history of assaulting, and threatening people with violence? There are plenty of court cases, restraining orders, and police reports that verify this. She was even on Judge Judy for attacking someone.
Matt Davis Says:
June 14th, 2008 at 6:56 am
And who are you, John?
John Smoak Says:
June 14th, 2008 at 10:37 am
I am a guy who used to work with Lisa. 3 of my friends have been to court over her either stalking or assaulting them. Some of these guys have restraining orders against her and she has slashed tires on a few occasions before. One of the court cases was open and shut because my friend saved all the messages that Lisa had sent to him accusing him of crazy things and making threats.
With one friend she showed up his house demanded weed, which he gave to her so she would go away. The friend was a pacifist that Lisa believed could he easily bullied. She showed up the next day and when he demanded that she leave she punched him in the face (this is the case that ended up on Judge Judy).
My issue with Lisa's that as one person put it she is a serial bully- she does not just pick fights with people- she picks fights with really nice and civiled people that she can push around. As you can probably tell at heart I am irrsopnsible and don’t really fall into that catagory. However I do know that Lisa’s beshavior will continue and that other peole will be picked on and terroized by her and that giving her favorable press will just add fuel to the fire.
I should apoloigise for my rants against you on the blog- they where unfair cheap shots, but I reallydo beleive the biggest error was insinuating that poeple have been picking on Lisa. If there is someone who has a history of violence, vandalism, stalking, and mental illness there really are not that many peole lining up to get in her line of fire voluntairly.
Evidentally she is good at playing the victim and getting the press on her side. My question still bacically why did you and the others who cover stories on her not mention her criminal history? And I do not mean bring up her jaywalking tickets. Since her court cases are public record I assume getting information on her criminal history should be easy. I assume that it just takes a search on a legal database (maybe I am wrong and this information is harder to get to than I thought).
John Smoak Says:
June 14th, 2008 at 10:39 am
PS Sorry there was a glitch and my response got sent while I was proofing it, so I apologise for the bad grammar and misspellings.
Laura M Says:
June 25th, 2008 at 11:14 pm
Matt, I think John makes an excellent point. Why didn’t you reference the rather extensive paper trail available via police records, county court records, and neighborhood association complaints? It’s certainly relevant and you ignored it entirely. Was it laziness on your part or did you feel that your readers should only be informed by Lee/Lisa and his/her lawyer? In either scenario, it’s just terrible journalism and doesn’t speak well of your professional ethics or integrity.
Please answer the question, why did you ignore or fail to reference reams of public records when writing this story?
FROM LISA:
Not a Good Hate Says:
June 29th, 2008 at 6:37 pm
I would like to thank Matt personally of trying to start another hate blog against Not a Good Queer. I want to let the readers know about the hate blog already written by the tenants of the Rose. It is here where the state found substanial evidence of gender discrimination.
Did it ever make you think that people who try to get stalking orders on people are being used as a payback. Did you ever think that a city with such totting of public anger, behaves quietly behind close doors to smear people. People like me who are right, hold you accountable, and make you feel uncomfortable. People like me make you feel uncomfortable because the world you live in, is blind to hate and motivators of retaliation to those who speak out.
This behavior is Portland, writing messages without signing ones name demonstrates the cities childhood obsessed behavior.
Also, I have be given enough experience and go to the legislature and complain that stalking orders and restraining orders are being misused as retaliatory behavior versus really being a victim. I think the court should pentalize those who try to get a restraining order, stalking order, they can’t get it, because it is seen as the judges as bullshit, that it should be reomoved from ones record.
I could go down to the court house on Monday and put on a stalking order against Joh Smoak, this would be on his record. Imagine, pissing off your friends, then they hate you as much as they loved you and they are freaked out about their own sexuality forget the understanding of ones gender which is so far removed from most brains.
I am Mr. Potatoe head. Potatoe head best explains gender. You can dress it up, but it is still a potatoe. I can wear a dress, and maybe put on a bra, but I am still different. As a matter of fact, this was said to me once in college by a professor in a full classrom. He said that lesbians can wear skirts but every one knows thier lesbians because they are so uncomfortable in their skirts.
I have to be nice to haters. Read Not a Good Queer on Google. Their is already a hate blog, but I guess know their is two hate blogs. I am flattered.
See ya
Lee
Laura M Says:
June 29th, 2008 at 10:59 pm
Hi Matt, still waiting for an answer. I’m really interested in knowing why you chose to ignore the ample evidence provided to you through public records.
Lee, so in your imagination the stalking and restraining orders against you are purely retalitory measures from transphobic people? You’ve never threatened anyone? Harassed them at their place of work? Yelled slurs like “faggot” and “dyke” at people who oppose you (by the way, so classy coming from someone who claims to champion queer rights)? Slashed tires? “Borrowed” cars from differently abled people without returning them, save by force? Bullied and intimidated? Physically attacked others? And that’s just a short list of the allegations. All of these are lies? I don’t think so.
Lee, you’re sick. You need help. Medicine. Therapy. Support. It’s got nothing to do with your gender, it’s got everything to do with untreated bi-polar disorder. Please stop using your transgender/bi-gendered status as a foil to carry out your petty revenge on people who disagree with you. It demeans the movement and discredits those who legitimately face discrimination because of their gender identification. Stop.
Matt Davis Says:
June 30th, 2008 at 10:01 am
I’m not answering any of these comments, and if you people persist in posting boring, weird, threatening stuff on here I’m just going to take the post down.
Laura M Says:
June 30th, 2008 at 10:52 am
Matt, you screwed up. Own it.
http://mattdavisopenshismouth.com/2008/06/manwoman-sues-womens-shelters-for-discrimination/
06/14/2008 08:55 AM
There are some very irresponsible journalists reporting on Lee/Lisa Iacuzzi referring to her as an activist or someone who is being picked on everyone from women's shelters, to community based non-profits, to tenants.
The truth is for anyone who knows Lisa Iacuzzi is that she is often off her meds, and that she frequently pyshically assaulted and threatens people. She has many arrests, convictions, and restraining orders against her, which are all part of public record, so any time the media reports on Iacuzzi's claims, and omits out this vital information out it is a travesty.
Lisa Iacuzzi is going to court on Monday and will most likely be doing end up doing time in jail for breaking one of her many restraining orders. She also has a history of stalking people and slashing tires. Be sure though that after she physically attacks someone or in the middle of the night vandalizes their property that she will cry that she is a victim. She wraps herself in the whole transgender, gay abuse issues to gain sympathy and justification for her actions. She is actually just a serial bully and pathological liar looking for attention.
Matt Davis, the journalist for the Mercury, omitted all of this- there is evidence that he knew of her history of violence, being a menace, and her severe mental illness, but decided deliberately to leave this out of his story. Also there is no excuse for him to claim that he did not know about Lisa Iacuzzi's terror sprees- it is all part of public record and she has even been on Judge Judy and lost for punching someone without cause. What is even worse is that Matt Davis infers that a woman's shelter and tenants in an apartment have been intolerant haters and gay bashing because they had trouble with Lisa.
The only thing that people need to know about Lisa Iacuzzi is who is currently on her revenge list, so they can sleep with one eye open, and jump at anything that goes bump in the night because it may well be Lisa lurking around in the dark
http://www.yourstreet.com/2008/6/12/21/3514622/man-woman-sues-women-s-shelters-for-discrimination
26 July 2008
07 July 2008
LISA CONFESSES! "I AM GUILTY"
Dear Lisa:
It was with the greatest pleasure that we here at NAGQ-OAE saw your blog entry for Thursday, 3rd July, at http://notagoodqueer.blogspot.com/2008/07/i-am-guilty-of.html, entitled:
I AM GUILTY OF:
Good for Lisa! we thought. Confession being good for the soul, we settled down to read what we thought would be a much-needed mea culpa from you.
Alas, we were saddened to find that, as usual, contrary to your title, you feel no guilt whatsoever for anything you've done. And, as usual, you blame all and sundry, particularly your favourite bete noire, that nebulous “hate mob”, in all its shifting incarnations, rather than the one most responsible for your woes: yourself. Very disappointing.
Hope springs eternal, however, and being charitable sorts at NAGQ-OAE, we offer the following facts in opposition to your most recent fabrications, fantasies, and self-exculpatory farradiddle, in the hope that some Power the giftie gie ye to see yoursel as ithers see ye, an' frae mony a blunder free ye.
Here they are:
MORE LIES THAT ARE LISA'S LIFE
PART DEUX
--------------------------------------
LIE #1
(as pertains to the following. As noted previously, a compilation of your lies would fill a book)
I am guitly of:
Being maculine and scaring women according to the DA office in Portland, Oregon.
THE FACTS:
You may define as “being maculine” your taunting, provoking, bullying, hitting, and racist name-calling, Lisa, but they are no more masculine than your shedding of copious crocodiles tears in court is feminine. What scares people – and not all of them women -- is your aberrant and often violent behaviour. That, too, is not “being maculine”. It's being the playground bully you most nearly resemble.
According to the DA's office, you repeatedly violated a stalking order issued by the court against you. After you achieved several setovers of your trial, you were finally found guilty. And after several setovers of the penalty phase of your trial, you will finally be sentenced on Friday, 11th July, at 2.00 p.m. Multnomah County Courthouse, Fifth Floor, Judge Wilson presiding.
LIE #2
I lost this political battle between the feminst and the gender folks.
THE FACTS:
Don't hype your peccadilloes out of proportion, Lisa. This “political battle” is nothing more than your repeated violations of one of the stalking orders issued by the court against you, and your upcoming sentencing therefor. Or are you referring to your selfish, self-centered, money-grubbing BOLI complaint against the Bradley-Angle domestic violence shelter, which took you in when you claimed – falsely—that you were a victim, rather than the perp you were?
LIE #3
The feminist say, your transgendered and your a man. This is what Bradley Angle House directer, Kara MacFarland, had to say that their public policies on gender are in fact discriminatory.
THE FACTS:
What Kara MacFarland actually said is:
"At this time, we are unable to comment on the specific facts of this matter, especially given that the allegations against Bradley-Angle House may impact a larger scope than just our organization--and could affect the county's provision of domestic violence services. However, we again reiterate that there is no merit to Lee/Lisa Iacuzzi's allegations that Bradley-Angle House discriminated against him/her in any way."
Jacob Anderson-Minshall of Trans Nation – another victim of your snow jobs – writes that no one at Bradley Angle “is willing to discuss the situation or the agency's gender policies.”
So, Lisa, who's lying here? MacFarland and Minshall-Anderson? Or you?
Anderson-Minshall further writes that “BOLI has submitted the issue to formal conciliation process, where [attorney Matthew] Ellis says he's hopeful that Bradley-Angle's policies can be examined and revamped.”
That, Lisa, would have been a positive goal for the activist you claim you are. But your BOLI grievances – first, against a non-profit which provides housing for low- and no-income people (over which you crowed you'd get “a million dollars, more than enough for a European vacation!”), then, secondly, against a shelter for domestic violence victims...well, one must wonder exactly what kind of “activist” you really are.
But your “activism” has ever had only one item on its agenda, and that's you.
LIES #4 through #6
The battle the feminst won is still in the Court houses that believe that I am a dangerous person.
THE FACTS:
You filed two discrimination grievances with the Oregon Bureau of Labor of Industries. You filed through BOLI, rather than retaining a lawyer, because it's free – for you, though not for the Oregon taxpayers who must pick up yet another bill for you. But you don't give a rat's ass for that, despite your claim that you “don't want a free ride”. You further stated that “No suits have been filed.” Of course no suits have been filed: you're too cheap to file one. Hence, no “Court houses” -- other than the one in which you will be sentenced for your violations of the stalking order against you.
As for your being a “dangerous person”, your self-serving BOLI complaints have nothing to do with that – although the victims of your violent antics have differing views.
LIE #7
Yes, i am fairly intelligent,
THE FACTS:
No, you're cunning and manipulative, but both are of the low variety, and if you were as intelligent as you imagine, you would have learned by now from your past mistakes. And if you were as compassionate as you advertise, you would have helped Bradley Angle House to examine and refine its policies regarding trans- and bi- gendered persons (which, despite your claims, you are not). That would have been the choice of a true activist. Instead, you chose to attack through BOLI, for no better reason than your expectation of a large monetary award -- your chief motivation, as you often stated, in filing the same discrimination charge against REACH CDC.
Surprising acts for an “activist”, Lisa. First, you attack a non-profit whose mission is to provide housing for low- and no-income persons, then you attack the West Coast's oldest domestic violence shelter, which may screw up its future ability to aid domestic violence victims -- and all for money, and because they failed to accord you the Paris Hilton treatment you demand.
You might have learned something from your vengeful OSHA go-around – that phony claim you filed against the alternative school for disadvantaged children which fired you in 2003. Your claim was seen for what it was – that of “self-serving manipulator,” and “disgruntled ex-employee with an axe to grind.” But you refused to learn.
On a positive note: one might have expected you to tack it onto your “I'm intelligent” claim your phony claim to an MA. But you didn't. Congratulations on a step in the right direction, Lisa.
LIE #8
but now your trying to criminalize me for my gender which was not understood and taken away from the jury.
THE FACTS:
No one is criminalizing you for your gender identification, Lisa, be that as it may. No one cares, and it wasn't the issue at your recent trial. At issue were your repeated violations of the stalking order issued against you.
You were savvy enough not to violate the restraining order issued to another of your victims. Why the slip up? Your taunting antics and toothy grin every time you violated it show that you were well aware of what you were doing -- and enjoyed it. Did you think you'd always get away without paying for what you get?
LIE #9
To say my trial was a modern day whitch hunt carried out by Arusi Loprinzini is an understatement.
THE FACTS:
To say your trial was a “whitch hunt”, modern or otherwise, is your usual bullfarb, Lisa. You were found guilty of repeatedly violating the stalking order issued by the court to one of your victims -- that, and more.
Note that the retaliatory temporary protective stalking order you obtained against another of your neighbours – one who had very little contact with you, to begin with – was shot down by the court because, your crocodile tears notwithstanding, it was so obviously just another load from your fertilizer factory.
FYI, people from the DA's office have spoken to a few more people than Meyers. Quite a few.
The only thing that Glenda Meyers has abo that is flawless cry and hyperventialtion act which seems to work for police, judges, and juries. Will just be served or will the witch hunt just gat uglier and uglier.
That cry/hyperventilation act sounds close to the subdued, tearful shtick you essayed for police the first time they questioned you regarding your violations of the temporary stalking order. Then there was your sterling and memorable performance for the court, in the matter of the retaliatory stalking orders you obtained last October, when you hung your head, spoke softly and tearfully, and oozed crocodile tears over how that nasty “hate mob” -- it was still a predominantly bible-thumping drug dealing “hate mob” of African American grannies back then -- was out to get you.
Tell us, Lisa, do you include your tearful, Little-Girl-Lost performances in your definition of “being maculine[sic] and scaring women”?
Any witch hunt, outside your imagination, has ever been YOURS, Lisa. That being so, one can only presume that it will get worse—unless you stop it. But you won't, until you learn to face the consequences of your negative actions, take responsibility for them, and work to change your self-destructive behaviour.
LIE #10
Wittness are staying quiet for I acuzzi due to threats to wittnesses.
THE FACTS:
First, we'll give you the benefit of the doubt your "wittnesses" actually exist. The fact still remains that the only threats uttered against any witnesses are those uttered by YOU.
Your convenient memory seems to have occluded the threatening notes you wrote and shoved under witnesses' doors; your verbal threats made in the presence of other witnesses – notably, “Join me or suffer!” and “If you go to court, I'll cut your legs off!” -- and you've clearly forgotten your threat to “show up or you're going to jail!” when you issued your laughably ridiculous subpoenae duces tecum.
Ask one of your court-appointed lawyers what a “subpoena duces tecum” is, Lisa, before you pencil any more absurdities.
LIES #11 and #12
Arusi loprinzi even came to the Rose residence place and met with Meyers in her home. Meyers is a well known homphobe which was documented by the state of Oregon's BOLI.
THE FACTS:
It was not documented as fact that “Meyers is a well known homphobe[sic]”, nor can it be documented as such; it's only a claim you frequently make, and your claim is false. It's also tedious. How Meyers can be a “homphobe”[sic], well known or otherwise, is difficult to see, when her friends include gays, lesbians, and a person who undergoing the transgendering process. Moreover, Meyers is quite matter-of-fact about her bisexuality, and has never been as shy about admitting it as you are about your lesbian orientation.
Speaking of the school which fired you, why only now are you claiming you were fired for gender discrimination? Why didn't you make that claim when you were fired?
LIES #13 and #14
Who is going to win this political battle that now i am losing and will continue to be punished for stating up against them that revolve around the building as the DA is seen with Reach CDC lawyers on a daily basis.
THE FACTS:
There is no “political battle”, Lisa. That's just you, indulging in your usual girlish hysteria and making yourself out to be more important than you are; if you think you're losing, it's only because no one takes you as seriously as you take yourself – except, perhaps, in the matter of your money-grubbing “gender discrimination” action against Bradley-Angle – which may have farther-reaching implications than you can imagine.
As for attorneys from the DA's office and for REACH meeting on a daily basis, that's rubbish only an ignoramus such as yourself could invent. That's another thing to ask your current lawyer.
LIE #15
I have a lawsuit against Reach CDC and
THE FACTS:
You don't, and said so to Jacob Anderson-Minshall, – or maybe it was the Portland Mercury. No matter. You lied to both, and both swallowed your lies, hook, line, and rotten fishguts.
You filed a grievance with BOLI – a lawsuit would have cost you money -- and crowed that you would get “one million dollars” and “own 988 REACH units.” In fact, you told the judge on 2nd November 2007 that you rejected a settlement offer because you were holding out for more money. More dollar signs are dancing in your wee little head over the grievance you filed with BOLI against Bradley-Angle House afterward.
Ditto the “lawsuit” you told Anderson-Minshall you filed against PSU, which you haven't. PSU's “discrimination” against you consists of the $5,000 student loan you reneged on repaying.
The time line of your BOLI grievances is interesting. First, you file against REACH CDC, claiming “gender discrimination” in the free housing given you. (That you began violating building rules from day one, and escalated your antics until your arrest, seems not to matter.) Months later, you file the same discrimination claim against the domestic violence shelter– even though you lived at Bradley Angle before moving to the Rose. One would expect your claims to have been filed in the order you experienced the alleged discrimination. Did your expectation of getting a million dollars out of REACH begin dwindling, so you decided to file against the domestic violence shelter when you learned of the million dollar grant they received?
Your repeated emphasis on money underscores what kind of “activist” you are.
LIES #16 and #17
I wonder if Lopronzini will meet with me and talk about a hate crime of a mob* at the Rose.
the DA Arusi Loprinzini does not have a problem with helping out the local businesses.
THE FACTS:
Take care here, Lisa. The DA's office isn't comprised of the sort of helpless, low income women you're used to bullying.
The only hate crimes of any “mob at the Rose” were -- like your “domestic violence” shtick -- perpetrated by YOU. Are calling African American tenants “niggers”, telling little black girls “All you nigger bitches do drugs,” and destroying the cable of a disabled, retired African American college teacher not consider racist hate actions when perpetrated by you?
LIE #18
This hate mob* is fooling you when they say they are threatened.
THE FACTS:
Unless you count yourself as a “hate mob” Lisa – and you could well do it -- there is no “mob” at the Rose, and never was.
Your violent and aberrant actions were sufficiently disturbing to all and sundry as to require the presence of round-the-clock security guards, even before you physically assaulted several tenants, and a crippled, homeless man in front of the building. As you noted previously, a number of the tenants are actual domestic violence survivors (as opposed to phony ones like yourself); your staged temper tantrums, screaming rages up and down the hall, physical assaults, racist hate speech and antics were, to say the least, disturbing – and that, dear Lisa, is an understatement.
Speaking of your hate mob, you may thank them that you weren't charged with providing drugs and alcohol to a minor.
Remember your “mentorship student”, Nicole? You initially introduced her as “my seventeen year old girlfriend,” when you had her over for several days and nights of boozing and drugging. The “hate mob” witnessed it all, but kept quiet about it. That was a year ago last April, months before you turned on them.
Tell us, Lisa, what mentorship program permitted you, a mentor, to provide alcohol and drugs to a minor in exchange for sex? Was it part of your “attempt” to “organize former students” against the alternative school which fired you in 2003? Who's your fellow mentor, Mary Kay Letourneau?
LIES #19 and #20
Their lying, they were never afraid, it was a pay back from winning the BOLI case.
THE FACTS:
Nobody lied, Lisa, except you. Nobody has need to lie, except you. Too many people witnessed your violent and aberrant antics -- and not all of them the neighbours you victimized.
You have won nothing. Get your lawyer to explain the difference between a determination, a ruling, and a verdict. Your false accusations, like your claim to have “won”, are merely two more of the myriad lies that are your life. Saddest of all are the victims of your lies. Look in a mirror: there's one of them.
But there may be more.
Domestic violence claims the lives of over 16,000 women every year. The number of male domestic violence victims is, by comparison, minute. If your insensate money-grubbing is a factor in forcing DV shelters to curtail services currently available for female victims, thus increasing the chances they may be murdered, you will be guilty of far more than you imagine.
But of course, if you win, there will be a few who will want to shake hands with you. And never notice the blood on them.
We still rise, we will not apologize for anything!
Not a Good Queer on Blog Spot!
“We are what we repeatedly do.” Aristotle on Ethics
--------------------
N.B.: * Lisa's Hate Mob
a) A gang of gay women “who have attacked me and come after me”
b) A gang of “predominantly African American women who are bible thumpers” led by a “convicted felon”
c) A “ruthless gang” of bible-thumping, drug-dealing African American grannies, whom Portland Impact personnel teach how to “sell their welfare cards for cash” for the purpose of “getting drug money” to buy and sell drugs
d) A gang of “twenty-people involved in a fraud of food stamps”
e) A “lynching hate mob”, a “lynch mob of a twenty dedicated to hate”
f) “A homphobic gang”, a “hate mob”, a “lynching mob”
g) “Math” heads
h) The Sheriff of Multnomah County, the Portland Police, and the DA's office, all of whom have “a reputation for hating trans people like me.”
--------------------
Not A Good Queer – Or Anything Else
Still we rise! (despite our inclinations to sleep in)
It was with the greatest pleasure that we here at NAGQ-OAE saw your blog entry for Thursday, 3rd July, at http://notagoodqueer.blogspot.com/2008/07/i-am-guilty-of.html, entitled:
I AM GUILTY OF:
Good for Lisa! we thought. Confession being good for the soul, we settled down to read what we thought would be a much-needed mea culpa from you.
Alas, we were saddened to find that, as usual, contrary to your title, you feel no guilt whatsoever for anything you've done. And, as usual, you blame all and sundry, particularly your favourite bete noire, that nebulous “hate mob”, in all its shifting incarnations, rather than the one most responsible for your woes: yourself. Very disappointing.
Hope springs eternal, however, and being charitable sorts at NAGQ-OAE, we offer the following facts in opposition to your most recent fabrications, fantasies, and self-exculpatory farradiddle, in the hope that some Power the giftie gie ye to see yoursel as ithers see ye, an' frae mony a blunder free ye.
Here they are:
MORE LIES THAT ARE LISA'S LIFE
PART DEUX
--------------------------------------
LIE #1
(as pertains to the following. As noted previously, a compilation of your lies would fill a book)
I am guitly of:
Being maculine and scaring women according to the DA office in Portland, Oregon.
THE FACTS:
You may define as “being maculine” your taunting, provoking, bullying, hitting, and racist name-calling, Lisa, but they are no more masculine than your shedding of copious crocodiles tears in court is feminine. What scares people – and not all of them women -- is your aberrant and often violent behaviour. That, too, is not “being maculine”. It's being the playground bully you most nearly resemble.
According to the DA's office, you repeatedly violated a stalking order issued by the court against you. After you achieved several setovers of your trial, you were finally found guilty. And after several setovers of the penalty phase of your trial, you will finally be sentenced on Friday, 11th July, at 2.00 p.m. Multnomah County Courthouse, Fifth Floor, Judge Wilson presiding.
LIE #2
I lost this political battle between the feminst and the gender folks.
THE FACTS:
Don't hype your peccadilloes out of proportion, Lisa. This “political battle” is nothing more than your repeated violations of one of the stalking orders issued by the court against you, and your upcoming sentencing therefor. Or are you referring to your selfish, self-centered, money-grubbing BOLI complaint against the Bradley-Angle domestic violence shelter, which took you in when you claimed – falsely—that you were a victim, rather than the perp you were?
LIE #3
The feminist say, your transgendered and your a man. This is what Bradley Angle House directer, Kara MacFarland, had to say that their public policies on gender are in fact discriminatory.
THE FACTS:
What Kara MacFarland actually said is:
"At this time, we are unable to comment on the specific facts of this matter, especially given that the allegations against Bradley-Angle House may impact a larger scope than just our organization--and could affect the county's provision of domestic violence services. However, we again reiterate that there is no merit to Lee/Lisa Iacuzzi's allegations that Bradley-Angle House discriminated against him/her in any way."
Jacob Anderson-Minshall of Trans Nation – another victim of your snow jobs – writes that no one at Bradley Angle “is willing to discuss the situation or the agency's gender policies.”
So, Lisa, who's lying here? MacFarland and Minshall-Anderson? Or you?
Anderson-Minshall further writes that “BOLI has submitted the issue to formal conciliation process, where [attorney Matthew] Ellis says he's hopeful that Bradley-Angle's policies can be examined and revamped.”
That, Lisa, would have been a positive goal for the activist you claim you are. But your BOLI grievances – first, against a non-profit which provides housing for low- and no-income people (over which you crowed you'd get “a million dollars, more than enough for a European vacation!”), then, secondly, against a shelter for domestic violence victims...well, one must wonder exactly what kind of “activist” you really are.
But your “activism” has ever had only one item on its agenda, and that's you.
LIES #4 through #6
The battle the feminst won is still in the Court houses that believe that I am a dangerous person.
THE FACTS:
You filed two discrimination grievances with the Oregon Bureau of Labor of Industries. You filed through BOLI, rather than retaining a lawyer, because it's free – for you, though not for the Oregon taxpayers who must pick up yet another bill for you. But you don't give a rat's ass for that, despite your claim that you “don't want a free ride”. You further stated that “No suits have been filed.” Of course no suits have been filed: you're too cheap to file one. Hence, no “Court houses” -- other than the one in which you will be sentenced for your violations of the stalking order against you.
As for your being a “dangerous person”, your self-serving BOLI complaints have nothing to do with that – although the victims of your violent antics have differing views.
LIE #7
Yes, i am fairly intelligent,
THE FACTS:
No, you're cunning and manipulative, but both are of the low variety, and if you were as intelligent as you imagine, you would have learned by now from your past mistakes. And if you were as compassionate as you advertise, you would have helped Bradley Angle House to examine and refine its policies regarding trans- and bi- gendered persons (which, despite your claims, you are not). That would have been the choice of a true activist. Instead, you chose to attack through BOLI, for no better reason than your expectation of a large monetary award -- your chief motivation, as you often stated, in filing the same discrimination charge against REACH CDC.
Surprising acts for an “activist”, Lisa. First, you attack a non-profit whose mission is to provide housing for low- and no-income persons, then you attack the West Coast's oldest domestic violence shelter, which may screw up its future ability to aid domestic violence victims -- and all for money, and because they failed to accord you the Paris Hilton treatment you demand.
You might have learned something from your vengeful OSHA go-around – that phony claim you filed against the alternative school for disadvantaged children which fired you in 2003. Your claim was seen for what it was – that of “self-serving manipulator,” and “disgruntled ex-employee with an axe to grind.” But you refused to learn.
On a positive note: one might have expected you to tack it onto your “I'm intelligent” claim your phony claim to an MA. But you didn't. Congratulations on a step in the right direction, Lisa.
LIE #8
but now your trying to criminalize me for my gender which was not understood and taken away from the jury.
THE FACTS:
No one is criminalizing you for your gender identification, Lisa, be that as it may. No one cares, and it wasn't the issue at your recent trial. At issue were your repeated violations of the stalking order issued against you.
You were savvy enough not to violate the restraining order issued to another of your victims. Why the slip up? Your taunting antics and toothy grin every time you violated it show that you were well aware of what you were doing -- and enjoyed it. Did you think you'd always get away without paying for what you get?
LIE #9
To say my trial was a modern day whitch hunt carried out by Arusi Loprinzini is an understatement.
THE FACTS:
To say your trial was a “whitch hunt”, modern or otherwise, is your usual bullfarb, Lisa. You were found guilty of repeatedly violating the stalking order issued by the court to one of your victims -- that, and more.
Note that the retaliatory temporary protective stalking order you obtained against another of your neighbours – one who had very little contact with you, to begin with – was shot down by the court because, your crocodile tears notwithstanding, it was so obviously just another load from your fertilizer factory.
FYI, people from the DA's office have spoken to a few more people than Meyers. Quite a few.
The only thing that Glenda Meyers has abo that is flawless cry and hyperventialtion act which seems to work for police, judges, and juries. Will just be served or will the witch hunt just gat uglier and uglier.
That cry/hyperventilation act sounds close to the subdued, tearful shtick you essayed for police the first time they questioned you regarding your violations of the temporary stalking order. Then there was your sterling and memorable performance for the court, in the matter of the retaliatory stalking orders you obtained last October, when you hung your head, spoke softly and tearfully, and oozed crocodile tears over how that nasty “hate mob” -- it was still a predominantly bible-thumping drug dealing “hate mob” of African American grannies back then -- was out to get you.
Tell us, Lisa, do you include your tearful, Little-Girl-Lost performances in your definition of “being maculine[sic] and scaring women”?
Any witch hunt, outside your imagination, has ever been YOURS, Lisa. That being so, one can only presume that it will get worse—unless you stop it. But you won't, until you learn to face the consequences of your negative actions, take responsibility for them, and work to change your self-destructive behaviour.
LIE #10
Wittness are staying quiet for I acuzzi due to threats to wittnesses.
THE FACTS:
First, we'll give you the benefit of the doubt your "wittnesses" actually exist. The fact still remains that the only threats uttered against any witnesses are those uttered by YOU.
Your convenient memory seems to have occluded the threatening notes you wrote and shoved under witnesses' doors; your verbal threats made in the presence of other witnesses – notably, “Join me or suffer!” and “If you go to court, I'll cut your legs off!” -- and you've clearly forgotten your threat to “show up or you're going to jail!” when you issued your laughably ridiculous subpoenae duces tecum.
Ask one of your court-appointed lawyers what a “subpoena duces tecum” is, Lisa, before you pencil any more absurdities.
LIES #11 and #12
Arusi loprinzi even came to the Rose residence place and met with Meyers in her home. Meyers is a well known homphobe which was documented by the state of Oregon's BOLI.
THE FACTS:
It was not documented as fact that “Meyers is a well known homphobe[sic]”, nor can it be documented as such; it's only a claim you frequently make, and your claim is false. It's also tedious. How Meyers can be a “homphobe”[sic], well known or otherwise, is difficult to see, when her friends include gays, lesbians, and a person who undergoing the transgendering process. Moreover, Meyers is quite matter-of-fact about her bisexuality, and has never been as shy about admitting it as you are about your lesbian orientation.
Speaking of the school which fired you, why only now are you claiming you were fired for gender discrimination? Why didn't you make that claim when you were fired?
LIES #13 and #14
Who is going to win this political battle that now i am losing and will continue to be punished for stating up against them that revolve around the building as the DA is seen with Reach CDC lawyers on a daily basis.
THE FACTS:
There is no “political battle”, Lisa. That's just you, indulging in your usual girlish hysteria and making yourself out to be more important than you are; if you think you're losing, it's only because no one takes you as seriously as you take yourself – except, perhaps, in the matter of your money-grubbing “gender discrimination” action against Bradley-Angle – which may have farther-reaching implications than you can imagine.
As for attorneys from the DA's office and for REACH meeting on a daily basis, that's rubbish only an ignoramus such as yourself could invent. That's another thing to ask your current lawyer.
LIE #15
I have a lawsuit against Reach CDC and
THE FACTS:
You don't, and said so to Jacob Anderson-Minshall, – or maybe it was the Portland Mercury. No matter. You lied to both, and both swallowed your lies, hook, line, and rotten fishguts.
You filed a grievance with BOLI – a lawsuit would have cost you money -- and crowed that you would get “one million dollars” and “own 988 REACH units.” In fact, you told the judge on 2nd November 2007 that you rejected a settlement offer because you were holding out for more money. More dollar signs are dancing in your wee little head over the grievance you filed with BOLI against Bradley-Angle House afterward.
Ditto the “lawsuit” you told Anderson-Minshall you filed against PSU, which you haven't. PSU's “discrimination” against you consists of the $5,000 student loan you reneged on repaying.
The time line of your BOLI grievances is interesting. First, you file against REACH CDC, claiming “gender discrimination” in the free housing given you. (That you began violating building rules from day one, and escalated your antics until your arrest, seems not to matter.) Months later, you file the same discrimination claim against the domestic violence shelter– even though you lived at Bradley Angle before moving to the Rose. One would expect your claims to have been filed in the order you experienced the alleged discrimination. Did your expectation of getting a million dollars out of REACH begin dwindling, so you decided to file against the domestic violence shelter when you learned of the million dollar grant they received?
Your repeated emphasis on money underscores what kind of “activist” you are.
LIES #16 and #17
I wonder if Lopronzini will meet with me and talk about a hate crime of a mob* at the Rose.
the DA Arusi Loprinzini does not have a problem with helping out the local businesses.
THE FACTS:
Take care here, Lisa. The DA's office isn't comprised of the sort of helpless, low income women you're used to bullying.
The only hate crimes of any “mob at the Rose” were -- like your “domestic violence” shtick -- perpetrated by YOU. Are calling African American tenants “niggers”, telling little black girls “All you nigger bitches do drugs,” and destroying the cable of a disabled, retired African American college teacher not consider racist hate actions when perpetrated by you?
LIE #18
This hate mob* is fooling you when they say they are threatened.
THE FACTS:
Unless you count yourself as a “hate mob” Lisa – and you could well do it -- there is no “mob” at the Rose, and never was.
Your violent and aberrant actions were sufficiently disturbing to all and sundry as to require the presence of round-the-clock security guards, even before you physically assaulted several tenants, and a crippled, homeless man in front of the building. As you noted previously, a number of the tenants are actual domestic violence survivors (as opposed to phony ones like yourself); your staged temper tantrums, screaming rages up and down the hall, physical assaults, racist hate speech and antics were, to say the least, disturbing – and that, dear Lisa, is an understatement.
Speaking of your hate mob, you may thank them that you weren't charged with providing drugs and alcohol to a minor.
Remember your “mentorship student”, Nicole? You initially introduced her as “my seventeen year old girlfriend,” when you had her over for several days and nights of boozing and drugging. The “hate mob” witnessed it all, but kept quiet about it. That was a year ago last April, months before you turned on them.
Tell us, Lisa, what mentorship program permitted you, a mentor, to provide alcohol and drugs to a minor in exchange for sex? Was it part of your “attempt” to “organize former students” against the alternative school which fired you in 2003? Who's your fellow mentor, Mary Kay Letourneau?
LIES #19 and #20
Their lying, they were never afraid, it was a pay back from winning the BOLI case.
THE FACTS:
Nobody lied, Lisa, except you. Nobody has need to lie, except you. Too many people witnessed your violent and aberrant antics -- and not all of them the neighbours you victimized.
You have won nothing. Get your lawyer to explain the difference between a determination, a ruling, and a verdict. Your false accusations, like your claim to have “won”, are merely two more of the myriad lies that are your life. Saddest of all are the victims of your lies. Look in a mirror: there's one of them.
But there may be more.
Domestic violence claims the lives of over 16,000 women every year. The number of male domestic violence victims is, by comparison, minute. If your insensate money-grubbing is a factor in forcing DV shelters to curtail services currently available for female victims, thus increasing the chances they may be murdered, you will be guilty of far more than you imagine.
But of course, if you win, there will be a few who will want to shake hands with you. And never notice the blood on them.
We still rise, we will not apologize for anything!
Not a Good Queer on Blog Spot!
“We are what we repeatedly do.” Aristotle on Ethics
--------------------
N.B.: * Lisa's Hate Mob
a) A gang of gay women “who have attacked me and come after me”
b) A gang of “predominantly African American women who are bible thumpers” led by a “convicted felon”
c) A “ruthless gang” of bible-thumping, drug-dealing African American grannies, whom Portland Impact personnel teach how to “sell their welfare cards for cash” for the purpose of “getting drug money” to buy and sell drugs
d) A gang of “twenty-people involved in a fraud of food stamps”
e) A “lynching hate mob”, a “lynch mob of a twenty dedicated to hate”
f) “A homphobic gang”, a “hate mob”, a “lynching mob”
g) “Math” heads
h) The Sheriff of Multnomah County, the Portland Police, and the DA's office, all of whom have “a reputation for hating trans people like me.”
--------------------
Not A Good Queer – Or Anything Else
Still we rise! (despite our inclinations to sleep in)
03 July 2008
Just WhenYou Thought It Was Safe........HEEEEERRRRRRRE'S LISA!!!!
The other day a Rose tenant was riding the 15, when two women boarded the bus near the methadone clinic on Belmont. One was a fairly attractive young woman. The other was the inestimable Lisa Iacuzzi, self-styled activist, homeless coalition spokesperson, gender discrimination consultant (from her office at Sisters of the Road cafe), dog trainer, teacher, vodka-dispensing teen mentor, you name it.
But omit “self-serving manipulator”, one of the nicer descriptions from a former co-worker. And don't, for heaven's sake, call her “Buzz Cut.” Lisa's friend Paul Hamilton, who polishes Lisa's better-written pieces for her blog, scolded her beloved “hate mob” of “homphobes” for it, saying it “is very much like the Germans dehumanizing the Jews in World War II so that they could gas them.”
[See: NAGQ-OAE CHARGED WITH NAZISM!
http://notagoodqueer-oae.blogspot.com/2008/01/nagq-oae-charged-with-nazism-boli-and.html]
Be that as it may.......when Lisa boarded the bus, the tenant turned her face to the window, pretended interest in the scenery, and hoped Lisa wouldn't see her. No such luck.
The other woman seated herself in front of the tenant, while Lisa busied herself with bus fare. When she turned and saw her former neighbor, she was visibly taken aback, then glowered as she made her way down the aisle. “You fucken freak!” Lisa hissed, by way of greeting her former neighbor.
The tenant continued to stare out the window. Lisa seated herself several seats behind the tenant and the other woman. “He doesn't like you very much,” was the comment from the woman who had boarded the bus with Lisa.
“Well, first of all,” the tenant said, “that's not a 'he'. She's a she.”
The woman disagreed. “No, he's a guy.”
“No, she's a woman.”
“No, he's a guy.”
“No, she's a woman,” the tenant said. “I know this because she lived in my building and was my neighbor. She almost tore our building apart with her actions. She made so many threats, we had to get 24-hour security because of her.”
The woman half-rose and looked down the aisle to where Lisa was seated. She dropped back into her seat. “That's a woman,” she said incredulously.
“Yes,” the tenant said, “it is.”
“She tried to pick me up,” the woman said.
The tenant took out her cell and called a friend, to ask directions where to proceed from the bus. The woman who had boarded the bus with Lisa joined in the conversation, offering advice on directions. The friend on the phone inquired as to the identity of the other person. The tenant said, “Well, she's on the bus.”
Lisa's reaction to this was untoward: at the next stop, she scuttled off. The tenant surmised later that Lisa assumed she was calling 911.
After all, Lisa had boarded the bus in the vicinity of the clinic, and the stalking order currently in place against her – for which she had already been haled into court, and found guilty of violating – forbade her to come near the place. Another violation of that order and she would have been facing a very long jail sentence, longer certainly than the 29 days she spent in the pokey last November—most of it in the jail psycho ward, due to her faked suicide attempt with a plastic shampoo bottle.
“I can't believe that was a woman,” the woman said incredulously. “She was weird.”
“You have no idea,” the tenant said.
The tenant could have told the woman about another Lisa pick up that failed, but didn't.
* * * * *
A little later, another tenant encountered Lisa at the food bank where that tenant worked. She was on the back porch with another volunteer, taking a break, when the other volunteer called out, “Hey, cute dog!” The tenant turned and saw Lisa and her dog, strolling down the street. “Oh gawd,” the tenant said. “It's my ex-neighbor.”
“The one you told us about?”
“The same.”
“Better warn the others, before anything happens.”
All that happened turned out to be less interesting than the other tenant's encounter on the bus with the woman Lisa tried to pick up by the methadone clinic. Lisa and Rowdy came in, went to the front desk, and asked for clothes. The receptionist said she was sorry, but clothing was closed that day.
Lisa scowled. “I need clothes.”
“Sorry,” the receptionist said. “We haven't enough staff to open anything but food today.”
“But I need clothes,” Lisa said, in a louder tone, as if this would increase the number of staff on hand.
“Sorry,” the receptionist said.
“I really need clothes,” Lisa said emphatically. “It's an emergency. All my clothes are dirty.”
After a few more exchanges along these lines, Lisa left. A community service worker asked, “Was that Lee Iacuzzi? I know her.”
“Sorry to hear it,” the tenant said.
“Yeah,” the worker said. “She used to come into the Pot, where I hang out sometimes. It's a coffee house up on 25th”
“I know that place,” the tenant said. “I used to live up the street. When I could afford to live up the street.”
“They 86'd her,” the worker said.
“Don't tell me,” the tenant said. They both chuckled.
* * * * *
Lisa's other failed pickup was a shade more dramatic than the pickup Lisa failed to make near the Belmont methadone clinic. It happened during one of Lisa's recurring periods of homelessness. The report comes from a friend of the woman, who, taking pity on Lisa, offered her a roof over her head and a couch to sleep on. Lisa always essays the role of poor little lamb with consummate skill. Naturally she accepted the Good Samaritan's offer, and went home with her.
Briefly, then, after preparing for bed, the woman started into the living room to tell Lisa good night, then stopped short. Lisa was just then finishing the process of disrobing; “unbinding,” is how she later put it. As the woman stood there, Lisa made it known that she considered the offer sexual, rather than the charitable one it was, and intended to make good of it. Perhaps it was the threat of forced sex, perhaps it was that combined with sight of those expansive rolls of pallid Aryan flab. It galvanized the Good Samaritan to beat a hasty retreat to her bedroom, slam the door and lean against it while making a frantic call to 911. The police arrived and escorted a furious Lisa from the woman's home.
That's the gist of the report; the details can be filled in by those who, from past experience, know Lisa better than she knows herself.
Lisa crows on her blog that since her release from jail, she has become “a legend.” Well, maybe if only a very minor one. It's a pity her self-delusion doesn't permit her to see her "legend" for what it actually is. Were it otherwise, she might begin to make the life changes necessary to arrest her increasingly rapid slide downhill. But, where there's life, there's hope.
Let's hope that Good Samaritan who took Lisa in, and was almost taken in by her, is a bit more discerning about where she chooses to dispense charitable acts of kindness.
Not A Good Queer – Or Anything Else
We still rise! (despite morning inclinations to stay in bed)
HAPPY BIRTHDAY, LISA!!!
Today is Thursday, 3rd July 2008, and Lisa is 45 years old. Therefore, let us all sing:
A very happy birthday
To you
Lisa!
A very happy birthday
To you
Lisa!
You're forty-five years old today
Start acting your age
A very happy birthday
To you!
A very happy birthday
To you
Lisa!
A very happy birthday
To you
Lisa!
You're forty-five years old today
Start acting your age
A very happy birthday
To you!
Not A Good Queer – Or Anything Else
We still rise! (despite morning inclinations to stay in bed)
POOR LISA!!! TAKE TWO
Judging from the sullen, glowering expression she normally wears, when she thinks no one is paying attention, smiling doesn't come easy to Lisa Iacuzzi. It was with a certain sadness, therefore, that blogsters at NAGQ-OAE learned that the ineffable Ms. Iacuzzi, Our Lisa, blogged in her Friday, 20th June entry “Don'T SHow Pain” (http://notagoodqueer.blogspot.com/2008/06/dont-show-pain.html) about the pain she was feeling, and her struggle to mask it with a smile.
Lisa writes:
Just being convicted of my first crime in my life, I show little pain. I try to keep a smile on my face. Has it been painful. Only my closest friends have seen it and I put on a smile on for most of my days.
Putting aside doubts that Lisa has any real friends, close or otherwise, this must arouse sympathy. But what's troubling Lisa trouble now? Hasn't Lisa achieved a “win” over one of the two charitable non-profits against whom she claims to have filed “lawsuits”? Are the “$1,000,000 settlement” and “$300,000 settlement”, over which she has cackled in (and out) of her blog, no longer in the offering? Has she not made herself into the “legend” she has styled herself on her blog? Weighed against this fortune and glory, surely Lisa can't be pained by some conviction over one of her recent misdemeanors.
I do go to bed at night and think that the hate mob now has some validation of me being convicted so they might now leave me alone.
Since getting out of jail, the hate mob continued to stalk me where I was gay bashed. I did not make a police report about it.
Well, so, there's nothing to report on that score. No member of Lisa's imaginary “hate mob” has ever reciprocated the amount of interest in Lisa as Lisa has devoted to that “hate mob”, in all its various incarnations.
But at least we now have some clue as to the root of Lisa's latest sufferings. After reveling in her starring role in two articles from an out-of-state blogster, a couple of puff pieces in the Portland Mercury, even a few lines in the staid Oregonian – all by writers who know Lisa only from what she has told them – Lisa must now confront an actual chunk of the reality she has created for herself. To one who spends a disturbing amount of time in her self-created fantasy world, the necessity of facing up to the results of her actions must indeed cause Lisa some pain.
(NAGQ-OAE deals with Lisa's cameo in the Oregonian article elsewhere. The larger context was the homeless sit-in downtown last April-May, and Lisa's latest “activism” on behalf of the homeless. A curious venue for Lisa's soi-disant “activism”, not to mention surprising to those who know her, when one considers her physical assault on a crippled homeless man last winter, and her more recent theft of another homeless man's sleeping bag and his staked out sleeping place – not to mention the fact that there seems to be no prospect of money for Lisa.)
I just left town for awhile. They called my family in New Jersey and said that I was arrested. When I called my sister, she could not stop crying, she said that she was crying all week. I told her that I was in Eugene and the hate mob could not come after me so please stop crying.
Histrionics aside, along with the usual shuffling of blame, it's odd how Lisa's “hate mob” tends to undergo various and sundry metamorphoses from time to time. In its previous incarnations, Lisa has described her “hate mob”, roughly in order of appearance, as:
a) A gang of gay women “who have attacked me and come after me”
b) A gang of “predominantly African American women”
c) A gang of “African American women who are bible thumpers” led by a “convicted felon”
d) A “ruthless gang” of African American women, led by Portland Impact, which held classes to “sell their welfare cards for cash” for “getting drug money”
e) A gang of “twenty-people involved in a fraud of food stamps”
f) A “lynching hate mob”
g) A “lynch mob of a twenty dedicated to hate”
h) “A homphobic gang”, a “hate mob”, a “lynching mob”
i) “Math” heads
j) The Sheriff of Multnomah County, the Portland Police, and the DA's office, all of whom have “a reputation for hating trans people like me.”
Between d) and e) above, Lisa shifted her emphasis rather quickly, and dropped the “ruthless, bible-thumping drug-dealing African American gang” from her hate mob. This occurred soon after NAGQ-OAE made reference to the complaint on file with the NAACP for Lisa's racist hate speech and actions against her African American neighbors. One might say that Lisa's “hate mob” thereafter changed its complexion.
One might also hope that Lisa learned an important lesson, namely, that it is not nice to bang on the doors of disabled, retired African American college teachers, then run away after yelling “Nigger! Nigger! Nigger!” (and destroy their cable TV); or to greet nine-year-old African American girls, out for a walk with their grandmothers, with the phrase: “All you nigger bitches do drugs.” In view of the foregoing, the “I love black people!” articles Lisa hurriedly slung on her blog, with some sort of apologia pro sua vita, fooled no one. Lisa's contrived apologia also indicates that, sadly, she learned no lesson, but at least she may have learned not to give vent to her penchant for racist hate speech.
Meyers did come into my hang out and asked questions about me. This is Meyers who the DA knows is a homphobe.
Clearly, this can't be the same Meyers whom her friends know is bisexual. What neither the DA's office, nor the friends of Meyers, nor Meyers herself know, but would dearly love to know, is how a woman who has never been shy about her bisexuality can be a “homphobe”. This is something only Lisa herself knows, and Lisa can't, or won't, explain.
Another thing Lisa doesn't explain is why almost everyone with whom she has provoked an altercation is a “homphobe”. The gay and bi- women who were the first, and remained chief, among the targets of Lisa's abuse throughout her seven-month (free) stay at The Rose apartments, were “homphobes”. The gay woman who led the ruthless, bible-thumping over-the-hill African American gang at the Rose was another “homphobe”. Soo, too, the “homphobic” hate mob at the Rose.
Not to worry, though. As with the Ruthless Over the Hill Gang of Bible Thumping African American Grandmothers, so too with the “homphobic” hate mob. Upon her realisation – again, courtesy of NAGQ-OAE -- that the majority of the “hate mob” are lesbians, or at least bisexual women, Lisa effected another rapid backpeddle and volte-face, and blogged some wonky self-exculpatory convolution as to why these women, her former neighbors, loathe her.
Racial origins and sexual preferences aside, it's odd that Lisa has never included amongst the members of her “hate mob” anyone from the Portland International Hostel, where she once worked. If anything, it seems that some of the employee there loathe her even more than her former neighbors. She also seems to have forgotten that the staff of the alternative school where she once worked, and which fired her, described her as “a disgruntled ex-employee with an axe to grind,” and “a self-serving manipulator.”
The DA knows that REACH CDC lied for Meyers to get a stalking order on me.
Unless Lisa works for the DA's office, this can be dismissed as Lisa's usual pie-in-the-sky whyfore.
The DA office in Portland has a reputation of hating trans folks.
When Meyers violated the stalking order, the DA did not press chargers.
Ah, so now it's hatred for “trans folks” which, along with homophobia, is the root cause for the negative emotion Lisa excites. Surely it can't be due to anything Lisa has said or done, since she is ever the innocent little lamb and sacrificial victim on the altar of irrational hate.
To save Lisa the time of writing them out -- and the trauma of having to produce intelligible written English – NAGQ-OAE offers the following excuses for Lisa to cut and paste on her blog:
* “The DA's office is persecuting me because all the DAs and their staff are 'homphobes' and HATE trans folks!”
* “Anyone who saw me yell 'All you nigger bitches do drugs!” at a little African American girl and her grandmother is LYING because they're 'homphobes' and HATE trans folks!”
* “Witnesses who saw me hitting and kicking and spitting on police when I was arrested, because I hit, kicked, and spit on police while they were arresting me, are LYING because they're 'homphobes' and they HATE trans folks!”
* “The cameras which recorded my repeated physical assaults on a crippled homeless man is LYING because that camera is a 'homphobe' and HATES trans folks!”
If the DA's office has a rep for “hating trans folks”, it's not as well known as its habit of not taking too seriously baseless and repetitious accusations made by, to put it kindly, self-serving manipulators with a number of axes to grind.
Showing pain channels energy away from surviving and gives the hate mob validation and joy that they are causing pain.
Welcome to the city of Portland, Oregon.
Contrary to Lisa's imaginings, no joy is felt by anyone who was a victim of Lisa Iacuzzi's hateful, hurtful antics – not by the gay women whom Lisa targeted for abuse, nor by her African American victims or anyone else. If Lisa wants to discover the real “hate mob”, she need only look in her mirror. But she won't.
We still rise, we will not apologize for anything!
This has ever been Lisa's problem, or rather one of them. If only Lisa would exert herself to transform and rechannel the energy she expends on vicious, troublemaking antics, and begin making something useful of her potential, rather than projecting and transferring her self-hatred onto others, she might find that most of her problems would dissipate – and so would her “hate mob”. She wouldn't even have to apologize.
But she can't, or won't.
Not a Good Queer on Blog Spot!
Not a Good Queer Back in the County Jail is what it may be, after Lisa is sentenced on 11th July.
Still, we at NAGQ-OAE cannot help but sadness for whatever pain Lisa's actions have brought her, as well as a crawling sort of pity for her. It must be difficult to become aware, even so late as middle age, of the effects of one's karma, or, as the Aristotlean concept puts it, of one's chickens coming home to roost – and shy away from looking it in the face. Hinc illae lacrimae.
The shiva visit:
So sorry about your loss.
Now back to my problems.
Not A Good Queer—Or Anything Else
We still rise! (despite morning inclinations to stay in bed)
Happy 45th, Lisa!
Lisa writes:
Just being convicted of my first crime in my life, I show little pain. I try to keep a smile on my face. Has it been painful. Only my closest friends have seen it and I put on a smile on for most of my days.
Putting aside doubts that Lisa has any real friends, close or otherwise, this must arouse sympathy. But what's troubling Lisa trouble now? Hasn't Lisa achieved a “win” over one of the two charitable non-profits against whom she claims to have filed “lawsuits”? Are the “$1,000,000 settlement” and “$300,000 settlement”, over which she has cackled in (and out) of her blog, no longer in the offering? Has she not made herself into the “legend” she has styled herself on her blog? Weighed against this fortune and glory, surely Lisa can't be pained by some conviction over one of her recent misdemeanors.
I do go to bed at night and think that the hate mob now has some validation of me being convicted so they might now leave me alone.
Since getting out of jail, the hate mob continued to stalk me where I was gay bashed. I did not make a police report about it.
Well, so, there's nothing to report on that score. No member of Lisa's imaginary “hate mob” has ever reciprocated the amount of interest in Lisa as Lisa has devoted to that “hate mob”, in all its various incarnations.
But at least we now have some clue as to the root of Lisa's latest sufferings. After reveling in her starring role in two articles from an out-of-state blogster, a couple of puff pieces in the Portland Mercury, even a few lines in the staid Oregonian – all by writers who know Lisa only from what she has told them – Lisa must now confront an actual chunk of the reality she has created for herself. To one who spends a disturbing amount of time in her self-created fantasy world, the necessity of facing up to the results of her actions must indeed cause Lisa some pain.
(NAGQ-OAE deals with Lisa's cameo in the Oregonian article elsewhere. The larger context was the homeless sit-in downtown last April-May, and Lisa's latest “activism” on behalf of the homeless. A curious venue for Lisa's soi-disant “activism”, not to mention surprising to those who know her, when one considers her physical assault on a crippled homeless man last winter, and her more recent theft of another homeless man's sleeping bag and his staked out sleeping place – not to mention the fact that there seems to be no prospect of money for Lisa.)
I just left town for awhile. They called my family in New Jersey and said that I was arrested. When I called my sister, she could not stop crying, she said that she was crying all week. I told her that I was in Eugene and the hate mob could not come after me so please stop crying.
Histrionics aside, along with the usual shuffling of blame, it's odd how Lisa's “hate mob” tends to undergo various and sundry metamorphoses from time to time. In its previous incarnations, Lisa has described her “hate mob”, roughly in order of appearance, as:
a) A gang of gay women “who have attacked me and come after me”
b) A gang of “predominantly African American women”
c) A gang of “African American women who are bible thumpers” led by a “convicted felon”
d) A “ruthless gang” of African American women, led by Portland Impact, which held classes to “sell their welfare cards for cash” for “getting drug money”
e) A gang of “twenty-people involved in a fraud of food stamps”
f) A “lynching hate mob”
g) A “lynch mob of a twenty dedicated to hate”
h) “A homphobic gang”, a “hate mob”, a “lynching mob”
i) “Math” heads
j) The Sheriff of Multnomah County, the Portland Police, and the DA's office, all of whom have “a reputation for hating trans people like me.”
Between d) and e) above, Lisa shifted her emphasis rather quickly, and dropped the “ruthless, bible-thumping drug-dealing African American gang” from her hate mob. This occurred soon after NAGQ-OAE made reference to the complaint on file with the NAACP for Lisa's racist hate speech and actions against her African American neighbors. One might say that Lisa's “hate mob” thereafter changed its complexion.
One might also hope that Lisa learned an important lesson, namely, that it is not nice to bang on the doors of disabled, retired African American college teachers, then run away after yelling “Nigger! Nigger! Nigger!” (and destroy their cable TV); or to greet nine-year-old African American girls, out for a walk with their grandmothers, with the phrase: “All you nigger bitches do drugs.” In view of the foregoing, the “I love black people!” articles Lisa hurriedly slung on her blog, with some sort of apologia pro sua vita, fooled no one. Lisa's contrived apologia also indicates that, sadly, she learned no lesson, but at least she may have learned not to give vent to her penchant for racist hate speech.
Meyers did come into my hang out and asked questions about me. This is Meyers who the DA knows is a homphobe.
Clearly, this can't be the same Meyers whom her friends know is bisexual. What neither the DA's office, nor the friends of Meyers, nor Meyers herself know, but would dearly love to know, is how a woman who has never been shy about her bisexuality can be a “homphobe”. This is something only Lisa herself knows, and Lisa can't, or won't, explain.
Another thing Lisa doesn't explain is why almost everyone with whom she has provoked an altercation is a “homphobe”. The gay and bi- women who were the first, and remained chief, among the targets of Lisa's abuse throughout her seven-month (free) stay at The Rose apartments, were “homphobes”. The gay woman who led the ruthless, bible-thumping over-the-hill African American gang at the Rose was another “homphobe”. Soo, too, the “homphobic” hate mob at the Rose.
Not to worry, though. As with the Ruthless Over the Hill Gang of Bible Thumping African American Grandmothers, so too with the “homphobic” hate mob. Upon her realisation – again, courtesy of NAGQ-OAE -- that the majority of the “hate mob” are lesbians, or at least bisexual women, Lisa effected another rapid backpeddle and volte-face, and blogged some wonky self-exculpatory convolution as to why these women, her former neighbors, loathe her.
Racial origins and sexual preferences aside, it's odd that Lisa has never included amongst the members of her “hate mob” anyone from the Portland International Hostel, where she once worked. If anything, it seems that some of the employee there loathe her even more than her former neighbors. She also seems to have forgotten that the staff of the alternative school where she once worked, and which fired her, described her as “a disgruntled ex-employee with an axe to grind,” and “a self-serving manipulator.”
The DA knows that REACH CDC lied for Meyers to get a stalking order on me.
Unless Lisa works for the DA's office, this can be dismissed as Lisa's usual pie-in-the-sky whyfore.
The DA office in Portland has a reputation of hating trans folks.
When Meyers violated the stalking order, the DA did not press chargers.
Ah, so now it's hatred for “trans folks” which, along with homophobia, is the root cause for the negative emotion Lisa excites. Surely it can't be due to anything Lisa has said or done, since she is ever the innocent little lamb and sacrificial victim on the altar of irrational hate.
To save Lisa the time of writing them out -- and the trauma of having to produce intelligible written English – NAGQ-OAE offers the following excuses for Lisa to cut and paste on her blog:
* “The DA's office is persecuting me because all the DAs and their staff are 'homphobes' and HATE trans folks!”
* “Anyone who saw me yell 'All you nigger bitches do drugs!” at a little African American girl and her grandmother is LYING because they're 'homphobes' and HATE trans folks!”
* “Witnesses who saw me hitting and kicking and spitting on police when I was arrested, because I hit, kicked, and spit on police while they were arresting me, are LYING because they're 'homphobes' and they HATE trans folks!”
* “The cameras which recorded my repeated physical assaults on a crippled homeless man is LYING because that camera is a 'homphobe' and HATES trans folks!”
If the DA's office has a rep for “hating trans folks”, it's not as well known as its habit of not taking too seriously baseless and repetitious accusations made by, to put it kindly, self-serving manipulators with a number of axes to grind.
Showing pain channels energy away from surviving and gives the hate mob validation and joy that they are causing pain.
Welcome to the city of Portland, Oregon.
Contrary to Lisa's imaginings, no joy is felt by anyone who was a victim of Lisa Iacuzzi's hateful, hurtful antics – not by the gay women whom Lisa targeted for abuse, nor by her African American victims or anyone else. If Lisa wants to discover the real “hate mob”, she need only look in her mirror. But she won't.
We still rise, we will not apologize for anything!
This has ever been Lisa's problem, or rather one of them. If only Lisa would exert herself to transform and rechannel the energy she expends on vicious, troublemaking antics, and begin making something useful of her potential, rather than projecting and transferring her self-hatred onto others, she might find that most of her problems would dissipate – and so would her “hate mob”. She wouldn't even have to apologize.
But she can't, or won't.
Not a Good Queer on Blog Spot!
Not a Good Queer Back in the County Jail is what it may be, after Lisa is sentenced on 11th July.
Still, we at NAGQ-OAE cannot help but sadness for whatever pain Lisa's actions have brought her, as well as a crawling sort of pity for her. It must be difficult to become aware, even so late as middle age, of the effects of one's karma, or, as the Aristotlean concept puts it, of one's chickens coming home to roost – and shy away from looking it in the face. Hinc illae lacrimae.
The shiva visit:
So sorry about your loss.
Now back to my problems.
Not A Good Queer—Or Anything Else
We still rise! (despite morning inclinations to stay in bed)
Happy 45th, Lisa!
LISA IN THE OREGONIAN, or Some of the Lies That Are Lisa’s Life
Apparently feeling that her life had become uneventful, that it wasn't fulfilling enough for her to lodge complaints against women's domestic violence shelters, or non-profit organizations for low- or no-income families, or alternative schools for troubled children, -- or spending 29 days in jail for violating one of several stalking orders against her – Our Lisa popped up in The Oregonian's online issue last May, where she essayed a featured role as a spokesperson for homeless people during their downtown protest last April and May.
In her 12 May 2008 article, Oregonian staffer Anna Griffin wrote:
Portland laws bar people from overnighting on public property and loitering. But because this is a protest, those rules don't apply. Protesters say their immediate priority is an end to those laws, or at least a promise that city police and private security guards won't enforce them. Several headed indoors and up a floor to speak at last week's City Council meeting.
Griffin then quoted Lisa herself:
"I don't want anything from you. I don't want any free ride from you at all," said Lisa Iacuzzi, part of the group now calling itself the "Homeless Liberation Front." "I have a master's degree. I paid my way for my own education. I don't want anything free."
To anyone who knows Lisa – and this clearly doesn't include Griffin, or the blogsters who have written about Lisa, based mostly on what Lisa has to say about herself -- these statements are as laughable as Lisa's sudden “activism” on behalf of the homeless.
Let's look at Lisa's utterances one by one.
"I don't want anything from you.”
Of course Lisa wants something. Usually it's free meals, free cigarettes, free housing, automatic deference, a couple bucks or a million dollars, but mostly it's attention. Apparently she got it when she was invited to discuss the homeless issue with the mayor, and was later quoted on her favorite subject: herself. This is probably as helpful to the homeless as a windshield wiper on a hippo's ass, but it's certainly a huge puff to Lisa's already oversized ego.
At this point, what she wanted from the City of Portland, was the right to camp in the Park Blocks, a right she didn't need, having previously stolen a homeless man's sleeping bag and driven him from his staked out place in an abandoned paint store on Grand and and Taylor. If she was temporarily homeless, it was due to her habit of abusing the generosity of almost everyone who has helped her.
"I don't want any free ride from you at all."
Nonsense. Of course Lisa wants a free ride. Her recent life history has been that of a number of free rides. Last July, she began entertaining the illusion that if she filed a discrimination charge against the women's domestic violence shelter which housed her, and the non-profit organization which gave her a room, she might stand to gain an even smoother free ride.
As she told two of her former neighbors last October: “Reach offered me $10,000 if I said I wouldn’t sue them. The amount isn’t enough. That isn’t enough for a European vacation! I want $1,000,000 from them.”
A propos of that, Lisa wrote in her 27th October letter to Jill Riddle of HAP: “I am going to own 988 Reach units.”
Lisa Iacuzzi, part of the group now calling itself the "Homeless Liberation Front."
Was Lisa ever a part of that group. Especially as there's no prospect of money in it for her?
"I have a master's degree.”
Lisa routinely claims to have earned an MA in education from PSU. (It used to be “Special Education,” until she read on NAGQ-OAE that PSU offers no such degree.) PSU also offered no degree to Lee/Lisa Mary Iacuzzi. What PSU actually has on Lisa is an outstanding bill for her $5,000 student loan, and a collection agency after her for reneging on the terms of that loan.
That aside, Lisa's lack of education is evident in her conversation, not to mention her writing. The blog entries which are polished by an acquaintance of hers are another matter. So are the blog entries which she pastes from other sites, and passes off as her own.
“I paid my way for my own education.”
Not according to PSU, which now faces retaliatory countercharges from Lisa for –you got it – discrimination. Well, it's cheaper for Lisa than paying what she owes.
“I don't want anything free."
To anyone who knows Lisa, this is like saying the Palestinian Authority doesn't want anything from Israel.
The above is by no means an inclusive list of the lies that are Lisa's life. For example, we haven't even touched on Lisa's so-called “mentorship student” -- previously introduced by Lisa as “my seventeen-year-old girlfriend, Nicole” -- and what mentorship program permitted Lisa to provide vodka and pot to a minor. But those omissions would fill a book.
The Oregonian article can be found at:
http://www.oregonlive.com/news/oregonian/index.ssf?/base/news/1210562703205000.xml&coll=7
Lacking fins or tail,
the gefilte fish swims with
great difficulty
Not A Good Queer – Or Anything Else
We still rise! (despite morning inclinations to stay in bed)
In her 12 May 2008 article, Oregonian staffer Anna Griffin wrote:
Portland laws bar people from overnighting on public property and loitering. But because this is a protest, those rules don't apply. Protesters say their immediate priority is an end to those laws, or at least a promise that city police and private security guards won't enforce them. Several headed indoors and up a floor to speak at last week's City Council meeting.
Griffin then quoted Lisa herself:
"I don't want anything from you. I don't want any free ride from you at all," said Lisa Iacuzzi, part of the group now calling itself the "Homeless Liberation Front." "I have a master's degree. I paid my way for my own education. I don't want anything free."
To anyone who knows Lisa – and this clearly doesn't include Griffin, or the blogsters who have written about Lisa, based mostly on what Lisa has to say about herself -- these statements are as laughable as Lisa's sudden “activism” on behalf of the homeless.
Let's look at Lisa's utterances one by one.
"I don't want anything from you.”
Of course Lisa wants something. Usually it's free meals, free cigarettes, free housing, automatic deference, a couple bucks or a million dollars, but mostly it's attention. Apparently she got it when she was invited to discuss the homeless issue with the mayor, and was later quoted on her favorite subject: herself. This is probably as helpful to the homeless as a windshield wiper on a hippo's ass, but it's certainly a huge puff to Lisa's already oversized ego.
At this point, what she wanted from the City of Portland, was the right to camp in the Park Blocks, a right she didn't need, having previously stolen a homeless man's sleeping bag and driven him from his staked out place in an abandoned paint store on Grand and and Taylor. If she was temporarily homeless, it was due to her habit of abusing the generosity of almost everyone who has helped her.
"I don't want any free ride from you at all."
Nonsense. Of course Lisa wants a free ride. Her recent life history has been that of a number of free rides. Last July, she began entertaining the illusion that if she filed a discrimination charge against the women's domestic violence shelter which housed her, and the non-profit organization which gave her a room, she might stand to gain an even smoother free ride.
As she told two of her former neighbors last October: “Reach offered me $10,000 if I said I wouldn’t sue them. The amount isn’t enough. That isn’t enough for a European vacation! I want $1,000,000 from them.”
A propos of that, Lisa wrote in her 27th October letter to Jill Riddle of HAP: “I am going to own 988 Reach units.”
Lisa Iacuzzi, part of the group now calling itself the "Homeless Liberation Front."
Was Lisa ever a part of that group. Especially as there's no prospect of money in it for her?
"I have a master's degree.”
Lisa routinely claims to have earned an MA in education from PSU. (It used to be “Special Education,” until she read on NAGQ-OAE that PSU offers no such degree.) PSU also offered no degree to Lee/Lisa Mary Iacuzzi. What PSU actually has on Lisa is an outstanding bill for her $5,000 student loan, and a collection agency after her for reneging on the terms of that loan.
That aside, Lisa's lack of education is evident in her conversation, not to mention her writing. The blog entries which are polished by an acquaintance of hers are another matter. So are the blog entries which she pastes from other sites, and passes off as her own.
“I paid my way for my own education.”
Not according to PSU, which now faces retaliatory countercharges from Lisa for –you got it – discrimination. Well, it's cheaper for Lisa than paying what she owes.
“I don't want anything free."
To anyone who knows Lisa, this is like saying the Palestinian Authority doesn't want anything from Israel.
The above is by no means an inclusive list of the lies that are Lisa's life. For example, we haven't even touched on Lisa's so-called “mentorship student” -- previously introduced by Lisa as “my seventeen-year-old girlfriend, Nicole” -- and what mentorship program permitted Lisa to provide vodka and pot to a minor. But those omissions would fill a book.
The Oregonian article can be found at:
http://www.oregonlive.com/news/oregonian/index.ssf?/base/news/1210562703205000.xml&coll=7
Lacking fins or tail,
the gefilte fish swims with
great difficulty
Not A Good Queer – Or Anything Else
We still rise! (despite morning inclinations to stay in bed)
Happy 45th, Lisa!
20 February 2008
Laugh of the Month: How Stupid is Lisa Iacuzzi?
On That Other Blog, Lisa provided the information that:
"One can trace the location of an anyone’s URL address which
is connected to one's blogs or WebPages."
Wow! Awwwwwweesome!
How stupid to you have to be not to know that?
About as stupid as Lisa Iacuzzi.
"One can trace the location of an anyone’s URL address which
is connected to one's blogs or WebPages."
Wow! Awwwwwweesome!
How stupid to you have to be not to know that?
About as stupid as Lisa Iacuzzi.
19 February 2008
IN ANSWER TO LISA IACUZZI'S "ESTIMATION"
On Saturday, February 9, Lisa blogged:
"Reach CDC : Building a hate Community" "
Their has been no response from Reach CDC to Paul Hamilton’s assessment of their enabling hate machine, this is due to the fact that Reach CDC finally shut down the haters Blog. Did they threaten the haters, Bren Athens and the mob to shut down or be evicted?
This is my estimation on why the hate Blog called Not a Good Queer or anything else has stopped blogging."
Well, Lisa, you are ...... WRONG, as usual.
We stopped blogging on this wonderful blog for the simple reason that, quite frankly, you tend to become an awful bore rather quickly -- even for a nutjob.
Do try to get a life, dear, besides accosting women in the City Team Ministries' dinner line.
Love and Kisses
"Reach CDC : Building a hate Community" "
Their has been no response from Reach CDC to Paul Hamilton’s assessment of their enabling hate machine, this is due to the fact that Reach CDC finally shut down the haters Blog. Did they threaten the haters, Bren Athens and the mob to shut down or be evicted?
This is my estimation on why the hate Blog called Not a Good Queer or anything else has stopped blogging."
Well, Lisa, you are ...... WRONG, as usual.
We stopped blogging on this wonderful blog for the simple reason that, quite frankly, you tend to become an awful bore rather quickly -- even for a nutjob.
Do try to get a life, dear, besides accosting women in the City Team Ministries' dinner line.
Love and Kisses
28 January 2008
NAGQ-OAE CHARGED WITH NAZISM!
BOLI AND DA'S OFFICE LAUNCH INVESTIGATIONS!
BLOG FAME SOARS TO NEW HEIGHTS!
(NOTE: Per our recent policy change,
we will no longer correct Lisa's customary
substandard English usage and errata.)
On her NAGQ blog, Lisa Iacuzzi issued the following proclamation.
This letter is in regards to a blog dedicated to the hate of NAGQ called notagoodqueer-oae.blogspot.com. This owner and authors of notagoodqueer-oranythingelse blog is going to be charged with a hate crime and the author is a tenant or a group of tenants who reside at the Rose.
So, in Lisa's world view, presenting facts in opposition to slanderous and libelous fabrications constitutes a hate crime. But into what category does this push Lisa Iacuzzi's racist hate attacks on black and gay women? Let us see.
(Regarding “this owner and authors” of the highly acclaimed NAGQ-OAE blog -- try points farther south. Make that a LOT farther south.)
Currently, this blog is being investigated by the Bureau of Labor and Industry and has been sent to the district attorneys office.
We at NAGQ-OAE are thrilled at the acclaim our blog has generated, and can only express our hope that BOLI and the DA's staff will find the facts presented herein informative and amusing, as opposed to the stew of lugubrious fabrications cooked up by Lisa Iacuzzi.
We further extend our congratulations to Lisa for her achievement in learning to spell “bureau” correctly, and our warmest wishes for further success in her continuing English language education.
This kind of behavior will not be tolerated and all those responsible will be held accountable.
Ah well, “this owner and authors” of NAGQ-OAE have faith that the American people prefer fact to fabrication. Most Americans, anyway. Just not those in the highest echelons of our government, who prefer to eschew needy Americans in favour of tonguing the bungholes of racist, misogynistic, antisemitic and dictatorial oil sheikh governments.
Racist....misogynistic....antisemitic.....dictatorial.....Do these words harken to Lisa Iacuzzi's past behaviour? Certainly Lisa hates blacks and women – particularly gay women – and her threats are a tad dictatorial, to-wit: “Join me or suffer!” “Support me or suffer!” “Go to court against me, I'll cut your legs off!” The antisemitic part falls to a couple of Lisa's supporters, one of whom, author of the second of the following two notes, who vets some of Lisa's wambly ramblings; if a Lisa piece is intelligible, you can be sure she ran it by Paul Hamilton. The first note is from blogger LEOPARDI, or Leo, another of those poor souls who have swallowed Lisa's stochastic diatribes, hook, line, and bullcuzzi.
Another response from the gay community is blogger Leopardi who about the mob at the Rose whose blog is mimicking NAGQ blog with HATE!
LEOPARDI SAID:
NAGQ's assertions of being lynched by a homophobic mob seem to demonstrate credence to NAGQ"S claim that the environment is hostile to queer people. While it is clear, based on the incidents you report that you have a cause for frustration, your comments, sadly, validate the core assertions by Lee. Let me remind you that no matter how challenging the individual conflicts you have with a particular person, there is no excuse for resorting to the kind of insensitive language you use in your posts about Lee. The entire tenor of your post revels in a heterosexual norm that confirms Lee's complaint that you create an oppressive climate. Your language may not only be offensive to Lee personally, but when you choose to broadcast these views publicly, you are engaging in hate speech against a large group of gays, lesbians, and trans-gendered people in the Portland area. I am not asserting whether or not your claim is just. However, I am unimpressed by your claim thus far. I don't doubt that institutes such as the justice system support you. They have always been on the side of the powerful. I would submit that Lee has done you a tremendous service. She has given you a way to tell yourself that there's nothing wrong with you. My question to you is this: when Lee is gone, who will you hate? Leo 08 December, 2007 10:44
http://notagoodqueer.blogspot.com/2007/12/hate-at-reach-cdc.html
Let us take a few of these comments for response. First, the obvious:
“...when Lee is gone..”
Gone? When is Lisa planning to leave? Two days after her release from jail, she was back in the vicinity, where she attempted to assault a (Native American) tenant. Since then, she has been haunting the area, stalking tenants, creeping to the building's windows at night and causing disturbances, strolling up and down in front of the building, and otherwise lurking in wait for tenants, to engage them in her usual childish verbal confrontations, age-appropriate to the kindergarten bully Lisa is. All this after a stipulated court order in which Lisa agreed to come no closer than one mile.
“...you are engaging in hate speech against a large group of gays, lesbians, and trans-gendered people in the Portland area. I am not asserting whether or not your claim is just.”
Of course Leo won't assert whether or not “your claim” -- singular, rather than the more accurate plural – is or is not “just.” He just doesn't care. Moreover, it might prove difficult to show how the presentation of facts in opposition to Lisa's fabrications is “engaging in hate speech against a large group of gays, lesbians, and trans-gendered people”. Lisa is one woman, whereas the targets of her hateful antics from the inception of her tenancy were, and remain, gay women and black women.
Nothing has been said of Lisa's hate speech and false charges of criminal behaviour directed against African Americans. Presumably Lisa's calling a disabled black teacher a “nigger” was not “engaging in hate speech,” nor is Lisa telling a black grandmother, in the hearing of her nine-year-old grandchild, “All you nigger bitches do drugs””engaging in hate speech.” Of course, Lisa's false accusations that African American tenants are engaged in perpetrating welfare fraud and drug dealing, with the assistance of Portland Impact, are NOT “engaging in hate speech;” Lisa wrote them, so it's engaging in libel.
“Your language may not only be offensive to Lee personally..there is no excuse for resorting to the kind of insensitive language you use in your posts about Lee.”
How is presenting FACTS in opposition to Lisa's lies “insensitive”? Certainly language used in presenting facts is offensive to Lisa, for it is established fact that she hates facts. It's also a fact that she can't relate the same incident twice without contradicting herself. And is the “insensitive language” used by NAGQ-OAE contributors any more insensitive than Lisa's calling African American women “nigger bitches”? Was Lisa engaging in kind and sensitive language when she threatened gay women to “Join me or suffer!”, or “Support me or suffer!”, or threatened to cut off others' legs if they appeared in court?
Apparently, it's “insensitive” and “engaging in hate speech against a large group of gays, lesbians, and trans-gendered people in the Portland area” to take someone to task for her lies, her libels, her threats of physical harm, and her racist hate speech. But it's NOT “insensitive” or “engaging in hate speech” when Lisa calls African American women “nigger bitches” and falsely accuses them of “selling their welfare cards to get drug money.”
“Your comments, sadly, validate the core assertions by Lee.”
Lisa's “core assertions” have been invalidated by Lisa herself.
“NAGQ's assertions of being lynched by a homophobic mob seem to demonstrate credence to NAGQ"S claim that the environment is hostile to queer people.”
When, exactly, was Lisa Iacuzzi “lynched by a homophobic hate mob”? Or by any mob? And what, exactly, are gay women are doing in the mob? When a building owner is forced to hire security guards to protect tenants against ONE resident, it takes the most flexible of mental contortionists to concoct from it a Kafkaesque phantasmagoria of that one person being “lynched by a homophobic hate mob.”
No need for security guards existed until Lisa's vicious antics created that need. And it was gay women at The Rose who requested them.
Lisa's paranoiac fantasies notwithstanding, the environment is no more hostile to “queerpeople” than it is to blacks or Jews. It was Lisa Iacuzzi herself who bent her efforts to create that hostile environment of which she complains so strenuously – after she filed her BOLI complaint, that is, from which she expects to garner $30,000 or $1,000,000, as she has crowed, and “end up owning 988 Reach units.”
Lisa has also been banned from the Speakeasy Tavern next door; maybe the homophobic hate mob of gay women effected that, too? In fact, Lisa's “homophobic mob” is nothing more the “bible thumping African American gang” of her earlier tales. She quickly abandoned that, as soon as she got wind of the letter sent to the NAACP detailing her racist hate speech and actions
At the risk of being thought “insensitive” and “engaging in hate speech against a large group of gays, lesbians, and trans-gendered people in the Portland area,” NAGQ-OAE feels that Lisa's being "lynched by a homophobic hate mob" (of gay women?) ought to be filed under the same heading as pickled aliens in Area 51, the Face of Elvis on Mars, the Protocols of the Learned Elders of Zion, and Lisa's self-awarded “MA@PSU”.
-------------------------
From Paul Hamilton:
You are suffering on behalf of those of us who have made a deal with the devil to live (for now) in this dysfunctional system. You have the strength right now to be on the front line of this struggle. I believe in you and I know that your work is supportive of our community. I have been appalled in investigating the situation the level to which those who have expressed hatred to you have resorted in order to demean-- themselves. Their web site mirroring yours is an example the violence of a lynch mob. It is not just an unhealthy situation, but one in which I now understand you had a very real concern for your safety. Lord of the Flies comes to mind. I have never seen a web site created whose sole purpose is the expression of hatred for a person. The only precedent is Nazi Germany or the Columbine massacres. It is a case study in the psychology of evil. The difference between your web site (operated by a single person) documenting, in occasional posts, claims against the apartment complex-- and a mob of people gathered in an orgy of hatred against a single individual -- is a difference between a freedom of speech and a lynch mob going to hang and torture a queer. Again, despite the horror that you face with homelessness looming over you, I feel that you have escaped the truly alarming prospect of escalating cruelty at the hands of people who enjoy telling themselves how normal they are through their combined hatred of one person. Their web site alone is a clear issue of hate speech directed at a single target. Its sole purpose is cruelty. If it was directed towards someone in power like the president of the United States, it would be warranted. But, to create such a web site targeting someone who is powerless is an example of the kind of casual bigotry that created the crematoriums in Nazi Germany. Their characterization of your hair as being "buzzed", is very much like the Germans dehumanizing the Jews in World War II so that they could gas them. As awful as it is, I think you need to just get the hell physically away from that group of people. I am creating a PDF copy of their Blog so that I can archive it. Then, perhaps we can respond, point for point, to the character assassination that they have undertaken towards you. I wish I could tell you to be strong. I still have family left to visit. . . so, despite my financial problems, I will have some kind of holidays. I can say-- hones tly-- that I will defend you the best way I can. Take Care, Paul
As with Leo's post, let's take a few of Paul's comments.
“I know that your work is supportive of our community.”
It would be interesting to learn how Lisa's bullying and racist hate speech are supportive of the gay community. As for “work,” has Lisa engaged in any, beyond her usual freeloading, recently?
“Their web site mirroring yours is an example the violence of a lynch mob.”
It would also be interesting to learn how a blog setting forth facts in opposition to garbled fictions equates with the violence of a lynch mob, as seen here:
http://markbey.files.wordpress.com/2007/04/bodylg.jpg
“I have never seen a web site created whose sole purpose is the expression of hatred for a person. The only precedent is Nazi Germany”
Only a non-Jew, and a rather ignorant one, could produce such a grotesque exaggeration.
“Their web site alone is a clear issue of hate speech directed at a single target. If it was directed towards someone in power like the president of the United States, it would be warranted.”
In short, Paul Hamilton actually condones “hate speech directed at a single target” -- IF it's someone he doesn't like. But it's “lynch mob” violence, and indefensible, if it's someone he likes (or thinks he likes). This is ethically relativistic and indicates a elasticity rather like the Nazis' Master Aryan Race.
You were Aryan if you were Japanese, especially after Japan bombed Pearl Harbor and British bases throughout the Pacific. You were Aryan if you were Farouk of Egypt, Amin al-Husayni and the Palestinian Arab Higher Committee, Rashid Ali of Iraq. You were not Aryan if you were Abdullah of Jordan, a British ally. The British were Aryans, if muddled ones, whereas Americans were “weak and feeble” mongrels, “dominated by Negroes and Jews.” Paul Hamilton's justification of “hate speech” is elastic like that.
“an example of the kind of casual bigotry that created the crematoriums in Nazi Germany.”
Again, a statement that only an ignorant and insensitive non-Jew could concoct.
“Their characterization of your hair as being "buzzed", is very much like the Germans dehumanizing the Jews in World War II so that they could gas them.”
With this profoundly grotesque comparison, Paul Hamilton tips over from the comments of an ignorant and insensitive non-Jew into borderline Holocaust denial.
“Fluids from diseased animals were injected into humans to observe the effect. Prisoners were forced to exist on sea water to see how long castaways might survive. Gynecology was an area of great interest. Various methods of sterilization were practiced—by massive X-ray, by irritants and drugs, by surgery without benefit of anesthetic. As techniques were perfected, it was estimated that a doctor with 10 assistants could sterilize 1,000 women per day. The “experimental people” were also used by Nazi doctors who needed practice performing various operations. One doctor at Auschwitz perfected his amputation technique on live prisoners; after he had finished, his maimed patients were sent off to the gas chamber.” WWII: History of the Second World War; The Death of a People, ed. D.S. Thomas et al., p 152
Equating the piddling little altercations Lisa herself provoked, then embroidered upon, to the brutal extermination of millions is a form of Holocaust denial, and that IS antisemitism.
And who was it who issued the threat – among her many others -- to “cut off your legs”?
“Perhaps we can respond, point for point, to the character assassination that they have undertaken towards you.”
Perhaps they can. We at NAGQ-OAE are not going wait with collectively bated breath, as we doubt Lisa et al will, or can, produce any point-by-point response based on facts. It seems that in the narrow views expressed above, attacks on gays and blacks are legitimate, so long they are directed solely against women, and Lisa Iacuzzi is the perpetrator. Lisa's racism and misogyny, apparently, aren't even blips on the indignation radar.
Now, about those BOLI and DA investigations, which Lisa claims “are underway”, and NAGQ-OAE contributors being “charged with a hate crime” ....
BRING 'EM ON.
Besides, Lisa loves the attention.
NAGQ-OAE
Cad fawr a fu o'r pan ddwyre haul hyd pan gynnu. A gwedi elwch tawelwch fu.
BLOG FAME SOARS TO NEW HEIGHTS!
(NOTE: Per our recent policy change,
we will no longer correct Lisa's customary
substandard English usage and errata.)
On her NAGQ blog, Lisa Iacuzzi issued the following proclamation.
This letter is in regards to a blog dedicated to the hate of NAGQ called notagoodqueer-oae.blogspot.com. This owner and authors of notagoodqueer-oranythingelse blog is going to be charged with a hate crime and the author is a tenant or a group of tenants who reside at the Rose.
So, in Lisa's world view, presenting facts in opposition to slanderous and libelous fabrications constitutes a hate crime. But into what category does this push Lisa Iacuzzi's racist hate attacks on black and gay women? Let us see.
(Regarding “this owner and authors” of the highly acclaimed NAGQ-OAE blog -- try points farther south. Make that a LOT farther south.)
Currently, this blog is being investigated by the Bureau of Labor and Industry and has been sent to the district attorneys office.
We at NAGQ-OAE are thrilled at the acclaim our blog has generated, and can only express our hope that BOLI and the DA's staff will find the facts presented herein informative and amusing, as opposed to the stew of lugubrious fabrications cooked up by Lisa Iacuzzi.
We further extend our congratulations to Lisa for her achievement in learning to spell “bureau” correctly, and our warmest wishes for further success in her continuing English language education.
This kind of behavior will not be tolerated and all those responsible will be held accountable.
Ah well, “this owner and authors” of NAGQ-OAE have faith that the American people prefer fact to fabrication. Most Americans, anyway. Just not those in the highest echelons of our government, who prefer to eschew needy Americans in favour of tonguing the bungholes of racist, misogynistic, antisemitic and dictatorial oil sheikh governments.
Racist....misogynistic....antisemitic.....dictatorial.....Do these words harken to Lisa Iacuzzi's past behaviour? Certainly Lisa hates blacks and women – particularly gay women – and her threats are a tad dictatorial, to-wit: “Join me or suffer!” “Support me or suffer!” “Go to court against me, I'll cut your legs off!” The antisemitic part falls to a couple of Lisa's supporters, one of whom, author of the second of the following two notes, who vets some of Lisa's wambly ramblings; if a Lisa piece is intelligible, you can be sure she ran it by Paul Hamilton. The first note is from blogger LEOPARDI, or Leo, another of those poor souls who have swallowed Lisa's stochastic diatribes, hook, line, and bullcuzzi.
Another response from the gay community is blogger Leopardi who about the mob at the Rose whose blog is mimicking NAGQ blog with HATE!
LEOPARDI SAID:
NAGQ's assertions of being lynched by a homophobic mob seem to demonstrate credence to NAGQ"S claim that the environment is hostile to queer people. While it is clear, based on the incidents you report that you have a cause for frustration, your comments, sadly, validate the core assertions by Lee. Let me remind you that no matter how challenging the individual conflicts you have with a particular person, there is no excuse for resorting to the kind of insensitive language you use in your posts about Lee. The entire tenor of your post revels in a heterosexual norm that confirms Lee's complaint that you create an oppressive climate. Your language may not only be offensive to Lee personally, but when you choose to broadcast these views publicly, you are engaging in hate speech against a large group of gays, lesbians, and trans-gendered people in the Portland area. I am not asserting whether or not your claim is just. However, I am unimpressed by your claim thus far. I don't doubt that institutes such as the justice system support you. They have always been on the side of the powerful. I would submit that Lee has done you a tremendous service. She has given you a way to tell yourself that there's nothing wrong with you. My question to you is this: when Lee is gone, who will you hate? Leo 08 December, 2007 10:44
http://notagoodqueer.blogspot.com/2007/12/hate-at-reach-cdc.html
Let us take a few of these comments for response. First, the obvious:
“...when Lee is gone..”
Gone? When is Lisa planning to leave? Two days after her release from jail, she was back in the vicinity, where she attempted to assault a (Native American) tenant. Since then, she has been haunting the area, stalking tenants, creeping to the building's windows at night and causing disturbances, strolling up and down in front of the building, and otherwise lurking in wait for tenants, to engage them in her usual childish verbal confrontations, age-appropriate to the kindergarten bully Lisa is. All this after a stipulated court order in which Lisa agreed to come no closer than one mile.
“...you are engaging in hate speech against a large group of gays, lesbians, and trans-gendered people in the Portland area. I am not asserting whether or not your claim is just.”
Of course Leo won't assert whether or not “your claim” -- singular, rather than the more accurate plural – is or is not “just.” He just doesn't care. Moreover, it might prove difficult to show how the presentation of facts in opposition to Lisa's fabrications is “engaging in hate speech against a large group of gays, lesbians, and trans-gendered people”. Lisa is one woman, whereas the targets of her hateful antics from the inception of her tenancy were, and remain, gay women and black women.
Nothing has been said of Lisa's hate speech and false charges of criminal behaviour directed against African Americans. Presumably Lisa's calling a disabled black teacher a “nigger” was not “engaging in hate speech,” nor is Lisa telling a black grandmother, in the hearing of her nine-year-old grandchild, “All you nigger bitches do drugs””engaging in hate speech.” Of course, Lisa's false accusations that African American tenants are engaged in perpetrating welfare fraud and drug dealing, with the assistance of Portland Impact, are NOT “engaging in hate speech;” Lisa wrote them, so it's engaging in libel.
“Your language may not only be offensive to Lee personally..there is no excuse for resorting to the kind of insensitive language you use in your posts about Lee.”
How is presenting FACTS in opposition to Lisa's lies “insensitive”? Certainly language used in presenting facts is offensive to Lisa, for it is established fact that she hates facts. It's also a fact that she can't relate the same incident twice without contradicting herself. And is the “insensitive language” used by NAGQ-OAE contributors any more insensitive than Lisa's calling African American women “nigger bitches”? Was Lisa engaging in kind and sensitive language when she threatened gay women to “Join me or suffer!”, or “Support me or suffer!”, or threatened to cut off others' legs if they appeared in court?
Apparently, it's “insensitive” and “engaging in hate speech against a large group of gays, lesbians, and trans-gendered people in the Portland area” to take someone to task for her lies, her libels, her threats of physical harm, and her racist hate speech. But it's NOT “insensitive” or “engaging in hate speech” when Lisa calls African American women “nigger bitches” and falsely accuses them of “selling their welfare cards to get drug money.”
“Your comments, sadly, validate the core assertions by Lee.”
Lisa's “core assertions” have been invalidated by Lisa herself.
“NAGQ's assertions of being lynched by a homophobic mob seem to demonstrate credence to NAGQ"S claim that the environment is hostile to queer people.”
When, exactly, was Lisa Iacuzzi “lynched by a homophobic hate mob”? Or by any mob? And what, exactly, are gay women are doing in the mob? When a building owner is forced to hire security guards to protect tenants against ONE resident, it takes the most flexible of mental contortionists to concoct from it a Kafkaesque phantasmagoria of that one person being “lynched by a homophobic hate mob.”
No need for security guards existed until Lisa's vicious antics created that need. And it was gay women at The Rose who requested them.
Lisa's paranoiac fantasies notwithstanding, the environment is no more hostile to “queerpeople” than it is to blacks or Jews. It was Lisa Iacuzzi herself who bent her efforts to create that hostile environment of which she complains so strenuously – after she filed her BOLI complaint, that is, from which she expects to garner $30,000 or $1,000,000, as she has crowed, and “end up owning 988 Reach units.”
Lisa has also been banned from the Speakeasy Tavern next door; maybe the homophobic hate mob of gay women effected that, too? In fact, Lisa's “homophobic mob” is nothing more the “bible thumping African American gang” of her earlier tales. She quickly abandoned that, as soon as she got wind of the letter sent to the NAACP detailing her racist hate speech and actions
At the risk of being thought “insensitive” and “engaging in hate speech against a large group of gays, lesbians, and trans-gendered people in the Portland area,” NAGQ-OAE feels that Lisa's being "lynched by a homophobic hate mob" (of gay women?) ought to be filed under the same heading as pickled aliens in Area 51, the Face of Elvis on Mars, the Protocols of the Learned Elders of Zion, and Lisa's self-awarded “MA@PSU”.
-------------------------
From Paul Hamilton:
You are suffering on behalf of those of us who have made a deal with the devil to live (for now) in this dysfunctional system. You have the strength right now to be on the front line of this struggle. I believe in you and I know that your work is supportive of our community. I have been appalled in investigating the situation the level to which those who have expressed hatred to you have resorted in order to demean-- themselves. Their web site mirroring yours is an example the violence of a lynch mob. It is not just an unhealthy situation, but one in which I now understand you had a very real concern for your safety. Lord of the Flies comes to mind. I have never seen a web site created whose sole purpose is the expression of hatred for a person. The only precedent is Nazi Germany or the Columbine massacres. It is a case study in the psychology of evil. The difference between your web site (operated by a single person) documenting, in occasional posts, claims against the apartment complex-- and a mob of people gathered in an orgy of hatred against a single individual -- is a difference between a freedom of speech and a lynch mob going to hang and torture a queer. Again, despite the horror that you face with homelessness looming over you, I feel that you have escaped the truly alarming prospect of escalating cruelty at the hands of people who enjoy telling themselves how normal they are through their combined hatred of one person. Their web site alone is a clear issue of hate speech directed at a single target. Its sole purpose is cruelty. If it was directed towards someone in power like the president of the United States, it would be warranted. But, to create such a web site targeting someone who is powerless is an example of the kind of casual bigotry that created the crematoriums in Nazi Germany. Their characterization of your hair as being "buzzed", is very much like the Germans dehumanizing the Jews in World War II so that they could gas them. As awful as it is, I think you need to just get the hell physically away from that group of people. I am creating a PDF copy of their Blog so that I can archive it. Then, perhaps we can respond, point for point, to the character assassination that they have undertaken towards you. I wish I could tell you to be strong. I still have family left to visit. . . so, despite my financial problems, I will have some kind of holidays. I can say-- hones tly-- that I will defend you the best way I can. Take Care, Paul
As with Leo's post, let's take a few of Paul's comments.
“I know that your work is supportive of our community.”
It would be interesting to learn how Lisa's bullying and racist hate speech are supportive of the gay community. As for “work,” has Lisa engaged in any, beyond her usual freeloading, recently?
“Their web site mirroring yours is an example the violence of a lynch mob.”
It would also be interesting to learn how a blog setting forth facts in opposition to garbled fictions equates with the violence of a lynch mob, as seen here:
http://markbey.files.wordpress.com/2007/04/bodylg.jpg
“I have never seen a web site created whose sole purpose is the expression of hatred for a person. The only precedent is Nazi Germany”
Only a non-Jew, and a rather ignorant one, could produce such a grotesque exaggeration.
“Their web site alone is a clear issue of hate speech directed at a single target. If it was directed towards someone in power like the president of the United States, it would be warranted.”
In short, Paul Hamilton actually condones “hate speech directed at a single target” -- IF it's someone he doesn't like. But it's “lynch mob” violence, and indefensible, if it's someone he likes (or thinks he likes). This is ethically relativistic and indicates a elasticity rather like the Nazis' Master Aryan Race.
You were Aryan if you were Japanese, especially after Japan bombed Pearl Harbor and British bases throughout the Pacific. You were Aryan if you were Farouk of Egypt, Amin al-Husayni and the Palestinian Arab Higher Committee, Rashid Ali of Iraq. You were not Aryan if you were Abdullah of Jordan, a British ally. The British were Aryans, if muddled ones, whereas Americans were “weak and feeble” mongrels, “dominated by Negroes and Jews.” Paul Hamilton's justification of “hate speech” is elastic like that.
“an example of the kind of casual bigotry that created the crematoriums in Nazi Germany.”
Again, a statement that only an ignorant and insensitive non-Jew could concoct.
“Their characterization of your hair as being "buzzed", is very much like the Germans dehumanizing the Jews in World War II so that they could gas them.”
With this profoundly grotesque comparison, Paul Hamilton tips over from the comments of an ignorant and insensitive non-Jew into borderline Holocaust denial.
“Fluids from diseased animals were injected into humans to observe the effect. Prisoners were forced to exist on sea water to see how long castaways might survive. Gynecology was an area of great interest. Various methods of sterilization were practiced—by massive X-ray, by irritants and drugs, by surgery without benefit of anesthetic. As techniques were perfected, it was estimated that a doctor with 10 assistants could sterilize 1,000 women per day. The “experimental people” were also used by Nazi doctors who needed practice performing various operations. One doctor at Auschwitz perfected his amputation technique on live prisoners; after he had finished, his maimed patients were sent off to the gas chamber.” WWII: History of the Second World War; The Death of a People, ed. D.S. Thomas et al., p 152
Equating the piddling little altercations Lisa herself provoked, then embroidered upon, to the brutal extermination of millions is a form of Holocaust denial, and that IS antisemitism.
And who was it who issued the threat – among her many others -- to “cut off your legs”?
“Perhaps we can respond, point for point, to the character assassination that they have undertaken towards you.”
Perhaps they can. We at NAGQ-OAE are not going wait with collectively bated breath, as we doubt Lisa et al will, or can, produce any point-by-point response based on facts. It seems that in the narrow views expressed above, attacks on gays and blacks are legitimate, so long they are directed solely against women, and Lisa Iacuzzi is the perpetrator. Lisa's racism and misogyny, apparently, aren't even blips on the indignation radar.
Now, about those BOLI and DA investigations, which Lisa claims “are underway”, and NAGQ-OAE contributors being “charged with a hate crime” ....
BRING 'EM ON.
Besides, Lisa loves the attention.
NAGQ-OAE
Cad fawr a fu o'r pan ddwyre haul hyd pan gynnu. A gwedi elwch tawelwch fu.
26 January 2008
Donate to Lisa/She's SOL/New "Legal" Address: Sisters of the Road Cafe
Lisa writes:
Donate to Not a Good Queer
You can donate to Not a Good Queer at the The Shop, located on 25th and Belmont in Portland, Oregon. You can also email, Lisaiacuzzi@yahoo.com. I did not receive a penny from REACH CDC who offered 15,000 for me to move out of their hate building. Instead, I was falsely arrested and had to tell the judge that I would move out of my apartment to get out of jail. I use to think that I did not have to fund other activists, that they should get a job, what I did not understand that activist are really working for me.
My legal address is:Lisa/Lee Iacuzzi,Not a Good Queer133 NW 6th Ave,Portland, Oregon 97209
Lisaiacuzzi@yahoo.com
One man, one voice, can make a difference to all!
ROTFLOL
Donate to Not a Good Queer
You can donate to Not a Good Queer at the The Shop, located on 25th and Belmont in Portland, Oregon. You can also email, Lisaiacuzzi@yahoo.com. I did not receive a penny from REACH CDC who offered 15,000 for me to move out of their hate building. Instead, I was falsely arrested and had to tell the judge that I would move out of my apartment to get out of jail. I use to think that I did not have to fund other activists, that they should get a job, what I did not understand that activist are really working for me.
My legal address is:Lisa/Lee Iacuzzi,Not a Good Queer133 NW 6th Ave,Portland, Oregon 97209
Lisaiacuzzi@yahoo.com
One man, one voice, can make a difference to all!
ROTFLOL
Funny of the Month - Lisa on her Non-Racism
This, from our companion blog NOT A GOOD QUEER:
No comment necessary. Just a question: How hard was Lisa hitting the bottle before she pecked this out?
-----------------------------------------------
http://notagoodqueer.blogspot.com/2008/01/history-of-martin-luther-king-day-by.html
NAGQ was never taught Black History month in college, grad school, or high school which were predominately white institutuions of education. This is where I learned about discrimination. I guess I ignored it because I was treated very nobily by my peers who were never homophobic to me . They treated me well. They mostly left me alone when my siter chris graduate class moved on, I was stuck with the super jocks where being a good athlete proctected one from an redicule. One would be protected and I had him his name was Mr. Smith. He told them to leave me alone and told me when you pu tyou head abouve the clouds Lisa, someone is ging to shoot you done. He knew that when Iwas a freshmen , I started on the varisty basketball teams point guard . My nickname was bob cousy where i was very focused on being a top athlete. I was blind to the social stresses of most society , yet as I grew older I realized my mother exerience at her h age is much different tham mine She was shamed in her forties as I am ashamed in y forties. Were booty wetn acorss the graime where were made choice that werer aginst the grain, and criticixed and all called inds amen didction diction abeleive what ou hear for m behind closed doors and be up fornt with me aor I will be at your door and askin g for the explanation why I am not shamed like my mother. I am showing up for the fight which is not asking you for an inveite no I am not a good queer and I am not asking for your permisssion to be loved sa sa sa sa ads a saa s a as squeuer quer you visuall ym e you visually weeemsigo where is joh hummel, former presindt from bro you answer me where are you I want to hear your voice . Reach out and aIIIII am getiing easier to find. As I go to Ted Wheeler and ask him if he has this bed I have slept in and said that he knew the unit that I had stayed in. Help me John Hummel, give me wisdom. I still Rise, I will not apologixe for anything! NAGQ you know that race is defined is what ever the dominacna t culture is what is wupppose to bpdogdfoigofigo
Posted by Not a Good Queer at 10:56 PM
No comment necessary. Just a question: How hard was Lisa hitting the bottle before she pecked this out?
-----------------------------------------------
http://notagoodqueer.blogspot.com/2008/01/history-of-martin-luther-king-day-by.html
NAGQ was never taught Black History month in college, grad school, or high school which were predominately white institutuions of education. This is where I learned about discrimination. I guess I ignored it because I was treated very nobily by my peers who were never homophobic to me . They treated me well. They mostly left me alone when my siter chris graduate class moved on, I was stuck with the super jocks where being a good athlete proctected one from an redicule. One would be protected and I had him his name was Mr. Smith. He told them to leave me alone and told me when you pu tyou head abouve the clouds Lisa, someone is ging to shoot you done. He knew that when Iwas a freshmen , I started on the varisty basketball teams point guard . My nickname was bob cousy where i was very focused on being a top athlete. I was blind to the social stresses of most society , yet as I grew older I realized my mother exerience at her h age is much different tham mine She was shamed in her forties as I am ashamed in y forties. Were booty wetn acorss the graime where were made choice that werer aginst the grain, and criticixed and all called inds amen didction diction abeleive what ou hear for m behind closed doors and be up fornt with me aor I will be at your door and askin g for the explanation why I am not shamed like my mother. I am showing up for the fight which is not asking you for an inveite no I am not a good queer and I am not asking for your permisssion to be loved sa sa sa sa ads a saa s a as squeuer quer you visuall ym e you visually weeemsigo where is joh hummel, former presindt from bro you answer me where are you I want to hear your voice . Reach out and aIIIII am getiing easier to find. As I go to Ted Wheeler and ask him if he has this bed I have slept in and said that he knew the unit that I had stayed in. Help me John Hummel, give me wisdom. I still Rise, I will not apologixe for anything! NAGQ you know that race is defined is what ever the dominacna t culture is what is wupppose to bpdogdfoigofigo
Posted by Not a Good Queer at 10:56 PM
LISA'S RAIN OF ERROR
On Saturday, 12th January 2008, the ineffable Lisa Iacuzzi, aka “Lee”, “NAGQ”, “Not A Good Queer”, feuilletoniste extraordinaire, posted the following to our companion blog, NOT A GOOD QUEER.
NOTE: no corrections will be offered to Lisa's usual misspellings, substandard grammatical constructions, and generally poor English usage; there's simply too much of it to contend with.
*
Metro Watch: You are so busted, I Still Rise.....
URL: notagoodqueer.blogspot.com/2008/01/metro-watch-you-are-busted.html
*
Looks like ole Lisa has found another target for her .... how did Stephen King phrase it? .... “her single-minded purpose....her unending fury.” Even though Steve was referring to Roland Bay, original owner of Christine the Demon Car, and it's stretching a point to use “single-minded” for Lisa. Come to think of it, though, the ole Iacuze IS something like that Fury. Just not as clever.
*
After 6 months of Reach CDC management failed to evict Not a Good Queer, they hired Metro Watch also known as Rent a Cop.
*
Known to Lisa, that is. You'd think after 29 days in jail, she could tell the difference. But she DID spend most of her time in the psycho ward.
*
Security guard Roy best describes the treatment that I received from security guards. They were paid to obtain information on me and investigate tenants complaints?
*
They were? And did Lisa obtain this information from Roy before or after she called him a “dick”, among other things, and defaced his car? (Lisa's attacks on the eldery man came after Roy refused to accede to her imperious command that he refer to her in all his conversations about her as the man she is not.)
*
Of course, this is not in their job description?
*
Is this in their job description? Roy, per Lisa's cell phone vid of him, said his job was to prevent the escalation of incidents into violence.
*
They turned off the lobby video cameras off, so now with with the security cameras off,
*
The security camera in the lobby was on the entire time Lisa engaged in her hatespeech to Roy. It was also on while Lisa threatened the tenant who was standing with Roy to join her “or suffer!”
*
hate behavior became worst with the gang members' boyfriends joining in on the hate
*
When, exactly, did these alleged “boyfriends” join in? With what gang? Which gang? So many gangs wander the untenanted interstices of Lisa's head, it's hard to keep track. There's the “small handful” of mostly gay women “who have attacked me and come after me”; the “ruthless gang of African Americans” who “sell their welfare cards” for “getting drug money” and “are bible thumpers”; the “Math” heads at The Rose; a ”lynching hate mob at The Rose;” “twenty-people involved in fraud of food stamps at The Rose”; “a lynch mob of a twenty dedicated to hate at The Rose”; the “homophobic gang at The Rose”; the “hate mob at The Rose”; the “lynching mob at The Rose”; the Portland Police; Portland Impact, and “African American members of the new KKK”. So, which gang is it whose members' boyfriends are “joining in on the hate”?
*
Come to think of it, “gang members' boyfriends” may refer to a tenant's brother and boyfriend, whose presence thwarted Lisa's attempted attack on that tenant, two days after her release from the pokey. No doubt this cheesed Lisa off as much as the African American teacher's refusal to let Lisa in to her apartment, one night, after Lisa banged on the door and demanded to watch The Sopranos. After the lady refused, Lisa banged on the door again, yelled “Nigger!” several times, then bulled down to the basement and cut her cable. “I took her cable and wore it around my neck like a necklace,” Lisa reported, laughing, to tenants. “ I had fun taunting everyone with it, and I loved watching everyone’s reactions as they ran. I guess I scared them!”
*
Lisa doesn't take kindly to any thwarting of her attacks. It sends her into a rage – once she has removed herself to a safe distance, of course. Talk about childish temper tantrums. But that's a little temper tantrum, compared to the maniacal, screaming rage Lisa displays whenever her bullying tactics fail to impress her intended target. Oy vevoy.
*
whiling liv'en easy and free in our all women's' building.
*
Gee, like Lisa and her 17-year-old little friend – oops! her “mentorship student”, as Lisa described Nicole months later. But Lisa's latest addition to the tale begs the question what sort of “mentorship” program allows a “teacher”, self-described or not, to provide alcohol and drugs to minors, as Lisa provided her little friend “Nicole”? NAMBLA, maybe? As with most Iacuzzi fabrications, Lisa won't offer clarification of any improbabilities to her tale; her imagination takes her only so far, and one can hardly demand, as BOLI did, that Lisa emend her “inaccuracies.”
*
During this time, Metro Watch security created even more instability and hostility in the environment. They continued the creation of the unstable environment by
*
The instability and hostility had already been created by Lisa herself; there was never a need for security guards before she moved in. The intensification came from Lisa herself, whenever Metro attempted to thwart Lisa's verbal and physical harassment of tenants. Either way, Lisa was bent on provoking reactions from tenants; she loves such reactions, which she can video on her cell in order to “submit” as her “evidence” that she's the “victim” of a “hostile environment”. Lisa, as she has stated, LOVES being an under dog. The fact Lisa herself created that environment would not enable her to extort the $30,000 or $1,000,000 which she claims she will get from REACH for the European vacation she wants to take.
*
Roy's own comments who appears to be listening and carried on an investigation of tenants complaints and doing the absent managers job.
*
What Lisa means is anyone's guess. Roy was one of the security guards hired to protect tenants from Lisa's hostile and hateful aggression. Their presence worked, to a certain extent, which is why Lisa is still sore about it.
*
I question if Roy is qualified for a managements position or his behavior under the job description for security guards for Metro Watch.?
*
Is Lisa cognizant of the Metro Watch job description? No. Does Lisa know what qualifies one for a building manager's position – particularly in a building with a psycho on the lose? Probably not. Who cares what Lisa questions? The vision of Lisa's questioning anyone's qualifications -- anyone without a hood and a sheet, that is -- is worth a few ROTFLOLs.
*
Is it that Metro Watch does not like working with cameras?
*
Well, Lisa does, everyone knows that. Metro Watch – as Lisa well knows – had no cameras. It's why she was so free with her verbal abuse of them.
*
They were hired because after verbal and emotional abuse from the hate mob, threaten to sue Reach CDC for having a transgendered/ bigendered person living an all women's building.
*
The security guards were hired to protect tenants from the antics of Lisa Iacuzzi, a documented perpetrator of domestic violence. As for “transgendered” persons, a previous tenant left The Rose of her own volition, while in the process of transgendering from female to male, because s/he no longer felt s/he could, in honesty, remain in an all-female building. S/he remains friends with a number of tenants, none of whom threaten to sue REACH or anyone for having a transgendered person – which Lisa Iacuzzi is not – in the building.
*
The key word here is “honesty” - a concept with which Lisa Iacuzzi has barely a nodding acquaintance. The term “bigendered” is another concept of which Lisa is clueless; the only accepted definition, to date, is that there is no accepted definition of 'bigendered”, and that it means, essentially, whatever the speaker wants it to mean. In Lisa's case, it seems to mean a racist female misogynist and wannabe extortionist.
*
The hate mob wrote an 8 page report to the police and Reach CDC, which was full of false allegations.
*
What, exactly, is this “8 page report” Lisa keeps nattering about? (In another account, it was a “fourteen page report” or “petition”.) Lisa has yet to identify this 8- or 14-page report or petition clearly, or quote anything from it, or even date it. It would help, of course, if such a report, whether 8 or 14 pages, was ever written to the police by any “hate mob”. But it never was.
*
When I would send reports to Reach CDC, they required me to document what exactly happened, lists witness, and please give us the exact time of the incident, otherwise, Reach CDC, will not help a tenant.
*
REACH advises all tenants with complaints, particularly tenants who complained of Lisa Iacuzzi's hostile and threatening behaviour, to do the same. REACH's response to the load of complaints about Lisa Iacuzzi was little more than a bankrupt exercise in irresolution and indecision.
*
But they did not question a document that was given to them and the police.
*
Possibly because that 8-page document doesn't exist outside Lisa's fervid imagination.
*
They took this document as the truth of 25 tenants.
*
How one takes a non-existent document as the truth of anything is something only Lisa Iacuzzi can explain – and Lisa has so far sidedodged explaining any of it.
*
Some of the tenants were told it was about getting rid of the bar,
*
If Lisa is referring to the letter sent to REACH and BOLI, no tenant was informed that it was “about getting rid of the bar.” All tenants were told what it was about, and advised to read it before signing it. Which they did.
*
If Lisa is referring to the letter which set forth her racist behaviour against African American tenants, her calling them “niggers” and “nigger bitches” to their faces, and her destruction of their property, that letter was sent to the NAACP, not to the police, and it was certainly not eight pages.
*
I talked to four tenants who thought it was a petitioner to end security.
*
Clearly, none of Lisa's alleged tenants ever saw either letter, and are therefore as much in the dark as Lisa. Of course, when one's head is firmly lodged up one's ass, one is usually in the dark.
*
Overall, over half of the tenants were coerced to sign or drugs and hate were also part of the signature dealings.
*
This is pure bullacuzzi. No tenant was coerced to sign anything. No tenant who witnessed Lisa Iacuzzi's behaviour needed to be coerced into signing anything.
*
This is Bren Athens, one of the tenants who did everything she could to get he me out of my home.
*
Actually, Lisa did it all by her li'l ole self.
*
This video was taken 48 hours before my false arrest. Bren Athens stated, "that it would be the end of me". I had tried to document Bren Athens behavior towards me over a 8 month period of time, where Reach CDC did not listen nor respond to my complaints..
*
But Lisa did not, because that behaviour consists of more bullacuzzi.
*
Her girlfriend below is Maria Leall who overdosed at the Rose apartments twice during her short-stay as a tenant. The source of her overdosing drug is called Clonzapen, which is prescribed to Glenda Meyers.
*
"Clonzapen" was never prescribed to Glenda. “Clonzapen” was never prescribed to anyone else, either. This is because “clonzapen” doesn't exist. Glenda's involvement in the incident likewise doesn't exist in Lisa's previous accounts of it. This is the first time Lisa has mentioned it. Maria did not OD twice. As for her “short-term stay”, she is still a tenant after almost a year, so what does that make Lisa Iacuzzi's seven- month residency?
*
I went to the hospital and spoke to the nurse and the doctor who performed a urinary analysis.
*
Lisa should know, based on her alleged experience as some kind of medtech, that nurses and doctors don't normally perform urinalyses. Then she should get some kind of prize for being able to cram more bs into fewer sentences than a Soviet encyclopaedist or a White Power propagandist.
*
I was constantly drilled by the doctors about the overdose, but I told him that she asked permission to lie down in my room because she said, "she was afraid of Bren Athens temper".
*
Let the improbabilities pass of doctors grilling a stranger on a patient's condition. In her previous account of the incident – one of them, anyway -- Lisa wrote:
*
“Maria was so tired; she asked if she could sleep in my room because
so many people were knocking on her door. I had a did not disturb sign on
my door. I wanted a private evening with my friend. When we came back
from eating dinner, I noticed bubbles coming out of Maria's mouth. I tried
to sit her up. She would not gain conscious ness. I saw that her hands were
purple. I thought because of her sleeping position she might have passed
out. She did not respond. I ran and got Bryn who said she was a paramedic.
Bryn came and said call 911. She told me to wait for the ambulance
downstairs. I told her when the come, to leave my room. First the fire
department came, and then I waited for the ambulance. When I arrived in
my room, I found the door wide open and Bryn pacing through my room
saying how much she loved Maria. She was saying that she was drinking
alcohol and had taken vicadin. I told her to leave my room. She would not
leave. I go into her face and told her to get out. Then she stood at my door
watching. I told the I was closing the door and she would not move. I closed
the door on her face.
*
“She told the ambulance that she was riding with them. I told her that she
was not. They used NARCAN on her that revived her which was consistent
with a drug overdose. When she was being put in the ambulance, I told the
driver not to take anyone but Maria to the hospital. I told her that Maria
requested to hide in my room from Brynn and that her and Bryn were
fighting all week and this was too much stress. The ambulance told Bryn
and I that she was going to Good Sam. I took the bus and expected Brynn to
go to the hospital. I came back up stairs and Bryn called me a Prick. She
said this in the hallway in front of another resident. I told her that she did
not know how to take a no. She called me a prick again.
*
“I went to the hospital and talked to the doctors. They said that she
overdosed. The doctors suspected that she took drugs while we were
cooking dinner or before she came into the room. When the doctor had her
urinary analyses, she asked me to leave the room. At this point, the doctors
knew that I did not know what was going on. I questioned Maria on what
she did, she said that Kimberly gave her liquid methadone and she took 5
clonzapen.”
*
There's that non-existent drug again. In another redaction, Lisa claims it was Kimberly who provided the "clonzapen". In the most recent, it's Glenda the "convicted drug dealer" [NOT] who provides the non-existent drug. Apparently, the liquid methadone from Lisa's earlier accounts flowed out of the tale, maybe through the holes in Lisa's head.
*
You can see on the video above, Bren Athens has quite a temper.
*
You can see, from Lisa's previous account, that she can't tell the same story twice in a row.
*
The three tenants above names in order of appearance are Glenda Meyers, Maria Leall, and Bren Athens. They all lied to police in several reports
*
None of the three lied in any “report” to police. Had they been so inclined, which they were not, there was no need. In fact, the only one with a need to lie, and the financial incentive to do so, is Lisa Iacuzzi, particularly where it concerns her violent and abusive behaviour, which was witnessed by more than half the tenants at The Rose, as well some guests, who were victims of Lisa's verbal and physical abuse.
*
which included my arrest 48 hours after I tried to file a police report about Bren's harassment towards trans people.
*
"Bren" doesn't harass “trans people”; she's quite friendly with several. She doesn't harass or attack gay women, either -- as Lisa Iacuzzi did, from the beginning of her seven-month stay at The Rose.
*
Maria Leal, is Bren Athens closing thing to a relationship, in five years and would lie to help Bren's vindictive anger which would help Maria look like a hero in the building who hated the Queer.
*
Hullo? Is there anyone who can translate the above garble into intelligible English?
*
The women smiling is named Glenda Meyers who told the judge a week later that she was so so fearful of me.
*
She was and is, for much the same reasons that Lisa's former partner was so fearful that the court granted her a restraining order against Lisa.
*
I guess you could not see all her fear with her big smile. Every morning,I hear them gathering outside my door for their morning dose Clonzapen and coffee at my neighbors house(Glenda Meyers).
*
Azoy, the non-existent drug again? And now Lisa has a coffee klatch with it?
*
How do I know this?
*
How does Lisa know this? The voices in her head tell her so.
*
Maria Leall spoke to me many times about what was going on. She said, "that she wanted to quit drugs and she knew that I was working a recovery program".
*
Maria disagrees.
*
She came to me for help her stop taking drugs.
*
Pretty funny rehab effort, asking help from a pothead who dispenses alcohol and drugs to minors. How dumb does Lisa think Maria is?
*
I saved her life once but she never appreciated this
*
Probably because the person who actually saved her life wasn't Lisa Iacuzzi, but one of the gay women of that “hate mob” whom Lisa claims are out to get her.
*
and is the main wittiness of the State regarding
my supposed "stalking violation".
*
Such "wittiness". Witless else the purveyor of this bullacuzzi.
*
The witnesses are Maria Leal, Glenda Meyers, and Eddie, a security guard from Metro Watch.
*
Some security guard. Eddie is a tenant's eleven year old grandson.
*
He said, "that he did not see me with Ms. Meyers but has witnessed in the past, my camera in "peoples faces"".
*
Quite a few more people than Eddie witnessed Lisa Iacuzzi's camera in peoples' faces – and had them there, too – along with Lisa's taunts and provocations, for the purpose of obtaining defensive reactions which she would then video with her cell phone, in order to use as “evidence” in her efforts to extort money from REACH.
*
Glenda and Leal were investigated by the state
*
They weren't.
*
who proved that their behavior was transphobic
*
It wasn't.
*
with 54 findings that provided substantial evidence for gender discrimination.
*
Per the voices in Lisa's head, perhaps.
*
I spent 29 days in jail
*
Most of which she spent in the psycho ward, following her faked suicide attempt with a shampoo bottle.
*
through the lying of the hate mob and Reach CDC employee Jamie Barton committing perjury.
*
“Hate mob” is the new Iacuzzi term for what used to be the drug dealing welfare-frauding African American gang, whose members, Lisa claimed, were receiving free cable TV. And Jamie Barton -- unlike Lisa Iacuzzi -- never committed perjury.
*
This matter of the imaginary free cable REALLY cheeses Lisa off. It was why she broke into the restricted area of the basement and cut the cables of two African American tenants, one the semi-retired partially-disable teacher mentioned above, who refused to let Lisa into her apartment so that Lisa could watch The Sopranos. When Lisa learned of the letter sent to the NAACP, detailing her racist hate behaviour to African American tenants, she quickly substituted a slew of other “gangs” whom she claims were “after her”. In an obvious attempt to cover her racism, and her ass, and show that she's not the hateful bigot she is, she also blogged a slew of “nice” articles about African-Americans. But nobody is fooled.
*
Will Justice Be served? I am working day and night for this to happen.
*
Lisa should be careful what she prays for, she may get it. Maybe she's already getting it. Does she get this? Of course she doesn't. Lisa is working – if producing piles of lies and freeloading can be called “work” -- to extort $1,000,000 from REACH, based on fluff, so she can vacation in Europe.
*
It is not enough to have the chargers dismissed. I want this hate mob charged.
*
So file charges against the “hate mob”, already. Those should be quite interesting.
*
Side Note: I did not start filming their behavior until after a year of abuse.
*
Lisa never started “filming” anything. Four months ago she started harassing people by jamming her cell in their faces and taking their pictures. This was immediately subsequent to her filing her BOLI “gender discrimination” complaint. A month or so before her arrest, she learned how to video them with her cell.
*
Once again, here are Lisa's “charges” as excerpted from her amended complaint of 13 December 2007. Naturally, she contradicts her previous statements, and, in any case, piles on the usual bullacuzzi. (For further details, see THE LIES THAT ARE LISA'S COMPLAINT.)
*
“3. In/about August, 2006 I applied for and was accepted as a tenant at The Rose. Respondent advised me that I was number 13 on its waiting list.
*
“4. On November 29, 2006 I visited The Rose to inquire about the status of my place on the waiting list. The resident manager, Jamie Barton, told me that I was still number 13. Ms. Barton also told me Respondent did not accept men as tenants in the building and asked me why I had bothered to even apply. Ms. Barton then slammed her door in my face.
*
“5. When I reported this incident to Respondent director Rachel Huber I was told that I had moved up to number 5 on the waiting list.
*
“6. On/about March 20, 2007, I signed the rental contract in Ms. Barton's office. When I inquired about their nondiscriminatory policies, Ms. Barton responded, “We do not accept men in the building.”
*
“7. On March 20, 2007, I moved into The Rose apartments. My assigned room was filthy. The room had a wooden frame bed with a mattress that was not useable. Ms. Barton had just discussed with me how my room had had a bed-bug outbreak and that bed-bugs live in wooden bed frames. All the other tenants are given a metal bed frame and a mattress with a plastic wrap.
*
“8. Shortly after I moved in, Respondent began treating me differently and subjecting me to a hostile environment based on my gender identity. The incidents included, but were not limited to:
*
“a) On March 29, 2007, I received a “Notice for Cause of Termination” of my lease because I had a male friend stay beyond visiting hours in order to deliver a mattress, as the one provided for me was not useable. I noticed that other tenants had male guests stay beyond visiting hours, but they did not receive notices.
*
“b) On April 23, 2007, I drank alcohol with another tenant in the common kitchen area. I
received another Notice for Cause of Termination, but the tenant I drank with did not.
*
“c) On April 30, 2007, I witnessed a tenant complain to Ms Barton that I identified as a male and Ms Barton responded that I was not allowed to do so.
*
“d) Respondent allowed the other tenants to subject me to a continuous pattern of name calling, threats of physical harm, intimidation and false accusations. Respondent failed to investigate my complaints or take effective action to stop the conduct. Presently, the conduct continues.
*
“9. I believe that Respondent discriminated against me on the basis of my gender identity in that I am treated differently and subjected to a hostile environment.
*
“I swear (or affirm) that I know and understand this complaint and that it is true to the best of my knowledge, information and belief.
“[signed] L Iacuzzi Not a Good Queer”
*
Now there's a sig to lend an air of gravity to the rest of the fluff.
*
I still rise, I will not apologize for anything!
NAGQ
*
Herr Schikelgruber never apologized for anything either.
*
And still, nary a word about the DA dropping the criminal charges [resisting arrest, et al] against Lisa. And that was supposed to have happened two weeks ago. One would have expected a crow or two on Lisa's blog. But nothing. Hmmmmm.... Lisa's silence is deafening.
*
NAGQ-OAE
Lisa Iacuzzi pète toujours plus haut que sa cul!
NOTE: no corrections will be offered to Lisa's usual misspellings, substandard grammatical constructions, and generally poor English usage; there's simply too much of it to contend with.
*
Metro Watch: You are so busted, I Still Rise.....
URL: notagoodqueer.blogspot.com/2008/01/metro-watch-you-are-busted.html
*
Looks like ole Lisa has found another target for her .... how did Stephen King phrase it? .... “her single-minded purpose....her unending fury.” Even though Steve was referring to Roland Bay, original owner of Christine the Demon Car, and it's stretching a point to use “single-minded” for Lisa. Come to think of it, though, the ole Iacuze IS something like that Fury. Just not as clever.
*
After 6 months of Reach CDC management failed to evict Not a Good Queer, they hired Metro Watch also known as Rent a Cop.
*
Known to Lisa, that is. You'd think after 29 days in jail, she could tell the difference. But she DID spend most of her time in the psycho ward.
*
Security guard Roy best describes the treatment that I received from security guards. They were paid to obtain information on me and investigate tenants complaints?
*
They were? And did Lisa obtain this information from Roy before or after she called him a “dick”, among other things, and defaced his car? (Lisa's attacks on the eldery man came after Roy refused to accede to her imperious command that he refer to her in all his conversations about her as the man she is not.)
*
Of course, this is not in their job description?
*
Is this in their job description? Roy, per Lisa's cell phone vid of him, said his job was to prevent the escalation of incidents into violence.
*
They turned off the lobby video cameras off, so now with with the security cameras off,
*
The security camera in the lobby was on the entire time Lisa engaged in her hatespeech to Roy. It was also on while Lisa threatened the tenant who was standing with Roy to join her “or suffer!”
*
hate behavior became worst with the gang members' boyfriends joining in on the hate
*
When, exactly, did these alleged “boyfriends” join in? With what gang? Which gang? So many gangs wander the untenanted interstices of Lisa's head, it's hard to keep track. There's the “small handful” of mostly gay women “who have attacked me and come after me”; the “ruthless gang of African Americans” who “sell their welfare cards” for “getting drug money” and “are bible thumpers”; the “Math” heads at The Rose; a ”lynching hate mob at The Rose;” “twenty-people involved in fraud of food stamps at The Rose”; “a lynch mob of a twenty dedicated to hate at The Rose”; the “homophobic gang at The Rose”; the “hate mob at The Rose”; the “lynching mob at The Rose”; the Portland Police; Portland Impact, and “African American members of the new KKK”. So, which gang is it whose members' boyfriends are “joining in on the hate”?
*
Come to think of it, “gang members' boyfriends” may refer to a tenant's brother and boyfriend, whose presence thwarted Lisa's attempted attack on that tenant, two days after her release from the pokey. No doubt this cheesed Lisa off as much as the African American teacher's refusal to let Lisa in to her apartment, one night, after Lisa banged on the door and demanded to watch The Sopranos. After the lady refused, Lisa banged on the door again, yelled “Nigger!” several times, then bulled down to the basement and cut her cable. “I took her cable and wore it around my neck like a necklace,” Lisa reported, laughing, to tenants. “ I had fun taunting everyone with it, and I loved watching everyone’s reactions as they ran. I guess I scared them!”
*
Lisa doesn't take kindly to any thwarting of her attacks. It sends her into a rage – once she has removed herself to a safe distance, of course. Talk about childish temper tantrums. But that's a little temper tantrum, compared to the maniacal, screaming rage Lisa displays whenever her bullying tactics fail to impress her intended target. Oy vevoy.
*
whiling liv'en easy and free in our all women's' building.
*
Gee, like Lisa and her 17-year-old little friend – oops! her “mentorship student”, as Lisa described Nicole months later. But Lisa's latest addition to the tale begs the question what sort of “mentorship” program allows a “teacher”, self-described or not, to provide alcohol and drugs to minors, as Lisa provided her little friend “Nicole”? NAMBLA, maybe? As with most Iacuzzi fabrications, Lisa won't offer clarification of any improbabilities to her tale; her imagination takes her only so far, and one can hardly demand, as BOLI did, that Lisa emend her “inaccuracies.”
*
During this time, Metro Watch security created even more instability and hostility in the environment. They continued the creation of the unstable environment by
*
The instability and hostility had already been created by Lisa herself; there was never a need for security guards before she moved in. The intensification came from Lisa herself, whenever Metro attempted to thwart Lisa's verbal and physical harassment of tenants. Either way, Lisa was bent on provoking reactions from tenants; she loves such reactions, which she can video on her cell in order to “submit” as her “evidence” that she's the “victim” of a “hostile environment”. Lisa, as she has stated, LOVES being an under dog. The fact Lisa herself created that environment would not enable her to extort the $30,000 or $1,000,000 which she claims she will get from REACH for the European vacation she wants to take.
*
Roy's own comments who appears to be listening and carried on an investigation of tenants complaints and doing the absent managers job.
*
What Lisa means is anyone's guess. Roy was one of the security guards hired to protect tenants from Lisa's hostile and hateful aggression. Their presence worked, to a certain extent, which is why Lisa is still sore about it.
*
I question if Roy is qualified for a managements position or his behavior under the job description for security guards for Metro Watch.?
*
Is Lisa cognizant of the Metro Watch job description? No. Does Lisa know what qualifies one for a building manager's position – particularly in a building with a psycho on the lose? Probably not. Who cares what Lisa questions? The vision of Lisa's questioning anyone's qualifications -- anyone without a hood and a sheet, that is -- is worth a few ROTFLOLs.
*
Is it that Metro Watch does not like working with cameras?
*
Well, Lisa does, everyone knows that. Metro Watch – as Lisa well knows – had no cameras. It's why she was so free with her verbal abuse of them.
*
They were hired because after verbal and emotional abuse from the hate mob, threaten to sue Reach CDC for having a transgendered/ bigendered person living an all women's building.
*
The security guards were hired to protect tenants from the antics of Lisa Iacuzzi, a documented perpetrator of domestic violence. As for “transgendered” persons, a previous tenant left The Rose of her own volition, while in the process of transgendering from female to male, because s/he no longer felt s/he could, in honesty, remain in an all-female building. S/he remains friends with a number of tenants, none of whom threaten to sue REACH or anyone for having a transgendered person – which Lisa Iacuzzi is not – in the building.
*
The key word here is “honesty” - a concept with which Lisa Iacuzzi has barely a nodding acquaintance. The term “bigendered” is another concept of which Lisa is clueless; the only accepted definition, to date, is that there is no accepted definition of 'bigendered”, and that it means, essentially, whatever the speaker wants it to mean. In Lisa's case, it seems to mean a racist female misogynist and wannabe extortionist.
*
The hate mob wrote an 8 page report to the police and Reach CDC, which was full of false allegations.
*
What, exactly, is this “8 page report” Lisa keeps nattering about? (In another account, it was a “fourteen page report” or “petition”.) Lisa has yet to identify this 8- or 14-page report or petition clearly, or quote anything from it, or even date it. It would help, of course, if such a report, whether 8 or 14 pages, was ever written to the police by any “hate mob”. But it never was.
*
When I would send reports to Reach CDC, they required me to document what exactly happened, lists witness, and please give us the exact time of the incident, otherwise, Reach CDC, will not help a tenant.
*
REACH advises all tenants with complaints, particularly tenants who complained of Lisa Iacuzzi's hostile and threatening behaviour, to do the same. REACH's response to the load of complaints about Lisa Iacuzzi was little more than a bankrupt exercise in irresolution and indecision.
*
But they did not question a document that was given to them and the police.
*
Possibly because that 8-page document doesn't exist outside Lisa's fervid imagination.
*
They took this document as the truth of 25 tenants.
*
How one takes a non-existent document as the truth of anything is something only Lisa Iacuzzi can explain – and Lisa has so far sidedodged explaining any of it.
*
Some of the tenants were told it was about getting rid of the bar,
*
If Lisa is referring to the letter sent to REACH and BOLI, no tenant was informed that it was “about getting rid of the bar.” All tenants were told what it was about, and advised to read it before signing it. Which they did.
*
If Lisa is referring to the letter which set forth her racist behaviour against African American tenants, her calling them “niggers” and “nigger bitches” to their faces, and her destruction of their property, that letter was sent to the NAACP, not to the police, and it was certainly not eight pages.
*
I talked to four tenants who thought it was a petitioner to end security.
*
Clearly, none of Lisa's alleged tenants ever saw either letter, and are therefore as much in the dark as Lisa. Of course, when one's head is firmly lodged up one's ass, one is usually in the dark.
*
Overall, over half of the tenants were coerced to sign or drugs and hate were also part of the signature dealings.
*
This is pure bullacuzzi. No tenant was coerced to sign anything. No tenant who witnessed Lisa Iacuzzi's behaviour needed to be coerced into signing anything.
*
This is Bren Athens, one of the tenants who did everything she could to get he me out of my home.
*
Actually, Lisa did it all by her li'l ole self.
*
This video was taken 48 hours before my false arrest. Bren Athens stated, "that it would be the end of me". I had tried to document Bren Athens behavior towards me over a 8 month period of time, where Reach CDC did not listen nor respond to my complaints..
*
But Lisa did not, because that behaviour consists of more bullacuzzi.
*
Her girlfriend below is Maria Leall who overdosed at the Rose apartments twice during her short-stay as a tenant. The source of her overdosing drug is called Clonzapen, which is prescribed to Glenda Meyers.
*
"Clonzapen" was never prescribed to Glenda. “Clonzapen” was never prescribed to anyone else, either. This is because “clonzapen” doesn't exist. Glenda's involvement in the incident likewise doesn't exist in Lisa's previous accounts of it. This is the first time Lisa has mentioned it. Maria did not OD twice. As for her “short-term stay”, she is still a tenant after almost a year, so what does that make Lisa Iacuzzi's seven- month residency?
*
I went to the hospital and spoke to the nurse and the doctor who performed a urinary analysis.
*
Lisa should know, based on her alleged experience as some kind of medtech, that nurses and doctors don't normally perform urinalyses. Then she should get some kind of prize for being able to cram more bs into fewer sentences than a Soviet encyclopaedist or a White Power propagandist.
*
I was constantly drilled by the doctors about the overdose, but I told him that she asked permission to lie down in my room because she said, "she was afraid of Bren Athens temper".
*
Let the improbabilities pass of doctors grilling a stranger on a patient's condition. In her previous account of the incident – one of them, anyway -- Lisa wrote:
*
“Maria was so tired; she asked if she could sleep in my room because
so many people were knocking on her door. I had a did not disturb sign on
my door. I wanted a private evening with my friend. When we came back
from eating dinner, I noticed bubbles coming out of Maria's mouth. I tried
to sit her up. She would not gain conscious ness. I saw that her hands were
purple. I thought because of her sleeping position she might have passed
out. She did not respond. I ran and got Bryn who said she was a paramedic.
Bryn came and said call 911. She told me to wait for the ambulance
downstairs. I told her when the come, to leave my room. First the fire
department came, and then I waited for the ambulance. When I arrived in
my room, I found the door wide open and Bryn pacing through my room
saying how much she loved Maria. She was saying that she was drinking
alcohol and had taken vicadin. I told her to leave my room. She would not
leave. I go into her face and told her to get out. Then she stood at my door
watching. I told the I was closing the door and she would not move. I closed
the door on her face.
*
“She told the ambulance that she was riding with them. I told her that she
was not. They used NARCAN on her that revived her which was consistent
with a drug overdose. When she was being put in the ambulance, I told the
driver not to take anyone but Maria to the hospital. I told her that Maria
requested to hide in my room from Brynn and that her and Bryn were
fighting all week and this was too much stress. The ambulance told Bryn
and I that she was going to Good Sam. I took the bus and expected Brynn to
go to the hospital. I came back up stairs and Bryn called me a Prick. She
said this in the hallway in front of another resident. I told her that she did
not know how to take a no. She called me a prick again.
*
“I went to the hospital and talked to the doctors. They said that she
overdosed. The doctors suspected that she took drugs while we were
cooking dinner or before she came into the room. When the doctor had her
urinary analyses, she asked me to leave the room. At this point, the doctors
knew that I did not know what was going on. I questioned Maria on what
she did, she said that Kimberly gave her liquid methadone and she took 5
clonzapen.”
*
There's that non-existent drug again. In another redaction, Lisa claims it was Kimberly who provided the "clonzapen". In the most recent, it's Glenda the "convicted drug dealer" [NOT] who provides the non-existent drug. Apparently, the liquid methadone from Lisa's earlier accounts flowed out of the tale, maybe through the holes in Lisa's head.
*
You can see on the video above, Bren Athens has quite a temper.
*
You can see, from Lisa's previous account, that she can't tell the same story twice in a row.
*
The three tenants above names in order of appearance are Glenda Meyers, Maria Leall, and Bren Athens. They all lied to police in several reports
*
None of the three lied in any “report” to police. Had they been so inclined, which they were not, there was no need. In fact, the only one with a need to lie, and the financial incentive to do so, is Lisa Iacuzzi, particularly where it concerns her violent and abusive behaviour, which was witnessed by more than half the tenants at The Rose, as well some guests, who were victims of Lisa's verbal and physical abuse.
*
which included my arrest 48 hours after I tried to file a police report about Bren's harassment towards trans people.
*
"Bren" doesn't harass “trans people”; she's quite friendly with several. She doesn't harass or attack gay women, either -- as Lisa Iacuzzi did, from the beginning of her seven-month stay at The Rose.
*
Maria Leal, is Bren Athens closing thing to a relationship, in five years and would lie to help Bren's vindictive anger which would help Maria look like a hero in the building who hated the Queer.
*
Hullo? Is there anyone who can translate the above garble into intelligible English?
*
The women smiling is named Glenda Meyers who told the judge a week later that she was so so fearful of me.
*
She was and is, for much the same reasons that Lisa's former partner was so fearful that the court granted her a restraining order against Lisa.
*
I guess you could not see all her fear with her big smile. Every morning,I hear them gathering outside my door for their morning dose Clonzapen and coffee at my neighbors house(Glenda Meyers).
*
Azoy, the non-existent drug again? And now Lisa has a coffee klatch with it?
*
How do I know this?
*
How does Lisa know this? The voices in her head tell her so.
*
Maria Leall spoke to me many times about what was going on. She said, "that she wanted to quit drugs and she knew that I was working a recovery program".
*
Maria disagrees.
*
She came to me for help her stop taking drugs.
*
Pretty funny rehab effort, asking help from a pothead who dispenses alcohol and drugs to minors. How dumb does Lisa think Maria is?
*
I saved her life once but she never appreciated this
*
Probably because the person who actually saved her life wasn't Lisa Iacuzzi, but one of the gay women of that “hate mob” whom Lisa claims are out to get her.
*
and is the main wittiness of the State regarding
my supposed "stalking violation".
*
Such "wittiness". Witless else the purveyor of this bullacuzzi.
*
The witnesses are Maria Leal, Glenda Meyers, and Eddie, a security guard from Metro Watch.
*
Some security guard. Eddie is a tenant's eleven year old grandson.
*
He said, "that he did not see me with Ms. Meyers but has witnessed in the past, my camera in "peoples faces"".
*
Quite a few more people than Eddie witnessed Lisa Iacuzzi's camera in peoples' faces – and had them there, too – along with Lisa's taunts and provocations, for the purpose of obtaining defensive reactions which she would then video with her cell phone, in order to use as “evidence” in her efforts to extort money from REACH.
*
Glenda and Leal were investigated by the state
*
They weren't.
*
who proved that their behavior was transphobic
*
It wasn't.
*
with 54 findings that provided substantial evidence for gender discrimination.
*
Per the voices in Lisa's head, perhaps.
*
I spent 29 days in jail
*
Most of which she spent in the psycho ward, following her faked suicide attempt with a shampoo bottle.
*
through the lying of the hate mob and Reach CDC employee Jamie Barton committing perjury.
*
“Hate mob” is the new Iacuzzi term for what used to be the drug dealing welfare-frauding African American gang, whose members, Lisa claimed, were receiving free cable TV. And Jamie Barton -- unlike Lisa Iacuzzi -- never committed perjury.
*
This matter of the imaginary free cable REALLY cheeses Lisa off. It was why she broke into the restricted area of the basement and cut the cables of two African American tenants, one the semi-retired partially-disable teacher mentioned above, who refused to let Lisa into her apartment so that Lisa could watch The Sopranos. When Lisa learned of the letter sent to the NAACP, detailing her racist hate behaviour to African American tenants, she quickly substituted a slew of other “gangs” whom she claims were “after her”. In an obvious attempt to cover her racism, and her ass, and show that she's not the hateful bigot she is, she also blogged a slew of “nice” articles about African-Americans. But nobody is fooled.
*
Will Justice Be served? I am working day and night for this to happen.
*
Lisa should be careful what she prays for, she may get it. Maybe she's already getting it. Does she get this? Of course she doesn't. Lisa is working – if producing piles of lies and freeloading can be called “work” -- to extort $1,000,000 from REACH, based on fluff, so she can vacation in Europe.
*
It is not enough to have the chargers dismissed. I want this hate mob charged.
*
So file charges against the “hate mob”, already. Those should be quite interesting.
*
Side Note: I did not start filming their behavior until after a year of abuse.
*
Lisa never started “filming” anything. Four months ago she started harassing people by jamming her cell in their faces and taking their pictures. This was immediately subsequent to her filing her BOLI “gender discrimination” complaint. A month or so before her arrest, she learned how to video them with her cell.
*
Once again, here are Lisa's “charges” as excerpted from her amended complaint of 13 December 2007. Naturally, she contradicts her previous statements, and, in any case, piles on the usual bullacuzzi. (For further details, see THE LIES THAT ARE LISA'S COMPLAINT.)
*
“3. In/about August, 2006 I applied for and was accepted as a tenant at The Rose. Respondent advised me that I was number 13 on its waiting list.
*
“4. On November 29, 2006 I visited The Rose to inquire about the status of my place on the waiting list. The resident manager, Jamie Barton, told me that I was still number 13. Ms. Barton also told me Respondent did not accept men as tenants in the building and asked me why I had bothered to even apply. Ms. Barton then slammed her door in my face.
*
“5. When I reported this incident to Respondent director Rachel Huber I was told that I had moved up to number 5 on the waiting list.
*
“6. On/about March 20, 2007, I signed the rental contract in Ms. Barton's office. When I inquired about their nondiscriminatory policies, Ms. Barton responded, “We do not accept men in the building.”
*
“7. On March 20, 2007, I moved into The Rose apartments. My assigned room was filthy. The room had a wooden frame bed with a mattress that was not useable. Ms. Barton had just discussed with me how my room had had a bed-bug outbreak and that bed-bugs live in wooden bed frames. All the other tenants are given a metal bed frame and a mattress with a plastic wrap.
*
“8. Shortly after I moved in, Respondent began treating me differently and subjecting me to a hostile environment based on my gender identity. The incidents included, but were not limited to:
*
“a) On March 29, 2007, I received a “Notice for Cause of Termination” of my lease because I had a male friend stay beyond visiting hours in order to deliver a mattress, as the one provided for me was not useable. I noticed that other tenants had male guests stay beyond visiting hours, but they did not receive notices.
*
“b) On April 23, 2007, I drank alcohol with another tenant in the common kitchen area. I
received another Notice for Cause of Termination, but the tenant I drank with did not.
*
“c) On April 30, 2007, I witnessed a tenant complain to Ms Barton that I identified as a male and Ms Barton responded that I was not allowed to do so.
*
“d) Respondent allowed the other tenants to subject me to a continuous pattern of name calling, threats of physical harm, intimidation and false accusations. Respondent failed to investigate my complaints or take effective action to stop the conduct. Presently, the conduct continues.
*
“9. I believe that Respondent discriminated against me on the basis of my gender identity in that I am treated differently and subjected to a hostile environment.
*
“I swear (or affirm) that I know and understand this complaint and that it is true to the best of my knowledge, information and belief.
“[signed] L Iacuzzi Not a Good Queer”
*
Now there's a sig to lend an air of gravity to the rest of the fluff.
*
I still rise, I will not apologize for anything!
NAGQ
*
Herr Schikelgruber never apologized for anything either.
*
And still, nary a word about the DA dropping the criminal charges [resisting arrest, et al] against Lisa. And that was supposed to have happened two weeks ago. One would have expected a crow or two on Lisa's blog. But nothing. Hmmmmm.... Lisa's silence is deafening.
*
NAGQ-OAE
Lisa Iacuzzi pète toujours plus haut que sa cul!
24 January 2008
THE LIES THAT ARE LISA'S COMPLAINT
Make that Lisa's Amended Complaint. The investigator handling the case required Lisa to amend her complaint, in order to “correct inaccuracies”. So, Lisa “corrected” her previous inaccuracies as follows:
BUREAU OF LABOR AND INDUSTRIES
Dan Gardner, Commissioner
Civil Rights Division Complaint of Unlawful Practice
AMENDED
COMPLAINANT: Case #: PTHOSO070702-10998
Lee/Lisa Iacuzzi
631 S.E. Taylor
Portland, OR 97214
Phone #: 503-756-9734
Attorney: David Lawrence
Phone #: 503-577-7260
[NOTE: Lisa lined out the attorney name
and phone number, and replaced them
with “Pro Se”]
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
RESPONDENT:
Reach CDDC
1136 S.E. Salmon St.
Portland, OR 97214
Phone #: 503-455-4304
County: MLT # of Employees: 50+ Phone #:
Contact:
Attorney: Mark McGranaghan
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Portland Ordinances 23.01.060(B), 23.01.070 (B) and Multnomah County Ordinances 15.344(B), 15.345 (B)
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
I, Lee/Lisa Iacuzzi, being first duly sworn, do depose and say as follows:
1. Respondent is a Non-Profit organization which runs a housing complex called “The Rose” which is an apartment complex that provides homes to female victims of domestic violence.
##########################
CORRECTIONS TO LISA'S ALLEGATIONS:
The Rose is an apartment building for low income women, some of whom pay rent, others who pay partial rent, and others, like Lisa Iacuzzi, who are provided with free housing paid for through HAP. Some, but not all, residents have been victims of domestic violence. At least one, Lisa Iacuzzi, is on record as a perpetrator of domestic violence.
##########################
2. I am transgendered in that I am a biological female with a male gender identity. I identify as bi-gendered.
##########################
CORRECTIONS TO, AND NOTES ON, LISA'S ALLEGATIONS:
The definition of “bigendered” is bogus. There is no current accepted definition. Nearly everyone who met Lisa at The Rose were subjected almost immediately to her opinion of herself as “a man in a woman's body”, and, further, how the “heterosexocracy” dominates America and discriminates against men in women's bodies.
A former resident also identified herself as male. That resident is taking the necessary steps to change into a biological male. Moreover, another residents is a close relative of an actual “transgendered” person – one whom Lisa pretends she knows, but does not. – Neither were subjected by Rose residents to the “gender discrimination” and “hostile environment” which Lisa claims affected her.
##########################
3. In/about August, 2006 I applied for and was accepted as a tenant at The Rose. Respondent advised me that I was number 13 on its waiting list.
4. On November 29, 2006 I visited The Rose to inquire about the status of my place on the waiting list. The resident manager, Jamie Barton, told me that I was still number 13. Ms. Barton also told me Respondent did not accept men as tenants in the building and asked me why I had bothered to even apply. Ms. Barton then slammed her door in my face.
5. When I reported this incident to Respondent director Rachel Huber I was told that I had moved up to number 5 on the waiting list.
6. On/about March 20, 2007, I signed the rental contract in Ms. Barton's office. When I inquired about their nondiscriminatory policies, Ms. Barton responded, “We do not accept men in the building.”
##########################
NOTES ON LISA'S ALLEGATIONS:
Lisa has given several differing versions of the foregoing, adding mysterious claims of “paper trails” and phone calls to the YWCA and other agencies. The statement of Jamie Barton, The Rose's former manager, whom Lisa drove from her job, that “We do not accept men in the building,” is true. The Rose is a residence for women only. If Lisa, “a biological female”, was uncomfortable with this, she should have declined her free tenancy. The former mentioned above, who is in the process of effecting a real transgendering -- as opposed to an imaginary one – moved out of the building on her own volition. S/he remains friends with a number of tenants.
##########################
7. On March 20, 2007, I moved into The Rose apartments. My assigned room was filthy. The room had a wooden frame bed with a mattress that was not useable. Ms. Barton had just discussed with me how
my room had had a bed-bug outbreak and that bed-bugs live in wooden bed frames. All the other tenants are given a metal bed frame and a mattress with a plastic wrap.
##########################
CORRECTIONS TO, AND NOTES ON, LISA'S ALLEGATIONS:
According to Lisa's previous accounts, she signed the lease on 26th March and moved in subsequently thereto. Rooms are thoroughly cleaned prior to tenant occupancy, some of them recarpeted and repainted, as mandated by Oregon law. The “bed-bug outbreak” occurred on the other side of the building long before Lisa moved in. Lisa's statement that “all the other tenants” are given metal bed frames and plastic-wrapped mattresses is false.
##########################
8. Shortly after I moved in, Respondent began treating me differently and subjecting me to a hostile environment based on my gender identity.
##########################
CORRECTIONS TO LISA'S ALLEGATIONS:
Immediately Lisa moved in, she demanded different treatment based upon her alleged “gender identity”. The “hostile environment” she created herself with her demands for special treatment, her self-aggrandizing falsehoods, and her hostile and aggressive behaviour. In fact, tenants were cooking meals for Lisa, and providing her with money and cigarettes whenever she came round begging for them.
##########################
The incidents included, but were not limited to:
a) On March 29, 2007, I received a “Notice for Cause of Termination” of my lease because I had a male friend stay beyond visiting hours in order to deliver a mattress, as the one provided for me was not useable. I noticed that other tenants had male guests stay beyond visiting hours, but they did not receive notices.
##########################
CORRECTION TO LISA'S ALLEGATIONS:
Tenants caught violating the rule against overnight guests, as Lisa did before her first week was out, all receive Notices for Cause of Termination. Because Lisa didn't notice tenants receiving such notices does not, of course, mean that they received no notices. When the violation occurs repeatedly, the tenant is evicted, as happened in the recent past.
##########################
b) On April 23, 2007, I drank alcohol with another tenant in the common kitchen area. I
received another Notice for Cause of Termination, but the tenant I drank with did not.
##########################
CORRECTIONS TO, AND NOTES ON, LISA'S ALLEGATIONS:
The above date was a Wednesday. Lisa's vodka drinking occurred the previous weekend. The tenant who was one of her drinking partners did, in fact, receive a Notice for Cause of Termination. Lisa's other drinking partner was her 17-year-old female friend, Nicole, whom Lisa allowed to stay over for several nights, in violation of the rule against overnight guests – as well as in violation of building rules against consuming alcohol on the premises, and of State and Federal laws against providing alcohol to minors. Lisa later dubbed her friend as her “mentorship student”. What mentorship program allows the provision of alcohol and controlled substances to minors is anyone's guess.
##########################
c) On April 30, 2007, I witnessed a tenant complain to Ms Barton that I identified as a male and Ms Barton responded that I was not allowed to do so.
##########################
CORRECTIONS TO, AND NOTES ON, LISA'S ALLEGATIONS:
If Lisa were honest, which she isn't, “I witnessed” would have read “I eavesdropped while a tenant complained”. Lisa omits the facts that several tenants complained to the manager about Lisa's incessant harping on her “gender identity” and the “heterosexocracy” running America and discriminating against her. It's doubtful that Jamie responded that Lisa “was not allowed to do so”. To tenants who mentioned Lisa's views as to her “gender”, Jamie responded that Lisa was perfectly free to express her opinions.
##########################
d) Respondent allowed the other tenants to subject me to a continuous pattern of name calling, threats of physical harm, intimidation and false accusations. Respondent failed to investigate my complaints or take effective action to stop the conduct. Presently, the conduct continues.
##########################
CORRECTIONS TO, AND NOTES ON, LISA'S ALLEGATIONS:
It was, in fact, Lisa Iacuzzi who subjected tenants to “name calling” -- particularly African American tenants – threats of physical harm, as well as physical assault, and false accusations. Over several months, Lisa repeatedly accused African American tenants of welfare fraud, aided and abetted by Lee Greer of Portland Impact. Ms. Greer was forced to resign her position, due to Lisa's ongoing harassment, as was Jamie Barton. Lisa further accused African American tenants of buying and selling illegal drugs – the purposes of the alleged welfare fraud -- including a handicapped African American teacher, who does not receive food stamps—as well as of receiving free cable TV. Lisa sabotaged the same African American teacher's cable, and later boasted of her sabotage. Lisa's stated reason was that the said tenant was receiving “free cable TV”, as was another African American tenant, who does not receive cable TV, free or otherwise. In fact, Ms. Iacuzzi's sabotage – which cost the tenant $60 to repair – was due to the fact that Ms. Iacuzzi appeared at her door one night and demanded to watch “The Sopranos.” The tenant, to whom Ms. Iacuzzi was a stranger, quite naturally refused to let her in. Ms. Iacuzzi subsequently banged on the tenant's door, called her racist epithets, then later sabotaged her cable TV, as well as her plants in the common garden area.
Lisa freely admitted her sabotage to other tenants, stating that she had “taken the panel off of the cable box while the security guard was downstairs in the lobby, and I cut their cable cords with a knife.” Lisa also bragged that she took the “cable and wore it around my neck like a necklace when I went into the computer room. I had fun taunting everyone with it, and I loved watching everyone’s reactions as they ran out of the computer room. I guess I scared them!”
Lisa also admitted to “messing with the lock on the community kitchen door.” She stated she did this because “several tenants in the building threatened to beat me up.” When pressed for the identities of those tenants, she failed to mention names. “I put some stuff in the lock because nobody would let me in the kitchen.” She then claimed that: “After I put the stuff in the lock, I took it back out afterwards.”
Lisa stated to tenants that someone at REACH “offered me $10,000 if I said I wouldn’t sue them.” She then laughed and said: “That isn’t enough for a European vacation. I want $1,000,000 from them.” This meshes with Ms. Iacuzzi's defacement of the front steps of The Rose, where she wrote: “$1,000,000 Reach CDC.” Ms Iacuzzi urged tenants to contact Kerry Johnson at BOLI and tell him they would back her complaint that she was “being harassed by and threatened” by “Reach employees and some of the tenants in the building due to being transgendered.” She stated “There would be more than enough money for a European vacation if we all sued and won.”
Around the same time in mid-October, Ms. Iacuzzi harassed and threatened a tenant and that tenant's guest, then physically assaulted the guest several times. Later, she threatened to push that guest down the staairs and “break his neck.” She also called the security guard, Roy of Metro Watch, several filthy names. Later she boasted of having gotten Roy fired.
Lisa's statement that REACH managed “failed to investigate my complaints or take effective action to stop the conduct”is patently false. Most of her “complaints” were based merely on her unique and extremely subjective perceptions, and eventually boiled down to Lisa's word against those of tenants and other witnesses.
Lisa's statement that “the conduct continues” is valid only when applied to her conduct. Two days after her release from jail, attempted to assault a tenant whom she believed a signatory to accounts detailing her actions. Lisa's attempted assault was forestalled due to the presence of that tenant's brother and former husband.
##########################
9. I believe that Respondent discriminated against me on the basis of my gender identity in that I am treated differently and subjected to a hostile environment.
##########################
NOTES ON LISA'S ALLEGATIONS:
If Lisa was, as she claims, “treated differently” and “subjected to a hostile environment,” it was not due to any “gender identity”claims, but rather that, from the inception of her tenancy, Lisa demanded to be treated differently, and in the course of her tenancy, she herself created that “hostile environment” from which she is now attempting to profit.
It's difficult to see why Lisa was never charged with for providing alcohol and marijuana to a minor – her so-called “mentorship student” -- or for her racist hate speech and attacks on African American and gay women. Lisa's violent behavior is attested by her record while incarcerated in the Multnomah County jail psychiatric ward.
##########################
I swear (or affirm) that I know and understand this complaint and that it is true to the best of my knowledge, information and belief.
[signed]
L Iacuzzi Not a Good Queer
##########################
ADDENDA
Now there's a sig to inspire trust and confidence.
As many have been made aware, “the best” of Lisa's “knowledge and information” is woefully less than adequate. As for her beliefs, those are best left to the shrinks at the jail psycho ward where she spent the better part of a month for her violent behaviour toward jail personnel and inmates.
NAGQ-OAE
Lisa Iacuzzi pète toujours plus haut que sa cul.
BUREAU OF LABOR AND INDUSTRIES
Dan Gardner, Commissioner
Civil Rights Division Complaint of Unlawful Practice
AMENDED
COMPLAINANT: Case #: PTHOSO070702-10998
Lee/Lisa Iacuzzi
631 S.E. Taylor
Portland, OR 97214
Phone #: 503-756-9734
Attorney: David Lawrence
Phone #: 503-577-7260
[NOTE: Lisa lined out the attorney name
and phone number, and replaced them
with “Pro Se”]
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
RESPONDENT:
Reach CDDC
1136 S.E. Salmon St.
Portland, OR 97214
Phone #: 503-455-4304
County: MLT # of Employees: 50+ Phone #:
Contact:
Attorney: Mark McGranaghan
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Portland Ordinances 23.01.060(B), 23.01.070 (B) and Multnomah County Ordinances 15.344(B), 15.345 (B)
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
I, Lee/Lisa Iacuzzi, being first duly sworn, do depose and say as follows:
1. Respondent is a Non-Profit organization which runs a housing complex called “The Rose” which is an apartment complex that provides homes to female victims of domestic violence.
##########################
CORRECTIONS TO LISA'S ALLEGATIONS:
The Rose is an apartment building for low income women, some of whom pay rent, others who pay partial rent, and others, like Lisa Iacuzzi, who are provided with free housing paid for through HAP. Some, but not all, residents have been victims of domestic violence. At least one, Lisa Iacuzzi, is on record as a perpetrator of domestic violence.
##########################
2. I am transgendered in that I am a biological female with a male gender identity. I identify as bi-gendered.
##########################
CORRECTIONS TO, AND NOTES ON, LISA'S ALLEGATIONS:
The definition of “bigendered” is bogus. There is no current accepted definition. Nearly everyone who met Lisa at The Rose were subjected almost immediately to her opinion of herself as “a man in a woman's body”, and, further, how the “heterosexocracy” dominates America and discriminates against men in women's bodies.
A former resident also identified herself as male. That resident is taking the necessary steps to change into a biological male. Moreover, another residents is a close relative of an actual “transgendered” person – one whom Lisa pretends she knows, but does not. – Neither were subjected by Rose residents to the “gender discrimination” and “hostile environment” which Lisa claims affected her.
##########################
3. In/about August, 2006 I applied for and was accepted as a tenant at The Rose. Respondent advised me that I was number 13 on its waiting list.
4. On November 29, 2006 I visited The Rose to inquire about the status of my place on the waiting list. The resident manager, Jamie Barton, told me that I was still number 13. Ms. Barton also told me Respondent did not accept men as tenants in the building and asked me why I had bothered to even apply. Ms. Barton then slammed her door in my face.
5. When I reported this incident to Respondent director Rachel Huber I was told that I had moved up to number 5 on the waiting list.
6. On/about March 20, 2007, I signed the rental contract in Ms. Barton's office. When I inquired about their nondiscriminatory policies, Ms. Barton responded, “We do not accept men in the building.”
##########################
NOTES ON LISA'S ALLEGATIONS:
Lisa has given several differing versions of the foregoing, adding mysterious claims of “paper trails” and phone calls to the YWCA and other agencies. The statement of Jamie Barton, The Rose's former manager, whom Lisa drove from her job, that “We do not accept men in the building,” is true. The Rose is a residence for women only. If Lisa, “a biological female”, was uncomfortable with this, she should have declined her free tenancy. The former mentioned above, who is in the process of effecting a real transgendering -- as opposed to an imaginary one – moved out of the building on her own volition. S/he remains friends with a number of tenants.
##########################
7. On March 20, 2007, I moved into The Rose apartments. My assigned room was filthy. The room had a wooden frame bed with a mattress that was not useable. Ms. Barton had just discussed with me how
my room had had a bed-bug outbreak and that bed-bugs live in wooden bed frames. All the other tenants are given a metal bed frame and a mattress with a plastic wrap.
##########################
CORRECTIONS TO, AND NOTES ON, LISA'S ALLEGATIONS:
According to Lisa's previous accounts, she signed the lease on 26th March and moved in subsequently thereto. Rooms are thoroughly cleaned prior to tenant occupancy, some of them recarpeted and repainted, as mandated by Oregon law. The “bed-bug outbreak” occurred on the other side of the building long before Lisa moved in. Lisa's statement that “all the other tenants” are given metal bed frames and plastic-wrapped mattresses is false.
##########################
8. Shortly after I moved in, Respondent began treating me differently and subjecting me to a hostile environment based on my gender identity.
##########################
CORRECTIONS TO LISA'S ALLEGATIONS:
Immediately Lisa moved in, she demanded different treatment based upon her alleged “gender identity”. The “hostile environment” she created herself with her demands for special treatment, her self-aggrandizing falsehoods, and her hostile and aggressive behaviour. In fact, tenants were cooking meals for Lisa, and providing her with money and cigarettes whenever she came round begging for them.
##########################
The incidents included, but were not limited to:
a) On March 29, 2007, I received a “Notice for Cause of Termination” of my lease because I had a male friend stay beyond visiting hours in order to deliver a mattress, as the one provided for me was not useable. I noticed that other tenants had male guests stay beyond visiting hours, but they did not receive notices.
##########################
CORRECTION TO LISA'S ALLEGATIONS:
Tenants caught violating the rule against overnight guests, as Lisa did before her first week was out, all receive Notices for Cause of Termination. Because Lisa didn't notice tenants receiving such notices does not, of course, mean that they received no notices. When the violation occurs repeatedly, the tenant is evicted, as happened in the recent past.
##########################
b) On April 23, 2007, I drank alcohol with another tenant in the common kitchen area. I
received another Notice for Cause of Termination, but the tenant I drank with did not.
##########################
CORRECTIONS TO, AND NOTES ON, LISA'S ALLEGATIONS:
The above date was a Wednesday. Lisa's vodka drinking occurred the previous weekend. The tenant who was one of her drinking partners did, in fact, receive a Notice for Cause of Termination. Lisa's other drinking partner was her 17-year-old female friend, Nicole, whom Lisa allowed to stay over for several nights, in violation of the rule against overnight guests – as well as in violation of building rules against consuming alcohol on the premises, and of State and Federal laws against providing alcohol to minors. Lisa later dubbed her friend as her “mentorship student”. What mentorship program allows the provision of alcohol and controlled substances to minors is anyone's guess.
##########################
c) On April 30, 2007, I witnessed a tenant complain to Ms Barton that I identified as a male and Ms Barton responded that I was not allowed to do so.
##########################
CORRECTIONS TO, AND NOTES ON, LISA'S ALLEGATIONS:
If Lisa were honest, which she isn't, “I witnessed” would have read “I eavesdropped while a tenant complained”. Lisa omits the facts that several tenants complained to the manager about Lisa's incessant harping on her “gender identity” and the “heterosexocracy” running America and discriminating against her. It's doubtful that Jamie responded that Lisa “was not allowed to do so”. To tenants who mentioned Lisa's views as to her “gender”, Jamie responded that Lisa was perfectly free to express her opinions.
##########################
d) Respondent allowed the other tenants to subject me to a continuous pattern of name calling, threats of physical harm, intimidation and false accusations. Respondent failed to investigate my complaints or take effective action to stop the conduct. Presently, the conduct continues.
##########################
CORRECTIONS TO, AND NOTES ON, LISA'S ALLEGATIONS:
It was, in fact, Lisa Iacuzzi who subjected tenants to “name calling” -- particularly African American tenants – threats of physical harm, as well as physical assault, and false accusations. Over several months, Lisa repeatedly accused African American tenants of welfare fraud, aided and abetted by Lee Greer of Portland Impact. Ms. Greer was forced to resign her position, due to Lisa's ongoing harassment, as was Jamie Barton. Lisa further accused African American tenants of buying and selling illegal drugs – the purposes of the alleged welfare fraud -- including a handicapped African American teacher, who does not receive food stamps—as well as of receiving free cable TV. Lisa sabotaged the same African American teacher's cable, and later boasted of her sabotage. Lisa's stated reason was that the said tenant was receiving “free cable TV”, as was another African American tenant, who does not receive cable TV, free or otherwise. In fact, Ms. Iacuzzi's sabotage – which cost the tenant $60 to repair – was due to the fact that Ms. Iacuzzi appeared at her door one night and demanded to watch “The Sopranos.” The tenant, to whom Ms. Iacuzzi was a stranger, quite naturally refused to let her in. Ms. Iacuzzi subsequently banged on the tenant's door, called her racist epithets, then later sabotaged her cable TV, as well as her plants in the common garden area.
Lisa freely admitted her sabotage to other tenants, stating that she had “taken the panel off of the cable box while the security guard was downstairs in the lobby, and I cut their cable cords with a knife.” Lisa also bragged that she took the “cable and wore it around my neck like a necklace when I went into the computer room. I had fun taunting everyone with it, and I loved watching everyone’s reactions as they ran out of the computer room. I guess I scared them!”
Lisa also admitted to “messing with the lock on the community kitchen door.” She stated she did this because “several tenants in the building threatened to beat me up.” When pressed for the identities of those tenants, she failed to mention names. “I put some stuff in the lock because nobody would let me in the kitchen.” She then claimed that: “After I put the stuff in the lock, I took it back out afterwards.”
Lisa stated to tenants that someone at REACH “offered me $10,000 if I said I wouldn’t sue them.” She then laughed and said: “That isn’t enough for a European vacation. I want $1,000,000 from them.” This meshes with Ms. Iacuzzi's defacement of the front steps of The Rose, where she wrote: “$1,000,000 Reach CDC.” Ms Iacuzzi urged tenants to contact Kerry Johnson at BOLI and tell him they would back her complaint that she was “being harassed by and threatened” by “Reach employees and some of the tenants in the building due to being transgendered.” She stated “There would be more than enough money for a European vacation if we all sued and won.”
Around the same time in mid-October, Ms. Iacuzzi harassed and threatened a tenant and that tenant's guest, then physically assaulted the guest several times. Later, she threatened to push that guest down the staairs and “break his neck.” She also called the security guard, Roy of Metro Watch, several filthy names. Later she boasted of having gotten Roy fired.
Lisa's statement that REACH managed “failed to investigate my complaints or take effective action to stop the conduct”is patently false. Most of her “complaints” were based merely on her unique and extremely subjective perceptions, and eventually boiled down to Lisa's word against those of tenants and other witnesses.
Lisa's statement that “the conduct continues” is valid only when applied to her conduct. Two days after her release from jail, attempted to assault a tenant whom she believed a signatory to accounts detailing her actions. Lisa's attempted assault was forestalled due to the presence of that tenant's brother and former husband.
##########################
9. I believe that Respondent discriminated against me on the basis of my gender identity in that I am treated differently and subjected to a hostile environment.
##########################
NOTES ON LISA'S ALLEGATIONS:
If Lisa was, as she claims, “treated differently” and “subjected to a hostile environment,” it was not due to any “gender identity”claims, but rather that, from the inception of her tenancy, Lisa demanded to be treated differently, and in the course of her tenancy, she herself created that “hostile environment” from which she is now attempting to profit.
It's difficult to see why Lisa was never charged with for providing alcohol and marijuana to a minor – her so-called “mentorship student” -- or for her racist hate speech and attacks on African American and gay women. Lisa's violent behavior is attested by her record while incarcerated in the Multnomah County jail psychiatric ward.
##########################
I swear (or affirm) that I know and understand this complaint and that it is true to the best of my knowledge, information and belief.
[signed]
L Iacuzzi Not a Good Queer
##########################
ADDENDA
Now there's a sig to inspire trust and confidence.
As many have been made aware, “the best” of Lisa's “knowledge and information” is woefully less than adequate. As for her beliefs, those are best left to the shrinks at the jail psycho ward where she spent the better part of a month for her violent behaviour toward jail personnel and inmates.
NAGQ-OAE
Lisa Iacuzzi pète toujours plus haut que sa cul.
Lisa Rants and Moans on Her Arrest - Again
On Thursday, January 10, Lisa wrote:
BOLI's Case Number: PTHOSO070702
NAGQ documents discrimination in the "Progressive" City Of Portland, Oregon
Translation: Lisa gives a highly selective version of her 12th November arrest and incarceration.
Good Cop Officer west Helfrich #29194 and Bad Cop Officer Andrew Kofoed #40928.
The bad cop with Officer Tim Lowry targeted and physically assaulted me in my arrest who tried to cite, "resisting arrest" on my police report where I spent 29 days in Mult. County jail
Translation: Lisa was arrested last November for violating a stalking order granted by the court to a resident whom Lisa had targeted for abuse. In the course of her arrest, Lisa hit, kicked, and spit on the arresting officers. Halfway down the block from the arrest site, the car pulled over so that Lisa could be muzzled, in order to keep her from spitting on the officers. Not a smart thing to do.
Another not so smart thing was to scream at her victim, “When I get out of jail, I'm going to kill you!”
and I still face criminal charges which should be dropped by Friday, January 11, 08 by District Attorney Fred Lansing.
Well, yes. About those charges – were they dropped? Hmmmm....Lisa doesn't say.
Officers Lowry and Kofoed only took testimonies from two tenants who had been targeting hate at Not a Good Queer.
Translation: the officers spoke to all who witnessed Lisa's arrest and her resistance thereto. There were considerably more than two present.
They did not interview staff who were present in the lobby, where a "supposed" threat by NAGQ was made against a hate mob tenant, these staff witnesses would have reported that the two haters statements were lies.
Actually, they reported hearing Lisa say to the target of her abuse: “When I get out, I'm going to kill you!”
Instead, NAGQ spent 29 days in jail
In the jail psychiatric ward, no less.
and had to tell the judge that NAGQ would move out of my apartment to get out of jail which made NAGQ homeless.
That was Lisa's own decision. REACH has stated that she is free to ingress and egress the building. Lisa is a bit smarter than she was during her arrest, however, and has wisely chosen to obey the court order that she stay away. Sort of.
Reach CDC also gave NAGQ a cause of eviction notice for false accusations for almost every month of NAGQ's apartment at the Rose.
Accusations of Lisa's racist hate language, her providing alcohol to a minor, her sabotage of tenant's property, her threats of physical harm to tenants, were none of them “false”.
The only one who has paid severely for the hate crimes is NAGQ and the witnesses of NAGQ who still are living in the "hate" building.
Apparently Lisa has changed her mind about “Payback is a good thing!”-- at least when she's on the receiving end.
These witnesses have been physically and emotionally threatened.
By Lisa. She certainly did threaten potential witnesses, physically and emotionally, telling them she would cut off their legs if they appeared in court, leaving threatening notes under their doors, screaming that she would kill them when she got out of the pokey.
Is the police going to do anything about it?
Is they? Apparently the justice system did do something about Lisa: 29 days in the jail psycho ward – pretty stiff for a stalking order violation.
We already know that Reach CDC has proven itself to do: Reach CDC already knows and has done nothing.
REACH certainly did nothing with regard to Lisa's hateful, abusive, and destructive antics directed against tenants.
To do nothing against harassment is not a defense: doing nothing, for fear of being penalized for doing something, has been Reach CDC's progressive management and organizational stance.!
Right about that. REACH's response to tenants who were abused and attacked by Lisa was to do NOTHING.
NOTICE OF SUBSTANTIAL EVIDENCE DETERMINATION
RESPONDENT: Reach CDC
COMPLAINANT: Lisa/Lee Iacuzzi, known as Not a Good Queer at Blogspot.
VIOLATION of Portland City Ordinance: 23.01.60(B),23.01.070(B). and Multonomah County Ordinances 15.344(B), 15.245(B).
23.01.060 Discrimination in Selling, Renting, or Leasing Real Property Prohibited. - Printable Version
(Amended by Ordinance No. 175158, effective January 15, 2001.)
A. It shall be unlawful to discriminate in selling, renting, or leasing real property on the basis of an individual’s race, religion, color, sex, national origin, marital status, familial status, or disability, by committing any of the acts made unlawful under the provisions of ORS 659.033 and 659.430.
B. In addition, it shall be unlawful to discriminate in selling, renting, or leasing real property on the basis of an individual’s sexual orientation, gender identity, source of income, or age if the individual is 18 years of age or older except as is excluded in ORS 659.033 subsection 6 (a) and (b), by committing against any such individual any of the acts already made unlawful under ORS 659.033 when committed against the categories of persons listed therein.
23.01.070 Discrimination in Places of Public Accommodation Prohibited - Printable Version
Printing excerpts from the Portland city ordinances means exactly what? Only Lisa knows for sure.
Amended by Ordinance No. 175158, effective January 15, 2001.)
I know activists helped me in the year of 2000 to make ordinances so that trans/bigendered people could be safe in housing. I would like to especially thank, Lori Buckwater who I believed helped pave the way for all trans and bigendered people in the state of Oregon.
Lori – a REAL transgenderd person, as well as a relative of one of the Rose tenants whom Lisa accosted several times -- would be appalled to learn she had helped Lisa do anything. Lori was already appalled to learn of Lisa's behaviour, and offered reassurances that such behaviour is NOT the norm for REAL transgenders.
A. It shall be unlawful to discriminate in public accommodations on the basis of an individual’s race, religion, color, sex, national origin, marital status, age if the individual is 18 years of age or older, or disability, by committing any of the acts made unlawful under the provisions of ORS 659.037, 659.425, or ORS 30.670 to 30.685.
B. In addition, it shall be unlawful in public accommodations to discriminate on the basis of an individual’s sexual orientation, gender identity, source of income or familial status, by committing against any such individual any of the acts already made unlawful under ORS 659.037 or ORS 30.670 to 30.685 when committed against the categories of persons listed therein.
23.01.070 Discrimination in Places of Public Accommodation Prohibited - Printable Version (Amended by Ordinance No. 175158, effective January 15, 2001.)
Lisa's point of pasting these portions of Portland's city ordinances is......?
A. It shall be unlawful to discriminate in public accommodations on the basis of an individual’s race, religion, color, sex, national origin, marital status, age if the individual is 18 years of age or older, or disability, by committing any of the acts made unlawful under the provisions of ORS 659.037, 659.425, or ORS 30.670 to 30.685.
B. In addition, it shall be unlawful in public accommodations to discriminate on the basis of an individual’s sexual orientation, gender identity, source of income or familial status, by committing against any such individual any of the acts already made unlawful under ORS 659.037 or ORS 30.670 to 30.685 when committed against the categories of persons listed therein.
So?
In case your wondering, NAGQ needs a civil rights lawyer and money for legal fees. NAGQ has interviewed several lawyers in Portland, but has not made a decision on who would represent NAGQ in the highest regards.
Translation: Lisa can't find a lawyer who will take her case on spec. Her previous lawyer, David Lawrence, seems to have resigned as counsel well over a month ago. Lisa's habit of welshing on her debts -- the $5,000 she owes PSU comes to mind -- may be a consideration.
Maybe Lisa can get her “sister Chris” to help her? After all, according to Lisa, sister Chris is a paralegal who works for a HUGE law firm, and has won “many awards” for her expertise in “solving cases.” According Lisa. BUT, also according to Lisa, when she tried “to call my family and demand that they make a 50,000 dollar bail” to get her out of jail, “my family said that I was guilty and that I had to do my time.“
So much for the help Lisa says she received from sister Chris.
The city of Portland became a role model for how people identify their gender to be safe. The ordinances are progressive but enforcing these ordinances have not always been successful. NAGQ spent 29 days in jail because the south east precinct decided to arrest the trouble making "tranny" versus doing solid police work.
Translation: the officers received a copy of a letter signed by over half the tenants of the Rose listing Lisa's violent and destructive antics. It gave them the means to act.
Officer Tim Lowry #41142 and AndrewKofoed #40928 took the side of a hate mob and intentionally and deliberately profiled Lisa/Lee Iacuzzi, known as http://notagoodqueer.blogspot.com
They “profiled” Lisa for what she is: a bully and an abuser. Shrinks in the jail psycho ward, where Lisa spent 29 days, provided further details.
It only takes one bad cop to put you in jail.
For Lisa, it took months of her hateful and abusive antics to get her there, and more of the same to keep her there.
The hate mob at the complainant's housing created a website dedicated to NAGQ called http://notagoodqueer-oae.blogspot.com/ who use a look alike name as my name on their website to write into submissions. Their blog is a must read for those who find gang behavior of hate enjoyable.
Awwwwww, Lisa's just jealous because NAGQ-OAE is far more literate and amusing than anything an uneducated boor could produce. What excites Lisa's fury more than jealousy, however, is NAGQ-OAE's provender of facts in opposition to Lisa's fabrications. Some of Lisa's fabrications. It would take a full-time staff of nine, working 24/7 to produce facts in opposition to ALL of Lisa' fabrications. Even then, it would be like trying to plug the effluvia from a fertilizer factory with a q-tip.
It only takes one bad cop to put you in jail.
It took Lisa's customary antics to put herself in jail, and the jail psycho ward, for 29 days.
Currently, I am homeless due to the Bad cops decision,
Lisa is currently vouchered into the Y, in spite of the support of all those friends she claims to have. So, she is hardly in the same category as homeless people on the streets. Not even the poor homeless man whose sleeping spot she “borrowed” -- along with his sleeping bag.
I can't feel my left arm, collar bone injury, and pain all though out my body.
That “collar bone injury” was the one where the cops stood Lisa on her collar bone, with all her weight thereon, right?
The stress has been unbelievable because the lynching mob tried to protray me as a money hungry freak that the "bad" police believed and who decided to protect due to poor information and the business influences of the police department versus the civil rights protections.
So many people out to get Lisa Iacuzzi....Has she ever stopped to wonder WHY they are all after her, but not after, say, a “trans activist” like Lori Buckwater?
The Souteast police precinct were given a copy of BOLI's compalint of civil rights violations but the police ignored the states' charges against Reach CDC.
There was no “BOLI compalint[sic] of civil rights violations”. There were no “states' charges against REACH” either. If Lisa gave the Southeast Precinct anything, besides grief, it was a copy of her complaint against REACH, which BOLI asked her to amend to correct her “inaccuracies”, as the investigator put it delicately:
“It will now go in to the conciliation process and my supervisor will try to settle the case. But before this begins I need to have you or your attorney sign an amended complaint. I HAD TO CORRECT SOME INACCURACIES IN THE COMPLAINT. I need the notarized signature of you or your attorney as soon as possibly. Is David Lawrence still representing you on the Reach matter? If so, I can have him sign the complaint. (I've enclosed a copy of the amended complaint.) Your letter indicated you wanted to settle the the Reach complaint. Do you have a settlement offer in mind? I'm still working on the Bradley Angle-House complaint. I'm not yet ready to make a determination on that complaint.”
“I really would urge you to get an attorney regarding the stalking order situation. . Remember the old saying, 'Anyone who represents himself has a fool for an attorney.'”
In fact, Lisa is no longer represented by attorney Lawrence on her BOLI complaint, as she herself signed it pro se. So, Lisa now has a fool for an attorney.
Reach CDC, I would like you to donate a house to the transgendered and bigendered community who have limited options for safety in the "progressive city of Portland".
Lisa Iacuzzi, REACH tenants would like you to get a heart transplant, so you'll have one—and “heart” doesn't mean the organ in your thorax.
Would you please be a solution to the problem?
Lisa is the problem. Would she be a solution to it? Not bloody likely. She enjoys causing trouble. A real nudnik.
Reach CDC has lots of properties and is well known in the city and state government as a leader in helping Building a Better Community and an organization who operates as a nonprofit to help the homeless. How about you help the gender community?
What, exactly, is a “gender community”? Is it the opposite of a “genderless community”?
How about REACH helping Lisa Iacuzzi by giving her a one-way ticket to Riyadh? Lisa can conduct a fact-finding mission on gender discrimination, take one of her little polls on gender equality and “bigendered/trigendered” persons, then write a dissertation on it all. This might be a great help to who has a marked tendency to bite all the hands that have fed her.
I do not apologize for anything! NAGQ
Neither did Herr Schikelgruber. He, too, shared with Lisa a certain tendency to make scapegoats of others – or, as Lisa puts is, “escape goat.”
BOLI's Case Number: PTHOSO070702
NAGQ documents discrimination in the "Progressive" City Of Portland, Oregon
Translation: Lisa gives a highly selective version of her 12th November arrest and incarceration.
Good Cop Officer west Helfrich #29194 and Bad Cop Officer Andrew Kofoed #40928.
The bad cop with Officer Tim Lowry targeted and physically assaulted me in my arrest who tried to cite, "resisting arrest" on my police report where I spent 29 days in Mult. County jail
Translation: Lisa was arrested last November for violating a stalking order granted by the court to a resident whom Lisa had targeted for abuse. In the course of her arrest, Lisa hit, kicked, and spit on the arresting officers. Halfway down the block from the arrest site, the car pulled over so that Lisa could be muzzled, in order to keep her from spitting on the officers. Not a smart thing to do.
Another not so smart thing was to scream at her victim, “When I get out of jail, I'm going to kill you!”
and I still face criminal charges which should be dropped by Friday, January 11, 08 by District Attorney Fred Lansing.
Well, yes. About those charges – were they dropped? Hmmmm....Lisa doesn't say.
Officers Lowry and Kofoed only took testimonies from two tenants who had been targeting hate at Not a Good Queer.
Translation: the officers spoke to all who witnessed Lisa's arrest and her resistance thereto. There were considerably more than two present.
They did not interview staff who were present in the lobby, where a "supposed" threat by NAGQ was made against a hate mob tenant, these staff witnesses would have reported that the two haters statements were lies.
Actually, they reported hearing Lisa say to the target of her abuse: “When I get out, I'm going to kill you!”
Instead, NAGQ spent 29 days in jail
In the jail psychiatric ward, no less.
and had to tell the judge that NAGQ would move out of my apartment to get out of jail which made NAGQ homeless.
That was Lisa's own decision. REACH has stated that she is free to ingress and egress the building. Lisa is a bit smarter than she was during her arrest, however, and has wisely chosen to obey the court order that she stay away. Sort of.
Reach CDC also gave NAGQ a cause of eviction notice for false accusations for almost every month of NAGQ's apartment at the Rose.
Accusations of Lisa's racist hate language, her providing alcohol to a minor, her sabotage of tenant's property, her threats of physical harm to tenants, were none of them “false”.
The only one who has paid severely for the hate crimes is NAGQ and the witnesses of NAGQ who still are living in the "hate" building.
Apparently Lisa has changed her mind about “Payback is a good thing!”-- at least when she's on the receiving end.
These witnesses have been physically and emotionally threatened.
By Lisa. She certainly did threaten potential witnesses, physically and emotionally, telling them she would cut off their legs if they appeared in court, leaving threatening notes under their doors, screaming that she would kill them when she got out of the pokey.
Is the police going to do anything about it?
Is they? Apparently the justice system did do something about Lisa: 29 days in the jail psycho ward – pretty stiff for a stalking order violation.
We already know that Reach CDC has proven itself to do: Reach CDC already knows and has done nothing.
REACH certainly did nothing with regard to Lisa's hateful, abusive, and destructive antics directed against tenants.
To do nothing against harassment is not a defense: doing nothing, for fear of being penalized for doing something, has been Reach CDC's progressive management and organizational stance.!
Right about that. REACH's response to tenants who were abused and attacked by Lisa was to do NOTHING.
NOTICE OF SUBSTANTIAL EVIDENCE DETERMINATION
RESPONDENT: Reach CDC
COMPLAINANT: Lisa/Lee Iacuzzi, known as Not a Good Queer at Blogspot.
VIOLATION of Portland City Ordinance: 23.01.60(B),23.01.070(B). and Multonomah County Ordinances 15.344(B), 15.245(B).
23.01.060 Discrimination in Selling, Renting, or Leasing Real Property Prohibited. - Printable Version
(Amended by Ordinance No. 175158, effective January 15, 2001.)
A. It shall be unlawful to discriminate in selling, renting, or leasing real property on the basis of an individual’s race, religion, color, sex, national origin, marital status, familial status, or disability, by committing any of the acts made unlawful under the provisions of ORS 659.033 and 659.430.
B. In addition, it shall be unlawful to discriminate in selling, renting, or leasing real property on the basis of an individual’s sexual orientation, gender identity, source of income, or age if the individual is 18 years of age or older except as is excluded in ORS 659.033 subsection 6 (a) and (b), by committing against any such individual any of the acts already made unlawful under ORS 659.033 when committed against the categories of persons listed therein.
23.01.070 Discrimination in Places of Public Accommodation Prohibited - Printable Version
Printing excerpts from the Portland city ordinances means exactly what? Only Lisa knows for sure.
Amended by Ordinance No. 175158, effective January 15, 2001.)
I know activists helped me in the year of 2000 to make ordinances so that trans/bigendered people could be safe in housing. I would like to especially thank, Lori Buckwater who I believed helped pave the way for all trans and bigendered people in the state of Oregon.
Lori – a REAL transgenderd person, as well as a relative of one of the Rose tenants whom Lisa accosted several times -- would be appalled to learn she had helped Lisa do anything. Lori was already appalled to learn of Lisa's behaviour, and offered reassurances that such behaviour is NOT the norm for REAL transgenders.
A. It shall be unlawful to discriminate in public accommodations on the basis of an individual’s race, religion, color, sex, national origin, marital status, age if the individual is 18 years of age or older, or disability, by committing any of the acts made unlawful under the provisions of ORS 659.037, 659.425, or ORS 30.670 to 30.685.
B. In addition, it shall be unlawful in public accommodations to discriminate on the basis of an individual’s sexual orientation, gender identity, source of income or familial status, by committing against any such individual any of the acts already made unlawful under ORS 659.037 or ORS 30.670 to 30.685 when committed against the categories of persons listed therein.
23.01.070 Discrimination in Places of Public Accommodation Prohibited - Printable Version (Amended by Ordinance No. 175158, effective January 15, 2001.)
Lisa's point of pasting these portions of Portland's city ordinances is......?
A. It shall be unlawful to discriminate in public accommodations on the basis of an individual’s race, religion, color, sex, national origin, marital status, age if the individual is 18 years of age or older, or disability, by committing any of the acts made unlawful under the provisions of ORS 659.037, 659.425, or ORS 30.670 to 30.685.
B. In addition, it shall be unlawful in public accommodations to discriminate on the basis of an individual’s sexual orientation, gender identity, source of income or familial status, by committing against any such individual any of the acts already made unlawful under ORS 659.037 or ORS 30.670 to 30.685 when committed against the categories of persons listed therein.
So?
In case your wondering, NAGQ needs a civil rights lawyer and money for legal fees. NAGQ has interviewed several lawyers in Portland, but has not made a decision on who would represent NAGQ in the highest regards.
Translation: Lisa can't find a lawyer who will take her case on spec. Her previous lawyer, David Lawrence, seems to have resigned as counsel well over a month ago. Lisa's habit of welshing on her debts -- the $5,000 she owes PSU comes to mind -- may be a consideration.
Maybe Lisa can get her “sister Chris” to help her? After all, according to Lisa, sister Chris is a paralegal who works for a HUGE law firm, and has won “many awards” for her expertise in “solving cases.” According Lisa. BUT, also according to Lisa, when she tried “to call my family and demand that they make a 50,000 dollar bail” to get her out of jail, “my family said that I was guilty and that I had to do my time.“
So much for the help Lisa says she received from sister Chris.
The city of Portland became a role model for how people identify their gender to be safe. The ordinances are progressive but enforcing these ordinances have not always been successful. NAGQ spent 29 days in jail because the south east precinct decided to arrest the trouble making "tranny" versus doing solid police work.
Translation: the officers received a copy of a letter signed by over half the tenants of the Rose listing Lisa's violent and destructive antics. It gave them the means to act.
Officer Tim Lowry #41142 and AndrewKofoed #40928 took the side of a hate mob and intentionally and deliberately profiled Lisa/Lee Iacuzzi, known as http://notagoodqueer.blogspot.com
They “profiled” Lisa for what she is: a bully and an abuser. Shrinks in the jail psycho ward, where Lisa spent 29 days, provided further details.
It only takes one bad cop to put you in jail.
For Lisa, it took months of her hateful and abusive antics to get her there, and more of the same to keep her there.
The hate mob at the complainant's housing created a website dedicated to NAGQ called http://notagoodqueer-oae.blogspot.com/ who use a look alike name as my name on their website to write into submissions. Their blog is a must read for those who find gang behavior of hate enjoyable.
Awwwwww, Lisa's just jealous because NAGQ-OAE is far more literate and amusing than anything an uneducated boor could produce. What excites Lisa's fury more than jealousy, however, is NAGQ-OAE's provender of facts in opposition to Lisa's fabrications. Some of Lisa's fabrications. It would take a full-time staff of nine, working 24/7 to produce facts in opposition to ALL of Lisa' fabrications. Even then, it would be like trying to plug the effluvia from a fertilizer factory with a q-tip.
It only takes one bad cop to put you in jail.
It took Lisa's customary antics to put herself in jail, and the jail psycho ward, for 29 days.
Currently, I am homeless due to the Bad cops decision,
Lisa is currently vouchered into the Y, in spite of the support of all those friends she claims to have. So, she is hardly in the same category as homeless people on the streets. Not even the poor homeless man whose sleeping spot she “borrowed” -- along with his sleeping bag.
I can't feel my left arm, collar bone injury, and pain all though out my body.
That “collar bone injury” was the one where the cops stood Lisa on her collar bone, with all her weight thereon, right?
The stress has been unbelievable because the lynching mob tried to protray me as a money hungry freak that the "bad" police believed and who decided to protect due to poor information and the business influences of the police department versus the civil rights protections.
So many people out to get Lisa Iacuzzi....Has she ever stopped to wonder WHY they are all after her, but not after, say, a “trans activist” like Lori Buckwater?
The Souteast police precinct were given a copy of BOLI's compalint of civil rights violations but the police ignored the states' charges against Reach CDC.
There was no “BOLI compalint[sic] of civil rights violations”. There were no “states' charges against REACH” either. If Lisa gave the Southeast Precinct anything, besides grief, it was a copy of her complaint against REACH, which BOLI asked her to amend to correct her “inaccuracies”, as the investigator put it delicately:
“It will now go in to the conciliation process and my supervisor will try to settle the case. But before this begins I need to have you or your attorney sign an amended complaint. I HAD TO CORRECT SOME INACCURACIES IN THE COMPLAINT. I need the notarized signature of you or your attorney as soon as possibly. Is David Lawrence still representing you on the Reach matter? If so, I can have him sign the complaint. (I've enclosed a copy of the amended complaint.) Your letter indicated you wanted to settle the the Reach complaint. Do you have a settlement offer in mind? I'm still working on the Bradley Angle-House complaint. I'm not yet ready to make a determination on that complaint.”
“I really would urge you to get an attorney regarding the stalking order situation. . Remember the old saying, 'Anyone who represents himself has a fool for an attorney.'”
In fact, Lisa is no longer represented by attorney Lawrence on her BOLI complaint, as she herself signed it pro se. So, Lisa now has a fool for an attorney.
Reach CDC, I would like you to donate a house to the transgendered and bigendered community who have limited options for safety in the "progressive city of Portland".
Lisa Iacuzzi, REACH tenants would like you to get a heart transplant, so you'll have one—and “heart” doesn't mean the organ in your thorax.
Would you please be a solution to the problem?
Lisa is the problem. Would she be a solution to it? Not bloody likely. She enjoys causing trouble. A real nudnik.
Reach CDC has lots of properties and is well known in the city and state government as a leader in helping Building a Better Community and an organization who operates as a nonprofit to help the homeless. How about you help the gender community?
What, exactly, is a “gender community”? Is it the opposite of a “genderless community”?
How about REACH helping Lisa Iacuzzi by giving her a one-way ticket to Riyadh? Lisa can conduct a fact-finding mission on gender discrimination, take one of her little polls on gender equality and “bigendered/trigendered” persons, then write a dissertation on it all. This might be a great help to who has a marked tendency to bite all the hands that have fed her.
I do not apologize for anything! NAGQ
Neither did Herr Schikelgruber. He, too, shared with Lisa a certain tendency to make scapegoats of others – or, as Lisa puts is, “escape goat.”
Lisa Pinballs on her 12th November Arrest (and other rants)
On Wednesday, January 9, Lisa wrote
Warning to NAGQ: Do not go back!
http://notagoodqueer.blogspot.com/2008/01/warning-to-nagq-do-not-go-back.com
NAGQ is currently couch surfing. NAGQ had to say to the Judge, that NAGQ would move to get out of jail. Also, NAGQ is innocent of charges of violation of a stalking order.
In Lisa's unique version of events, anyway.
But, cannot get too detailed about the upcoming events where justice may be served.
Of course Lisa “cannot get too detailed”. Details, as we have seen, tend to get Lisa in a muddle, particularly when details are factual and accurate, as opposed to the sort Lisa deals out. Moreover, she may change her story down the road, as she invariably does, and the details of her various redactions may come back to haunt her at her trial next month. In that case, “justice”, as Lisa notes “may be served.”
The stalking order cost NAGQ 29 days in jail.
Another spew of muddled details – in a single sentence, yet.
The stalking order granted by the court against Lisa Iacuzzi cost her nothing. It was by her repeated violations of that order that she cost herself some jail time. Normally, such a violator would have been jailed, briefly, then released on his/her own recognition. In Lisa's case, however, it was her resisting arrest, hitting, kicking, and spitting on the arresting officers, her attempted assault of jail personnel and inmates, added to her usual mouthing off – in short, a repeat performance of her antics at The Rose – which, added together, “cost NAGQ 29 days in jail”.
Regarding those “29 days in jail,” Lisa writes elsewhere:
--“I was fighting with other inmates about my sexuality. I then heckled guards Maxwell.”
--Lisa told Maxwell “that he was fat all his life and the kids in the school yard must have really picked on him for him to be so mean".
--“I said fuck you to Guardsmen Maxewell .”
--Most of Lisa's jail time was spent in the psycho ward, following a faked suicide attempt with a plastic shampoo bottle: “I bite off my shampoo bottle and started to cut my wrists North to South. I took a chance that my life would not end. I cut from 10pm until 9am.”
--Lisa also notes “My lawyer did not take collect calls.” This is not normal procedure for criminal lawyers; if he refused her collect calls, she gave him very good reason. Lisa's family may have entertained similar reasons, as Lisa wrote:
--“I asked Lefty to call my family and demand that they make a 50,000 dollar bail to get me out of this hell. Lefty told me that my family said that I was guilty and that I had to do my time.”
--“The nurses asked me what was the first thing I was going to do out of jail, I told them that I was going to sue them.”
--“The guards asked me what I was going to do when I got out? I told them that I am going to sue the Sheriff, Police, and Reach CDC! Please keep laughing, I am enjoying being the underdog!”
--“I plan on filing a retaliation claim against Reach CDC, who provided false evidence for Glenda Meyers "stalking order" which resulted in 29 days in jail.”
----------------------------
We return now to the currently-scheduled Iacuzzi rant.
The stalking order was assisted by Reach CDC former manager Jamie Barton.
Jamie, whom NAGQ's harassment forced out of a job, wrote a two sentence verification the victim's statement of NAGQ's unlovely habit of lurking outside closed doors and eavesdropping on personal conversations which are none of her business. Many residents can verify NAGQ's behaviour.
During this time Reach CDC was under investigation for a gender discrimination complaint.
This sounds far more dramatic than it actually is. NAGQ filed a complaint with the Bureau of Labor and Industries for the purpose of obtaining a large monetary settlement from REACH CDC. That complaint is based on Lisa's belief that REACH “discriminated against me on the basis of my gender identity in that I am treated differently and subjected to a hostile environment,” as set forth, in part, in her amended complaint of 13th December 2007, as follows:
“7. On March 20, 2007, I moved into The Rose apartments. My assigned room was filthy. The room had a wooden frame bed with a mattress that was not useable. Ms. Barton had just discussed with me how my room had had a bed-bug outbreak and that bed-bugs live in wooden bed frames. All the other tenants are given a metal bed frame and a mattress with a plastic wrap.
“8. Shortly after I moved in, Respondent began treating me differently and subjecting me to a hostile environment based on my gender identity. The incidents included, but were not limited to:
“a) On March 29, 2007, I received a “Notice for Cause of Termination” of my lease because I had a male friend stay beyond visiting hours in order to deliver a mattress, as the one provided for me was not useable. I noticed that other tenants had male guests stay beyond visiting hours, but they did not receive notices.
“b) On April 23, 2007, I drank alcohol with another tenant in the common kitchen area. I
received another Notice for Cause of Termination, but the tenant I drank with did not.
“c) On April 30, 2007, I witnessed a tenant complain to Ms Barton that I identified as a male and Ms Barton responded that I was not allowed to do so.
“d) Respondent allowed the other tenants to subject me to a continuous pattern of name calling, threats of physical harm, intimidation and false accusations. Respondent failed to investigate my complaints or take effective action to stop the conduct. Presently, the conduct continues.
Back to the stalking order, and Lisa's violations thereof:
Jamie Barton offered the only shred of evidence to this stalking complaint which consisted of a letter she wrote stating that the video camera placed me outside her door. She stated that she asked me to leave her door and to wait in the lobby for her to finish her gossiping about me to another resident. The fact that the fire alarm went off and she was called in from home for this alarm, she was in fact ignoring a fire alarm.
The fact is that Jamie's “shred of evidence” was a note supporting the victim's statement that NAGQ was eavesdropping. How Jamie could ask Lisa to leave her door, and then be called in from home regarding the fire alarm, is a feat of bilocation that only Lisa Iacuzzi can explain.
The truth is that she was obsessed about ganging evidence about me because NAGQ recently made a complaint about several residents that Jamie Barton had an unprofessional relationship.
The truth is that Jamie's husband demanded that she resign from her position for her health's sake, as a result of Lisa's continuous antics, as well as Lisa's harassment of Jamie, for nothing more than attempting to get Lisa to follow the building rules. Lisa's “complaint” that Jamie was involved in a relationship with an emotionally disturbed tenant, is bogus, libelous, and no one believes it.
This led to a criminal investigation of Jamie Barton by Portlands' Housing Authority.
No such “criminal investigation” occurred.
After BOLI, a civil rights organization that is ran by the state, investigates the camera.
NAGQ doesn't even know what the Bureau of Labor and Industries is (or, as Lisa has previously put it, “the Beware of Labor & Industries”, “the Bower of Labor and Industries”, “the Beaure of Labor” etc), even though Lisa is making use of them, at taxpayers' expense, to extort money from several nonprofit organizations which have helped Lisa in the past.
FWIW, BOLI's mission statement is:
“The Bureau of Labor and Industries promotes the development of a highly-skilled, competitive workforce in Oregon through partnerships with government, labor, business, and educational institutions. It protects the rights of workers and citizens to equal, non-discriminatory treatment; encourages and enforces compliance with state laws relating to wages, hours, terms and conditions of employment; and advocates policies that balance the demands of the workplace and employers with the protections of workers and their families.”
http://www.oregon.gov/BOLI/about_us.shtml
That “equal, non-discriminatory” phrase is apparently the crack through which two-legged cockroaches can scuttle.
The cameras is in the lobby not pointed at Jamie Baton's door which her letter to the judge described.
Jamie wrote no letter to a judge. She typed a brief note which served as an attachment to the victim's petition for a stalking order. It verified Lisa's habit of eavesdropping on private, personal conversations which have nothing to do with her. And the cameras is not pointed at Jamie's door.
When he questions the letter, he is told that the camera timed me when I passed through it again. Well their are two exits leaving Jamie Barton's door and NAGQ quite frequently walks up the back stairs which would not have been video taped.
There are no cameras in the back corridor. Lisa, in her muddled way, refers to the “cameras” which “is in the lobby”.
But this explanation was not given to the judge
Azoy? After the judge “questions the [non-existent] letter?
and a whole lot of information was missing for the letters that was called evidence.
How many letters “was called evidence”? Lisa is in quite her usual muddle. In any case, the judge had all the “evidence” he needed to grant a temporary stalking order – not that much is needed, as Lisa discovered when she retaliated with temporary stalking orders herself.
So Reach CDC you are not that slick. I am scared of your tactics that is being supported by your friends also known as tenants of the Rose.
REACH's tactics, so far, have been to cave in to the Iacuzzi extortion, and, in the matter of Lisa's abuse of tenants, take the YOYO position. (YOYO: You're On Your Own).
My friend Paul wrote:
Maybe I am enabling them by asking them to reflect on what they are doing . . . Giving them too much power. But, the fact is that I am genuinely concerned about your safety based on the kind of situation that is being stirred up. They are creating a situation in which any kind of violence towards you seems rational.
It's obvious that the unfortunate Paul Hamilton has swallowed Lisa's tale of woe hook, line, and bullpuckey.
This is quite frightening to me. I want you to know I am not validating their claim by saying they can go through the proper channels if they have a grievance.
For Paul's information: Tenants have gone through “proper” channels, such as are available to them, by advising both BOLI and REACH of Lisa Iacuzzi's violent and destructive behaviour, and the NAACP as well, concerning the matter of Lisa Iacuzzi's racist hate speech to, and abuse of, African American tenants.
I am just trying to suggest that they realize that there are choices other than projecting hatred as a group towards a single person. These processes are built in to insure that mobs don't get created like this - act irrationally - and hurt people.
The only one acting irrationally here is Lisa Iacuzzi – because she IS irrational.
Actually, the fabrication by members of the building in order to get you placed in jail is an example of the action of this violence. It worries me . . .
Whatever “fabrications” Paul Hamilton has been induced to believe, it's clear that Lisa's abuse of Rose tenants DOESN'T worry Paul.
Anyway, I just wanted to clarify.
It's equally clear that Paul Hamilton does NOT want to clarify anything.
I don't want to support these people in any way,
Lisa's friend apparently has no interest in supporting facts either.
but I am more concerned with your safety than anything else.
Lisa Iacuzzi's safety was never at issue. The issue, or issues, have been the violence she has directed against tenants, along with her threats of further physical violence, even to the point of killing them.
But --as Paul says, in so many words -- he doesn't care a rat's ass about that.
Take Care,
Paul
Posted by Not a Good Queer
In another email to Lisa, Paul Hamilton expresses his horror at poor Lisa's treatment – her version, of course --, and offers his unqualified opinion that “homophobic gang at The Rose” treats poor Lisa as Nazis treated Jews, to-wit:
“The only precedent is Nazi Germany or the Columbine massacres. It is a case study in the psychology of evil.....a mob of people gathered in an orgy of hatred against a single individual...the kind of casual bigotry that created the crematoriums in Nazi Germany. Their characterization of [you] is very much like the Germans dehumanizing the Jews in World War II so that they could gas them.”
Oy vevoy! For Paul's edification, as well as others', a few brief quotes:
“On that very first day, the victims were the Jewish children, and I shall never forget the harrowing scenes and blood-curdling incidents when the SS men most cruelly attacked the children--children roaming in the streets...Even today the cries and shrieking of those children are clear in my mind.” From Adolf Berman's testimony, Jerusalem 1961
“People are being hunted down in the streets like animals of the forest.The children in particular rend the heavens with their cries. The old people and the middle-aged deportees accept the judgment in silent submission.But there is no limit to the sorrow and tears of the young women.” From Chaim Kaplan's diary, Warsaw, July 1942
“238,000 were burned in the crematorium. I saw the ovens, the gas chambers, the kennels, the gallows, the prisoners' quarters, and the SS quarters [at Dachau]. Until April 15 this year 48,000 Jews were here [in Belsen]. Since then 31,000 have died (of typhus, tuberculosis).” From David Ben-Gurion's diary, October 1945
Anyone think that the “only precedent” for Lisa Iacuzzi's experiences at The Rose is Nazi Germany? That Lisa experienced “the kind of casual bigotry that created the crematoriums in Nazi Germany”? That Rose tenants' substantiated FACTS in opposition to Lisa Iacuzzi's paskudneh version are “very much like the Germans dehumanizing the Jews in World War II so that they could gas them”? Yasher koyach – NOT. Paul drayt zich vi a forst in shtchav, and Lisa even more so.
Feh.
Elsewhere, Lisa writes:
“I still face criminal charges [for resisting arrest] which should be dropped by Friday, January 11, 08 by District Attorney Fred Lansing.”
Well, what do you know, here it is, two weeks after Lisa's dropped charges date, and what has Lisa to comment about it? Given Lisa's tendency to self-puffery, one would expect a crow or two, at least. But not a peep from Lisa about the dropped charges. On her blog, the only comment is .....
********sound of crickets*******
Looks like Lisa has another kretch on her plate. But don't hold your breath waiting for another Iacuzzi tale of woe regarding the apparently UNdismissed criminal charges.
Finis
Warning to NAGQ: Do not go back!
http://notagoodqueer.blogspot.com/2008/01/warning-to-nagq-do-not-go-back.com
NAGQ is currently couch surfing. NAGQ had to say to the Judge, that NAGQ would move to get out of jail. Also, NAGQ is innocent of charges of violation of a stalking order.
In Lisa's unique version of events, anyway.
But, cannot get too detailed about the upcoming events where justice may be served.
Of course Lisa “cannot get too detailed”. Details, as we have seen, tend to get Lisa in a muddle, particularly when details are factual and accurate, as opposed to the sort Lisa deals out. Moreover, she may change her story down the road, as she invariably does, and the details of her various redactions may come back to haunt her at her trial next month. In that case, “justice”, as Lisa notes “may be served.”
The stalking order cost NAGQ 29 days in jail.
Another spew of muddled details – in a single sentence, yet.
The stalking order granted by the court against Lisa Iacuzzi cost her nothing. It was by her repeated violations of that order that she cost herself some jail time. Normally, such a violator would have been jailed, briefly, then released on his/her own recognition. In Lisa's case, however, it was her resisting arrest, hitting, kicking, and spitting on the arresting officers, her attempted assault of jail personnel and inmates, added to her usual mouthing off – in short, a repeat performance of her antics at The Rose – which, added together, “cost NAGQ 29 days in jail”.
Regarding those “29 days in jail,” Lisa writes elsewhere:
--“I was fighting with other inmates about my sexuality. I then heckled guards Maxwell.”
--Lisa told Maxwell “that he was fat all his life and the kids in the school yard must have really picked on him for him to be so mean".
--“I said fuck you to Guardsmen Maxewell .”
--Most of Lisa's jail time was spent in the psycho ward, following a faked suicide attempt with a plastic shampoo bottle: “I bite off my shampoo bottle and started to cut my wrists North to South. I took a chance that my life would not end. I cut from 10pm until 9am.”
--Lisa also notes “My lawyer did not take collect calls.” This is not normal procedure for criminal lawyers; if he refused her collect calls, she gave him very good reason. Lisa's family may have entertained similar reasons, as Lisa wrote:
--“I asked Lefty to call my family and demand that they make a 50,000 dollar bail to get me out of this hell. Lefty told me that my family said that I was guilty and that I had to do my time.”
--“The nurses asked me what was the first thing I was going to do out of jail, I told them that I was going to sue them.”
--“The guards asked me what I was going to do when I got out? I told them that I am going to sue the Sheriff, Police, and Reach CDC! Please keep laughing, I am enjoying being the underdog!”
--“I plan on filing a retaliation claim against Reach CDC, who provided false evidence for Glenda Meyers "stalking order" which resulted in 29 days in jail.”
----------------------------
We return now to the currently-scheduled Iacuzzi rant.
The stalking order was assisted by Reach CDC former manager Jamie Barton.
Jamie, whom NAGQ's harassment forced out of a job, wrote a two sentence verification the victim's statement of NAGQ's unlovely habit of lurking outside closed doors and eavesdropping on personal conversations which are none of her business. Many residents can verify NAGQ's behaviour.
During this time Reach CDC was under investigation for a gender discrimination complaint.
This sounds far more dramatic than it actually is. NAGQ filed a complaint with the Bureau of Labor and Industries for the purpose of obtaining a large monetary settlement from REACH CDC. That complaint is based on Lisa's belief that REACH “discriminated against me on the basis of my gender identity in that I am treated differently and subjected to a hostile environment,” as set forth, in part, in her amended complaint of 13th December 2007, as follows:
“7. On March 20, 2007, I moved into The Rose apartments. My assigned room was filthy. The room had a wooden frame bed with a mattress that was not useable. Ms. Barton had just discussed with me how my room had had a bed-bug outbreak and that bed-bugs live in wooden bed frames. All the other tenants are given a metal bed frame and a mattress with a plastic wrap.
“8. Shortly after I moved in, Respondent began treating me differently and subjecting me to a hostile environment based on my gender identity. The incidents included, but were not limited to:
“a) On March 29, 2007, I received a “Notice for Cause of Termination” of my lease because I had a male friend stay beyond visiting hours in order to deliver a mattress, as the one provided for me was not useable. I noticed that other tenants had male guests stay beyond visiting hours, but they did not receive notices.
“b) On April 23, 2007, I drank alcohol with another tenant in the common kitchen area. I
received another Notice for Cause of Termination, but the tenant I drank with did not.
“c) On April 30, 2007, I witnessed a tenant complain to Ms Barton that I identified as a male and Ms Barton responded that I was not allowed to do so.
“d) Respondent allowed the other tenants to subject me to a continuous pattern of name calling, threats of physical harm, intimidation and false accusations. Respondent failed to investigate my complaints or take effective action to stop the conduct. Presently, the conduct continues.
Back to the stalking order, and Lisa's violations thereof:
Jamie Barton offered the only shred of evidence to this stalking complaint which consisted of a letter she wrote stating that the video camera placed me outside her door. She stated that she asked me to leave her door and to wait in the lobby for her to finish her gossiping about me to another resident. The fact that the fire alarm went off and she was called in from home for this alarm, she was in fact ignoring a fire alarm.
The fact is that Jamie's “shred of evidence” was a note supporting the victim's statement that NAGQ was eavesdropping. How Jamie could ask Lisa to leave her door, and then be called in from home regarding the fire alarm, is a feat of bilocation that only Lisa Iacuzzi can explain.
The truth is that she was obsessed about ganging evidence about me because NAGQ recently made a complaint about several residents that Jamie Barton had an unprofessional relationship.
The truth is that Jamie's husband demanded that she resign from her position for her health's sake, as a result of Lisa's continuous antics, as well as Lisa's harassment of Jamie, for nothing more than attempting to get Lisa to follow the building rules. Lisa's “complaint” that Jamie was involved in a relationship with an emotionally disturbed tenant, is bogus, libelous, and no one believes it.
This led to a criminal investigation of Jamie Barton by Portlands' Housing Authority.
No such “criminal investigation” occurred.
After BOLI, a civil rights organization that is ran by the state, investigates the camera.
NAGQ doesn't even know what the Bureau of Labor and Industries is (or, as Lisa has previously put it, “the Beware of Labor & Industries”, “the Bower of Labor and Industries”, “the Beaure of Labor” etc), even though Lisa is making use of them, at taxpayers' expense, to extort money from several nonprofit organizations which have helped Lisa in the past.
FWIW, BOLI's mission statement is:
“The Bureau of Labor and Industries promotes the development of a highly-skilled, competitive workforce in Oregon through partnerships with government, labor, business, and educational institutions. It protects the rights of workers and citizens to equal, non-discriminatory treatment; encourages and enforces compliance with state laws relating to wages, hours, terms and conditions of employment; and advocates policies that balance the demands of the workplace and employers with the protections of workers and their families.”
http://www.oregon.gov/BOLI/about_us.shtml
That “equal, non-discriminatory” phrase is apparently the crack through which two-legged cockroaches can scuttle.
The cameras is in the lobby not pointed at Jamie Baton's door which her letter to the judge described.
Jamie wrote no letter to a judge. She typed a brief note which served as an attachment to the victim's petition for a stalking order. It verified Lisa's habit of eavesdropping on private, personal conversations which have nothing to do with her. And the cameras is not pointed at Jamie's door.
When he questions the letter, he is told that the camera timed me when I passed through it again. Well their are two exits leaving Jamie Barton's door and NAGQ quite frequently walks up the back stairs which would not have been video taped.
There are no cameras in the back corridor. Lisa, in her muddled way, refers to the “cameras” which “is in the lobby”.
But this explanation was not given to the judge
Azoy? After the judge “questions the [non-existent] letter?
and a whole lot of information was missing for the letters that was called evidence.
How many letters “was called evidence”? Lisa is in quite her usual muddle. In any case, the judge had all the “evidence” he needed to grant a temporary stalking order – not that much is needed, as Lisa discovered when she retaliated with temporary stalking orders herself.
So Reach CDC you are not that slick. I am scared of your tactics that is being supported by your friends also known as tenants of the Rose.
REACH's tactics, so far, have been to cave in to the Iacuzzi extortion, and, in the matter of Lisa's abuse of tenants, take the YOYO position. (YOYO: You're On Your Own).
My friend Paul wrote:
Maybe I am enabling them by asking them to reflect on what they are doing . . . Giving them too much power. But, the fact is that I am genuinely concerned about your safety based on the kind of situation that is being stirred up. They are creating a situation in which any kind of violence towards you seems rational.
It's obvious that the unfortunate Paul Hamilton has swallowed Lisa's tale of woe hook, line, and bullpuckey.
This is quite frightening to me. I want you to know I am not validating their claim by saying they can go through the proper channels if they have a grievance.
For Paul's information: Tenants have gone through “proper” channels, such as are available to them, by advising both BOLI and REACH of Lisa Iacuzzi's violent and destructive behaviour, and the NAACP as well, concerning the matter of Lisa Iacuzzi's racist hate speech to, and abuse of, African American tenants.
I am just trying to suggest that they realize that there are choices other than projecting hatred as a group towards a single person. These processes are built in to insure that mobs don't get created like this - act irrationally - and hurt people.
The only one acting irrationally here is Lisa Iacuzzi – because she IS irrational.
Actually, the fabrication by members of the building in order to get you placed in jail is an example of the action of this violence. It worries me . . .
Whatever “fabrications” Paul Hamilton has been induced to believe, it's clear that Lisa's abuse of Rose tenants DOESN'T worry Paul.
Anyway, I just wanted to clarify.
It's equally clear that Paul Hamilton does NOT want to clarify anything.
I don't want to support these people in any way,
Lisa's friend apparently has no interest in supporting facts either.
but I am more concerned with your safety than anything else.
Lisa Iacuzzi's safety was never at issue. The issue, or issues, have been the violence she has directed against tenants, along with her threats of further physical violence, even to the point of killing them.
But --as Paul says, in so many words -- he doesn't care a rat's ass about that.
Take Care,
Paul
Posted by Not a Good Queer
In another email to Lisa, Paul Hamilton expresses his horror at poor Lisa's treatment – her version, of course --, and offers his unqualified opinion that “homophobic gang at The Rose” treats poor Lisa as Nazis treated Jews, to-wit:
“The only precedent is Nazi Germany or the Columbine massacres. It is a case study in the psychology of evil.....a mob of people gathered in an orgy of hatred against a single individual...the kind of casual bigotry that created the crematoriums in Nazi Germany. Their characterization of [you] is very much like the Germans dehumanizing the Jews in World War II so that they could gas them.”
Oy vevoy! For Paul's edification, as well as others', a few brief quotes:
“On that very first day, the victims were the Jewish children, and I shall never forget the harrowing scenes and blood-curdling incidents when the SS men most cruelly attacked the children--children roaming in the streets...Even today the cries and shrieking of those children are clear in my mind.” From Adolf Berman's testimony, Jerusalem 1961
“People are being hunted down in the streets like animals of the forest.The children in particular rend the heavens with their cries. The old people and the middle-aged deportees accept the judgment in silent submission.But there is no limit to the sorrow and tears of the young women.” From Chaim Kaplan's diary, Warsaw, July 1942
“238,000 were burned in the crematorium. I saw the ovens, the gas chambers, the kennels, the gallows, the prisoners' quarters, and the SS quarters [at Dachau]. Until April 15 this year 48,000 Jews were here [in Belsen]. Since then 31,000 have died (of typhus, tuberculosis).” From David Ben-Gurion's diary, October 1945
Anyone think that the “only precedent” for Lisa Iacuzzi's experiences at The Rose is Nazi Germany? That Lisa experienced “the kind of casual bigotry that created the crematoriums in Nazi Germany”? That Rose tenants' substantiated FACTS in opposition to Lisa Iacuzzi's paskudneh version are “very much like the Germans dehumanizing the Jews in World War II so that they could gas them”? Yasher koyach – NOT. Paul drayt zich vi a forst in shtchav, and Lisa even more so.
Feh.
Elsewhere, Lisa writes:
“I still face criminal charges [for resisting arrest] which should be dropped by Friday, January 11, 08 by District Attorney Fred Lansing.”
Well, what do you know, here it is, two weeks after Lisa's dropped charges date, and what has Lisa to comment about it? Given Lisa's tendency to self-puffery, one would expect a crow or two, at least. But not a peep from Lisa about the dropped charges. On her blog, the only comment is .....
********sound of crickets*******
Looks like Lisa has another kretch on her plate. But don't hold your breath waiting for another Iacuzzi tale of woe regarding the apparently UNdismissed criminal charges.
Finis
09 January 2008
A poem which has nothing to do with Lisa
Alone in the night
On a dark hill
With pines around me
Spicy and still,
And a heaven full of stars
Over my head,
White and topaz
And misty red;
Myriads with beating
Hearts of fire
That aeons
Cannot vex or tire;
Up the dome of heaven
Like a great hill,
I watch them marching
Stately and still,
And I know that I
Am honored to be
Witness
Of so much majesty.
Sara Teasdale (1884-1933)
More Praise for NAGQ!
LISA STILL FOAMING WITH ENTHUSIASM, PRAISE, FOR NAGQ-OAE!!!
Lisa Iacuzzi expressed her undying admiration for NAGQ-OAE as follows:
==================================
Not a Good Queer (aka Lisa Mary Iacuzzi) said...
Lisa Iacuzzi expressed her undying admiration for NAGQ-OAE as follows:
==================================
Not a Good Queer (aka Lisa Mary Iacuzzi) said...
NAGQ would like to thank you for being so public about your hate. You can keep writing because everytime you post, you affirm my lawsuit. My lawyer told me that I did not have a half million dollar case, but now he says, I could get a 1,000,000. Thank you so so much by showing your cards. The jury is going to really appreciate your writing and I am sure Reach CDC will eventually shut you down. Reach CDC never gave me a warning of hate mail because my blog is not hateful. It is an artistic piece of work and your blog is dedicated to the hate of a single person. It is to late to erase your work because it has been put on a pdf.
I hope you tenants enjoy being on the local news for a hate crime. I have a question, why would you put your threats of my witnesses in writing. You can not even imagine that you are going to jail? I can. I spend my entire day talking to the press, city council, hate-crimes detective, narcotics, welfare fraud, and BOLI.
Reach CDC will be too embarrassed about your behavior and they will have to settle out of court. I am surprised that they have not started evicting you.
Sincerely,
Not a Good
Well, NAGQ believes the bloggers are Bren Athens and Debra. Yes, I believe Annie has participated and others.
Take Care of your gang and make sure thier are no cracks.
Not a Good Queer"
For Lisa
When you are gone there will be no memory
Of you and no regret.
For you do not share the Pierian roses,
but unseen in the house of Hades
you will stray,
breathed out,
among the ghostly dead.
The Muses have filled my life
with delight. And when I die,
I shall not be forgotten.
- Sappho
When you are gone there will be no memory
Of you and no regret.
For you do not share the Pierian roses,
but unseen in the house of Hades
you will stray,
breathed out,
among the ghostly dead.
The Muses have filled my life
with delight. And when I die,
I shall not be forgotten.
- Sappho
07 January 2008
Dept. of Puffed Egos
MORE ACCOLADES FOR NAGQ-OAE!!!
As if we weren't bowled over by Lisa Iacuzzi's foaming enthusiam for our NAGQ-OAE blog, as she expressed on our companion NAGQ blog, we hear that on January 4th, REACH issued a memo to all Rose tenants, touching on “Internet postings, blogs, etc.”
From the memo:
"REACH Commmunity Development, Inc., its assigns, representatives, officers, and employees do not support, encourage nor condone any internet postings that are perceived, or intended to be derogatory or discriminatory in nature toward tenants, associates, employees, volunteers or any other persons associated in any way with REACH CDC housing."
Et cetera!
Waaaaaaaaaoooooooowwwwwwwww. AWWWWWWWWWWWESOME
You can bet LIsa Iacuzzi's NAGQ log NEVER, in all the time she was using REACH computers to post her hateful, racist, and libellous drivel EVER received such attention! With all due modesty, permit us to suggest that this may be due to the fact that NAGQ-OAE writers are far superior to anything Lisa has produced (which she hasn't pasted from another source, that is, like the recent additions made to her blog in an obvious and futile effort to prove she isn't the racist she is).
Lisa must have indulged herself in quite a storm of weeping and wailing and gnashing of smoke-stained fangs, over our little NAGQ-OAE blog, so hurriedly did REACH fire off that attorney-inspired and most pleasant ego-puff of a memo. The memo enlivened and warmed yet another dreary, cold, and wet day here at NAGQ-OAE Central (and whoever said it doesn't rain in Southern California should spend a winter there tied to a tree in the backyard. So Petaluma isn't SoCal, but so what? It's still dreary, cold, and wet.)
In the interests of avoiding any cyber-nudzhing, one must point to the erroneous use of “nor” in the second line of the notice. “...support, encourage nor condone...” SHOULD have read “...support, encourage OR condone...” Be advised that the foregoing is intended to serve as NAGQ-OAE HQ's Get Out Of Nudzhing Free card for any and all English Usage Cossacks.
NAGQ-OAE will not point to the ramifications of what must be evident to a number of you, gentle readers, regarding the January 4th notice from REACH concerning Internet postings, blogs, etc. Permit NAGQ-OAE, if you will, to note the the following:
In all the months that Lisa Mary Iacuzzi used Rose tenants' computers -- and other personal computers – for the express purpose of publishing, circulating, issuing, and displaying communications, notices, and signs indicating preference, limitation, specification and discrimination based upon race, color, sex, source of income, religion, sexual orientation, gender identity, as well as derogatory and discriminatory remarks, fabrications, prevarications, and outright lies, directed against Rose tenants and REACH assigns, representatives, officers, associates, employees, volunteers, and any and all other persons associated with Rose tenants and REACH housing, – NOT ONCE did REACH ever issue a disavowal thereof.
The Latin maxim is qui tacet consentire. One might be forgiven for suspecting that REACH's silence in the matter of Lisa Iacuzzi's false, hateful, and hurtful postings is a possible indication that REACH might have tacitly consented thereto.
But that's another matter, to be addressed with at another time.
For the nonce, we shall recline by our cyberfire, in our cushy wingback chair, enjoy the crackle of cyberflames, and savour a cup of hot cybercocoa along with all the foaming enthusiasm lately showered on NAGQ-OAE.
Wassail, wassail all over the town!
NAGQ-OAE it is good, and our cocoa it is brown.
Our writers have it all over Iacuzzi.
In cyberspace we will wassail thee!
Finis
As if we weren't bowled over by Lisa Iacuzzi's foaming enthusiam for our NAGQ-OAE blog, as she expressed on our companion NAGQ blog, we hear that on January 4th, REACH issued a memo to all Rose tenants, touching on “Internet postings, blogs, etc.”
From the memo:
"REACH Commmunity Development, Inc., its assigns, representatives, officers, and employees do not support, encourage nor condone any internet postings that are perceived, or intended to be derogatory or discriminatory in nature toward tenants, associates, employees, volunteers or any other persons associated in any way with REACH CDC housing."
Et cetera!
Waaaaaaaaaoooooooowwwwwwwww. AWWWWWWWWWWWESOME
You can bet LIsa Iacuzzi's NAGQ log NEVER, in all the time she was using REACH computers to post her hateful, racist, and libellous drivel EVER received such attention! With all due modesty, permit us to suggest that this may be due to the fact that NAGQ-OAE writers are far superior to anything Lisa has produced (which she hasn't pasted from another source, that is, like the recent additions made to her blog in an obvious and futile effort to prove she isn't the racist she is).
Lisa must have indulged herself in quite a storm of weeping and wailing and gnashing of smoke-stained fangs, over our little NAGQ-OAE blog, so hurriedly did REACH fire off that attorney-inspired and most pleasant ego-puff of a memo. The memo enlivened and warmed yet another dreary, cold, and wet day here at NAGQ-OAE Central (and whoever said it doesn't rain in Southern California should spend a winter there tied to a tree in the backyard. So Petaluma isn't SoCal, but so what? It's still dreary, cold, and wet.)
In the interests of avoiding any cyber-nudzhing, one must point to the erroneous use of “nor” in the second line of the notice. “...support, encourage nor condone...” SHOULD have read “...support, encourage OR condone...” Be advised that the foregoing is intended to serve as NAGQ-OAE HQ's Get Out Of Nudzhing Free card for any and all English Usage Cossacks.
NAGQ-OAE will not point to the ramifications of what must be evident to a number of you, gentle readers, regarding the January 4th notice from REACH concerning Internet postings, blogs, etc. Permit NAGQ-OAE, if you will, to note the the following:
In all the months that Lisa Mary Iacuzzi used Rose tenants' computers -- and other personal computers – for the express purpose of publishing, circulating, issuing, and displaying communications, notices, and signs indicating preference, limitation, specification and discrimination based upon race, color, sex, source of income, religion, sexual orientation, gender identity, as well as derogatory and discriminatory remarks, fabrications, prevarications, and outright lies, directed against Rose tenants and REACH assigns, representatives, officers, associates, employees, volunteers, and any and all other persons associated with Rose tenants and REACH housing, – NOT ONCE did REACH ever issue a disavowal thereof.
The Latin maxim is qui tacet consentire. One might be forgiven for suspecting that REACH's silence in the matter of Lisa Iacuzzi's false, hateful, and hurtful postings is a possible indication that REACH might have tacitly consented thereto.
But that's another matter, to be addressed with at another time.
For the nonce, we shall recline by our cyberfire, in our cushy wingback chair, enjoy the crackle of cyberflames, and savour a cup of hot cybercocoa along with all the foaming enthusiasm lately showered on NAGQ-OAE.
Wassail, wassail all over the town!
NAGQ-OAE it is good, and our cocoa it is brown.
Our writers have it all over Iacuzzi.
In cyberspace we will wassail thee!
Finis
Homophohohobic Verses for NAGQ
FAIRIES
Up the airy mountain,
Down the rushy glen,
We daren’t go a-hunting
For fear of little men;
Wee folk, good folk,
Trooping all together;
Green jacket, red cap,
And white owl’s feather.
Down along the rocky shore
Some make their home,
They live on crispy pancakes
Of yellow tide-foam;
Some in the reeds
Of the black mountain lake,
With frogs for their watch-dogs,
All night awake.
High on the hill-top
The old King sits;
He is now so old and gray
He ’s nigh lost his wits.
With a bridge of white mist
Columbkill he crosses,
On his stately journeys
From Slieveleague to Rosses;
Or going up with music
On cold starry nights
To sup with the Queen
Of the gay Northern Lights.
They stole little Bridget
For seven years long;
When she came down again
Her friends were all gone.
They took her lightly back,
Between the night and morrow,
They thought that she was fast asleep,
But she was dead with sorrow.
They have kept her ever since
Deep within the lake,
On a bed of flag-leaves,
Watching till she wake.
By the craggy hill-side,
Through the mosses bare,
They have planted thorn-trees
For pleasure here and there.
If any man so daring
As dig them up in spite,
He shall find their sharpest thorns
In his bed at night.
Up the airy mountain,
Down the rushy glen,
We daren’t go a-hunting
For fear of little men;
Wee folk, good folk,
Trooping all together;
Green jacket, red cap,
And white owl’s feather.
William Allingham, c 1824 -1889
Up the airy mountain,
Down the rushy glen,
We daren’t go a-hunting
For fear of little men;
Wee folk, good folk,
Trooping all together;
Green jacket, red cap,
And white owl’s feather.
Down along the rocky shore
Some make their home,
They live on crispy pancakes
Of yellow tide-foam;
Some in the reeds
Of the black mountain lake,
With frogs for their watch-dogs,
All night awake.
High on the hill-top
The old King sits;
He is now so old and gray
He ’s nigh lost his wits.
With a bridge of white mist
Columbkill he crosses,
On his stately journeys
From Slieveleague to Rosses;
Or going up with music
On cold starry nights
To sup with the Queen
Of the gay Northern Lights.
They stole little Bridget
For seven years long;
When she came down again
Her friends were all gone.
They took her lightly back,
Between the night and morrow,
They thought that she was fast asleep,
But she was dead with sorrow.
They have kept her ever since
Deep within the lake,
On a bed of flag-leaves,
Watching till she wake.
By the craggy hill-side,
Through the mosses bare,
They have planted thorn-trees
For pleasure here and there.
If any man so daring
As dig them up in spite,
He shall find their sharpest thorns
In his bed at night.
Up the airy mountain,
Down the rushy glen,
We daren’t go a-hunting
For fear of little men;
Wee folk, good folk,
Trooping all together;
Green jacket, red cap,
And white owl’s feather.
William Allingham, c 1824 -1889
CAVEAT!
IACUZZI LURKING, STILL THREATENING TENANTS
The Spell Ain't Broke, and We're Not Free...
When Lisa Mary (“Lee”) Iacuzzi was arrested and jailed last November, NAGQ-OAE, envisioning an Iacuzzi-free holiday, exulted: “The spell is broke, and we are free, we'll see no more of Iacuzzi!” Well, that was true, as far as the recent holidays were concerned. Alas, we exulted too soon.
Despite the court injunction that Lisa must avoid The Rose, several tenants have observed Lisa strolling to and fro -- and to and fro, and to and fro – in front of the building. One tenant reports a recent face-to-face encounter, in which Lisa threatened “to get” her. Lisa has also been observed loitering in the alley at the northwestern corner of the building, in the vicinity of her chief victim's apartment.
(That Lisa has been loitering in that particular area of the alley implies that someone in the building is feeding her information. That informant may be grateful that this is not postwar France, where Nazi collaborators and informants routinely met gruesome fates.)
Strange as it is, though rumour hath it that Lisa has been ensconced at the downtown Y, she appears to have taken up residence a mere two blocks from The Rose, on the corner of Grand and Taylor, in the environs of the paint store. This spot was originally staked out by a former friend of Lisa --- most of Lisa's friends seem to be former friends – which Lisa “borrowed”. She also “borrowed” her former friend's sleeping bag, and he is now without. (Even stranger is Lisa should be camping out on the streets, given all the friends and supporters she claims to have.)
Be that as it may, should any of you, gentle readers, encounter Lisa Mary (“Lee”) Iacuzzi, NAGQ-OAE offers you up there on the front lines the following advice:
If you see Lisa Iacuzzi loitering near The Rose, call the police non-emergency line. Make a note of the time, date, and exact place, and give it to Glennda.
DO NOT approach Lisa Iacuzzi.
AVOID Lisa Iacuzzi. 29 days in the jail psycho ward should give you a clue why.
DO NOT show fear. Serial bullies like Lisa feed on fear; when you show it, it only encourages them to escalate their abuse. Don't feed the monkey; ignore Lisa as if she isn't there.
One tenant reports a face-to-face encounter in which Lisa castigated the tenant for signing a “document” (or “petition” -- Lisa is still vague as to what, exactly, a majority of Rose tenants signed. Lisa's claim that it was full of lies can be dismissed as the gibberish it is). To be sure, Lisa's threats were only of the vague “I'll get you!” variety, as opposed to the concrete “When I get out, I'm gonna kill you!” threat Lisa uttered during her arrest in November.
The tenant's calm response in this encounter caused the usual response in Lisa: she scuttled off. Of course, this calm response or no-response tactic falls flat, in the face of another person who encountered Lisa. When Lisa attempted to photograph her with her ubiquitous cell, that person grabbed the cell, told Lisa that if she took her picture again, she'd shove it up...... er, where the sun doesn't shine. Lisa's reaction was the same: she scuttled off. It's the usual response of a coward, which is what a bully is, and Lisa is nothing if not a bully. But that's not a response most of us would prefer to engage in.
If an encounter with Lisa is unavoidable, remain calm and DO NOT run. If Lisa taunts you and tries to provoke you, DO NOT react. Or, if you feel you must respond, either laugh her off, or tell her, kindly, “I'll be praying for you, Lisa.” But make sure you mean it.
Bear in mind that, despite her vicious antics, Lisa Iacuzzi is a human being, and a deeply disturbed one. It's possible she's menopausal, which would make it worse. Whatever hatred she has shown to others must be nowhere near as great as her hatred of herself. Considering the viciousness Lisa has shown to others, especially to African Americans and gay women, her self-hatred must be a terrible burden for her to bear. Lisa Iacuzzi is more to be pitied than anything else.
The best thing to do, if you encounter Lisa, can't avoid her, feel you can't ignore her harasssment, feel you will burst if you don't respond, simply tell her as kindly as you can, “I'll be praying for you, Lisa.”
And pity her.
IACUZZI LURKING, STILL THREATENING TENANTS
The Spell Ain't Broke, and We're Not Free...
When Lisa Mary (“Lee”) Iacuzzi was arrested and jailed last November, NAGQ-OAE, envisioning an Iacuzzi-free holiday, exulted: “The spell is broke, and we are free, we'll see no more of Iacuzzi!” Well, that was true, as far as the recent holidays were concerned. Alas, we exulted too soon.
Despite the court injunction that Lisa must avoid The Rose, several tenants have observed Lisa strolling to and fro -- and to and fro, and to and fro – in front of the building. One tenant reports a recent face-to-face encounter, in which Lisa threatened “to get” her. Lisa has also been observed loitering in the alley at the northwestern corner of the building, in the vicinity of her chief victim's apartment.
(That Lisa has been loitering in that particular area of the alley implies that someone in the building is feeding her information. That informant may be grateful that this is not postwar France, where Nazi collaborators and informants routinely met gruesome fates.)
Strange as it is, though rumour hath it that Lisa has been ensconced at the downtown Y, she appears to have taken up residence a mere two blocks from The Rose, on the corner of Grand and Taylor, in the environs of the paint store. This spot was originally staked out by a former friend of Lisa --- most of Lisa's friends seem to be former friends – which Lisa “borrowed”. She also “borrowed” her former friend's sleeping bag, and he is now without. (Even stranger is Lisa should be camping out on the streets, given all the friends and supporters she claims to have.)
Be that as it may, should any of you, gentle readers, encounter Lisa Mary (“Lee”) Iacuzzi, NAGQ-OAE offers you up there on the front lines the following advice:
If you see Lisa Iacuzzi loitering near The Rose, call the police non-emergency line. Make a note of the time, date, and exact place, and give it to Glennda.
DO NOT approach Lisa Iacuzzi.
AVOID Lisa Iacuzzi. 29 days in the jail psycho ward should give you a clue why.
DO NOT show fear. Serial bullies like Lisa feed on fear; when you show it, it only encourages them to escalate their abuse. Don't feed the monkey; ignore Lisa as if she isn't there.
One tenant reports a face-to-face encounter in which Lisa castigated the tenant for signing a “document” (or “petition” -- Lisa is still vague as to what, exactly, a majority of Rose tenants signed. Lisa's claim that it was full of lies can be dismissed as the gibberish it is). To be sure, Lisa's threats were only of the vague “I'll get you!” variety, as opposed to the concrete “When I get out, I'm gonna kill you!” threat Lisa uttered during her arrest in November.
The tenant's calm response in this encounter caused the usual response in Lisa: she scuttled off. Of course, this calm response or no-response tactic falls flat, in the face of another person who encountered Lisa. When Lisa attempted to photograph her with her ubiquitous cell, that person grabbed the cell, told Lisa that if she took her picture again, she'd shove it up...... er, where the sun doesn't shine. Lisa's reaction was the same: she scuttled off. It's the usual response of a coward, which is what a bully is, and Lisa is nothing if not a bully. But that's not a response most of us would prefer to engage in.
If an encounter with Lisa is unavoidable, remain calm and DO NOT run. If Lisa taunts you and tries to provoke you, DO NOT react. Or, if you feel you must respond, either laugh her off, or tell her, kindly, “I'll be praying for you, Lisa.” But make sure you mean it.
Bear in mind that, despite her vicious antics, Lisa Iacuzzi is a human being, and a deeply disturbed one. It's possible she's menopausal, which would make it worse. Whatever hatred she has shown to others must be nowhere near as great as her hatred of herself. Considering the viciousness Lisa has shown to others, especially to African Americans and gay women, her self-hatred must be a terrible burden for her to bear. Lisa Iacuzzi is more to be pitied than anything else.
The best thing to do, if you encounter Lisa, can't avoid her, feel you can't ignore her harasssment, feel you will burst if you don't respond, simply tell her as kindly as you can, “I'll be praying for you, Lisa.”
And pity her.
05 January 2008
BOFFO BLOG SMASH HIT!!!
BOFFO BLOG SMASH HIT!!!
REVIEWER GOES BALLISTIC
WITH PRAISE FOR NAGQ-OAE!
After discovering and perusing the wonderful NOT A GOOD QUEER (OR ANYTHING ELSE) blog, one reviewer found herself so overcome by excitement, rapture, and supernal joy, that she could scarcely find language coherent enough to express her admiration and praise for NAGQ-OAE:
Direct Message to Residents at The Rose
Posted by Lisa/Lee Iacuzzi
Hello, lynching hate mob called http://notagoodqueer-oae.blogspot.com which is not to be confused with Notagoodqueer.blogspot.com.
Hoo there, in castle keep, you king singsong owls, who moonbeam the flickering runs and dive the dingle furred deer dead!
Huloo, on plumbed bryns, O my ruffled ring dove in the hooting, nearly dark, coo rooing the woods' praise, who moons her blue notes from her nest down to the curlew herd!
Ho, hullaballooing clan agape, with woe in your beaks, on the grabbing capes!
Heigh, on horseback hill, jack whisking hare
Ah, fewk it.
NAGQ wants to inform all of you who signed a document that was given to the police, that you soon will be charged with civil harassment and lying to the police.
OZ THE GWEAT AND TEWWIBLE has spoken. Brrrr – how scary! How exciting!
Well well folks you should be careful to what you sign. Since it was given to police, it is a felony to lie to the police. The authors of this document are Karen, Debra, Terry Sharpe, Bren, etc..
If, by “document”, Lisa means the letter to BOLI and REACH setting forth some of Ms. Iacuzzi's willful, malicious, and destructive antics, and signed by a majority of tenants, then the authors of that well-written missive were NOT Karen, Debra, Terry Sharpe, Bren, and Etc. If, by “document”, Lisa means the letter to the NAACP setting forth Lisa's hateful behaviour to African American residents, her use of racist epithets, her vandalisation of their personal property, such as that of an African American teacher and stroke victim who was a target of Lisa Iacuzzi's blatant racism, then the authors of that equally well-written missive weren't Karen, Debra, Terry Sharpe, Bren, or Etc, either.
You signers can say that you did not write this document
And it would be quite true, since ALL signatories naturally didn't write either letter. Whichever letter Lisa means. Whatever Lisa means. Given her impoverished English skills, it's usually hard to tell.
but you signed the document full of lies which makes you liable.
Pun not intended.
Now you have to prove to the police and the district attorney that you were forced to sign it.
Why one would have to – or even want to -- PROVE coercion in signing something one signed freely, willingly, and voluntarily, is a mystery which Lisa will probably not bother to clarify.
Believe me the tables are turning.
Believing Lisa Iacuzzi about anything requires too great a suspension of disbelief for most folks. But something's turning, all right, and it ain't no tables.
On the first page of the document, Glenda Meyers states, "that she went to Judge Kushman and asked for the stalking order trial to be moved up". This is the only statement in the whole document that has a paper trail. Well, it was NAGQ who went to Judge Kushman and asked for this request: not Glenda Meyers. This claim is easy to prove as a lie. So, you lied to the police: every single vowel and consonant, you are liable for.
Well, that's not in the letter to BOLI and REACH, which a majority of Rose residents signed, and it's not the letter to the NAACP either. If Lisa's alleged document has a paper trail, it's a pity she's so bad a writer she can't follow it as far as she can spit. Unless, of course, she's making it up, so that her threats won't sound like the hot air they really are.
Payback is a good thing!
Payback's a bitch, actually. The evil aliens of Independence Day knew it. Lisa should know it, too, especially after the recent 29-day vacation she earned herself in the Multnomah County jail – in the psychiatric ward, yet.
I do not want to hear your whining and suffering that you were lied to by Bren Athens or Jackie in room 208. Why did you not ask me if these allegations were true?
Asking Lisa Iacuzzi for truth is like asking Mamoud Abbas for a donation to the UJA. And who, except Lisa, is whining?
No you did Portland like behavior and behaved passive-aggressively and just believed lies. You own behavior is going to hurt you.
Nowhere near as much as Lisa's antics have hurt her. But maybe she's already forgotten how her deliberate, willful, and malicious antics earned her a 29-day sojourn in the jail's psycho ward.
It would be interesting to hear why, exactly, the shrinks didn't want to release Lisa, even after 29 days. It would be almost as interesting to learn the details of Lisa's “inappropriate behaviour” which caused her termination as a teacher's aide. Plying a minor with drugs and alcohol, as she did her underaged friend “Nicole” last April, can probably be ruled out here.
Isn't it odd how Lisa keeps spewing accusations of falsehood, yet never, EVER comes up with a few facts in opposition to those “lies” she keeps alleging?
Hey Reach CDC, this should put Glenda Meyers on an eviction path who was already given a cause of termination when she sicked her dogs after me named Terry Sharpe, Jackie, Bren Ahtnes, and Maria Leal.
Glenda's already been evicted, so to speak, from her former apartment next to her noisy, abusive, and inconsiderate neighbour NAGQ. And Glenda is enjoying it.
These tenants are threatening other tenants in the building not to help my wittiness's
Help Lisa's wittiness? How can one help wittiness in one who lacks it?
who need help with housework and g groceries and who are legally disabled are being threatened. Shame on you. These tasks NAGQ would do for them
Balgs-daddja. The tasks Lisa performed at The Rose were generally confined to eating meals cooked for her by tenants who felt sorry for her (until they wised up to her sob stories), smoking pot, and going door to door begging for cigarettes and money. Other Iacuzzi tasks involved making a monstrous nuisance of herself, and threatening tenants with physical harm.
and is no longer allowed in the building without police escort. My wittiness's have been physical threatened
Again, how can one threaten wittiness, physically or otherwise, where it is lacking?
and intimated
SP - “intimidated” is probably what Lisa means.
by Bren Athens and Jackie(room 208) who both have said to my witnesses, "you have to live in the building".
“My witnesses” -- the possessive sounds rather odd, but then, Lisa is VERY possessive, especially of the possessions of others. And "you have to live in the building" doesn't make it as a threat, when set beside Lisa's threats to cut off tenants' legs, and: “Join me or suffer!” and “Support me or suffer!” and “Join me and together we will rule the Galaxy!” Well, maybe Lisa didn't say that, but she wrote to Jill Riddle of HAP that “I am going to own 988 Reach units.”
This hate mob behaves like a gang which is not socially acceptable in a building that is suppose to deal with domestic violence victim's.
That's not what The Rose is about. And the above apostrophe is not necessary.
These domestic violence victims are still experiencing domestic violence by a few residents who call themselves an organized tenant association.
Oh, so now it's an “organized tenant association”? What happened to the “bible-thumping African American gang”? Considering Lisa's racist hate language to African American ladies, “hate mob” is pretty funny, coming as it does from a racist. Either way, the restraining order taken out by Lisa Iacuzzi's former partner shows that she is a perpetrator of domestic violence, not a victim of it, and her bullying behaviour made residents feel as if they were being subjected to more of the same, and triggered several episodes of post-traumatic stress disorder.
They are not a tenant organization because they do everything behind closed doors and decide who they will accept in the building or not. This includes staff people like Kim Matic, a former Transition Projects case manager, who was falsely accused or erroneous behavior by the lynching mob. Kim Matic was just trying to hold these people accountable and it cost her job.
“Trying to hold people accountable” does not normally cost a case manager her job; chronic tardiness, unexcused absences, and dismal job performance are causes for termination, and complaints of the same did not derive solely from Rose clients. Had Ms. Mattic actually attempted to “hold people responsible”, Lisa Iacuzzi would have screamed the loudest for her resignation. What probably has Lisa still disgruntled is the loss of a reliable source for her schnorring forays. Naturally, she puts it down to some sort of conspiracy. It will be recalled that prior to her latest redaction, Lisa blamed the conspiracy of a bible-thumping, drug dealing African American gang, led by a gay woman.
Lisa dwells richly on her imaginary conspiracies. If she weren't too lazy to write them down – or get somebody to write them, so they'd be intelligible -- she would have quite a compilation. The Protocols of the Learned Elders of The Rose, she could call it, or something like that. Mein Kampf, anyone?
You all that signed the document will be charged with civil harassment and lying to the police.
Gee, we're very frightened. After dinner, we may faint.
I do not feel sorry for a single one of you.
ESPECIALLY the African American and gay women who have been Lisa's favourite targets for her bullying. But of course, Lisa feels sorry for nobody but herself.
Still I Rise
[snip a Maya Angelou poem – most inappropriate in view of Lisa's hostile attitude and behaviour toward African Americans.]
Given Lisa's megalomania – which is not to be confused with her monomania – a more appropriate close would be:
I am exalted,
Great upon earth!
Let all praise me--
This hunt was mine!
That's more Lisa's speed. Of course, it's futile to expect her to heed the tag that:
The gods have many faces,
And many fates fulfill,
To work their will.
The end expected comes not;
God brings the unexpected to be.....
Like 29 days in the jail psycho ward. For Rose residents, a visit from St Nicholas, with a shawl of peace over this Christmas, and a wool-white bell-tongued ball of holidays resting at the rim of the carol-singing sea.
I do not apologize for anything!
Je péterai toujours plus haut que mon cul! ought to be Lisa's sig tag. Alas, Lisa somehow managed to evade that demonstrable fluency in a foreign language (not to mention standard English), which is sine qua non for the MA she claims to have earned, so scratch that.
Lisa/Lee Iacuzzi MA @ PSU Not a Good Queer
http://notagoodqueer.blogspot.com/2007/12/direct-message-to-residents-at-rose.html
A better sig: La Duchesa, after Lisa's fellow fascistic megalomaniac, Il Duce Musso. La Povera Lisa works OK, too. So does Madam Poskudnika -- or M'sieur Poskudnyok, as Lisa prefers.
Je péterai toujours plus haut que mon cul!
La Povera Duchesa Lisa Poskudnika, M[ajor] A[sswipe]
Not a Good Queer (Or Anything Else)
It plays.
Finis, pro tem.
Now take your Haldol, Lisa, old gel.
=====================================================
REVIEWER GOES BALLISTIC
WITH PRAISE FOR NAGQ-OAE!
After discovering and perusing the wonderful NOT A GOOD QUEER (OR ANYTHING ELSE) blog, one reviewer found herself so overcome by excitement, rapture, and supernal joy, that she could scarcely find language coherent enough to express her admiration and praise for NAGQ-OAE:
Direct Message to Residents at The Rose
Posted by Lisa/Lee Iacuzzi
Hello, lynching hate mob called http://notagoodqueer-oae.blogspot.com which is not to be confused with Notagoodqueer.blogspot.com.
Hoo there, in castle keep, you king singsong owls, who moonbeam the flickering runs and dive the dingle furred deer dead!
Huloo, on plumbed bryns, O my ruffled ring dove in the hooting, nearly dark, coo rooing the woods' praise, who moons her blue notes from her nest down to the curlew herd!
Ho, hullaballooing clan agape, with woe in your beaks, on the grabbing capes!
Heigh, on horseback hill, jack whisking hare
Ah, fewk it.
NAGQ wants to inform all of you who signed a document that was given to the police, that you soon will be charged with civil harassment and lying to the police.
OZ THE GWEAT AND TEWWIBLE has spoken. Brrrr – how scary! How exciting!
Well well folks you should be careful to what you sign. Since it was given to police, it is a felony to lie to the police. The authors of this document are Karen, Debra, Terry Sharpe, Bren, etc..
If, by “document”, Lisa means the letter to BOLI and REACH setting forth some of Ms. Iacuzzi's willful, malicious, and destructive antics, and signed by a majority of tenants, then the authors of that well-written missive were NOT Karen, Debra, Terry Sharpe, Bren, and Etc. If, by “document”, Lisa means the letter to the NAACP setting forth Lisa's hateful behaviour to African American residents, her use of racist epithets, her vandalisation of their personal property, such as that of an African American teacher and stroke victim who was a target of Lisa Iacuzzi's blatant racism, then the authors of that equally well-written missive weren't Karen, Debra, Terry Sharpe, Bren, or Etc, either.
You signers can say that you did not write this document
And it would be quite true, since ALL signatories naturally didn't write either letter. Whichever letter Lisa means. Whatever Lisa means. Given her impoverished English skills, it's usually hard to tell.
but you signed the document full of lies which makes you liable.
Pun not intended.
Now you have to prove to the police and the district attorney that you were forced to sign it.
Why one would have to – or even want to -- PROVE coercion in signing something one signed freely, willingly, and voluntarily, is a mystery which Lisa will probably not bother to clarify.
Believe me the tables are turning.
Believing Lisa Iacuzzi about anything requires too great a suspension of disbelief for most folks. But something's turning, all right, and it ain't no tables.
On the first page of the document, Glenda Meyers states, "that she went to Judge Kushman and asked for the stalking order trial to be moved up". This is the only statement in the whole document that has a paper trail. Well, it was NAGQ who went to Judge Kushman and asked for this request: not Glenda Meyers. This claim is easy to prove as a lie. So, you lied to the police: every single vowel and consonant, you are liable for.
Well, that's not in the letter to BOLI and REACH, which a majority of Rose residents signed, and it's not the letter to the NAACP either. If Lisa's alleged document has a paper trail, it's a pity she's so bad a writer she can't follow it as far as she can spit. Unless, of course, she's making it up, so that her threats won't sound like the hot air they really are.
Payback is a good thing!
Payback's a bitch, actually. The evil aliens of Independence Day knew it. Lisa should know it, too, especially after the recent 29-day vacation she earned herself in the Multnomah County jail – in the psychiatric ward, yet.
I do not want to hear your whining and suffering that you were lied to by Bren Athens or Jackie in room 208. Why did you not ask me if these allegations were true?
Asking Lisa Iacuzzi for truth is like asking Mamoud Abbas for a donation to the UJA. And who, except Lisa, is whining?
No you did Portland like behavior and behaved passive-aggressively and just believed lies. You own behavior is going to hurt you.
Nowhere near as much as Lisa's antics have hurt her. But maybe she's already forgotten how her deliberate, willful, and malicious antics earned her a 29-day sojourn in the jail's psycho ward.
It would be interesting to hear why, exactly, the shrinks didn't want to release Lisa, even after 29 days. It would be almost as interesting to learn the details of Lisa's “inappropriate behaviour” which caused her termination as a teacher's aide. Plying a minor with drugs and alcohol, as she did her underaged friend “Nicole” last April, can probably be ruled out here.
Isn't it odd how Lisa keeps spewing accusations of falsehood, yet never, EVER comes up with a few facts in opposition to those “lies” she keeps alleging?
Hey Reach CDC, this should put Glenda Meyers on an eviction path who was already given a cause of termination when she sicked her dogs after me named Terry Sharpe, Jackie, Bren Ahtnes, and Maria Leal.
Glenda's already been evicted, so to speak, from her former apartment next to her noisy, abusive, and inconsiderate neighbour NAGQ. And Glenda is enjoying it.
These tenants are threatening other tenants in the building not to help my wittiness's
Help Lisa's wittiness? How can one help wittiness in one who lacks it?
who need help with housework and g groceries and who are legally disabled are being threatened. Shame on you. These tasks NAGQ would do for them
Balgs-daddja. The tasks Lisa performed at The Rose were generally confined to eating meals cooked for her by tenants who felt sorry for her (until they wised up to her sob stories), smoking pot, and going door to door begging for cigarettes and money. Other Iacuzzi tasks involved making a monstrous nuisance of herself, and threatening tenants with physical harm.
and is no longer allowed in the building without police escort. My wittiness's have been physical threatened
Again, how can one threaten wittiness, physically or otherwise, where it is lacking?
and intimated
SP - “intimidated” is probably what Lisa means.
by Bren Athens and Jackie(room 208) who both have said to my witnesses, "you have to live in the building".
“My witnesses” -- the possessive sounds rather odd, but then, Lisa is VERY possessive, especially of the possessions of others. And "you have to live in the building" doesn't make it as a threat, when set beside Lisa's threats to cut off tenants' legs, and: “Join me or suffer!” and “Support me or suffer!” and “Join me and together we will rule the Galaxy!” Well, maybe Lisa didn't say that, but she wrote to Jill Riddle of HAP that “I am going to own 988 Reach units.”
This hate mob behaves like a gang which is not socially acceptable in a building that is suppose to deal with domestic violence victim's.
That's not what The Rose is about. And the above apostrophe is not necessary.
These domestic violence victims are still experiencing domestic violence by a few residents who call themselves an organized tenant association.
Oh, so now it's an “organized tenant association”? What happened to the “bible-thumping African American gang”? Considering Lisa's racist hate language to African American ladies, “hate mob” is pretty funny, coming as it does from a racist. Either way, the restraining order taken out by Lisa Iacuzzi's former partner shows that she is a perpetrator of domestic violence, not a victim of it, and her bullying behaviour made residents feel as if they were being subjected to more of the same, and triggered several episodes of post-traumatic stress disorder.
They are not a tenant organization because they do everything behind closed doors and decide who they will accept in the building or not. This includes staff people like Kim Matic, a former Transition Projects case manager, who was falsely accused or erroneous behavior by the lynching mob. Kim Matic was just trying to hold these people accountable and it cost her job.
“Trying to hold people accountable” does not normally cost a case manager her job; chronic tardiness, unexcused absences, and dismal job performance are causes for termination, and complaints of the same did not derive solely from Rose clients. Had Ms. Mattic actually attempted to “hold people responsible”, Lisa Iacuzzi would have screamed the loudest for her resignation. What probably has Lisa still disgruntled is the loss of a reliable source for her schnorring forays. Naturally, she puts it down to some sort of conspiracy. It will be recalled that prior to her latest redaction, Lisa blamed the conspiracy of a bible-thumping, drug dealing African American gang, led by a gay woman.
Lisa dwells richly on her imaginary conspiracies. If she weren't too lazy to write them down – or get somebody to write them, so they'd be intelligible -- she would have quite a compilation. The Protocols of the Learned Elders of The Rose, she could call it, or something like that. Mein Kampf, anyone?
You all that signed the document will be charged with civil harassment and lying to the police.
Gee, we're very frightened. After dinner, we may faint.
I do not feel sorry for a single one of you.
ESPECIALLY the African American and gay women who have been Lisa's favourite targets for her bullying. But of course, Lisa feels sorry for nobody but herself.
Still I Rise
[snip a Maya Angelou poem – most inappropriate in view of Lisa's hostile attitude and behaviour toward African Americans.]
Given Lisa's megalomania – which is not to be confused with her monomania – a more appropriate close would be:
I am exalted,
Great upon earth!
Let all praise me--
This hunt was mine!
That's more Lisa's speed. Of course, it's futile to expect her to heed the tag that:
The gods have many faces,
And many fates fulfill,
To work their will.
The end expected comes not;
God brings the unexpected to be.....
Like 29 days in the jail psycho ward. For Rose residents, a visit from St Nicholas, with a shawl of peace over this Christmas, and a wool-white bell-tongued ball of holidays resting at the rim of the carol-singing sea.
I do not apologize for anything!
Je péterai toujours plus haut que mon cul! ought to be Lisa's sig tag. Alas, Lisa somehow managed to evade that demonstrable fluency in a foreign language (not to mention standard English), which is sine qua non for the MA she claims to have earned, so scratch that.
Lisa/Lee Iacuzzi MA @ PSU Not a Good Queer
http://notagoodqueer.blogspot.com/2007/12/direct-message-to-residents-at-rose.html
A better sig: La Duchesa, after Lisa's fellow fascistic megalomaniac, Il Duce Musso. La Povera Lisa works OK, too. So does Madam Poskudnika -- or M'sieur Poskudnyok, as Lisa prefers.
Je péterai toujours plus haut que mon cul!
La Povera Duchesa Lisa Poskudnika, M[ajor] A[sswipe]
Not a Good Queer (Or Anything Else)
It plays.
Finis, pro tem.
Now take your Haldol, Lisa, old gel.
=====================================================
Dept. of Sears Energizer Pscyho Bunnies
ADVENTURES IN (AND OUT OF) THE PSYCHO WARD
Portland Police's "Good" and "Bad" Cop
Posted by Lisa/Lee Iacuzzi
The problem is, it only takes one bad cop to put you in jail. This photo was taken when tenant in room 207, Laura Fornillee called the police about and attempted assault of a women named Terry Elaine Sharpe, Glenda Meyers, and Theresa. Of course, the Rose tenants also called the police which is why things became so wrong so fast. Terry Sharpe and others were never charged on that September day.
Mainly because nothing of the sort ever happened.
It is no secret that Glenda Jean Meyers convicted drug dealer
That conviction certainly is secret. It's so secret that not even Glenda knows about it. In fact, so secret is this alleged drug deal conviction that there's no record of it anywhere – outside the fertilizer factory in Liza Iacuzzi's head. And that over-productive factory is, of course, one of the real problems.
who was able to sob on the shoulder of the "bad" cop above. He helped her with information about me so she could obtain a stalking order on me in which NAGQ lived only two feet from her door.
No cop helped Glenda obtain a stalking order. No cops helped the two men who previously filed for stalking orders against Lisa “Lee” Iacuzzi, or helped Iacuzzi's former partner obtain a restraining order against her, either.
Was Glenda's Friend!
Was Never Anyone's Friend!
NAGQ was very helpful to this women neighbor for months by taking care of her when she was sick and when she hurt her back.
This story might be nice, were it other than a story. How many “women neighbor” are there whom Lisa helped? Nowhere near as many as helped Lisa out, cooking meals for her when she whined of having no food, providing her with cigarettes and money when she went door to door, schnorring for both, sitting and listening to her long sad stories while she smoked all their cigarettes and never paid them back.
Also NAGQ listened to her whole life story including the impending death of her sister who had cancer.
Lisa never listened to ANYONE'S “whole life story”. As the object of her own life, she has never had as much interest in listening to anyone as she has in relating the saga of her life. One of the sagas of her life. She changes them frequently, depending on the listener.
NAGQ lived peacefully with this women
NAQG lived “peacefully” with very few women. Mostly she bullies women and harasses them, particularly gay women and African American women. In fact, her chief targets after African American women are gay women.
until she became the new drug dealer in the building. The old drug dealer named Kim Swegeringer,retired from the position, was in the hospital so Glenda took over her new job responsibilities which included taking Oregon food cards and turning them into cash for residents to buy drugs.
Whoa! Ole Lisa is confusing her stories again. As we know, it wasn't Kimberly whom Lisa accused of being the building's resident drug-dealer-in-chief; that honour went to – drum roll – African American women. As Lisa screamed in the face of one African American resident: “All you nigger bitches do drugs!” In front of the lady's nine-year old granddaughter, yet.
As for "taking Oregon food cards and turning them into cash for residents to buy drgus" -- we all know who it was whom Lisa previously crowned with that honour. Yup, a lady who was, and remains, a great friend to a number of Rose tenants, and who happens to be gay. In Lisa's previous redaction, the lady was aided, of course, by the bible-thumping drug-dealing (slightly over-the-hill) African American Gang
Lisa has a real thing against African Americans. From her behaviour toward gay women at The Rose, she seems to hate them almost as much.
Their is
SP - “There are”
about twenty-people involved in this fraud of food stamps who gave thier name
SP - “their names”
to me when they wrote a 8 page document full of false documentation to the police, Portland's Housing authority, Reach CDC, and child protective services.
Does Lisa EVER bother to read anything she pretends to rail against? Or does she just spew whatever happens to be churning in that fertilizer factory between her ears? It's clear she's taken to heart Hitler's maxim about repeating one's lies until they are believed. In Lisa's case, however, she can't seem to keep her lies straight.
What, exactly, is this “8 page document full of false documentation[sic] which Lisa is slavering over? Is it the letter (four and a half pages) to BOLI and REACH, which set forth a few of Lisa's outstandingly violent antics, and which was signed by over half the residents? That letter was copied to – among others – the two officers most nearly concerned with this building whenever Lisa's antics required police assistance. If Lisa believes it's “full of false documentation” -- whatever that means – she should provide some facts in opposition thereto. But of course, she can't do that, because she has no facts, and the lack shows.
But maybe Lisa means the letter to the local branch of the NAACP, setting forth her racist hate speech against African American residents?
Not to mention a website dedicated to hate of NAGQ which is filled with homophobia.
Well, we all know what Lisa means by “website” here! (Elsewhere, she expresses her foaming admiration and praise for that “website” in the most fulsome terms.) But whatever Lisa means by “hate” and “homophobia”, it's pretty funny. After all, Lisa's chief targets for her bullying antics were, after African Americans, gay women, whom Lisa harassed, threatened with physical suffering, and on occasion physically assaulted.
If there's any homophobia on this blog, let Lisa point it out. Of course, if there were, the gay women who've read it would have pointed it out, by now, and requested its removal. But they find it amusing. Perhaps these gay women are rabidly homophobic?
So the bad cop made sure he arrested me eventhough NAGQ was able to get a contact order on Glenda Meyers.
Geez
---plop---
---plop---
more nuggets from the Iacuzzi fertilizer factory.
As a matter of fact, Lisa Iacuzzi obtained a temporary stalking order against Glenda Myers two days before she was required to appear in court on Glenda's original stalking order. At the same time, Lisa obtained a second temporary stalking order against Terry Sharp, based largely on imaginary – and quite laughable – incidents which happened only in the spaces between Lisa's ears.
One funny accusation was how one resident – in Lisa's later redaction, two – stood outside Lisa's second-storey window and watched while Lisa masturbated. In court, Lisa kept insisting to the judge that the window, and her apartment, were UNDER the table in the garden.
How the judge provided this contact order in the first place is another story
One can bet it's “another story”, and one should be grateful Lisa hasn't chosen to lob more nuggets from the factory. Although that may be due to appear shortly, given Lisa's love for conspiracy scenarios – with herself as the star, director, producer, crew, plus an imaginary cast of thousands.
and an example of misuse of the legal system that is suppose to protect people which was used to harass NAGQ.
Translation: If Lisa misuses the legal system to continue her willful, deliberate, and malicious harassment of others, it's GOOD. If Lisa misuses the legal system to file phony complaints whose sole purpose is to fill her personal exchequer, it's GOOD. If people turn to the legal system to defend themselves against Lisa's bullying, it's BAD.
Glenda called the police for violating the contact order at least 8 times which included passing me in the building while NAGQ was eating spaghetti. To say it was abusive would be an understatement.
So, passing somebody who's eating spaghetti is WORSE than abusive? Do tell. Is it as bad as knocking on an African American stroke victim's door, saying, "Nigger! Nigger! Nigger!" then running away? As bad as rampaging up and down halls screaming, "Niggers!" "Tweakers!" and "Fuck you all!"? or parading outside a building singing, "Come and get me, bitches! The roof's on fire! Come and get me, bitches! The roof's on fire!"? How about threatening to cut off people's legs for telling the truth? As bad as all that? Worse?
It's a shame Lisa's written English is so poor it renders her incapable of producing a coherent thought on paper (or in cyberspace). This leads one to wonder: with such poor English skills, written and spoken, however did Lisa manage to earn the MA she claims to have earned?
The good cop above was smart enough to know that even the lynch mob of a twenty was as he would say, "the majority is not always right".
Huh? Did somebody get paid twenty?
He understood what was happening but this message did not get to the whole department. NAGQ gave the southeast precinct a copy of a BOLI complaint that included a statement from the state of Oregon that NAGQ was living in a "hostile environment".
If Lisa actually received that alleged statement, what are the odds she would have given it a priority spot on her blog? It must be due to an extraordinary oversight on her part. Or maybe she was just so excited by seeing NAGQ-OAE that she was temporarily overwhelmed with admiration and joy.
NAGQ also provided two letters from other tenants citing a homophobic gang like of behavior of tenats that included them making up false incidents.
What a sad, sad statement. And not just because it's more of Lisa's incoherent English. It's sad. Out of all the tenants in the building, out of all the tenants who signed the letter setting forth the facts of Lisa's hateful antics, all the support Lisa could muster was two people. And probably the one doesn't know Lisa very well, and what are the odds that the other is one who spends an inordinate amount of time on the vilest of Jew-hating sites on the net? Dygystudd deurudd dagrau; wylaf wers, tawaf wedi. It's sad. Naturally, Lisa doesn't get the implications.
NAGQ also called Community Policing around 12 times but still could not get any help even though I was able to speak to officer Picket and had spoken to officer Fulitano.
If Lisa bothered to read the letter she's whinging about -- if that letter is what Lisa's whinging about -- she might have noted the name of one of the two officers to whom it was copied. But who knows what she's whinging about? Maybe she's sad because she knows that the only time she writes as well as the contributors to this blog is when she's copying the writings of someone else.
On Friday November 9at approximately at 9am, NAGQ called the police for Glenda Meyers bumping and telling me to fuck off. Dispatch said that it could not come out to help due to two residents having a stalking order in the same building was not enforceable.
Or else, by then, the police were as heartily sick of Lisa's antics as residents were. And, too, they may have sensed that this “incident” was another of those which are undetectable to any entity not residing within the narrow confines of Lisa's head.
I called the police again about tenant Bren Athens attempted assault.
Was this the “Bren Athens attempted assault” when Lisa struck Bren, as caught on the lobby security cams? Or when Lisa tried to hit Bren? Or when Lisa crammed her cell into Bren's face, and Bren pushed it aside?
The bad cop came out and even though he was showed a video of my attack, he still did not press charges.
Cops don't “press charges”; victims press charges. And Lisa's cell phone “videos” are as informative as an Andy Warhol epic showing a fly crawling across a man's nose.
On his way out of the building, I did see him talk to Glenda Meyers where he told her to call him personally to arrest NAGQ of violation of stalking order. I video taped him that has the date and the time on the camera, I knew that he, the bad cop, was after me and it was only a matter of time when this was going to happen.
Translation: Lisa reinvents the past, so that her self-destructive antics won't seem as stupid as they were.
After Glenda made over eight phone calls to the police and dealing with the police at least five times trying to arrest me over a one month period of time, I showed officer Lowry my camera which showed the harassment of Glenda. This still did not help.
Gee, imagine that.
I carried the camera to protect me from false accusations and video taped lots of harassment in which officer Lowry and his partner, the bad cop, would not charge any resident with harassment including the day of my arrest.
Lisa carries her cell for the express purpose of shoving it into people's faces, against their expressed wishes, in order to harass and provoke them. The reason her cell videos fall down as propaganda is the narration. The tale is in the telling. Lisa needs to study Goebbels' propaganda films, like the one showing a herd of rats; it's very simple. Here's a herd of rats. “Ah,” the audience thinks, “a herd of rats.” But nein! “This is what Jews are like,” the narrator says. “Ah,” the audience thinks, “Jews are rats.”
It's such simple propaganda, even Lisa Iacuzzi could do it.
Lisa's version would probably show a herd of rats. “Ah,” the audience thinks, “a herd of rats.” Nein! “This is the bible-thumping drug-dealing African American gang at The Rose who has fomented a conspiracy against me,” Lisa intones. “Ah,” the audience thinks. “Lisa Iacuzzi is a racist ass.”
On November 12th at approximately 9am, Glenda Meyers called the police again when I told her to walk in the opposite direction when she approached me.
As if.
When the police came,I told Lowry, please arrest me, I am tired of this whole thing, please.....
Yeah, right. Lisa is tired of the whole thing, so she resists arrest, to the point of forcing the arresting officers to shackle her, and gag her for spitting on them. Oh, pull the other one, it's got bells on it.
I tried to give my camera which had my evidence to another tenant. He would not allow this is when he threw my face against the wall and handcuffed.
Oh, my! He threw Lisa's face against the wall? Heavens to Mergatroid!
As he was handcuffing, another officer walked from behind and pulled my finger back as he was pressing my knuckle. I screamed that he was hurting me but he kept on squeezing.
That's usually what happens when one starts kicking and screaming and cussing and spitting on officers when one is being arrested.
I screamed about my dog being locked in my room to a Reach employee who witnessed the whole police attack on the front steps at the Rose.
More than one person witnessed Lisa's arrest. The manly Lisa was quite the hysterical girl.
When I was brought downtown after a hellish car ride where Lowry and the bad cop ensighted degrading marks in the car ride.
Huh? Somehow, ensighting degrading marks in the car ride sounds like they lit up some joysticks.
The boys said that I was just after money and that I made them sick because this was all about money. No sorry.
Yeah, well, we all know Lisa is “no sorry” for anything. But it's true that since she was fired for inappropriate behaviour from her job as a teacher's aide, Lisa has netted a series of tidy incomes by filing ridiculous charges, or threatening to file ridiculous charges, against organizations; schools, domestic violence shelters, shelters for the homeless, even against the dv shelter where she apparently lived after her partner got a restraining order against her. Evidently she finds it easier than working.
I Lisa/Lee Iacuzzi have proven through the law of Oregon that bigendered and transgendered people are allowed in male and female "only places.
Lisa has proven nothing beyond the fact that she is a mentally and emotionally disturbed woman, and that to know her very well is to want to avoid her in the future.
I was brought into checking. It is here where officer Tracey Owens grabbed my breast during the not so routine body search. I flinched and they lifted my body up on a table using my handcuffs behind my back.
That's what usually happens when one goes on resisting arrest, if it can be called “resisting arrest” after one has landed oneself in jail, and is stupid enough to continue trying to hit, kick, and spit on jail personnel, as Lisa apparently did.
Then another guard pulled my wrists and fingers until I squelled like a pig, "please stop, I will be good".
It's extraordinarily easy to imagine Lisa squealing like a pig. Squealing like a pig is one of the things cowardly bullies do when they find themselves on the receiving end of even a little of what they have inflicted on others.
Then the lifted my body and put me in a cell with my entire weight on my collar bone and crossing my legs in midair.
It's a miracle the collar bone with Lisa's entire weight on it. Getting a human body into the extraordinarily acrobatic position Lisa describes must have been another miracle.
Then officer Jameson, who was written about in a recent tribune article, refused my phone call for 6 hours. Of course my bruising earned me time in hole which could hide my facial and hand bruising from Police officer Lowry and collar bone injury from Deputy Tracy Owens. I was let out of my cell 15 minutes per day with no window.
You don't get thrown into solitary because you're bruised. Your violent behaviour is what lands you there, as Lisa's behaviour landed her in the jail's psychiatric ward for 29 days.
Guess, what, I am out.
Out of jail, perhaps. Out of the psycho ward in the jail, perhaps. But she's not out of her personal prison of virulent self-hatred where she buried herself deep and keeps herself shackled.
The guards asked me what I was going to do when I got out? I told them that I am going to sue the Sheriff, Police, and Reach CDC! Please keep laughing, I am enjoying being the underdog!
O wad some Power the giftie gie her,
to see hersel as ithers see her!
It wad frae mony a blunder free her,
an' foolish notion.
The state of Oregon with the Beaure of Labor, has found in favor of Lisa/Lee Iacuzzi, Not a good queer, that gender discrimination occurred and is still occurring at Reach CDC and that it is a hostile environment.
Load of balls. If that were true, Lisa would have trumpeted it on her silly blog. All she's posted is a copy of her complaint, and a letter from the investigator requesting her to amend her complaint, which means nothing.
Presumably, the $1,000,000 Lisa was drooling over extorting from REACH is not in her immediate future either.
I plan on filing a retaliation claim against Reach CDC, who provided false evidence for Glenda Meyers "stalking order" which resulted in 29 days in jail.
In this instance, the stalking order is immaterial. La Povera can't get it through her thick skull that it was her own demented behaviour, resisting arrest, spitting on the cops, attempting to assault jail personnel, shrieking and screaming and generally carrying on like the loon she is, which earned her 29 days in the jail psycho ward. No mere stalking order will do that. And the stalking order had nothing to do with the shrinks' reluctance to release Lisa from the psycho ward, either.
I am angry and I will hold all those accountable for my abuse
It's a given that Lisa will never look where she can find those most accountable for her “abuse” - her mirror. Certainly she will never take that person into account.
which includes my companion dog being in a locked room for 24 hours without food or water.
A friend's dog, actually. Whose fault was that? As it happened, however, the dog was NOT “without food or water” for 24 hours. Enough residents were concerned enough to ensure that the innocent animal did not suffer needlessly merely because it had the misfortune to be attached to a confirmed poskudnika.
I do not apologize for anything!
Je péterai toujours plus haut que mon cul! ought to be Lisa's sig tag. Alas, Lisa somehow managed to evade that demonstrable fluency in a foreign language (not to mention standard English) which is sine qua non for the MA she claims to have earned, scratch that.
Lisa/Lee Iacuzzi MA @ PSU Not a Good Queer
http://notagoodqueer.blogspot.com/2007/12/29-days-in-jail-good-cop-and-bad-cop.html
A better sig: La Duchesa, after Lisa's fellow fascistic megalomaniac, Il Duce Musso. La Povera Lisa works OK, too. So does Madam Poskudnika. Or M'sieur Poskudnyok, as Lisa prefers.
Je péterai toujours plus haut que mon cul!
La Povera Lisa Poskudnika, M[ajor] A[sswipe]
Not a Good Queer (Or Anything Else)
Finis, pro tem.
Now take your Haldol, Lisa, old gel.
Portland Police's "Good" and "Bad" Cop
Posted by Lisa/Lee Iacuzzi
The problem is, it only takes one bad cop to put you in jail. This photo was taken when tenant in room 207, Laura Fornillee called the police about and attempted assault of a women named Terry Elaine Sharpe, Glenda Meyers, and Theresa. Of course, the Rose tenants also called the police which is why things became so wrong so fast. Terry Sharpe and others were never charged on that September day.
Mainly because nothing of the sort ever happened.
It is no secret that Glenda Jean Meyers convicted drug dealer
That conviction certainly is secret. It's so secret that not even Glenda knows about it. In fact, so secret is this alleged drug deal conviction that there's no record of it anywhere – outside the fertilizer factory in Liza Iacuzzi's head. And that over-productive factory is, of course, one of the real problems.
who was able to sob on the shoulder of the "bad" cop above. He helped her with information about me so she could obtain a stalking order on me in which NAGQ lived only two feet from her door.
No cop helped Glenda obtain a stalking order. No cops helped the two men who previously filed for stalking orders against Lisa “Lee” Iacuzzi, or helped Iacuzzi's former partner obtain a restraining order against her, either.
Was Glenda's Friend!
Was Never Anyone's Friend!
NAGQ was very helpful to this women neighbor for months by taking care of her when she was sick and when she hurt her back.
This story might be nice, were it other than a story. How many “women neighbor” are there whom Lisa helped? Nowhere near as many as helped Lisa out, cooking meals for her when she whined of having no food, providing her with cigarettes and money when she went door to door, schnorring for both, sitting and listening to her long sad stories while she smoked all their cigarettes and never paid them back.
Also NAGQ listened to her whole life story including the impending death of her sister who had cancer.
Lisa never listened to ANYONE'S “whole life story”. As the object of her own life, she has never had as much interest in listening to anyone as she has in relating the saga of her life. One of the sagas of her life. She changes them frequently, depending on the listener.
NAGQ lived peacefully with this women
NAQG lived “peacefully” with very few women. Mostly she bullies women and harasses them, particularly gay women and African American women. In fact, her chief targets after African American women are gay women.
until she became the new drug dealer in the building. The old drug dealer named Kim Swegeringer,retired from the position, was in the hospital so Glenda took over her new job responsibilities which included taking Oregon food cards and turning them into cash for residents to buy drugs.
Whoa! Ole Lisa is confusing her stories again. As we know, it wasn't Kimberly whom Lisa accused of being the building's resident drug-dealer-in-chief; that honour went to – drum roll – African American women. As Lisa screamed in the face of one African American resident: “All you nigger bitches do drugs!” In front of the lady's nine-year old granddaughter, yet.
As for "taking Oregon food cards and turning them into cash for residents to buy drgus" -- we all know who it was whom Lisa previously crowned with that honour. Yup, a lady who was, and remains, a great friend to a number of Rose tenants, and who happens to be gay. In Lisa's previous redaction, the lady was aided, of course, by the bible-thumping drug-dealing (slightly over-the-hill) African American Gang
Lisa has a real thing against African Americans. From her behaviour toward gay women at The Rose, she seems to hate them almost as much.
Their is
SP - “There are”
about twenty-people involved in this fraud of food stamps who gave thier name
SP - “their names”
to me when they wrote a 8 page document full of false documentation to the police, Portland's Housing authority, Reach CDC, and child protective services.
Does Lisa EVER bother to read anything she pretends to rail against? Or does she just spew whatever happens to be churning in that fertilizer factory between her ears? It's clear she's taken to heart Hitler's maxim about repeating one's lies until they are believed. In Lisa's case, however, she can't seem to keep her lies straight.
What, exactly, is this “8 page document full of false documentation[sic] which Lisa is slavering over? Is it the letter (four and a half pages) to BOLI and REACH, which set forth a few of Lisa's outstandingly violent antics, and which was signed by over half the residents? That letter was copied to – among others – the two officers most nearly concerned with this building whenever Lisa's antics required police assistance. If Lisa believes it's “full of false documentation” -- whatever that means – she should provide some facts in opposition thereto. But of course, she can't do that, because she has no facts, and the lack shows.
But maybe Lisa means the letter to the local branch of the NAACP, setting forth her racist hate speech against African American residents?
Not to mention a website dedicated to hate of NAGQ which is filled with homophobia.
Well, we all know what Lisa means by “website” here! (Elsewhere, she expresses her foaming admiration and praise for that “website” in the most fulsome terms.) But whatever Lisa means by “hate” and “homophobia”, it's pretty funny. After all, Lisa's chief targets for her bullying antics were, after African Americans, gay women, whom Lisa harassed, threatened with physical suffering, and on occasion physically assaulted.
If there's any homophobia on this blog, let Lisa point it out. Of course, if there were, the gay women who've read it would have pointed it out, by now, and requested its removal. But they find it amusing. Perhaps these gay women are rabidly homophobic?
So the bad cop made sure he arrested me eventhough NAGQ was able to get a contact order on Glenda Meyers.
Geez
more nuggets from the Iacuzzi fertilizer factory.
As a matter of fact, Lisa Iacuzzi obtained a temporary stalking order against Glenda Myers two days before she was required to appear in court on Glenda's original stalking order. At the same time, Lisa obtained a second temporary stalking order against Terry Sharp, based largely on imaginary – and quite laughable – incidents which happened only in the spaces between Lisa's ears.
One funny accusation was how one resident – in Lisa's later redaction, two – stood outside Lisa's second-storey window and watched while Lisa masturbated. In court, Lisa kept insisting to the judge that the window, and her apartment, were UNDER the table in the garden.
One can bet it's “another story”, and one should be grateful Lisa hasn't chosen to lob more nuggets from the factory. Although that may be due to appear shortly, given Lisa's love for conspiracy scenarios – with herself as the star, director, producer, crew, plus an imaginary cast of thousands.
and an example of misuse of the legal system that is suppose to protect people which was used to harass NAGQ.
Translation: If Lisa misuses the legal system to continue her willful, deliberate, and malicious harassment of others, it's GOOD. If Lisa misuses the legal system to file phony complaints whose sole purpose is to fill her personal exchequer, it's GOOD. If people turn to the legal system to defend themselves against Lisa's bullying, it's BAD.
Glenda called the police for violating the contact order at least 8 times which included passing me in the building while NAGQ was eating spaghetti. To say it was abusive would be an understatement.
So, passing somebody who's eating spaghetti is WORSE than abusive? Do tell. Is it as bad as knocking on an African American stroke victim's door, saying, "Nigger! Nigger! Nigger!" then running away? As bad as rampaging up and down halls screaming, "Niggers!" "Tweakers!" and "Fuck you all!"? or parading outside a building singing, "Come and get me, bitches! The roof's on fire! Come and get me, bitches! The roof's on fire!"? How about threatening to cut off people's legs for telling the truth? As bad as all that? Worse?
It's a shame Lisa's written English is so poor it renders her incapable of producing a coherent thought on paper (or in cyberspace). This leads one to wonder: with such poor English skills, written and spoken, however did Lisa manage to earn the MA she claims to have earned?
The good cop above was smart enough to know that even the lynch mob of a twenty was as he would say, "the majority is not always right".
Huh? Did somebody get paid twenty?
He understood what was happening but this message did not get to the whole department. NAGQ gave the southeast precinct a copy of a BOLI complaint that included a statement from the state of Oregon that NAGQ was living in a "hostile environment".
If Lisa actually received that alleged statement, what are the odds she would have given it a priority spot on her blog? It must be due to an extraordinary oversight on her part. Or maybe she was just so excited by seeing NAGQ-OAE that she was temporarily overwhelmed with admiration and joy.
NAGQ also provided two letters from other tenants citing a homophobic gang like of behavior of tenats that included them making up false incidents.
What a sad, sad statement. And not just because it's more of Lisa's incoherent English. It's sad. Out of all the tenants in the building, out of all the tenants who signed the letter setting forth the facts of Lisa's hateful antics, all the support Lisa could muster was two people. And probably the one doesn't know Lisa very well, and what are the odds that the other is one who spends an inordinate amount of time on the vilest of Jew-hating sites on the net? Dygystudd deurudd dagrau; wylaf wers, tawaf wedi. It's sad. Naturally, Lisa doesn't get the implications.
NAGQ also called Community Policing around 12 times but still could not get any help even though I was able to speak to officer Picket and had spoken to officer Fulitano.
If Lisa bothered to read the letter she's whinging about -- if that letter is what Lisa's whinging about -- she might have noted the name of one of the two officers to whom it was copied. But who knows what she's whinging about? Maybe she's sad because she knows that the only time she writes as well as the contributors to this blog is when she's copying the writings of someone else.
On Friday November 9at approximately at 9am, NAGQ called the police for Glenda Meyers bumping and telling me to fuck off. Dispatch said that it could not come out to help due to two residents having a stalking order in the same building was not enforceable.
Or else, by then, the police were as heartily sick of Lisa's antics as residents were. And, too, they may have sensed that this “incident” was another of those which are undetectable to any entity not residing within the narrow confines of Lisa's head.
I called the police again about tenant Bren Athens attempted assault.
Was this the “Bren Athens attempted assault” when Lisa struck Bren, as caught on the lobby security cams? Or when Lisa tried to hit Bren? Or when Lisa crammed her cell into Bren's face, and Bren pushed it aside?
The bad cop came out and even though he was showed a video of my attack, he still did not press charges.
Cops don't “press charges”; victims press charges. And Lisa's cell phone “videos” are as informative as an Andy Warhol epic showing a fly crawling across a man's nose.
On his way out of the building, I did see him talk to Glenda Meyers where he told her to call him personally to arrest NAGQ of violation of stalking order. I video taped him that has the date and the time on the camera, I knew that he, the bad cop, was after me and it was only a matter of time when this was going to happen.
Translation: Lisa reinvents the past, so that her self-destructive antics won't seem as stupid as they were.
After Glenda made over eight phone calls to the police and dealing with the police at least five times trying to arrest me over a one month period of time, I showed officer Lowry my camera which showed the harassment of Glenda. This still did not help.
Gee, imagine that.
I carried the camera to protect me from false accusations and video taped lots of harassment in which officer Lowry and his partner, the bad cop, would not charge any resident with harassment including the day of my arrest.
Lisa carries her cell for the express purpose of shoving it into people's faces, against their expressed wishes, in order to harass and provoke them. The reason her cell videos fall down as propaganda is the narration. The tale is in the telling. Lisa needs to study Goebbels' propaganda films, like the one showing a herd of rats; it's very simple. Here's a herd of rats. “Ah,” the audience thinks, “a herd of rats.” But nein! “This is what Jews are like,” the narrator says. “Ah,” the audience thinks, “Jews are rats.”
It's such simple propaganda, even Lisa Iacuzzi could do it.
Lisa's version would probably show a herd of rats. “Ah,” the audience thinks, “a herd of rats.” Nein! “This is the bible-thumping drug-dealing African American gang at The Rose who has fomented a conspiracy against me,” Lisa intones. “Ah,” the audience thinks. “Lisa Iacuzzi is a racist ass.”
On November 12th at approximately 9am, Glenda Meyers called the police again when I told her to walk in the opposite direction when she approached me.
Yeah, right. Lisa is tired of the whole thing, so she resists arrest, to the point of forcing the arresting officers to shackle her, and gag her for spitting on them. Oh, pull the other one, it's got bells on it.
I tried to give my camera which had my evidence to another tenant. He would not allow this is when he threw my face against the wall and handcuffed.
Oh, my! He threw Lisa's face against the wall? Heavens to Mergatroid!
As he was handcuffing, another officer walked from behind and pulled my finger back as he was pressing my knuckle. I screamed that he was hurting me but he kept on squeezing.
That's usually what happens when one starts kicking and screaming and cussing and spitting on officers when one is being arrested.
I screamed about my dog being locked in my room to a Reach employee who witnessed the whole police attack on the front steps at the Rose.
More than one person witnessed Lisa's arrest. The manly Lisa was quite the hysterical girl.
When I was brought downtown after a hellish car ride where Lowry and the bad cop ensighted degrading marks in the car ride.
Huh? Somehow, ensighting degrading marks in the car ride sounds like they lit up some joysticks.
The boys said that I was just after money and that I made them sick because this was all about money. No sorry.
Yeah, well, we all know Lisa is “no sorry” for anything. But it's true that since she was fired for inappropriate behaviour from her job as a teacher's aide, Lisa has netted a series of tidy incomes by filing ridiculous charges, or threatening to file ridiculous charges, against organizations; schools, domestic violence shelters, shelters for the homeless, even against the dv shelter where she apparently lived after her partner got a restraining order against her. Evidently she finds it easier than working.
I Lisa/Lee Iacuzzi have proven through the law of Oregon that bigendered and transgendered people are allowed in male and female "only places.
Lisa has proven nothing beyond the fact that she is a mentally and emotionally disturbed woman, and that to know her very well is to want to avoid her in the future.
I was brought into checking. It is here where officer Tracey Owens grabbed my breast during the not so routine body search. I flinched and they lifted my body up on a table using my handcuffs behind my back.
That's what usually happens when one goes on resisting arrest, if it can be called “resisting arrest” after one has landed oneself in jail, and is stupid enough to continue trying to hit, kick, and spit on jail personnel, as Lisa apparently did.
Then another guard pulled my wrists and fingers until I squelled like a pig, "please stop, I will be good".
It's extraordinarily easy to imagine Lisa squealing like a pig. Squealing like a pig is one of the things cowardly bullies do when they find themselves on the receiving end of even a little of what they have inflicted on others.
Then the lifted my body and put me in a cell with my entire weight on my collar bone and crossing my legs in midair.
It's a miracle the collar bone with Lisa's entire weight on it. Getting a human body into the extraordinarily acrobatic position Lisa describes must have been another miracle.
Then officer Jameson, who was written about in a recent tribune article, refused my phone call for 6 hours. Of course my bruising earned me time in hole which could hide my facial and hand bruising from Police officer Lowry and collar bone injury from Deputy Tracy Owens. I was let out of my cell 15 minutes per day with no window.
You don't get thrown into solitary because you're bruised. Your violent behaviour is what lands you there, as Lisa's behaviour landed her in the jail's psychiatric ward for 29 days.
Guess, what, I am out.
Out of jail, perhaps. Out of the psycho ward in the jail, perhaps. But she's not out of her personal prison of virulent self-hatred where she buried herself deep and keeps herself shackled.
The guards asked me what I was going to do when I got out? I told them that I am going to sue the Sheriff, Police, and Reach CDC! Please keep laughing, I am enjoying being the underdog!
O wad some Power the giftie gie her,
to see hersel as ithers see her!
It wad frae mony a blunder free her,
an' foolish notion.
The state of Oregon with the Beaure of Labor, has found in favor of Lisa/Lee Iacuzzi, Not a good queer, that gender discrimination occurred and is still occurring at Reach CDC and that it is a hostile environment.
Load of balls. If that were true, Lisa would have trumpeted it on her silly blog. All she's posted is a copy of her complaint, and a letter from the investigator requesting her to amend her complaint, which means nothing.
Presumably, the $1,000,000 Lisa was drooling over extorting from REACH is not in her immediate future either.
I plan on filing a retaliation claim against Reach CDC, who provided false evidence for Glenda Meyers "stalking order" which resulted in 29 days in jail.
In this instance, the stalking order is immaterial. La Povera can't get it through her thick skull that it was her own demented behaviour, resisting arrest, spitting on the cops, attempting to assault jail personnel, shrieking and screaming and generally carrying on like the loon she is, which earned her 29 days in the jail psycho ward. No mere stalking order will do that. And the stalking order had nothing to do with the shrinks' reluctance to release Lisa from the psycho ward, either.
I am angry and I will hold all those accountable for my abuse
It's a given that Lisa will never look where she can find those most accountable for her “abuse” - her mirror. Certainly she will never take that person into account.
which includes my companion dog being in a locked room for 24 hours without food or water.
A friend's dog, actually. Whose fault was that? As it happened, however, the dog was NOT “without food or water” for 24 hours. Enough residents were concerned enough to ensure that the innocent animal did not suffer needlessly merely because it had the misfortune to be attached to a confirmed poskudnika.
I do not apologize for anything!
Je péterai toujours plus haut que mon cul! ought to be Lisa's sig tag. Alas, Lisa somehow managed to evade that demonstrable fluency in a foreign language (not to mention standard English) which is sine qua non for the MA she claims to have earned, scratch that.
Lisa/Lee Iacuzzi MA @ PSU Not a Good Queer
http://notagoodqueer.blogspot.com/2007/12/29-days-in-jail-good-cop-and-bad-cop.html
A better sig: La Duchesa, after Lisa's fellow fascistic megalomaniac, Il Duce Musso. La Povera Lisa works OK, too. So does Madam Poskudnika. Or M'sieur Poskudnyok, as Lisa prefers.
Je péterai toujours plus haut que mon cul!
La Povera Lisa Poskudnika, M[ajor] A[sswipe]
Not a Good Queer (Or Anything Else)
Finis, pro tem.
Now take your Haldol, Lisa, old gel.
01 January 2008
RAVE REVIEWS FOR NAGQ-OAE!
Comments on NAGQ-OAE:
"...an example the violence of a lynch mob...Lord of the Flies comes to mind...The only precedent is Nazi Germany or the Columbine massacres. It is a case study in the psychology of evil....an example of the kind of casual bigotry that created the crematoriums in Nazi Germany....very much like the Germans dehumanizing the Jews in World War II so that they could gas them."
WOWEE!!!
Somebody over at a certain silly, self-indulgent blog seems quite taken with Nazi Germany. Not too surprising, considering that the source is a woman whose past actions show she would have had a fine career in a Schutzstaffel einsatzgruppe. But that even such a one could be so petty-minded and self-centered as to claim that her troubles -- troubles which she brought on herself -- are tantamount to the horrors inflicted on Jews and others during the Holocaust can only be put down to the breathtakingly monumental narcissism of a profoundly, and possibly dangerously, disturbed mentality.
It also goes to show that cowardly gas bags of hot air can't take the barest fraction of what they blow out on others.
Other than that, it's pretty funny to see a blog equated simultaneously with Nazis, Lord of the Flies, and the Columbine tragedy. And isn't it pushing the comedic envelope to call NAGQ-OAE a "case study in the psychology of evil"? Clearly, someone needs to cultivate the vast barren tracts in their education -- such as that may have been.
ROTFLMAO!!!!!
"...an example the violence of a lynch mob...Lord of the Flies comes to mind...The only precedent is Nazi Germany or the Columbine massacres. It is a case study in the psychology of evil....an example of the kind of casual bigotry that created the crematoriums in Nazi Germany....very much like the Germans dehumanizing the Jews in World War II so that they could gas them."
WOWEE!!!
Somebody over at a certain silly, self-indulgent blog seems quite taken with Nazi Germany. Not too surprising, considering that the source is a woman whose past actions show she would have had a fine career in a Schutzstaffel einsatzgruppe. But that even such a one could be so petty-minded and self-centered as to claim that her troubles -- troubles which she brought on herself -- are tantamount to the horrors inflicted on Jews and others during the Holocaust can only be put down to the breathtakingly monumental narcissism of a profoundly, and possibly dangerously, disturbed mentality.
It also goes to show that cowardly gas bags of hot air can't take the barest fraction of what they blow out on others.
Other than that, it's pretty funny to see a blog equated simultaneously with Nazis, Lord of the Flies, and the Columbine tragedy. And isn't it pushing the comedic envelope to call NAGQ-OAE a "case study in the psychology of evil"? Clearly, someone needs to cultivate the vast barren tracts in their education -- such as that may have been.
ROTFLMAO!!!!!
22 November 2007
POEM FOR LISA
As I was going up the stair,
I met Iacuzzee, who wasn't there.
She wasn't there again today.
How I wish, I wish she'd stay away!
I met Iacuzzee, who wasn't there.
She wasn't there again today.
How I wish, I wish she'd stay away!
Not so secret meeting
ANOTHER SECRET MEETING AT THE ROSE?
Agenda Hidden from Leesa Iacuzzee
Tuesday, 20th November, 3.00 pm -- Rose residents and REACH personnel gathered in the conference room in what appeared to be yet another secret meeting whose agenda was hidden from The Rose's Chief Problem Child, otherwise known as Leesa “Lee” “Not A Good Queer” “NAGQ” “Buzz Cut” Iacuzzee.
*
Iacuzzee has charged that REACH and Rose tenants held several meetings whose deliberations were deliberately kept secret from her. In her semi-literate scribblings, Iacuzzee dwells richly, and at some length, on these secret meetings. Her usual claims are that the meetings are instigated by the “bible thumping African American gang at The Rose” led by “Gang Leader Marttha, Reach's Star Wittness”, who are out to take over The Rose. It's the Iacuzzi version of the Protocols of the Learned Elders of Zion. Call it The Iacuzzi Protocols of the Learned Bible-Thumping African American Elders of The Rose.
*
Iacuzzee has been incarcerated in the Multnomah County jail pyschiatric ward since Monday, 12th November, providing Rose residents with a blessed two-week hiatus from her antics.
*
On Monday the 19th, preparatory to the 3.00 pm Tuesday gathering, Rosanne Marmor made secret deliveries to select Rose residents. Chief recipients of the largesse were Pat, Cheryl, and Valerie. The results were made deliciously clear the following afternoon.
*
The chief item on the not so hidden agenda was the turkey, cooked to a superb turn by Pat. Other items on the meeting agenda complimented the 16-pounder; they included dressing, gravy, mashed potatoes, candied yams, green beans, green beans with corn (organic!), fruit, rolls with homemade blackberry jam, raisin nut bread, sweet potato pie, coffee, apple juice, and several varieties of soda pop.
*
Pat's turkey was lush, tender and juicy. She put it in the oven at 250 around 8.00 pm the previous night, and turned off the heat at 4.00 am. The slow, low cooking was a trick she learned from her job as a sous-chef years ago, and produced a wonderfully tasty bird. Pat also made the superb dressing for the bird.
*
Cheryl tackled the task of turning raw potatoes into mashed potatoes, which were warmed immediately before serving by Debbie Lowder. Cheryl said she had never made mashed potatoes until now. Her maiden efforts should be crowned with an A+++. Turkey, dressing, and potatoes were complimented by a giblet gravy with mushrooms which can only be described as near perfection.
*
Glenda proved it's hard to keep a good woman down. Utilizing her kitchen for the first time in the long months when she was made the chief target of the brand of kindergarten playground bully antics at which Lisa Iacuzzi excels, Glenda produced two wonderful pineapple upside-down cakes. “It was great being able to get back into my kitchen,” she said. “For the first time in months I could put some into my cupboard and not have it stolen.”
*
Valerie's candied yams with marshmallows were a paradigm of orange sweetmess. Prior to setting her large tray of yams on the table, Valerie issued a warning to all diabetics that it would send their blood sugar level to sky. And how! “I don't eat pumpkin pie,” Valerie said, “and I wanted something sweet.” So did Rose residents, upon viewing the colorful creation, and again, after sampling it—and the rolls, butter, homemade jam, green beans and corn, pickles, olives, chocolate donut holes, raisin bread, gallons of apple juice, and cola, citrus soda, and orange soda.
*
It may be The Rose's kindergarten playground bully will be greatly disappointed to learn that she was mentioned at the meeting only once: a few residents asked what measures are to be taken pending Iacuzzee's release from the jailhouse psycho ward. Rosanne replied, but, as her answer coincided with the start of the procession of tasty dishes to the table, her answer was lost on all but a few residents. Thereafter, ill thoughts fled, and good cheer – and good food – permeated the room.
*
“You can tell how good a meal is,” Rosanne observed, “by the silence.” Judging from the silence which prevailed, it was a VERY good meal—and that's an understatement.
*
A big and a great and a mighty and a huge
*
*
THANKS!
*
*
to all who provided and prepared this wonderful Thanksgiving meal.
*
=============================
*
When you reap the harvest of your land, you shall not reap all the way to the edges of your field, or gather the gleanings of your harvest. You shall not pick your vineyard bare, or gather the fallen fruit of your vineyard; you shall leave them for the poor and the stranger. Leviticus 19,9-10
*
*
Barukh ata Adonai Eloheinu melekh haolam, hamotzi lehem min haaretz.
19 November 2007
ROSE RESIDENTS GIVE THANKS THIS THANKSGIVING
ROSE RESIDENTS HYMN THANKSGIVING BLESSINGS
Come, ye thankful people, come,
Raise the song of Harvest Home:
All is safely gathered in,
Ere the winter storms begin.
God, our Maker, will provide
For our wants to be supplied;
Come to God's own Temple, come,
Raise the song of Harvest Home.
All the world is God's own field,
Fruit unto his praise to yield;
Wheat and tares together sown,
Unto joy or sorrow grown.
First the blade, and then the ear,
Then the full corn shall appear:
Grant, O harvest Lord that we
Wholesome grain and pure may be.
For the Lord our God shall come
And shall take his harvest home;
From his field shall in that day
All offences purge away;
Give his angels charge at last
In the fire the tares to cast,
But the fruitful ears to store
In his garner ever more.
Even so, Lord, quickly come
To Your final Harvest Home;
Gather now Your people in,
Free from sorrow, free from sin;
There, for ever purified,
In Your presence to abide:
Come, with all Your angels, come,
Raise the glorious Harvest Home!
---------------------------------------
C3P0's Thanksgiving Praises:
“Thank the Maker...
..... for helping the Empire take over the Galaxy, for destroying the Jedi, for ruining Padme's life,
for forgetting all about me in Attack of the Clones, for building a giant space tennis ball to blow up planets and billions of their inhabitants.....
This oil bath is going to feel so good!”
Come, ye thankful people, come,
Raise the song of Harvest Home:
All is safely gathered in,
Ere the winter storms begin.
God, our Maker, will provide
For our wants to be supplied;
Come to God's own Temple, come,
Raise the song of Harvest Home.
All the world is God's own field,
Fruit unto his praise to yield;
Wheat and tares together sown,
Unto joy or sorrow grown.
First the blade, and then the ear,
Then the full corn shall appear:
Grant, O harvest Lord that we
Wholesome grain and pure may be.
For the Lord our God shall come
And shall take his harvest home;
From his field shall in that day
All offences purge away;
Give his angels charge at last
In the fire the tares to cast,
But the fruitful ears to store
In his garner ever more.
Even so, Lord, quickly come
To Your final Harvest Home;
Gather now Your people in,
Free from sorrow, free from sin;
There, for ever purified,
In Your presence to abide:
Come, with all Your angels, come,
Raise the glorious Harvest Home!
---------------------------------------
C3P0's Thanksgiving Praises:
“Thank the Maker...
..... for helping the Empire take over the Galaxy, for destroying the Jedi, for ruining Padme's life,
for forgetting all about me in Attack of the Clones, for building a giant space tennis ball to blow up planets and billions of their inhabitants.....
This oil bath is going to feel so good!”
HEARING OF THE YEAR
HEARING OF THE YEAR
----------------------------------------------
Stalking Orders Permanent, With
Proviso; Little Change in Status
Quo, says Plaintiff's Counsel
-----------------------------------------------
This Thanksgiving, Rose Residents
Pray: “God bless Lisa Iacuzzi and
keep her--far away from us.”
by M. Shochet, Special Reporter for
Not A Good Queer Or Anything Else
PORTLAND, OR – The protective stalking order granted by the Multnomah County Circuit Court to the much-harried resident of The Rose Apartments, who has been one of the chief targets of Lisa (“Lee”, “Not A Good Queer”, “NAGQ”) Iacuzzi, was made permanent at a hearing held on Friday, 16th November 2007, before the Honorable Judge Reardon.
At the same time, the retaliatory protective stalking order taken out by Respondent Iacuzzi against her victim two days before the original hearing of 2nd November was also made permanent. Both orders carried the proviso that, upon one or the other parties moving out of the Rose, the orders would be voided.
According to eyewitnesses, no witnesses were allowed in Room 228 of the Multnomah County Courthouse, where the hearing commenced at 10.00 am last Friday. Prior thereto, Respondent had subpoenaed all Rose residents who could attest to facts detrimental to her case, thus excluding those witnesses from the hearing.
Petitioner appeared with her attorney in fact; well-wishers who could not be present, due to prior commitments, or because they were excluded, sent supportive thoughts winging her way. Respondent, currently in custody since last Monday for several criminal charges pending against her -- including violation of the temporary stalking order, harassment and attempted criminal assault of building personnel and Petitioner's counsel, and criminal assault of jail personnel and inmates -- appeared with her court-appointed attorney.
Escorted by a very large female guard, Respondent Iacuzzi entered the courtroom after Petitioner and her counsel were seated. “Buzz Cut was glowing with happiness and grinning from ear to ear,” observed one incredulous observer, shuffling along as if an unseen band heralded her appearance with the Horst Wessel Lied. “Her eyes were like Charlie Manson's.”
When Respondent Iacuzzi attempted to seat herself next to Petitioner and Petitioner's counsel, she was pushed to a far chair by a bailiff. Upon Respondent's request to sit next to Petitioner's counsel, a bailiff responded with a sharp and incredulous, “No!” Despite the rebuff, Respondent made additional attempts to move closer to the petitioner and her counsel.
Witnesses were undecided as to whether Ms. Iacuzzi's attempts to sit next to Petitioner's counsel and Petitioner were due to her belief that she might overwhelm them with her well-attested stench, or because she harbors a sexual attraction for one or both.
Petitioner was tastefully attired in subdued tan and grey, which appeared to be retro Chanel. Respondent appeared in white pants and shirt, which she accessorized with matching footgear, and handcuffs, ankle cuffs, and shackles. Although the white pants suit is requisite jailhouse attire for psychiatric inmates--even after Labor Day--some Rose residents suspected Respondent's attire was a statement of her solidarity with White Power groups and the KKK, given her well-attested racism.
For further details on courtroom wear, see article in Section F, “White After Labor Day? Fashion Police Descend on Justice Center jail.”
The hearing lasted nearly two hours, an unusual length of time to devote to stalking orders. Respondent Iacuzzimade at least four attempts to derail the proceeding into other, irrelevant channels. One attempt involved her belief that she was being discriminated against, because of her demand to be treated as a man, instead of the middle-aged woman she is. When the judge cut short her ramblings, she tried other tack, one regarding her allegedly unhappy childhood, another the “gender discrimination” grievance she filed with the Bureau of Labor & Industries, to stave off her eviction last August.
Judge Reardon reprimanded her each time, and brought the proceeding back on track. He informed her that the issue before the court was not some irrelevant grievance or a rehash of her childhood.
“This is not about what happened in the past,” the judge informed Ms. Iacuzzi. “It is about what is happening now, whether there has been a change in the condition of harassment, and to resolve the dispute.”
At one point, Judge Reardon called 30-minute recess so that Respondent could confer with her court-appointed attorney. Upon Respondent's demand, the courtroom was cleared of all observers. Later, Petitioner joined the judge for an in camera conference. Upon emerging from the judge's chambers, it transpired that Petitioner had agreed, much against her will, to a proposal that the temporary protective stalking orders be made permanent only until one or the other of the parties moved out of the Rose, at which time both orders would be vacated.
Respondent stated she planned to move out in ten days.
The agreement was incorporated into the court's order, and with that, the hearing concluded shortly before noon.
“Nothing has changed,” Petitioner's counsel stated in a post-hearing interview. Both stalking orders – the one granted petitioner against Lisa Iacuzzi for the latter's months of harassment, and Ms. Iacuzzi's retaliatory order against petitioner -- have been made permanent, with the proviso that, upon Ms. Iacuzzi's moving out of The Rose, both will be vacated.
Whether the ten day period alluded to by Respondent Iacuzzi begins upon the date of the hearing, or upon her release from jail, is still unclear.
Ms. Iacuzzi is currently being held in custody for psychiatric observation and evaluation, a period which, it is believed will last two weeks.
Psychiatric non-professionals are divided in their opinions as to the exact nature of the mental dysfunctions which Ms. Iacuzzi has evinced over the course of her seven long months at The Rose. Some are of the opinion that Ms. Iacuzzi is bi-polar
(see: http://www.behavenet.com/capsules/disorders/bipdis.htm).
Others believe she suffers from severe NPD (Narcissistic Personality Disorder)
(see: http://www.behavenet.com/capsules/disorders/narcissisticpd.htm).
Still others blame her excessive use of marijuana and other drugs, coupled with an inherent physiological disorder (see article in Science Supplement Section S, “Congenital Dysfunction: Is Her Head So Far Up Her Ass That She Can Chew Her Food Twice?”)
Lisa (“Lee”, “Not A Good Queer”, “NAGQ”) Iacuzzi is currently slated to appear before the court on several other charges. These include criminal harassment, and a temporary stalking order which she took out against Rose resident Terry Elaine Sharp. As witnesses will attest, Ms. Sharp has done nothing which can even remotely be considered as “stalking” Ms. Iacuzzi. In fact, Ms. Sharp has gone out of her way to avoid Ms. Iacuzzi, even before Ms. Iacuzzi threatened to “cut off your legs” if Ms. Sharp appeared in court.
Ms. Iacuzzi issued similar threats to other Rose residents, including a written threat to one resident, which was shoved under her door prior to the 2nd November hearing. In fact, it was to keep these threats from being heard by the court that Rose residents were subpoened as witnesses. While the subpoenas as issued by Ms. Iacuzzi were grossly incorrect and improper, they were held to be valid.
The criminal harassment charge is scheduled for 26th November in Courtroom #1, on Judge Evans' afternoon docket. The newest stalking order is slated to be heard 30th November in Courtroom #4, also on the afternoon docket. Both are in the Justice Center, located at 1120 SW Third.
The Justice Center, a Portland landmark, was designed by the late Norm Zimmer z”l, founder of Zimmer Gunsel Frasca and the Oregon School of Architecture & Design. (See related articles in Section D Design, “Iacuzzi Antics Continue in ZGF's Justice Center” and “Downtown Portland: When Did It Stop Being Frasca-land?”)
The docket regarding Ms. Iacuzzi's violation of the original stalking order; resisting arrest; assaults of, and spitting on, jail personnel and inmates, was not available at this time.
Despite the lack of real change in the stalking order status quo, as Petitioner's counsel commented in her post-hearing interview, Rose residents are hopeful. “If it accomplished nothing else,” said one, “we have two Iacuzzi-free weeks to look forward to. That's good enough for me.”
Said another: “A Thanksgiving without Lee is reason enough to give thanks.”
----------------------------------------------
Stalking Orders Permanent, With
Proviso; Little Change in Status
Quo, says Plaintiff's Counsel
-----------------------------------------------
This Thanksgiving, Rose Residents
Pray: “God bless Lisa Iacuzzi and
keep her--far away from us.”
by M. Shochet, Special Reporter for
Not A Good Queer Or Anything Else
PORTLAND, OR – The protective stalking order granted by the Multnomah County Circuit Court to the much-harried resident of The Rose Apartments, who has been one of the chief targets of Lisa (“Lee”, “Not A Good Queer”, “NAGQ”) Iacuzzi, was made permanent at a hearing held on Friday, 16th November 2007, before the Honorable Judge Reardon.
At the same time, the retaliatory protective stalking order taken out by Respondent Iacuzzi against her victim two days before the original hearing of 2nd November was also made permanent. Both orders carried the proviso that, upon one or the other parties moving out of the Rose, the orders would be voided.
According to eyewitnesses, no witnesses were allowed in Room 228 of the Multnomah County Courthouse, where the hearing commenced at 10.00 am last Friday. Prior thereto, Respondent had subpoenaed all Rose residents who could attest to facts detrimental to her case, thus excluding those witnesses from the hearing.
Petitioner appeared with her attorney in fact; well-wishers who could not be present, due to prior commitments, or because they were excluded, sent supportive thoughts winging her way. Respondent, currently in custody since last Monday for several criminal charges pending against her -- including violation of the temporary stalking order, harassment and attempted criminal assault of building personnel and Petitioner's counsel, and criminal assault of jail personnel and inmates -- appeared with her court-appointed attorney.
Escorted by a very large female guard, Respondent Iacuzzi entered the courtroom after Petitioner and her counsel were seated. “Buzz Cut was glowing with happiness and grinning from ear to ear,” observed one incredulous observer, shuffling along as if an unseen band heralded her appearance with the Horst Wessel Lied. “Her eyes were like Charlie Manson's.”
When Respondent Iacuzzi attempted to seat herself next to Petitioner and Petitioner's counsel, she was pushed to a far chair by a bailiff. Upon Respondent's request to sit next to Petitioner's counsel, a bailiff responded with a sharp and incredulous, “No!” Despite the rebuff, Respondent made additional attempts to move closer to the petitioner and her counsel.
Witnesses were undecided as to whether Ms. Iacuzzi's attempts to sit next to Petitioner's counsel and Petitioner were due to her belief that she might overwhelm them with her well-attested stench, or because she harbors a sexual attraction for one or both.
Petitioner was tastefully attired in subdued tan and grey, which appeared to be retro Chanel. Respondent appeared in white pants and shirt, which she accessorized with matching footgear, and handcuffs, ankle cuffs, and shackles. Although the white pants suit is requisite jailhouse attire for psychiatric inmates--even after Labor Day--some Rose residents suspected Respondent's attire was a statement of her solidarity with White Power groups and the KKK, given her well-attested racism.
For further details on courtroom wear, see article in Section F, “White After Labor Day? Fashion Police Descend on Justice Center jail.”
The hearing lasted nearly two hours, an unusual length of time to devote to stalking orders. Respondent Iacuzzimade at least four attempts to derail the proceeding into other, irrelevant channels. One attempt involved her belief that she was being discriminated against, because of her demand to be treated as a man, instead of the middle-aged woman she is. When the judge cut short her ramblings, she tried other tack, one regarding her allegedly unhappy childhood, another the “gender discrimination” grievance she filed with the Bureau of Labor & Industries, to stave off her eviction last August.
Judge Reardon reprimanded her each time, and brought the proceeding back on track. He informed her that the issue before the court was not some irrelevant grievance or a rehash of her childhood.
“This is not about what happened in the past,” the judge informed Ms. Iacuzzi. “It is about what is happening now, whether there has been a change in the condition of harassment, and to resolve the dispute.”
At one point, Judge Reardon called 30-minute recess so that Respondent could confer with her court-appointed attorney. Upon Respondent's demand, the courtroom was cleared of all observers. Later, Petitioner joined the judge for an in camera conference. Upon emerging from the judge's chambers, it transpired that Petitioner had agreed, much against her will, to a proposal that the temporary protective stalking orders be made permanent only until one or the other of the parties moved out of the Rose, at which time both orders would be vacated.
Respondent stated she planned to move out in ten days.
The agreement was incorporated into the court's order, and with that, the hearing concluded shortly before noon.
“Nothing has changed,” Petitioner's counsel stated in a post-hearing interview. Both stalking orders – the one granted petitioner against Lisa Iacuzzi for the latter's months of harassment, and Ms. Iacuzzi's retaliatory order against petitioner -- have been made permanent, with the proviso that, upon Ms. Iacuzzi's moving out of The Rose, both will be vacated.
Whether the ten day period alluded to by Respondent Iacuzzi begins upon the date of the hearing, or upon her release from jail, is still unclear.
Ms. Iacuzzi is currently being held in custody for psychiatric observation and evaluation, a period which, it is believed will last two weeks.
Psychiatric non-professionals are divided in their opinions as to the exact nature of the mental dysfunctions which Ms. Iacuzzi has evinced over the course of her seven long months at The Rose. Some are of the opinion that Ms. Iacuzzi is bi-polar
(see: http://www.behavenet.com/capsules/disorders/bipdis.htm).
Others believe she suffers from severe NPD (Narcissistic Personality Disorder)
(see: http://www.behavenet.com/capsules/disorders/narcissisticpd.htm).
Still others blame her excessive use of marijuana and other drugs, coupled with an inherent physiological disorder (see article in Science Supplement Section S, “Congenital Dysfunction: Is Her Head So Far Up Her Ass That She Can Chew Her Food Twice?”)
Lisa (“Lee”, “Not A Good Queer”, “NAGQ”) Iacuzzi is currently slated to appear before the court on several other charges. These include criminal harassment, and a temporary stalking order which she took out against Rose resident Terry Elaine Sharp. As witnesses will attest, Ms. Sharp has done nothing which can even remotely be considered as “stalking” Ms. Iacuzzi. In fact, Ms. Sharp has gone out of her way to avoid Ms. Iacuzzi, even before Ms. Iacuzzi threatened to “cut off your legs” if Ms. Sharp appeared in court.
Ms. Iacuzzi issued similar threats to other Rose residents, including a written threat to one resident, which was shoved under her door prior to the 2nd November hearing. In fact, it was to keep these threats from being heard by the court that Rose residents were subpoened as witnesses. While the subpoenas as issued by Ms. Iacuzzi were grossly incorrect and improper, they were held to be valid.
The criminal harassment charge is scheduled for 26th November in Courtroom #1, on Judge Evans' afternoon docket. The newest stalking order is slated to be heard 30th November in Courtroom #4, also on the afternoon docket. Both are in the Justice Center, located at 1120 SW Third.
The Justice Center, a Portland landmark, was designed by the late Norm Zimmer z”l, founder of Zimmer Gunsel Frasca and the Oregon School of Architecture & Design. (See related articles in Section D Design, “Iacuzzi Antics Continue in ZGF's Justice Center” and “Downtown Portland: When Did It Stop Being Frasca-land?”)
The docket regarding Ms. Iacuzzi's violation of the original stalking order; resisting arrest; assaults of, and spitting on, jail personnel and inmates, was not available at this time.
Despite the lack of real change in the stalking order status quo, as Petitioner's counsel commented in her post-hearing interview, Rose residents are hopeful. “If it accomplished nothing else,” said one, “we have two Iacuzzi-free weeks to look forward to. That's good enough for me.”
Said another: “A Thanksgiving without Lee is reason enough to give thanks.”
17 November 2007
LET THE JOYOUS NEWS ABOUND!
The spell is broke, and we are free
We'll see no more of Iacuzzi!
Come, tenants, all and dance in a ring!
Join hands together and let us sing.......
As residents of The Rose
In the county of the land of O
We proclaim a day of independence
for all the tenants
And their descendants
Yes, let the joyous news abound
The evil dumb bitch at last is gone!
Ding-dong the bitch is gone
Which old bitch?
The evil bitch
Ding-dong the evil bitch is gone
She's gone where the goblins go
Below - below - below
Yo-ho, let's open up and sing
and ring the bells out
Ding Dong the merry-O,
Sing it high, sing it low
Let them know that Iacuzzee's is gone!
We represent the Sewing Club
The Sewing Club, the Sewing Club
And in the name of the Sewing Club.......
We'll raise a cheer, for Leesa's gone!
We represent the Gardening Guild
The Gardening Guild, the Gardening Guild
And in the name of the Gardening Guild
We blossom forth, for Leesa's gone!
We blossom forth, for Leesa's gone!
Tra la la la la la la la la la la la
From now on she'll be history
She'll be hist...
She'll be hist...
She'll be history
And we will glorify this day
She will be a bust...
Be a bust...
Be a bust...
In the hall of shame!
Tra la la la la la la la la la la
Tra la la la la la la
Tra la la la la la la la la la la
Tra la la la la la la!
We'll see no more of Iacuzzi!
Come, tenants, all and dance in a ring!
Join hands together and let us sing.......
As residents of The Rose
In the county of the land of O
We proclaim a day of independence
for all the tenants
And their descendants
Yes, let the joyous news abound
The evil dumb bitch at last is gone!
Ding-dong the bitch is gone
Which old bitch?
The evil bitch
Ding-dong the evil bitch is gone
She's gone where the goblins go
Below - below - below
Yo-ho, let's open up and sing
and ring the bells out
Ding Dong the merry-O,
Sing it high, sing it low
Let them know that Iacuzzee's is gone!
We represent the Sewing Club
The Sewing Club, the Sewing Club
And in the name of the Sewing Club.......
We'll raise a cheer, for Leesa's gone!
We represent the Gardening Guild
The Gardening Guild, the Gardening Guild
And in the name of the Gardening Guild
We blossom forth, for Leesa's gone!
We blossom forth, for Leesa's gone!
Tra la la la la la la la la la la la
From now on she'll be history
She'll be hist...
She'll be hist...
She'll be history
And we will glorify this day
She will be a bust...
Be a bust...
Be a bust...
In the hall of shame!
Tra la la la la la la la la la la
Tra la la la la la la
Tra la la la la la la la la la la
Tra la la la la la la!
15 November 2007
POOR LEESA!
Commentaria Contra Iacuzziana – “Poor Leesa!”
On Tuesday, 6th November 2007, the incomparable Lisa Iacuzzi posted another rant on her “Not A Good Queer” blog, entitled “Damages from Reach CDC”. Following is a copy of that whinge, interspersed with comments, corrections, and facts in opposition to Lisa's usual fabrications and prevarications.
Tuesday, November 6
Damages from Reach CDC
Lisa/Lee Iacuzzi 631 South East Taylor Portland, Oregon 97214 (503)756-9734 November 6, 2007
This is, perhaps, the one valid statement in the entire whinge.
To Whom It May Concern, Damages •Developed heart condition, currently on a beta blocker for tachycardia and high blood pressure! •Checked into hospital in November for suicide when Jamie Barton told Lee, why did you bother to sign up for housing at the Rose, when you are a man?
When, exactly, was this November hospital “check in” for “suicide”? Not on 1st November – police kept Lisa busy in the morning interviewing her over her latest violation of the stalking order against her; in the afternoon, Lisa was at the courthouse, writing and filing stalking order petitions against Glenda Myers and Terry Sharp. Not on 2nd November--Lisa was busy preparing for, then appearing at, the hearing on the original stalking order against her, then organizing a rally at The Rose in her support. (Lisa cancelled the rally because, she claimed, she had a nasty respiratory infection. Actually, nobody showed up.) Not that weekend or Monday--Lisa acquired a dog; harassed tenants, particularly those in #203 and #204, and played on the computer. The hospital stay certainly didn't occur the date of this whinge--Lisa was in and out of the computer room and the office all day. Moreover, hospitals tend to keep suicidal patients longer than part of a day for a “check in”.
So, when, exactly, was Lisa's November hospital visit for “suicide”? Who knows? It's also difficult to see how a remark from Jamie Barton could have occasioned Lisa's suicidal “check in”, as Jamie resigned before the end of October -- as Lisa well knows, since she crowed about it on her blog.
Defamation of character •I have worked in the nonprofit industry for many years
“Non-profit industry” here must be a synonym for “unemployed” (saving and excepting Lisa's brief employment as a teacher's aide, from which she was fired in 2004 for “inappropriate behaviour” toward students).
Moreover, it's difficult to see how one could possibly defame Lisa's character; she does it so well herself.
and will be black balled by: Reach CDC, Portland Impact, Bradley Angle House, Transition Projects •All these agencies were told by management that they were frightened by me
These agencies have their own records as to Lisa's violent and threatening behaviour, and need no imaginary information from Rose “management.”
even though I have never threatened anyone here at the Rose.
Evidently Lisa believes that her statements to Rose tenants -- “Join me or suffer!” and “Support me or suffer!” and “If you go to court, you'll be sorry!” and “I'll cut off your legs if you go to court!” -- fall under the category of gentle discourse.
The management falsely accused me and when I asked for video tapes that the used to make write-ups, they said that they loosed tapes.
What false accusations? What “loosed tapes”? On whom did “management” loose them?
•Harassment of 17 year old mentorship student.
So, Lisa's little friend Nicole is now her “mentorship student”. Pity any “student” of a teacher's aide fired for inappropriate conduct. Heretofore, Nicole was Lisa's “friend”, “guest”, “my 17-year-old kid”. In fact, Nicole was the 17-year old who spent several nights with Lisa, and whom residents observed drinking vodka with Lisa in the 2nd floor west kitchen, and later smoking marijuana with Lisa. (The inappropriate conduct which occasioned Lisa's firing in 2004 may be hinted at by Lisa's her providing booze and pot to her minor “student” in exchange for sex, as well as Lisa's vists to teen porn sites.)
Lee brings clients to the Rose to show public housing, Jamie Barton humiliates Lee in front of client.
If the reference is to Lee Greer, she never brought clients to The Rose to show them public housing. If the reference is to the inestimable Ms. Leesa Iacuzzi, she has no clients.
•Jamie Barton is under criminal investigation from Hap. She did not follow administrative rules for my housing and deliberately tried to keep me out of the building.
This “criminal investigation” is more of Lisa's wishful thinking. There is no “criminal investigation.”
•Lee Greer, Portland Impact, had a secret meeting with residents where she taught them how to do write-ups after she wrote me a document that she does not deal with behavior.
This is Lisa's third or fourth redaction of her “secret meeting” tale. In previous versions, Lisa alluded to:
1) “secret meetings behind close doors with residents who are involved in the discrimination case”;
2) “a meeting ... not posted on any calendar which was used to teach tenants how to document incidences which resulted in Kim Matick from TPI being fired and a 14 page document that is being circulated around the building to get NAGQ evicted”;
3) “a learned helpless class taught by Lee Greer from Portland Impact [to] create fraud with some of the [bible-thumping African American] gang members food stamp benefits. Lee Greer helps get them free food so that they can sell their welfare cards for cash is the main vehicle into getting ones’ drug money.”
The “secret meeting” Lisa loves to dwell on was the 13th September 2007 STARTS orientation class. Notices were posted all over the building. Before class, Lisa was busy in the computer room next door, pecking out another of her ill-spelt, ungrammatical rants. During class, Lisa peeked in the door (instead of skulking outside the door and eavesdropping, as she usually does). Lee Greer invited Lisa to participate, Lisa declined and scuttled off. So much for “secret meetings”.
She refuses me client services for 4 months, quits, and then tells the gang in the building that she is afraid of me. This creates more hostility form gang members.
Lisa herself admitted that Lee provided her with several men's suits, while numerous residents saw Lisa obtain bus tickets, toiletries, and other client services. Lee Greer's supervisors removed her from the building for “security reasons” having to do with Lisa's ongoing antics. Shortly thereafter, Lee Greer resigned. She did not give reasons to Lisa's fantasy “bible-thumping drug-dealing African American gang” members, or to anyone else. Any dark looks directed toward Lisa by Rose residents are due solely to Lisa's vocation of making a nuisance of herself.
Legal Abuse •Jamie Barton provides a document for tenant to get a contact order on me. The document is a lie that is easily proven by the location of the video cameras.
Jamie Barton typed a note attesting to Lisa's frequently-observed habit of eavesdropping on private conversations, per the request of a tenant for attachment to a petition for a temporary protective stalking order. Video cameras can hardly prove the statement a lie: no video cameras are located where Lisa conducts her clandestine surveillance; moreover, many Rose tenants can attest to Lisa's habit of eavesdropping on private conversations which are none of her business.
This allowed tenant Glenda Meyers to continue to harass Lee by calling the police 7 times in a one week period to get him/her arrested. Glenda Meyers tells the police, that Lee has a stench that makes her sick.
Petitioner Glenda Myers called police when Lisa violated the temporary stalking order granted by the court on several occasions. Other tenants can attest to Lisa's halitosis and frequent b.o.
•Metro watch security lies to the police which results in a charge of harassment from another tenant. Video will show his lies and his homophobic behavior.
Lisa's personal video of the security guard shows nothing that could be construed as “homophobic” outside Lisa's imagination. Lisa called the security guard a “dick” and other epithets, in front of a tenant whom Lisa threatened twice to “Join me or suffer!” and “Support me or suffer!” Lisa's tantrum was occasioned by the security guard's refusal to accede to Lisa's fascistic demand that he refer to her in the masculine gender. It was due to Lisa's threats and aberrant behaviour that the witnessing tenant feared for her safety and that of her partner.
•Lee came into the building as domestic violence survivor but received harassment within the first hours entering the building.
According to Lisa's first version, she was written up for allowing a guest to stay longer than the allotted time, and it occurred “within 36 hours” of her residency. So much for “harassment”. Lisa's violent and destructive behaviour since April 2007, as well as petitions for stalking orders and restraining orders against her, and on file with the court, show Lisa less a victim of domestic violence than a perpetrator.
• Reach created a hostile homoiphobic environment and blamed Lee for a residents overdose.
It's difficult to see how, or why, REACH would create a “hostile homoiphobic[sic] environment”, when a number of REACH personnel are themselves gay. In her previous versions, Lisa failed to mention that REACH blamed her for the incident, despite Lisa having provided the tenant with drugs, possibly because the lie hadn't yet occurred to her.
• Jamie Barton would not write up individuals who attacked Lee nor would follow up on any reports of my complaints.
Tenants have been written up for deprecatory comments about Lisa, including one tenant who called her "a prick boi twice”, another tenant who called Lisa a “dildo”, and yet another tenant who said that Lisa's “head is so far up her ass that she can chew her food twice.” If other individuals have not been written up in response to “reports of my complaints”, it's possibly because it's usually Lisa who is on the attack, rather than any tenant -- also because the majority of Lisa's complaints are as bogus as her alleged MA in Education.
• Security was hired at the Rose after 5 months of tenant’s harassment of Lee and when tenants and management failed to evict Lee, they said they were scared.
Security guards were hired at The Rose, for the first time in the building's long history, solely on the basis of Lisa Iacuzzi's violent, destructive, and abusive antics.
As of Thursday, 15th November, Lisa Iacuzzi is in jail, in 24-hour lockdown for her violent behaviour.
• Reach ignored all written complaints of fear of safety of Lee Iacuzzi who has written documentation from other residents who have witnessed their threats on Lee’s life.
That alleged “written documentation” is on a par with Lisa's complaint that a tenant (in Lisa's later version, two tenants) “peeped” into Lisa's second-floor window, in front of which is a large piece of furniture and a dead tree branch, and watched Lisa masturbate – without puking at the sight.
Emotional Abuse • When my companion animal was put down for bone cancer, Reach CDC gave Lee a cause of eviction notice two weeks later for bogus charges. The grieving loss process was interupted by cruelty!
While the death of one's pet is certainly cause for grief, it is not generally held to be sufficient cause for voiding evictions based on non-payment of rent, destruction of building property, racist hate speech, and vicious harassment of neighbours and other residents.
As ye sow, so shall ye reap. From the generally desperate tone of Lisa's latest whinge, it may be that she has begun to reap what she has sown, and the fruit is nowhere as sweet as she had deceived herself into believing. Karma, neh?
I do not apologize for anything! Lisa/Lee Iacuzzi Not a good Queer MA @ PSU
Herr Schicklgruber didn't apologize for anything, either.
Finis
===============================================
===============================================
COMMENTARY To Lisa Iacuzzi's “Gender Discrimination Charges Go South for Reach CDC”
On Saturday, 29th September 2007, Rose resident Lisa Iacuzzi posted the above-entitled rant on her “Not A Good Queer” blogsite. Following is a copy of that rant, with comments and corrections to her customary English usage errata interspersed.
====================
http://notagoodqueer.blogspot.com/2007/09/gender-discrimination-charges-go-south.html
Gender Discrimination Charges Go South for Reach CDC
[Photo of Jamie Barton, published without her permission, excised]
Photo caption:
Picture above states, stop Jamie Barton from harassment and gender discrimination at the Rose.
Reach community development is likely to be caught in what people may call an untruth. They told Chief Investigator of the Bureau of Labor and Industry(BOLI), Kerry Johnson a detail that can be found in the paper trail.
The players are Reach’s Rachel Huber and Jamie Barton. Reach has claimed the reason why my waiting list number changed was due to eight people being rejected through the housing appeals process within a two week period. This paper trail can be traced by Portland's Housing Authority(HAP) who would have appeals records. These eight appeals pending cases all happened within a two week period. Phone records would show, the YWCA making several calls to Jamie Barton and Rachel Huber on my behalf.
What the foregoing garble means is anyone's guess. For the record, Kerry Johnson is a Senior Civil Rights Investigator of the Civil Rights Division of the Bureau of Labor & Industries. Apparently, when faced with eviction for her repeated violations of her lease provisions, Lisa Iacuzzi lodged some sort of complaint with BOLI, based either on her fantasy that, contrary to physiological evidence, she is a) a male; or b) a transgendered female who is now a male; or that the presence of security cameras in the security building where she is now housed violates one or another of her self-described “civil rights”.
At one point, Jamie Barton's
sp – incorrect usage of possessive.
said that she no longer worked for Reach.
This, clearly, is another fantasy.
The trace and investigation is on by HAPS
[sic] There is no S on the acronym for the Housing Authority of Portland
director Jill Peterson. A question comes to mind regarding the penalties for lying to a BOLI investigator.
The question of prevarication does indeed come to mind relative to those produced by Lisa Iacuzzi.
Some background information:
Charges were flied against Reach CDC in July 2007 for gender discrimination.
Said charge was “flied” by Lisa Iacuzzi, possibly, as noted above, as referencing her desire to be known as a male/transgendered female, rather than the female she is. Said charge may have been “flied” in reaction to citations for the first of her many lease violations, which began the day she moved in, when by her own admission she entertained a male guest past visiting hours, thereby violating provisions 15.(b)1.3 and 15.(b)3.3.
Reach is a nonprofit with over 988 units.
988 units of what? Sausages? According to whom?
They oversea
sp – OVERSEE
a building called the Rose apartments who
[sic] WHICH
is managed by Rachel Huber and Jamie Barton.
REACH Community Development, Inc. CDC owns The Rose Apartments; it does not “oversea” it. Rachel Huber is Property Management Supervisor for REACH. Jamie Barton is Building Manager for The Rose (and a good one).
The people who live at the Rose are referred by Bradley Angle House and Genes’ Place.
sp – JEAN's Place. Rose tenants come from other places besides Bradley-Angle and JEAN'S Place.
Gene’s Place
sp - JEAN'S Place
is a homeless shelter for people who suffered domestic violence and people who are homeless.
Redundancy, as a homeless shelter is, usually, for homeless people. Jean's Place is neither a homeless nor a DV shelter; it is transitional housing for women, some of whom have matriculated through DV shelters such as Bradley-Angle House, which maintains offices at The Rose, or through other programs, such as Northwest Pilot Project.
Bradley Angle’s services reach out to strictly to people who have experienced domestic violence.
Ergo, Bradley-Angle, through which Lisa Iacuzzi claims to have matriculated, is the DV shelter which Jean's Place is not.
So in the building, there is a combination of people suffering from domestic violence and homeless with both groups fighting poverty. The building is supposed to be drug and alcohol free but most residents use hard drugs.
This last is a blatant falsehood. The majority of residents do not use, and many have never used, hard drugs. Obviously Lisa Iacuzzi, who by her own admission was drunk on vodka with her underage female companion “Nicole” within weeks of her arrival, is not among their number.
A fellow resident almost died in my room from a Clonzapen overdose
In the long, semi-literate rant entitled FRAUD AT THE ROSE, which she composed shortly after that event, Lisa Iacuzzi stated that said resident overdosed on Clonzpen after she had “just finished committing suicide over another woman.” How one commits suicide, then revives to almost die from an overdose, must remain a medical mystery.
She asked to stay in my room alone so she could hide from another women
sp - WOMAN
in the building who was making overt gestures to be her new girlfriend. So being a good queer, NAGQ
NAGQ – i.e., Not A Good Queer = Lisa Iacuzzi.
let her stay in my room alone while I was in the building cooking dinner. When NAGQ came back into my room, she was foaming from the mouth and unconscious. NAGQ made the mistake of getting the paramedic in the building who also was her stalker.
There has never been a “paramedic in the building” at The Rose, and the resident so described had not worked as paramedic for many years, at the time the other resident almost died from the Clonzapen following her suicide.
Her life was saved but the drama over the incident was not appreciated by Not a Good Queer. The stalker would not leave my room and demaded
sp - DEMANDED
to go into the ambulance of this barely conscious women. NAGQ said no to her ambulance drive request and told her to take the bus like NAGQ was going to do to the hospital. The stalker called me a prick boi twice during this interaction then went to management the next morning who signed a get well card. This stalker told Jamie Barton about her overdose and it's details. She was irrate
sp - IRATE (or, perhaps, IRRITATED)
at me for not allowing her to go into the ambulance
Why a former paramedic would believe Lisa Iacuzzi controlled the occupancy of “the ambulance of this barely conscious woman” is another unexplained mystery.
so she needed vegence
sp - VENGEANCE
which she recieved
sp - RECEIVED
with the help of Jamie Barton.
How, exactly, The Rose's building manager helped the “paramedic in the building” get “VEGENCE” is never clearly explained.
Eventhough the prick boi
sp – BOY
comment was reported, the stalker was never written up for verbal harassment.
In fact, said tenant was “written up” by management for name-calling.
Of course, the overdose was accidental like her first overdose. Of course this tenant has never been written up for a single episode even though the paramedics and fire department had to reinstate her life with a dose of NARCAN.
This must count for the second time said tenant had her life “reinstated” -- after she finished committing suicide.
But, this was not an overdose?
Is it material to the within issues?
She claims it was a seizure but NAGQ went to the hospital and was told by the tenants nurse that she had every barbiturate known to man in her system.
It is highly unlikely that a nurse would violate patient confidentiality by volunteering information of this nature to one who simply showed up at the hospital and inquired.
NAGQ reported her drug use to try to help save this womens
sp - WOMAN'S
life who is still currently using narcotics illegally.
There is no evidence for this beyond Lisa Iacuzzi's clearly dubious word.
No, NAGQ cannot make someone stop hurting themselves, but NAGQ does not have to watch or get blamed for the unwanted "show".
NAGQ, as evidenced by her antics, would far rather hurt others herself. As it is, Lisa Iacuzzi has an unlovely habit of engineering situations in which she can then star as the victim, or, as she puts it, an “escape goat”.
When NAGQ came back from the overdose hospital run trying to save and protect this “innocent” women’s life
sp - WOMAN'S. “Trying to save and protect” a life is a rather grandiose exaggeration for taking a bus to Good Sam and talking to a nurse.
only to find rumors around the building that NAGQ would be cited for drinking alcohol in the kitchen on a previous Monday.
Should Lisa Iacuzzi have NOT been cited for drinking vodka in the communal kitchen --or administering it to a minor? And this violation after having the said minor “Nicole” as an overnight guest several times, in addition to entertaining an older male guest past visiting hours, in violation of the terms of the lease agreement. Be that as it may, the one has nothing to do with the other, except in Lisa Iacuzzi's obviously confused and turgid imagination.
The alcohol was the overdosing tenant’s vodka that was used to make ice teas.
Apart from there being no evidence for this other than Lisa Iacuzzi's claim, it is not germane to the fact that Iacuzzi was drinking alcohol on the premises in violation of lease agreement provision 15.1.5, and administering alcohol to a minor in violation of Oregon law.
We were both in the kitchen making dinner with the overdosing tenant walking around the building noticeably in a drunkard state.
sp - DRUNKEN
Said resident's alleged state was not mentioned in the earlier Iacuzzi semi-literate rambling rant entitled FRAUD AT THE ROSE. Nor is it clarified whether said resident was ambulatory in this state before or after she “finished committing suicide.”
The bottle of vodka was finished on that Monday.
Whether the vodka was finished “that Monday”, or Tuesday, or Wednesday, or any other day of the week, is irrelevant to the fact that drinking on the premises is a violation of the provisions of the lease agreement, and administering alcohol to a minor is a violation of Oregon law.
Their
sp - THERE
was no noise in the kitchen but only NAGQ was written up for alcohol in the building.
Possibly because Lisa Iacuzzi and her underage companion “Nicole” were consuming alcohol in the kitchen - but quietly!
The bottle of alcohol was finished on Monday night
Irrelevant, as noted above. Under previous, less forgiving building managers, consuming alcohol on the premises would have resulted in immediate eviction. (And here one must register a heavy sigh for all good things past.) It may also have resulted in criminal charges for giving alcohol to a minor. (Another sigh.)
but the haters in the building had to blame it on the boi for this women's
sp - WOMAN'S
overdose. The most easy and convenient escape goat,
sp - SCAPEGOAT
who did not pack with any tenant gang, and who wrote a document to protest the write-up called Fraud at the Rose.
“Document” is a glorification of the rambling, semi-coherent, semi-literate four-page self-exculpatory garble which Iacuzzi hacked out, following the aforesaid drinking episode, then shoved under residents' doors at approximately 1.00 o’clock a.m., placed on toilet tanks.
Yes, there is a gang in the building here at the Rose. The gang is predominately African American women
How lovely to see Iacuzzi using “African-American”, rather than the usual prejudicial and derogatory epithet she has previously directed toward African American ladies living at The Rose.
who are also bible thumpers and who believe that they are the one’s entitled to make judgments about other peoples lives.
One would think that these women would be perfect in their standing in the building and how they carry themselves. They are the first ones that call foul and yet they have been attacking others in the building and calling them racist for simply being white and having a black boyfriend.
Lisa Iacuzzi is, apparently, the only resident who has observed that African American ladies at The Rose “have been attacking others” and “calling them racist” for “having a black boyfriend” -- or for any other reason.
Their ridiculous behavior is non-stop.
Ridiculous behavior is an Iacuzzi forte, albeit a gross understatement when describing her unremitting antics, which comprise the chief reason REACH now employs a security guard at The Rose – to the relief of most residents, particularly those whom Lisa Iacuzzi have made the targets of harassment.
NAGQ has been called all kinds of slang that include dildo, prick, butch, and boi are thrown around when the gets angry at NAGQ.
Who, exactly, are the “the” who “gets angry at NAQG”? Are they, perhaps, the African American ladies to whom Lisa Iacuzzi has directed offensive hate speech, or are the “who” the many residents who are tired of the non-stop Iacuzzi antics?
Or if NAGQ simply takes any space in the building like using the computer room or singing down the hallway.
Or singing and whistling and throwing little temper tantrums when people are trying to work in the computer room.
It is not only African American ladies at The Rose who have taken exception to Lisa Iacuzzi's failure to abide by the rules, such as not signing in when using the computer room, taking up more than her allotted hour, chatting on her cell phone, singing and talking to herself, visiting porno sites, infecting the computers with a virus through improper usage thereof, and directing hostile and obscene language at other tenants.
A few of the other tenants get called racist who just stand up for themselves
Have they been so called? This is news.
but most of the building live in fear of these people who believe that they are allowed to “run the show”.
In fact, most residents of are currently living in a state of agitation over Lisa Iacuzzi's antics, such as rampaging up and down the hallways screaming imprecations at other residents, using racist hate language, inflicting her semi-coherent pseudo-political views on others, prowling the corridors at all hours of the night, eavesdropping at doors, and entering tenants' rooms without their permission while the tenants are temporarily absent.
This complied with a Jamie Barton confidant who has her direct phone line to Jamies' home and calls Jamie when she deems inappropriate behavior is going on. This women has schizophrenia and NAGQ sees her early in the morning’s maybe to refill her methadone dose? Who knows what happened to her teeth.
The tenant in question, who clearly recognized herself in the unflattering description above, is neither schizophrenic, nor on methodone, nor does she have Jamie Barton's home number.
This gang is ruthless and gets benefits of free cable television that the management at the Rose allows.
No imaginary “bible thumping African American gang” at The Rose “gets benefits of free cable television.” No one else at The Rose “gets benefits of free cable television” either. If this were not another fantasy, it would be an insufficient excuse for Lisa Iacuzzi's breaking into the restricted area of the basement and attempting to disconnect the cable TV box of one (African American) resident.
So for many of these residents, do not have to leave the building because their whole life is a learned helpless class taught by Lee Greer from Portland Impact.
If Lee Greer has taught any “learned helpless class”, it's another well-kept secret known only to Lisa Iacuzzi.
Who provides them with basic needs, birthday parties and gifts, large garden,
Missed the July birthday/bbq at which she would have received a birthday gift, did she?
first takes on donated food, etc. Within all this abundant food that Lee is bringing in, creates fraud with some of the gang members food stamp benefits. Lee Greer helps get them free food so that they can sell their welfare cards for cash is the main vehicle into getting ones’ drug money. This is how they get their drug money.
This racist canard says nothing about “bible thumping African American gang” members who don't get “drug money” via Lee Greer, or anyone else, or don't possess “welfare cards”, or, for that matter, don't do drugs.
Some of the gang members get their drugs brought into the drug-free building versus buying it on the outside of the building and keeping the hard drug element from people who are trying to maintain ones’ sobriety.
sp - ONE'S
Another predictable racist slur on African Americans from one, who, considering her previous alcoholic antics, as well as the smell of pot emanating from her room, as noted by her near neighbours, is clearly NOT among those residents trying“to maintain ones' [sic] sobriety.”
Yes, there are a minority of residents who are trying to heal and fight for their lives back. They are working 12 step programs and are actively looking for work. These people are trying to better themselves and have goals that do not include public housing in their future.
This minority does not appear to include the one who seems to be actively looking for new ways to menace and harass Rose residents.
It’s a combination of people that are not healing in a building that is advertised as a domestic violence shelter according to Reach’s own description of the Rose.
REACH neither describes The Rose, nor operates it, as a domestic violence shelter.
Portland impact Leer Greer
Leer Greer?
handles client services but her job description, according to Lee Greer does not dealing with behavior. How Special! (Chuckle)
How incomprehensible and semi-literate – and typical of the source! (Chuckle)
Lee Greer was caught having a “special food and beverage drinks" only to a particular group of residents. All of these women happen to “hate” NAGQ but this program was not advertised like all the programs are advertised in the building.
More incomprehensible twaddle from the resident exemplar of incomprehensible twaddle.
How special that Lee Greer does not deal with behavior but will coach people on how to document behavior. NAGQ is sure that she will justify this position.
Dealing with abnormal behavior such as that demonstrated by Lisa Iacuzzi is not part of a Portland Impact Community Coordinator's job.
How about, stay out of the investigation. How about ending your secret meetings behind close doors with residents who are involved in the discrimination case.
How cheering to note that “Leer” has clearly touched a nerve.
How about letting me in the clothes closet to get some clothes like the other residents!
How about asking? Even though unjustly smeared by the usual Iacuzzi prevarications, Lee Greer has a big enough heart to oblige. Better yet, how about behaving like a forty-four-year-old semi-sentient entity, instead of a four-year-old in a state of perpetual tantrum?
A beautiful feminist momentThe reason the building is not a healing environment is that the management uses people in the building to do help them due their positions.
“To DO help them DUE their positions” is untranslatable.
This includes bringing up groceries and errands around the building.
This may refer to residents voluntarily helping either the Gleaners' bring in their donated produce, or “Leer” Greer with the free bread the latter brings from Franz.
This includes dividing people so management can weed out people that they do not like.
Clearly, Lisa Iacuzzi slipped through the cracks in this weeding-out process. Alas.
They hate NAGQ because before my arrival NAGQ asked for their mission statement and complained about Jamie Barton’s inappropriate behavior of constantly telling NAGQ : my wait list number was lucky 13.
Now, finally, at long last, a clue may surface as to the reason for Lisa Iacuzzi's latest semi-literate whinge. Maybe.
During my arrival, NAGQ received the mission statement, which did not include gender.
REACH owns other buildings in the Portland area, which provide affordable housing for males as well as females. The REACH mission statement reads: “Our Mission is to develop and maintain a permanent resource of affordable housing, promote healthy neighborhoods, and provide opportunities for low-income people through partnerships and community involvement.” The Rose is for women-only – as all residents know before they move in.
Jamie Barton’s response to the gender policy when questioned, was, “men are not accepted in the building”.
Don't like it? Move.
It was a beautiful feminist moment... Which resulted in a wooden bed susceptible to bed bugs and a carpet full of 20 or more cigarette burns?
Beggars can't be choosers. Clean your room instead of harassing residents.
After my two hour introduction to the Building where they told me that their gender policy meant that their was
sp – THERE WERE
no men in the building. Then NAGQ gets written up in my first 36 hours in the building when my friend dropped off an air mattress and left at 10:30. Folks, it was an air mattress in a box. No harm was done and no noise was made.
Folks, it was a violation of lease provision 15.(b)1.3.
Countless times others in the building have been inappropriate and NAGQ has received an eviction almost every month.
None seem to have been effective, yet – alas.
One eviction included nonpayment of rent in which NAGQ paid the rent three days before they even filed the eviction.
So, add nonpayment of rent to the list of Lisa Iacuzzi's other lease violations, including, but not limited to: consuming alcohol and illegal drugs on the premises; allowing an underage female guest and an older male guest to stay overnight; deliberately, wilfully, and maliciously disturbing other tenants with excessive noise; repeated harassment of other tenants; using racist hate speech; destroying residents' personal property and disconnecting a resident's cable; and entering a resident's apartment without permission.
Of course they had to dismiss it
It was dismissed, as many are, due to procedural error.
but if I did not show up then NAGQ would have been evicted.
Halevai.
It goes on and on with all kinds of follies that Jamie Barton keeps performing over and over again.
Such as NOT evicting NAGQ?
NAGQ has had written on my door that NAGQ is not literate. This is somewhat true,
Based upon the “Gender Discrimination Charges” and the so-called “document” FRAUD AT THE ROSE, it is quite true.
but you can kill the messenger but you cannot kill my message.
This would indeed prove difficult, since what that “message” might be is almost as mysterious as how one can overdose after one has “finished committing suicide.”
Jamie Barton reminds me of the keystone cops: people who end up creatinga mess that should never have happened.
Lisa Iacuzzi is apparently as ignorant of Keystone Kops classics as she is in a number of other areas.
Her position requires boundaries and professionalism where Jamie Barton has already been cited for an inappropriate relationship with a lesbian in the building.
This is a blatant lie, pure and gratuitous insult, not even meant to deceive.
Kerry Johnson (BOLI)is being told half-truths regarding many of the claims of NAGQ from Reach.
Most of “NAGQ”'s claims are, in fact, half truths, excepting those which are bogus.
On November 27, NAGQ, taking two witnesses. went to see Jamie Barton about my waiting list number. Jamie slammed the door in my shoe
What, no civil rights claim was lodged over such a dastardly deed?
as NAGQ tried to keep it open to finish the conversation. She said that NAGQ was number 13; yeah we all know what number 13 means.
Actually, most don't.
NAGQ went to the YMCA to get documentation.
Why the Y_M_CA? Is the Y_W_CA another part of the Worldwide Conspiracy Against Lisa Iacuzzi®?
The evening shift person who also works with Bradley Angle House relief called Rachel Huber and she said that NAGQ was number 5 on the list.
How did the “evening shift person” reach Rachel Huber, presumably in the evening?
This number is significantly higher that
sp – THAN
the number 13 that NAGQ was quoted on the same day. Here comes the lie,
At last!
Rachel Huber tells Kerry Johnson that eight people were on an appeals list and in a two week period of time, all people were reviewed and seen as unqualified by the Housing Authority. Are you kidding me! NAGQ bought the Brooklyn Bridge too.
This may be probable, but Lisa Iacuzzi is more likely to be caught trying to sell it.
The Housing Authority does this screening which is done by the state and requires a criminal background check.
The Housing Authority of Portland performs the screening, the State of Oregon does not.
The housing authority would not have eight names that they checked out and failed during this short time period.
It is entirely likely that in the two-week period stated above the Housing Authority would indeed have performed checks on and found those eight lacking the requirements for free housing such as Lisa Iacuzzi now enjoys. In fact, it would be altogether surprising if the Housing Authority had performed only eight checks in that two-week period.
NAGQ believes that Reach has been caught in another lie.
As many have been made aware, NAGQ appears to believe a lot of things, and would dearly love for others to believe them, too.
Do you want to know something better?
Bigfoot was sighted at The Rose?
NAGQ went over Sherry Sacheo, the Rose’s too friendly contact for resident services for HAP. NAGQ went to the top shelf of HAP and found two ethical people who are not afraid to find the truth.
What is – or, rather, who are – the “top shelf of HAP”?
What is the penalty for lying to a BOLI investigator? NAGQ hopes the punishment is a felony………
Governmental bodies such as the Bureau of Labor & Industries are all too aware of the numerous claims on file originating from certifiable loons. As we see here.
I will not apologize for anything!
Neither did Herr Schicklegruber.
Lisa/Lee IacuzziNot A Good QueerMA @ PSU
Lisa Iacuzzi's claim that she managed, somehow, to earn an MA – in anything – would be more believable to college-educated residents and those who actually hold university degrees, if her friend Paul Hamilton had made his usual corrections and revisions to her semi-literate twaddle before she posted it to her blog. As it is, she leaves the reader's imagination rather strained in speculating how she ever managed to fulfill the degree's requirement of demonstrable proficiency in a foreign language, let alone English.
Posted by Not a Good Queer
An apter sig would have been “Not Really a Nice Human Being”. Add to it:
“Nobody loves me, everybody hates me
Guess I'll eat some wer-er-erms.
Big fat juicy ones, small little cute ones,
Boy, do they taste good!”
Finis
On Tuesday, 6th November 2007, the incomparable Lisa Iacuzzi posted another rant on her “Not A Good Queer” blog, entitled “Damages from Reach CDC”. Following is a copy of that whinge, interspersed with comments, corrections, and facts in opposition to Lisa's usual fabrications and prevarications.
Tuesday, November 6
Damages from Reach CDC
Lisa/Lee Iacuzzi 631 South East Taylor Portland, Oregon 97214 (503)756-9734 November 6, 2007
This is, perhaps, the one valid statement in the entire whinge.
To Whom It May Concern, Damages •Developed heart condition, currently on a beta blocker for tachycardia and high blood pressure! •Checked into hospital in November for suicide when Jamie Barton told Lee, why did you bother to sign up for housing at the Rose, when you are a man?
When, exactly, was this November hospital “check in” for “suicide”? Not on 1st November – police kept Lisa busy in the morning interviewing her over her latest violation of the stalking order against her; in the afternoon, Lisa was at the courthouse, writing and filing stalking order petitions against Glenda Myers and Terry Sharp. Not on 2nd November--Lisa was busy preparing for, then appearing at, the hearing on the original stalking order against her, then organizing a rally at The Rose in her support. (Lisa cancelled the rally because, she claimed, she had a nasty respiratory infection. Actually, nobody showed up.) Not that weekend or Monday--Lisa acquired a dog; harassed tenants, particularly those in #203 and #204, and played on the computer. The hospital stay certainly didn't occur the date of this whinge--Lisa was in and out of the computer room and the office all day. Moreover, hospitals tend to keep suicidal patients longer than part of a day for a “check in”.
So, when, exactly, was Lisa's November hospital visit for “suicide”? Who knows? It's also difficult to see how a remark from Jamie Barton could have occasioned Lisa's suicidal “check in”, as Jamie resigned before the end of October -- as Lisa well knows, since she crowed about it on her blog.
Defamation of character •I have worked in the nonprofit industry for many years
“Non-profit industry” here must be a synonym for “unemployed” (saving and excepting Lisa's brief employment as a teacher's aide, from which she was fired in 2004 for “inappropriate behaviour” toward students).
Moreover, it's difficult to see how one could possibly defame Lisa's character; she does it so well herself.
and will be black balled by: Reach CDC, Portland Impact, Bradley Angle House, Transition Projects •All these agencies were told by management that they were frightened by me
These agencies have their own records as to Lisa's violent and threatening behaviour, and need no imaginary information from Rose “management.”
even though I have never threatened anyone here at the Rose.
Evidently Lisa believes that her statements to Rose tenants -- “Join me or suffer!” and “Support me or suffer!” and “If you go to court, you'll be sorry!” and “I'll cut off your legs if you go to court!” -- fall under the category of gentle discourse.
The management falsely accused me and when I asked for video tapes that the used to make write-ups, they said that they loosed tapes.
What false accusations? What “loosed tapes”? On whom did “management” loose them?
•Harassment of 17 year old mentorship student.
So, Lisa's little friend Nicole is now her “mentorship student”. Pity any “student” of a teacher's aide fired for inappropriate conduct. Heretofore, Nicole was Lisa's “friend”, “guest”, “my 17-year-old kid”. In fact, Nicole was the 17-year old who spent several nights with Lisa, and whom residents observed drinking vodka with Lisa in the 2nd floor west kitchen, and later smoking marijuana with Lisa. (The inappropriate conduct which occasioned Lisa's firing in 2004 may be hinted at by Lisa's her providing booze and pot to her minor “student” in exchange for sex, as well as Lisa's vists to teen porn sites.)
Lee brings clients to the Rose to show public housing, Jamie Barton humiliates Lee in front of client.
If the reference is to Lee Greer, she never brought clients to The Rose to show them public housing. If the reference is to the inestimable Ms. Leesa Iacuzzi, she has no clients.
•Jamie Barton is under criminal investigation from Hap. She did not follow administrative rules for my housing and deliberately tried to keep me out of the building.
This “criminal investigation” is more of Lisa's wishful thinking. There is no “criminal investigation.”
•Lee Greer, Portland Impact, had a secret meeting with residents where she taught them how to do write-ups after she wrote me a document that she does not deal with behavior.
This is Lisa's third or fourth redaction of her “secret meeting” tale. In previous versions, Lisa alluded to:
1) “secret meetings behind close doors with residents who are involved in the discrimination case”;
2) “a meeting ... not posted on any calendar which was used to teach tenants how to document incidences which resulted in Kim Matick from TPI being fired and a 14 page document that is being circulated around the building to get NAGQ evicted”;
3) “a learned helpless class taught by Lee Greer from Portland Impact [to] create fraud with some of the [bible-thumping African American] gang members food stamp benefits. Lee Greer helps get them free food so that they can sell their welfare cards for cash is the main vehicle into getting ones’ drug money.”
The “secret meeting” Lisa loves to dwell on was the 13th September 2007 STARTS orientation class. Notices were posted all over the building. Before class, Lisa was busy in the computer room next door, pecking out another of her ill-spelt, ungrammatical rants. During class, Lisa peeked in the door (instead of skulking outside the door and eavesdropping, as she usually does). Lee Greer invited Lisa to participate, Lisa declined and scuttled off. So much for “secret meetings”.
She refuses me client services for 4 months, quits, and then tells the gang in the building that she is afraid of me. This creates more hostility form gang members.
Lisa herself admitted that Lee provided her with several men's suits, while numerous residents saw Lisa obtain bus tickets, toiletries, and other client services. Lee Greer's supervisors removed her from the building for “security reasons” having to do with Lisa's ongoing antics. Shortly thereafter, Lee Greer resigned. She did not give reasons to Lisa's fantasy “bible-thumping drug-dealing African American gang” members, or to anyone else. Any dark looks directed toward Lisa by Rose residents are due solely to Lisa's vocation of making a nuisance of herself.
Legal Abuse •Jamie Barton provides a document for tenant to get a contact order on me. The document is a lie that is easily proven by the location of the video cameras.
Jamie Barton typed a note attesting to Lisa's frequently-observed habit of eavesdropping on private conversations, per the request of a tenant for attachment to a petition for a temporary protective stalking order. Video cameras can hardly prove the statement a lie: no video cameras are located where Lisa conducts her clandestine surveillance; moreover, many Rose tenants can attest to Lisa's habit of eavesdropping on private conversations which are none of her business.
This allowed tenant Glenda Meyers to continue to harass Lee by calling the police 7 times in a one week period to get him/her arrested. Glenda Meyers tells the police, that Lee has a stench that makes her sick.
Petitioner Glenda Myers called police when Lisa violated the temporary stalking order granted by the court on several occasions. Other tenants can attest to Lisa's halitosis and frequent b.o.
•Metro watch security lies to the police which results in a charge of harassment from another tenant. Video will show his lies and his homophobic behavior.
Lisa's personal video of the security guard shows nothing that could be construed as “homophobic” outside Lisa's imagination. Lisa called the security guard a “dick” and other epithets, in front of a tenant whom Lisa threatened twice to “Join me or suffer!” and “Support me or suffer!” Lisa's tantrum was occasioned by the security guard's refusal to accede to Lisa's fascistic demand that he refer to her in the masculine gender. It was due to Lisa's threats and aberrant behaviour that the witnessing tenant feared for her safety and that of her partner.
•Lee came into the building as domestic violence survivor but received harassment within the first hours entering the building.
According to Lisa's first version, she was written up for allowing a guest to stay longer than the allotted time, and it occurred “within 36 hours” of her residency. So much for “harassment”. Lisa's violent and destructive behaviour since April 2007, as well as petitions for stalking orders and restraining orders against her, and on file with the court, show Lisa less a victim of domestic violence than a perpetrator.
• Reach created a hostile homoiphobic environment and blamed Lee for a residents overdose.
It's difficult to see how, or why, REACH would create a “hostile homoiphobic[sic] environment”, when a number of REACH personnel are themselves gay. In her previous versions, Lisa failed to mention that REACH blamed her for the incident, despite Lisa having provided the tenant with drugs, possibly because the lie hadn't yet occurred to her.
• Jamie Barton would not write up individuals who attacked Lee nor would follow up on any reports of my complaints.
Tenants have been written up for deprecatory comments about Lisa, including one tenant who called her "a prick boi twice”, another tenant who called Lisa a “dildo”, and yet another tenant who said that Lisa's “head is so far up her ass that she can chew her food twice.” If other individuals have not been written up in response to “reports of my complaints”, it's possibly because it's usually Lisa who is on the attack, rather than any tenant -- also because the majority of Lisa's complaints are as bogus as her alleged MA in Education.
• Security was hired at the Rose after 5 months of tenant’s harassment of Lee and when tenants and management failed to evict Lee, they said they were scared.
Security guards were hired at The Rose, for the first time in the building's long history, solely on the basis of Lisa Iacuzzi's violent, destructive, and abusive antics.
As of Thursday, 15th November, Lisa Iacuzzi is in jail, in 24-hour lockdown for her violent behaviour.
• Reach ignored all written complaints of fear of safety of Lee Iacuzzi who has written documentation from other residents who have witnessed their threats on Lee’s life.
That alleged “written documentation” is on a par with Lisa's complaint that a tenant (in Lisa's later version, two tenants) “peeped” into Lisa's second-floor window, in front of which is a large piece of furniture and a dead tree branch, and watched Lisa masturbate – without puking at the sight.
Emotional Abuse • When my companion animal was put down for bone cancer, Reach CDC gave Lee a cause of eviction notice two weeks later for bogus charges. The grieving loss process was interupted by cruelty!
While the death of one's pet is certainly cause for grief, it is not generally held to be sufficient cause for voiding evictions based on non-payment of rent, destruction of building property, racist hate speech, and vicious harassment of neighbours and other residents.
As ye sow, so shall ye reap. From the generally desperate tone of Lisa's latest whinge, it may be that she has begun to reap what she has sown, and the fruit is nowhere as sweet as she had deceived herself into believing. Karma, neh?
I do not apologize for anything! Lisa/Lee Iacuzzi Not a good Queer MA @ PSU
Herr Schicklgruber didn't apologize for anything, either.
Finis
===============================================
===============================================
COMMENTARY To Lisa Iacuzzi's “Gender Discrimination Charges Go South for Reach CDC”
On Saturday, 29th September 2007, Rose resident Lisa Iacuzzi posted the above-entitled rant on her “Not A Good Queer” blogsite. Following is a copy of that rant, with comments and corrections to her customary English usage errata interspersed.
====================
http://notagoodqueer.blogspot.com/2007/09/gender-discrimination-charges-go-south.html
Gender Discrimination Charges Go South for Reach CDC
[Photo of Jamie Barton, published without her permission, excised]
Photo caption:
Picture above states, stop Jamie Barton from harassment and gender discrimination at the Rose.
Reach community development is likely to be caught in what people may call an untruth. They told Chief Investigator of the Bureau of Labor and Industry(BOLI), Kerry Johnson a detail that can be found in the paper trail.
The players are Reach’s Rachel Huber and Jamie Barton. Reach has claimed the reason why my waiting list number changed was due to eight people being rejected through the housing appeals process within a two week period. This paper trail can be traced by Portland's Housing Authority(HAP) who would have appeals records. These eight appeals pending cases all happened within a two week period. Phone records would show, the YWCA making several calls to Jamie Barton and Rachel Huber on my behalf.
What the foregoing garble means is anyone's guess. For the record, Kerry Johnson is a Senior Civil Rights Investigator of the Civil Rights Division of the Bureau of Labor & Industries. Apparently, when faced with eviction for her repeated violations of her lease provisions, Lisa Iacuzzi lodged some sort of complaint with BOLI, based either on her fantasy that, contrary to physiological evidence, she is a) a male; or b) a transgendered female who is now a male; or that the presence of security cameras in the security building where she is now housed violates one or another of her self-described “civil rights”.
At one point, Jamie Barton's
sp – incorrect usage of possessive.
said that she no longer worked for Reach.
This, clearly, is another fantasy.
The trace and investigation is on by HAPS
[sic] There is no S on the acronym for the Housing Authority of Portland
director Jill Peterson. A question comes to mind regarding the penalties for lying to a BOLI investigator.
The question of prevarication does indeed come to mind relative to those produced by Lisa Iacuzzi.
Some background information:
Charges were flied against Reach CDC in July 2007 for gender discrimination.
Said charge was “flied” by Lisa Iacuzzi, possibly, as noted above, as referencing her desire to be known as a male/transgendered female, rather than the female she is. Said charge may have been “flied” in reaction to citations for the first of her many lease violations, which began the day she moved in, when by her own admission she entertained a male guest past visiting hours, thereby violating provisions 15.(b)1.3 and 15.(b)3.3.
Reach is a nonprofit with over 988 units.
988 units of what? Sausages? According to whom?
They oversea
sp – OVERSEE
a building called the Rose apartments who
[sic] WHICH
is managed by Rachel Huber and Jamie Barton.
REACH Community Development, Inc. CDC owns The Rose Apartments; it does not “oversea” it. Rachel Huber is Property Management Supervisor for REACH. Jamie Barton is Building Manager for The Rose (and a good one).
The people who live at the Rose are referred by Bradley Angle House and Genes’ Place.
sp – JEAN's Place. Rose tenants come from other places besides Bradley-Angle and JEAN'S Place.
Gene’s Place
sp - JEAN'S Place
is a homeless shelter for people who suffered domestic violence and people who are homeless.
Redundancy, as a homeless shelter is, usually, for homeless people. Jean's Place is neither a homeless nor a DV shelter; it is transitional housing for women, some of whom have matriculated through DV shelters such as Bradley-Angle House, which maintains offices at The Rose, or through other programs, such as Northwest Pilot Project.
Bradley Angle’s services reach out to strictly to people who have experienced domestic violence.
Ergo, Bradley-Angle, through which Lisa Iacuzzi claims to have matriculated, is the DV shelter which Jean's Place is not.
So in the building, there is a combination of people suffering from domestic violence and homeless with both groups fighting poverty. The building is supposed to be drug and alcohol free but most residents use hard drugs.
This last is a blatant falsehood. The majority of residents do not use, and many have never used, hard drugs. Obviously Lisa Iacuzzi, who by her own admission was drunk on vodka with her underage female companion “Nicole” within weeks of her arrival, is not among their number.
A fellow resident almost died in my room from a Clonzapen overdose
In the long, semi-literate rant entitled FRAUD AT THE ROSE, which she composed shortly after that event, Lisa Iacuzzi stated that said resident overdosed on Clonzpen after she had “just finished committing suicide over another woman.” How one commits suicide, then revives to almost die from an overdose, must remain a medical mystery.
She asked to stay in my room alone so she could hide from another women
sp - WOMAN
in the building who was making overt gestures to be her new girlfriend. So being a good queer, NAGQ
NAGQ – i.e., Not A Good Queer = Lisa Iacuzzi.
let her stay in my room alone while I was in the building cooking dinner. When NAGQ came back into my room, she was foaming from the mouth and unconscious. NAGQ made the mistake of getting the paramedic in the building who also was her stalker.
There has never been a “paramedic in the building” at The Rose, and the resident so described had not worked as paramedic for many years, at the time the other resident almost died from the Clonzapen following her suicide.
Her life was saved but the drama over the incident was not appreciated by Not a Good Queer. The stalker would not leave my room and demaded
sp - DEMANDED
to go into the ambulance of this barely conscious women. NAGQ said no to her ambulance drive request and told her to take the bus like NAGQ was going to do to the hospital. The stalker called me a prick boi twice during this interaction then went to management the next morning who signed a get well card. This stalker told Jamie Barton about her overdose and it's details. She was irrate
sp - IRATE (or, perhaps, IRRITATED)
at me for not allowing her to go into the ambulance
Why a former paramedic would believe Lisa Iacuzzi controlled the occupancy of “the ambulance of this barely conscious woman” is another unexplained mystery.
so she needed vegence
sp - VENGEANCE
which she recieved
sp - RECEIVED
with the help of Jamie Barton.
How, exactly, The Rose's building manager helped the “paramedic in the building” get “VEGENCE” is never clearly explained.
Eventhough the prick boi
sp – BOY
comment was reported, the stalker was never written up for verbal harassment.
In fact, said tenant was “written up” by management for name-calling.
Of course, the overdose was accidental like her first overdose. Of course this tenant has never been written up for a single episode even though the paramedics and fire department had to reinstate her life with a dose of NARCAN.
This must count for the second time said tenant had her life “reinstated” -- after she finished committing suicide.
But, this was not an overdose?
Is it material to the within issues?
She claims it was a seizure but NAGQ went to the hospital and was told by the tenants nurse that she had every barbiturate known to man in her system.
It is highly unlikely that a nurse would violate patient confidentiality by volunteering information of this nature to one who simply showed up at the hospital and inquired.
NAGQ reported her drug use to try to help save this womens
sp - WOMAN'S
life who is still currently using narcotics illegally.
There is no evidence for this beyond Lisa Iacuzzi's clearly dubious word.
No, NAGQ cannot make someone stop hurting themselves, but NAGQ does not have to watch or get blamed for the unwanted "show".
NAGQ, as evidenced by her antics, would far rather hurt others herself. As it is, Lisa Iacuzzi has an unlovely habit of engineering situations in which she can then star as the victim, or, as she puts it, an “escape goat”.
When NAGQ came back from the overdose hospital run trying to save and protect this “innocent” women’s life
sp - WOMAN'S. “Trying to save and protect” a life is a rather grandiose exaggeration for taking a bus to Good Sam and talking to a nurse.
only to find rumors around the building that NAGQ would be cited for drinking alcohol in the kitchen on a previous Monday.
Should Lisa Iacuzzi have NOT been cited for drinking vodka in the communal kitchen --or administering it to a minor? And this violation after having the said minor “Nicole” as an overnight guest several times, in addition to entertaining an older male guest past visiting hours, in violation of the terms of the lease agreement. Be that as it may, the one has nothing to do with the other, except in Lisa Iacuzzi's obviously confused and turgid imagination.
The alcohol was the overdosing tenant’s vodka that was used to make ice teas.
Apart from there being no evidence for this other than Lisa Iacuzzi's claim, it is not germane to the fact that Iacuzzi was drinking alcohol on the premises in violation of lease agreement provision 15.1.5, and administering alcohol to a minor in violation of Oregon law.
We were both in the kitchen making dinner with the overdosing tenant walking around the building noticeably in a drunkard state.
sp - DRUNKEN
Said resident's alleged state was not mentioned in the earlier Iacuzzi semi-literate rambling rant entitled FRAUD AT THE ROSE. Nor is it clarified whether said resident was ambulatory in this state before or after she “finished committing suicide.”
The bottle of vodka was finished on that Monday.
Whether the vodka was finished “that Monday”, or Tuesday, or Wednesday, or any other day of the week, is irrelevant to the fact that drinking on the premises is a violation of the provisions of the lease agreement, and administering alcohol to a minor is a violation of Oregon law.
Their
sp - THERE
was no noise in the kitchen but only NAGQ was written up for alcohol in the building.
Possibly because Lisa Iacuzzi and her underage companion “Nicole” were consuming alcohol in the kitchen - but quietly!
The bottle of alcohol was finished on Monday night
Irrelevant, as noted above. Under previous, less forgiving building managers, consuming alcohol on the premises would have resulted in immediate eviction. (And here one must register a heavy sigh for all good things past.) It may also have resulted in criminal charges for giving alcohol to a minor. (Another sigh.)
but the haters in the building had to blame it on the boi for this women's
sp - WOMAN'S
overdose. The most easy and convenient escape goat,
sp - SCAPEGOAT
who did not pack with any tenant gang, and who wrote a document to protest the write-up called Fraud at the Rose.
“Document” is a glorification of the rambling, semi-coherent, semi-literate four-page self-exculpatory garble which Iacuzzi hacked out, following the aforesaid drinking episode, then shoved under residents' doors at approximately 1.00 o’clock a.m., placed on toilet tanks.
Yes, there is a gang in the building here at the Rose. The gang is predominately African American women
How lovely to see Iacuzzi using “African-American”, rather than the usual prejudicial and derogatory epithet she has previously directed toward African American ladies living at The Rose.
who are also bible thumpers and who believe that they are the one’s entitled to make judgments about other peoples lives.
One would think that these women would be perfect in their standing in the building and how they carry themselves. They are the first ones that call foul and yet they have been attacking others in the building and calling them racist for simply being white and having a black boyfriend.
Lisa Iacuzzi is, apparently, the only resident who has observed that African American ladies at The Rose “have been attacking others” and “calling them racist” for “having a black boyfriend” -- or for any other reason.
Their ridiculous behavior is non-stop.
Ridiculous behavior is an Iacuzzi forte, albeit a gross understatement when describing her unremitting antics, which comprise the chief reason REACH now employs a security guard at The Rose – to the relief of most residents, particularly those whom Lisa Iacuzzi have made the targets of harassment.
NAGQ has been called all kinds of slang that include dildo, prick, butch, and boi are thrown around when the gets angry at NAGQ.
Who, exactly, are the “the” who “gets angry at NAQG”? Are they, perhaps, the African American ladies to whom Lisa Iacuzzi has directed offensive hate speech, or are the “who” the many residents who are tired of the non-stop Iacuzzi antics?
Or if NAGQ simply takes any space in the building like using the computer room or singing down the hallway.
Or singing and whistling and throwing little temper tantrums when people are trying to work in the computer room.
It is not only African American ladies at The Rose who have taken exception to Lisa Iacuzzi's failure to abide by the rules, such as not signing in when using the computer room, taking up more than her allotted hour, chatting on her cell phone, singing and talking to herself, visiting porno sites, infecting the computers with a virus through improper usage thereof, and directing hostile and obscene language at other tenants.
A few of the other tenants get called racist who just stand up for themselves
Have they been so called? This is news.
but most of the building live in fear of these people who believe that they are allowed to “run the show”.
In fact, most residents of are currently living in a state of agitation over Lisa Iacuzzi's antics, such as rampaging up and down the hallways screaming imprecations at other residents, using racist hate language, inflicting her semi-coherent pseudo-political views on others, prowling the corridors at all hours of the night, eavesdropping at doors, and entering tenants' rooms without their permission while the tenants are temporarily absent.
This complied with a Jamie Barton confidant who has her direct phone line to Jamies' home and calls Jamie when she deems inappropriate behavior is going on. This women has schizophrenia and NAGQ sees her early in the morning’s maybe to refill her methadone dose? Who knows what happened to her teeth.
The tenant in question, who clearly recognized herself in the unflattering description above, is neither schizophrenic, nor on methodone, nor does she have Jamie Barton's home number.
This gang is ruthless and gets benefits of free cable television that the management at the Rose allows.
No imaginary “bible thumping African American gang” at The Rose “gets benefits of free cable television.” No one else at The Rose “gets benefits of free cable television” either. If this were not another fantasy, it would be an insufficient excuse for Lisa Iacuzzi's breaking into the restricted area of the basement and attempting to disconnect the cable TV box of one (African American) resident.
So for many of these residents, do not have to leave the building because their whole life is a learned helpless class taught by Lee Greer from Portland Impact.
If Lee Greer has taught any “learned helpless class”, it's another well-kept secret known only to Lisa Iacuzzi.
Who provides them with basic needs, birthday parties and gifts, large garden,
Missed the July birthday/bbq at which she would have received a birthday gift, did she?
first takes on donated food, etc. Within all this abundant food that Lee is bringing in, creates fraud with some of the gang members food stamp benefits. Lee Greer helps get them free food so that they can sell their welfare cards for cash is the main vehicle into getting ones’ drug money. This is how they get their drug money.
This racist canard says nothing about “bible thumping African American gang” members who don't get “drug money” via Lee Greer, or anyone else, or don't possess “welfare cards”, or, for that matter, don't do drugs.
Some of the gang members get their drugs brought into the drug-free building versus buying it on the outside of the building and keeping the hard drug element from people who are trying to maintain ones’ sobriety.
sp - ONE'S
Another predictable racist slur on African Americans from one, who, considering her previous alcoholic antics, as well as the smell of pot emanating from her room, as noted by her near neighbours, is clearly NOT among those residents trying“to maintain ones' [sic] sobriety.”
Yes, there are a minority of residents who are trying to heal and fight for their lives back. They are working 12 step programs and are actively looking for work. These people are trying to better themselves and have goals that do not include public housing in their future.
This minority does not appear to include the one who seems to be actively looking for new ways to menace and harass Rose residents.
It’s a combination of people that are not healing in a building that is advertised as a domestic violence shelter according to Reach’s own description of the Rose.
REACH neither describes The Rose, nor operates it, as a domestic violence shelter.
Portland impact Leer Greer
Leer Greer?
handles client services but her job description, according to Lee Greer does not dealing with behavior. How Special! (Chuckle)
How incomprehensible and semi-literate – and typical of the source! (Chuckle)
Lee Greer was caught having a “special food and beverage drinks" only to a particular group of residents. All of these women happen to “hate” NAGQ but this program was not advertised like all the programs are advertised in the building.
More incomprehensible twaddle from the resident exemplar of incomprehensible twaddle.
How special that Lee Greer does not deal with behavior but will coach people on how to document behavior. NAGQ is sure that she will justify this position.
Dealing with abnormal behavior such as that demonstrated by Lisa Iacuzzi is not part of a Portland Impact Community Coordinator's job.
How about, stay out of the investigation. How about ending your secret meetings behind close doors with residents who are involved in the discrimination case.
How cheering to note that “Leer” has clearly touched a nerve.
How about letting me in the clothes closet to get some clothes like the other residents!
How about asking? Even though unjustly smeared by the usual Iacuzzi prevarications, Lee Greer has a big enough heart to oblige. Better yet, how about behaving like a forty-four-year-old semi-sentient entity, instead of a four-year-old in a state of perpetual tantrum?
A beautiful feminist momentThe reason the building is not a healing environment is that the management uses people in the building to do help them due their positions.
“To DO help them DUE their positions” is untranslatable.
This includes bringing up groceries and errands around the building.
This may refer to residents voluntarily helping either the Gleaners' bring in their donated produce, or “Leer” Greer with the free bread the latter brings from Franz.
This includes dividing people so management can weed out people that they do not like.
Clearly, Lisa Iacuzzi slipped through the cracks in this weeding-out process. Alas.
They hate NAGQ because before my arrival NAGQ asked for their mission statement and complained about Jamie Barton’s inappropriate behavior of constantly telling NAGQ : my wait list number was lucky 13.
Now, finally, at long last, a clue may surface as to the reason for Lisa Iacuzzi's latest semi-literate whinge. Maybe.
During my arrival, NAGQ received the mission statement, which did not include gender.
REACH owns other buildings in the Portland area, which provide affordable housing for males as well as females. The REACH mission statement reads: “Our Mission is to develop and maintain a permanent resource of affordable housing, promote healthy neighborhoods, and provide opportunities for low-income people through partnerships and community involvement.” The Rose is for women-only – as all residents know before they move in.
Jamie Barton’s response to the gender policy when questioned, was, “men are not accepted in the building”.
Don't like it? Move.
It was a beautiful feminist moment... Which resulted in a wooden bed susceptible to bed bugs and a carpet full of 20 or more cigarette burns?
Beggars can't be choosers. Clean your room instead of harassing residents.
After my two hour introduction to the Building where they told me that their gender policy meant that their was
sp – THERE WERE
no men in the building. Then NAGQ gets written up in my first 36 hours in the building when my friend dropped off an air mattress and left at 10:30. Folks, it was an air mattress in a box. No harm was done and no noise was made.
Folks, it was a violation of lease provision 15.(b)1.3.
Countless times others in the building have been inappropriate and NAGQ has received an eviction almost every month.
None seem to have been effective, yet – alas.
One eviction included nonpayment of rent in which NAGQ paid the rent three days before they even filed the eviction.
So, add nonpayment of rent to the list of Lisa Iacuzzi's other lease violations, including, but not limited to: consuming alcohol and illegal drugs on the premises; allowing an underage female guest and an older male guest to stay overnight; deliberately, wilfully, and maliciously disturbing other tenants with excessive noise; repeated harassment of other tenants; using racist hate speech; destroying residents' personal property and disconnecting a resident's cable; and entering a resident's apartment without permission.
Of course they had to dismiss it
It was dismissed, as many are, due to procedural error.
but if I did not show up then NAGQ would have been evicted.
Halevai.
It goes on and on with all kinds of follies that Jamie Barton keeps performing over and over again.
Such as NOT evicting NAGQ?
NAGQ has had written on my door that NAGQ is not literate. This is somewhat true,
Based upon the “Gender Discrimination Charges” and the so-called “document” FRAUD AT THE ROSE, it is quite true.
but you can kill the messenger but you cannot kill my message.
This would indeed prove difficult, since what that “message” might be is almost as mysterious as how one can overdose after one has “finished committing suicide.”
Jamie Barton reminds me of the keystone cops: people who end up creatinga mess that should never have happened.
Lisa Iacuzzi is apparently as ignorant of Keystone Kops classics as she is in a number of other areas.
Her position requires boundaries and professionalism where Jamie Barton has already been cited for an inappropriate relationship with a lesbian in the building.
This is a blatant lie, pure and gratuitous insult, not even meant to deceive.
Kerry Johnson (BOLI)is being told half-truths regarding many of the claims of NAGQ from Reach.
Most of “NAGQ”'s claims are, in fact, half truths, excepting those which are bogus.
On November 27, NAGQ, taking two witnesses. went to see Jamie Barton about my waiting list number. Jamie slammed the door in my shoe
What, no civil rights claim was lodged over such a dastardly deed?
as NAGQ tried to keep it open to finish the conversation. She said that NAGQ was number 13; yeah we all know what number 13 means.
Actually, most don't.
NAGQ went to the YMCA to get documentation.
Why the Y_M_CA? Is the Y_W_CA another part of the Worldwide Conspiracy Against Lisa Iacuzzi®?
The evening shift person who also works with Bradley Angle House relief called Rachel Huber and she said that NAGQ was number 5 on the list.
How did the “evening shift person” reach Rachel Huber, presumably in the evening?
This number is significantly higher that
sp – THAN
the number 13 that NAGQ was quoted on the same day. Here comes the lie,
At last!
Rachel Huber tells Kerry Johnson that eight people were on an appeals list and in a two week period of time, all people were reviewed and seen as unqualified by the Housing Authority. Are you kidding me! NAGQ bought the Brooklyn Bridge too.
This may be probable, but Lisa Iacuzzi is more likely to be caught trying to sell it.
The Housing Authority does this screening which is done by the state and requires a criminal background check.
The Housing Authority of Portland performs the screening, the State of Oregon does not.
The housing authority would not have eight names that they checked out and failed during this short time period.
It is entirely likely that in the two-week period stated above the Housing Authority would indeed have performed checks on and found those eight lacking the requirements for free housing such as Lisa Iacuzzi now enjoys. In fact, it would be altogether surprising if the Housing Authority had performed only eight checks in that two-week period.
NAGQ believes that Reach has been caught in another lie.
As many have been made aware, NAGQ appears to believe a lot of things, and would dearly love for others to believe them, too.
Do you want to know something better?
Bigfoot was sighted at The Rose?
NAGQ went over Sherry Sacheo, the Rose’s too friendly contact for resident services for HAP. NAGQ went to the top shelf of HAP and found two ethical people who are not afraid to find the truth.
What is – or, rather, who are – the “top shelf of HAP”?
What is the penalty for lying to a BOLI investigator? NAGQ hopes the punishment is a felony………
Governmental bodies such as the Bureau of Labor & Industries are all too aware of the numerous claims on file originating from certifiable loons. As we see here.
I will not apologize for anything!
Neither did Herr Schicklegruber.
Lisa/Lee IacuzziNot A Good QueerMA @ PSU
Lisa Iacuzzi's claim that she managed, somehow, to earn an MA – in anything – would be more believable to college-educated residents and those who actually hold university degrees, if her friend Paul Hamilton had made his usual corrections and revisions to her semi-literate twaddle before she posted it to her blog. As it is, she leaves the reader's imagination rather strained in speculating how she ever managed to fulfill the degree's requirement of demonstrable proficiency in a foreign language, let alone English.
Posted by Not a Good Queer
An apter sig would have been “Not Really a Nice Human Being”. Add to it:
“Nobody loves me, everybody hates me
Guess I'll eat some wer-er-erms.
Big fat juicy ones, small little cute ones,
Boy, do they taste good!”
Finis
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
